Sean Lewitts wrote: Can someone help me please. So I'm trying to work on my natural lighting portraits and was trying to photograph someone in front of an old covered bridge as the sun was coming up. The problem that I'm facing is the portraits when I look at them on computer are soft from my model moving. With it being somewhat dark out, my exposure time was nearly 4 seconds with ISO set at 800. I don't want to go much further up with my ISO and my aperture was set at f/11. Although I did open it up to f/5.6 in a few shots, but didn't seem much difference.
There must be a trick to getting sharp still shots using just natural light, even when not much of it? Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.
Sean
Sean Lewitts wrote: Can someone help me please. So I'm trying to work on my natural lighting portraits and was trying to photograph someone in front of an old covered bridge as the sun was coming up. The problem that I'm facing is the portraits when I look at them on computer are soft from my model moving. With it being somewhat dark out, my exposure time was nearly 4 seconds with ISO set at 800. I don't want to go much further up with my ISO and my aperture was set at f/11. Although I did open it up to f/5.6 in a few shots, but didn't seem much difference.
There must be a trick to getting sharp still shots using just natural light, even when not much of it? Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.
Sean
garyrhook wrote: <forehead hits keyboard>
Okay, now that that's out of the way...
Why are you using f/11 in low light?
Why are you using f/11 for a portrait?
Why are you using f/11?
Option: get over "natural light" and learn to use a speedlite in these situations. "Natural light" is becoming a term to describe lazy photographers that don't understand light. Don't be that guy. (This comes from personal experience, not just an opinion.)
Leilanee wrote:
In a scene where the lighting is poor to begin with, yeah go nuts with the flash, but natural light simply looks better when there's enough of it and generalizing it to say that a flash is always superior and that people who appreciate what you can do with natural light are just lazy and unwilling to learn makes you look like such a tool.i take huge offence to that. Natural light simply looks better in most cases, and certain equipment can come in handy for certain situations, but compare the catchlight in an eye of a naturally lit scene to the catchlight of a flash (which eliminates reflection and reduces the light caught to one ugly white dot), and the flash is just a waste of time. Natural light can also come to a wonderful advantage for softer looking skin.
garyrhook wrote:
Leilanee wrote:
In a scene where the lighting is poor to begin with, yeah go nuts with the flash, but natural light simply looks better when there's enough of it and generalizing it to say that a flash is always superior and that people who appreciate what you can do with natural light are just lazy and unwilling to learn makes you look like such a tool.i take huge offence to that. Natural light simply looks better in most cases, and certain equipment can come in handy for certain situations, but compare the catchlight in an eye of a naturally lit scene to the catchlight of a flash (which eliminates reflection and reduces the light caught to one ugly white dot), and the flash is just a waste of time. Natural light can also come to a wonderful advantage for softer looking skin.
I'll begin by suggesting that you re-read what I actually wrote, not what you think I said.
I did not generalize, I said don't rely on natural light; I should have added "in every situation." I did not state, much less suggest, that flash was superior; it is neither inferior nor superior. It is a tool, unlike me. I did not say that those that only use natural light are lazy, I simply pointed out that, based on my observations, it's become a "nom de lense" for photographers that don't understand light. I didn't even suggest they were unwilling to learn. I believe that the term is garnering a negative connotation.
You've seen my work, so I think you know perfectly well what I'm capable of, both with and without a flash. I'll stand by my remarks, I don't think I was insulting, and I hope that the OP has something to think about. Besides, aside from perhaps oversharing, I did address the questions raised. Didn't I?
Oh, and with respect to catchlights, if the light is terribly diffuse, you kind end up with no catchlights at all. I'll take those produced by a flash over none.
The Canon EOS R100 is an entry-level mirrorless camera introduced in 2023. But just because it’s an entry-level camera doesn’t mean it’s a bare-bones camera. Find out why in this review!
Nikon’s retro-looking Nikon Zfc is anything but retro. Under its classic body is a host of features and amenities that make it a worthwhile compact mirrorless camera for 2024.
The Canon EOS R50 is one of the newest R-system cameras from Canon. Is it worth your money? Find out all the details you need to know in this comprehensive review.
The Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II is Sony’s flagship mirrorless zoom lens. As such, it’s loaded with features and has a top-shelf build quality that makes it a top pick!
Creating impactful photos of landscapes depends on many factors, not the least of which is your talent behind the lens. This guide explores other elements required for the best product.
The Canon EOS R100 is an entry-level mirrorless camera introduced in 2023. But just because it’s an entry-level camera doesn’t mean it’s a bare-bones camera. Find out why in this review!
Are you ready to upgrade your camera? Before buying new, you might consider the value of purchasing used gear to save money.
The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is a micro four thirds camera released in 2020. It’s an entry-level system along with the OM-D E-M5 Mark III. Use this guide to determine which one is best for you!
Blue hour photography might not be as well known as golden hour photography, but it is every bit as good a time to create epic images of landscapes. Learn how in this quick tutorial!
Nikon’s retro-looking Nikon Zfc is anything but retro. Under its classic body is a host of features and amenities that make it a worthwhile compact mirrorless camera for 2024.
Moving from taking snapshots of your dog to creating beautiful images doesn’t have to be that difficult! Use the tips outlined in this dog photography guide, and you’ll get better results in no time.
Acrylic print photos are a beautiful way to display your favorite images. But they don’t come without some questions. Get all the answers you need about this medium in this guide!