Do all teleconverters degrade image quality?

11 years 7 months ago #250542 by DJMarcus
Are there any teleconverters that won't degrade image quality? I was told to stay away from 2x teleconverters, but what about the 1.4x or 1.7x?


,
11 years 7 months ago #250589 by Gene.Culley
I don't know about degrading shots, it will slow things down a bit


Photo Comments
,
11 years 7 months ago #250603 by Baydream
Adding the extra glass will degrade. Better 1.4 TCs will have the least effect.

Shoot, learn and share. It will make you a better photographer.
fineartamerica.com/profiles/john-g-schickler.html?tab=artwork

Photo Comments
,
11 years 7 months ago - 11 years 7 months ago #250644 by Henry Peach
Do some personal testing, and see what you think. The common advice is that yes, teleconverters are not as good as a lens of the desired focal length. But you would be better off seeing it with your own eyes, and making your own opinion.

A long time ago I saw a portfolio of surfing shots. They were these awesome shots of surfers riding waves against a giant sun. The photographer was stacking 3 and 4 teleconverters together to get the shots. Now that's crazy, because we all know you aren't supposed to do that, but he broke the rules that we all follow, and that's why his photos looked so unique.
,
11 years 7 months ago - 11 years 7 months ago #250754 by effron

DJMarcus wrote: Are there any teleconverters that won't degrade image quality? I was told to stay away from 2x teleconverters, but what about the 1.4x or 1.7x?


Not all 2x TCs are the same.
Here is a pretty involved review.......
mansurovs.com/nikon-tc-20e-iii-review

Why so serious?
Photo Comments
,
11 years 7 months ago #250755 by chasrich

Henry Peach wrote: Do some personal testing, and see what you think. The common advice is that yes, teleconverters are not as good as a lens of the desired focal length. But you would be better off seeing it with your own eyes, and making your own opinion.

A long time ago I saw a portfolio of surfing shots. They were these awesome shots of surfers riding waves against a giant sun. The photographer was stacking 3 and 4 teleconverters together to get the shots. Now that's crazy, because we all know you aren't supposed to do that, but he broke the rules that we all follow, and that's why his photos looked so unique.


I need to get my white lab coat from the cleaners... I love stacking stuff! :woohoo:

“Amateurs worry about equipment, professionals worry about money, masters worry about light, I just make pictures… ” ~ Vernon Trent
,
11 years 7 months ago #250770 by Henry Peach

chasrich wrote:

Henry Peach wrote: Do some personal testing, and see what you think. The common advice is that yes, teleconverters are not as good as a lens of the desired focal length. But you would be better off seeing it with your own eyes, and making your own opinion.

A long time ago I saw a portfolio of surfing shots. They were these awesome shots of surfers riding waves against a giant sun. The photographer was stacking 3 and 4 teleconverters together to get the shots. Now that's crazy, because we all know you aren't supposed to do that, but he broke the rules that we all follow, and that's why his photos looked so unique.


I need to get my white lab coat from the cleaners... I love stacking stuff! :woohoo:


Remember that each x2 isn't added, it's multiplied, so 2 x2 TC block 4 stops, 3 block 8 stops, 4 block 16 stops....
The following user(s) said Thank You: chasrich
,
11 years 7 months ago #250803 by Joves
:agree:
Well I have a feeling that with the newer High ISO sensors that the loss in stops at one point will not be relevant. Then it comes down to optical elements and image degradation. I have never been a fan of TCs, but if you are on a budget and want reach they are a great option. The 2x have always been hell nos in my opinion. A lot of the image degradation can be due to a couple of things, vibration being one. So using a mirror lock and a good sturdy tripod will eliminate that problem.
To DJ yes some do. It depends on the quality. This is an area where cheap and good do not meet. I know many people have been satisfied with the Kenko Pro Series TCs. What I find ironic is that Kenko makes one that will work fully with my 80-400 lens, and Nikon does not. You can go to B&H and read the user comments on the Kenkos. Anytime I have had a 1.7x in my film days they were all terrible. I do not know why the 1.7 never seems to be any good. Fact is I have had 2x TCs that were better. The 1.4 have always been the least evil.


,
11 years 7 months ago #250804 by Screamin Scott
Any time you introduce additional glass surfaces into the equation that were not part of the original optical design, there will be some loss of image quality. How much depends both the TC & the lens it's being used on. In older film days, they made TC's that were matched to specific lenses & thus gave better results when used with those lenses. Only thing you can do it to try them out & if you don't like the results, return them or sell them off (depending on where you get them from)

Scott Ditzel Photography

www.flickr.com/photos/screaminscott/

Photo Comments
,

817.3K

241K

  • Facebook

    817,251 / Likes

  • Twitter

    241,000 / Followers

  • Google+

    1,620,816 / Followers

Latest Reviews

The Canon EOS R100 is an entry-level mirrorless camera introduced in 2023. But just because it’s an entry-level camera doesn’t mean it’s a bare-bones camera. Find out why in this review!

Apr 22, 2024

Nikon’s retro-looking Nikon Zfc is anything but retro. Under its classic body is a host of features and amenities that make it a worthwhile compact mirrorless camera for 2024.

Apr 15, 2024

The Canon EOS R50 is one of the newest R-system cameras from Canon. Is it worth your money? Find out all the details you need to know in this comprehensive review.

Apr 10, 2024

The Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II is Sony’s flagship mirrorless zoom lens. As such, it’s loaded with features and has a top-shelf build quality that makes it a top pick!

Mar 27, 2024

Latest Articles

Creating impactful photos of landscapes depends on many factors, not the least of which is your talent behind the lens. This guide explores other elements required for the best product.

Apr 23, 2024

The Canon EOS R100 is an entry-level mirrorless camera introduced in 2023. But just because it’s an entry-level camera doesn’t mean it’s a bare-bones camera. Find out why in this review!

Apr 22, 2024

Are you ready to upgrade your camera? Before buying new, you might consider the value of purchasing used gear to save money.

Apr 18, 2024

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is a micro four thirds camera released in 2020. It’s an entry-level system along with the OM-D E-M5 Mark III. Use this guide to determine which one is best for you!

Apr 17, 2024

Blue hour photography might not be as well known as golden hour photography, but it is every bit as good a time to create epic images of landscapes. Learn how in this quick tutorial!

Apr 17, 2024

Nikon’s retro-looking Nikon Zfc is anything but retro. Under its classic body is a host of features and amenities that make it a worthwhile compact mirrorless camera for 2024.

Apr 15, 2024

Moving from taking snapshots of your dog to creating beautiful images doesn’t have to be that difficult! Use the tips outlined in this dog photography guide, and you’ll get better results in no time.

Apr 15, 2024

Acrylic print photos are a beautiful way to display your favorite images. But they don’t come without some questions. Get all the answers you need about this medium in this guide!

Apr 15, 2024