Downsides to shooting in Raw?

9 years 2 months ago #423511 by Randall McNabb
Good morning.  I'm new here.  I tried finding an exact answer and did find anything and was wondering for those who have been shooting in JPEG format and want to change to shooting in RAW.  What are the downsides to RAW?

From what I'm seeing, it's just a little performance because the RAW files are larger?  So it will use up more of the cameras buffer as it processes.  Is that correct? 


Photo Comments
,
9 years 2 months ago #423550 by KCook
That, and you will need a fairly decent photo editor to take proper advantage of the potential of RAW.  The typical freebie editors and those supplied with new cameras do not accomplish this.  With an exception for Canon's Digital Photo Professional, which is a good transition editor for those on their way to Lightroom.

Kelly Cook

Canon 50D, Olympus PL2
kellycook.zenfolio.com/

,
9 years 2 months ago #423580 by Joves
Why not just shoot in dual format? I shoot in RAW+Jpeg Fine all the time. The camera clears the buffer just fine when doing so. To me it is having the best of both worlds. I tweak the settings in my Picture Controls to pre-process my Jpegs for effect, and sometimes play with my RAW files to see what I can get out of them differently. I have learned what my camera does with the PC settings, and usually only do minor tweaks at times, in photoshop. For processing your RAWs you can use Nikon Transfer as well, though it is really only good for minor work, to get the most out there are other programs for that.


,
9 years 2 months ago #423591 by Hassner
Once you have the hang of processing RAW in eg. Photoshop or Lightroom,  you will never shoot jpg again, unless you are in a huge hurry and need the shots fast.


This person is a posting maniac and deserves a #1 badge!Top Poster
No one kicks up there feet next to the water cooler better than this person.  Top poster - LoungeLounge Guru
Photo Comments
,
9 years 2 months ago #423607 by effron

Hassner wrote: Once you have the hang of processing RAW in eg. Photoshop or Lightroom,  you will never shoot jpg again, unless you are in a huge hurry and need the shots fast.


Bingo. There are no downsides to raw format. Photoshop comes with ACR, and learning post processing is as important as learning the camera controls. The file sizes are bigger but digital storage is cheap, and getting "more affordable" by the day....;)

Why so serious?
Photo Comments
,
9 years 2 months ago #423631 by garyrhook

Randall McNabb wrote: Good morning.  I'm new here.  I tried finding an exact answer and did find anything and was wondering for those who have been shooting in JPEG format and want to change to shooting in RAW.  What are the downsides to RAW?

From what I'm seeing, it's just a little performance because the RAW files are larger?  So it will use up more of the cameras buffer as it processes.  Is that correct? 


There is no downside, unless you consider having to actually create an image that fulfills your artistic vision, as opposed to letting the camera's software do it, a downside.

You will have to learn to post process your images. It will take time, and work, and patience. But there are infinite possibilities when you start with a lump of clay.


Photo Comments
,
9 years 2 months ago #423704 by JD Imagery

Hassner wrote: Once you have the hang of processing RAW in eg. Photoshop or Lightroom,  you will never shoot jpg again, unless you are in a huge hurry and need the shots fast.



I couldn't agree more.  Actually I can't remember the last time I shot in JPG.  


Photo Comments
,
9 years 1 month ago #423977 by Scott Klubeck

effron wrote:

Hassner wrote: Once you have the hang of processing RAW in eg. Photoshop or Lightroom,  you will never shoot jpg again, unless you are in a huge hurry and need the shots fast.


Bingo. There are no downsides to raw format. Photoshop comes with ACR, and learning post processing is as important as learning the camera controls. The file sizes are bigger but digital storage is cheap, and getting "more affordable" by the day....;)



+1 Agree


Photo Comments
,
9 years 1 month ago #423981 by Stealthy Ninja
You can't just email the file to someone and expect them to be able to use it. Jpegs are good for that, if you just want to send something to someone quickly.

But if that's the case, most of the time I'll just use my phone.

Sports/News photographers might be a different story.
,
9 years 1 month ago #424034 by Cliff
My wife reminds me of that every time she wants to get into the photos I have taken.  :rofl:


Photo Comments
,
9 years 1 month ago #426221 by stutter warrior
Shooting in RAW + JPG means you can quickly send someone a jpg to see what they think.

I prefer JPG as I want the photo to look the same as when I took it but then I like my photos to be either over or under exposed and looking a bit different.


,
9 years 1 month ago #426231 by stuartsbarbie
I see no downside to RAW.  If I want to send a picture to someone, I just do a quick convert in Light Room.  Raw give so much more to work with.


Photo Comments
,
9 years 1 month ago #426250 by Baydream

Joves wrote: Why not just shoot in dual format? I shoot in RAW+Jpeg Fine all the time. The camera clears the buffer just fine when doing so. To me it is having the best of both worlds. I tweak the settings in my Picture Controls to pre-process my Jpegs for effect, and sometimes play with my RAW files to see what I can get out of them differently. I have learned what my camera does with the PC settings, and usually only do minor tweaks at times, in photoshop. For processing your RAWs you can use Nikon Transfer as well, though it is really only good for minor work, to get the most out there are other programs for that.

:agree:
I often use the jpegs to pre-select photo for further processing, then work on the RAW files.

Shoot, learn and share. It will make you a better photographer.
fineartamerica.com/profiles/john-g-schickler.html?tab=artwork

Photo Comments
,
9 years 1 month ago #426501 by Joves

Baydream wrote:

Joves wrote: Why not just shoot in dual format? I shoot in RAW+Jpeg Fine all the time. The camera clears the buffer just fine when doing so. To me it is having the best of both worlds. I tweak the settings in my Picture Controls to pre-process my Jpegs for effect, and sometimes play with my RAW files to see what I can get out of them differently. I have learned what my camera does with the PC settings, and usually only do minor tweaks at times, in photoshop. For processing your RAWs you can use Nikon Transfer as well, though it is really only good for minor work, to get the most out there are other programs for that.

:agree:
I often use the jpegs to pre-select photo for further processing, then work on the RAW files.


Exactly John. Jpegs just like anything else are just tools that aid you in getting what you want. Also if your Jpeg turns out as you wanted, you can just hit the apply as shot in the RAW processor, and do any minor tweaks to the RAW file. Then you can convert it to any of the larger formats for other purposes. Far too many just blow off using Jpeg in my opinion, and as I have stated I try to get it right when shot, and the Jpeg is the direct result of how I set the camera to get it. I processed the image, but I tried to get the processing done before I shot it.


,
9 years 1 month ago #427308 by dragosticu
From my part, the only downside is the file size.

Of course if you don't like / don't have time to process the photo, just use JPEG (or JPEG + RAW) until you are ready to shot RAW.


,

817.3K

241K

  • Facebook

    817,251 / Likes

  • Twitter

    241,000 / Followers

  • Google+

    1,620,816 / Followers

Latest Reviews

The Leica SL2-S is an attractive, premium mirrorless camera with photo and video specs that are sure to impress. And with the legendary Leica name, you know this camera exudes quality!

Mar 26, 2024

The Sigma fp L is a compact full-frame camera with a 61-megapixel sensor, 4K video capabilities, in-body image stabilization, and weather-sealed construction. What’s not to like?!

Mar 19, 2024

The Canon 1DX Mark III is a big, burly professional camera packed with top-end features. Is it worth the investment in 2024? Find out in this detailed review!

Mar 04, 2024

In the OM-1 vs OM-5 debate, which camera comes out on top? Though they’re different cameras for different purposes, comparing them head to head clarifies which is best for your needs.

Mar 01, 2024

Forum Top Posters

Latest Articles

Time management is a critical skill to master when you’re a photographer. But how do you get the most out of the limited time you have? Check out this guide to learn a few tricks!

Mar 27, 2024

The Leica SL2-S is an attractive, premium mirrorless camera with photo and video specs that are sure to impress. And with the legendary Leica name, you know this camera exudes quality!

Mar 26, 2024

Opening a photography business means undertaking various photography marketing strategies to promote your work. But you don’t want to do the same old thing - try these unique ideas!

Mar 22, 2024

The Canon EOS 80D might be a few years old, but it’s nevertheless a quality camera to invest in as a beginner or enthusiast looking for a mid-range DSLR with tons of lens options.

Mar 22, 2024

Wedding consultations are a critical part of a wedding photography gig. It’s when you learn about the couple and their wants, and present them with how you will meet those desires.

Mar 22, 2024

If you're looking for the best metal print of 2023, you'll find it from Artbeat Studios. After months of testing, Artbeat Studios beat out the competition!

Mar 21, 2024

Getting the best video shots on your camera or smartphone requires you to understand the fundamentals of composition and video editing. It helps to have the appropriate gear, too!

Mar 20, 2024

It’s easy to lose your inspiration behind the lens, especially as a beginner. These creative photography projects can help inspire you to try new techniques and improve your photos.

Mar 20, 2024