Do we need Film?

3 years 9 months ago #500678 by martinaconcha
C'mon!

Digital photography came to make our life easier. 

Don't you think it will be dead soon? I mean, FILM. 


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
3 years 9 months ago #500680 by Screamin Scott
As a commercial enterprise, maybe. As a niche market, no.....

Scott Ditzel Photography

www.flickr.com/photos/screaminscott/

Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
3 years 9 months ago #500688 by Hassner
Agree with Mr Scott.

A big interest in film cameras the last year or so here on the southern tip of Africa.


No one kicks up there feet next to the water cooler better than this person.  Top poster - LoungeLounge Guru
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
3 years 9 months ago #500717 by pegonperez
If you are like Tarantino.


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
3 years 9 months ago #501138 by effron
There are a few still using film, and many in Hollyweird continue to shoot with it. It shouldn't be a worry for a digital photographer if film lives on or not though....

Why so serious?
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
3 years 9 months ago #501371 by martinaconcha
I think it's demanding to learn where all came from!


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
3 years 9 months ago #503020 by Stic
Film will never truly be dead, just like petrol cars (once electric and hydrogen vehicles become the norm)...

There will always be a few who keep it alive...


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
3 years 9 months ago #503210 by Chris Yates
As a teacher, I have to say that film is an incredibly useful tool in the learning process. With a limited number of exposures, you're forced to perfect your composition, consider your camera settings, and move more slowly than you normally would slowly. In the professional market, there may not be a use for film. But in the art community, I think that it still holds a very special place in the hearts of many.


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
3 years 9 months ago #503228 by icepics
I've been reading that film sales are up.

I don't think film was any harder to learn to shoot than digital. It takes time if you develop/print your own. So does post processing digital images. The more you get good photos and don't need to process just to make corrections (whether in a wet or digital darkroom) the more efficiently you can use your time I think. 

Developing your own film typically was just done with B&W film in a home darkroom. If someone worked for a camera store or lab, they would have processed film. Otherwise as a photographer the process with color film was - #1 drop it off at the store  #2 go pick up the pictures! lol not too hard! Now it takes more time having to send out color film for developing.

You want to learn what all of what came from? If you want to learn more about film try http://www.filmphotogrphyproject.com .

Sharon
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
3 years 9 months ago #504139 by effron
I did Color film (negative, positive) processing and printing in my basement lab, and knew a few others that did the same. However, unless one was doing quite a lot of work..and getting paid, a B&W set up was an easy financial choice. Once I stopped photography for dough, I did send out my neg and slide film for processing, but continued to print my own work. I still have most of my gear, but some has become a bit worn from sitting. I will never go back....

Why so serious?
Photo Comments
The following user(s) said Thank You: NewavaMike

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
2 years 11 months ago #538213 by McBeth Photography


Personally, I think that film will never go away, nor should it. there is just something about the process that slows me down..... makes me think, perhaps it is a meditation.

Film can be forgiving in the highlights where a digital sensor is not at all. 

The bottom line is that it is just a different medium, or a different tool for the artist to select....some embrace it and a others do not, to each their own.

It is what it is.
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
1 year 5 months ago #629901 by kuzenski
I love the long exposure shot of the creek--just beautiful work.

As to film/digital, it's easy for me: Before digital, when my wife directed a play, I'd shoot either 48 or 72 exposures during the show (320T for you other oldsters.) It isn't easy to get good photos during a live production, and I'd be happy to get a dozen or more decent shots, and a small handful of good shots for her portfolio.

Digital changed that; I could shoot 300 frames during one production and have dozens of excellent shots, because there were so many more shots to choose from. It was great, as far as getting good photos went. (I don't get many calls lately, mostly because people's cellphones get pretty good photos these days.)

But when I'm shooting for my own enjoyment, I use a camera that doesn't take batteries at all, and I shoot maybe three frames of 120 for a specific image. Two entirely different approaches to photography for two different purposes. :-)


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
1 year 1 month ago #647665 by fmw
No, we don't need it any more than we need vinyl records.  I agree that both will continue as a niche market.  Some people can't let go of the past.  Nothing wrong with that.


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,

802.3K

205K

1.62M

  • Facebook

    802,251 / Likes

  • Twitter

    205,000 / Followers

  • Google+

    1,620,816 / Followers

Latest Reviews

In this Nikon D500 vs Nikon D7500 matchup, we explore the features and specs, pros and cons, and prices of these older, but highly capable DSLRs.

Jun 22, 2020

Check out this Sony a7R IV review to learn all about this incredible camera's specs, features, image quality, price, and more.

Jun 15, 2020

The Panasonic Lumix S1 might be a few years old, but its features and specs (and its used price today) make it worth a long, hard look.

Jun 08, 2020

In this Olympus OM-D E-M1 II review, learn about the camera's specs and features, pros and cons, price, and much more.

Jun 02, 2020
Get 600+ Pro photo lessons for $1

Latest Articles

With this list of gifts for photographers under $250, you have tons of great holiday gift ideas for the photographer on your list!

Aug 06, 2020

The Canon EOS 80D is several years old, but it has some great specs and features that still make it a solid choice in 2020.

Aug 05, 2020

A great way to supplement your income is to sell stock photos. The question is, how do you sell photos online? Use these tips to increase stock photography sales.

Aug 04, 2020

Our upcoming photography trek and adventure series will provide you with actionable steps you can take to improve your photography and get ready for outdoor adventures of your own.

Aug 04, 2020

Not sure how to use your camera as a webcam? Use this guide to learn how to set up a DSLR or mirrorless camera with your computer.

Aug 04, 2020

A common question beginner photographers have is, what are step up rings? Learn what they are, why they're valuable, and where you can get a next-generation step up ring.

Aug 04, 2020

Photographing fog and photographing mist can be a challenge, but with these tips, you can get improved images on early morning foggy landscapes.

Aug 04, 2020

In this Sony a5100 vs Sony a6000 comparison review, you'll learn how these cameras are similar and different, including build quality, video performance, price, and more!

Aug 03, 2020