A question about UV, Haze, and Clear filters

10 years 6 months ago #35889 by fotozone
I am new to the world of DSLR cameras. I just upgraded to a Nikon D3100 from a Olympus Sp590. I have been told to always keep a UV filter on my lenses to protect them, when I went to get the UV filter I saw that there are also Haze-1, Skylight, and Clear. I started trying to research this and now I am more confused. I read in several places that UV filters are unnecessary on a DSLR that it is built in to the sensor. A few articles recommend not using any filters because of lens flare. I do a lot of high elevation shooting and with my Olympus hazy horizons was a big problem. So my question is this what filter do you recommend for everyday shooting? One more question; I also read to get a step up filter so you only need one set of filters to my novice brain this makes sense. Is there any reason not to do this?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
10 years 6 months ago #35900 by Baydream
UV, Sky and Clear filters primarily protect your lens from getting scratched (an expensive injury). With a good quality lens, effects should be minimal. In the odd situation that you might get flare, you can always remove the filter, shoot, then replace it. I have a skylight one and a UV on the other lens.
As for size: If you have or are getter lenses of various sizes, the step up would benefit you but you would need different lens caps and may not be able to use lens hoods to control flare. In addition, the larger filters are usually more expensive. For your "protective" lenses, getter filters to match makes sense. If you have 58mm lenses and get a 52mm prime, get a step up for using filters like polarizers that can run into money.

For those hazy horizons, a circular polarizer may help.

Shoot, learn and share. It will make you a better photographer.
fineartamerica.com/profiles/john-g-schickler.html?tab=artwork

Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
10 years 6 months ago #35966 by Joves

Baydream wrote: UV, Sky and Clear filters primarily protect your lens from getting scratched (an expensive injury). With a good quality lens, effects should be minimal. In the odd situation that you might get flare, you can always remove the filter, shoot, then replace it. I have a skylight one and a UV on the other lens.
As for size: If you have or are getter lenses of various sizes, the step up would benefit you but you would need different lens caps and may not be able to use lens hoods to control flare. In addition, the larger filters are usually more expensive. For your "protective" lenses, getter filters to match makes sense. If you have 58mm lenses and get a 52mm prime, get a step up for using filters like polarizers that can run into money.

For those hazy horizons, a circular polarizer may help.

:goodpost:
I personally only use the Clears as protection.The sensors on digitals already filter for UV through the filter on it.


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
10 years 6 months ago #36013 by Stealthy Ninja
A hood will protect your lens more than a filter ever will. In fact if you drop your lens, the filter might shatter and damage the front element.

The front element is pretty darn strong and unless you want to prevent damage from sand/sea-spray etc. they're probably not necessary.

Personally I have some lenses with them some without (70-200 has one on, the 24-70 doesn't right now, the 14-24 can't and the 50mm 1.4 from Sigma doesn't). Often I forget to put them back on after I use a CP.

Like Baydream suggested, if you do use them, get the best quality you can, to avoid any possible deterioration in the IQ.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
10 years 5 months ago #36961 by Joves

Stealthy Ninja wrote: A hood will protect your lens more than a filter ever will. In fact if you drop your lens, the filter might shatter and damage the front element.

The front element is pretty darn strong and unless you want to prevent damage from sand/sea-spray etc. they're probably not necessary.

Personally I have some lenses with them some without (70-200 has one on, the 24-70 doesn't right now, the 14-24 can't and the 50mm 1.4 from Sigma doesn't). Often I forget to put them back on after I use a CP.

Like Baydream suggested, if you do use them, get the best quality you can, to avoid any possible deterioration in the IQ.


Normally for many people this is true but I rock climb with my camera alot and have had some parts of cliffs get past the hoods. I shattered a few filters, now granted it owuld have only been a minor scratch on a lens but, better to shatter a filter.


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
10 years 5 months ago #36963 by Baydream

Joves wrote:

Stealthy Ninja wrote: A hood will protect your lens more than a filter ever will. In fact if you drop your lens, the filter might shatter and damage the front element.

The front element is pretty darn strong and unless you want to prevent damage from sand/sea-spray etc. they're probably not necessary.

Personally I have some lenses with them some without (70-200 has one on, the 24-70 doesn't right now, the 14-24 can't and the 50mm 1.4 from Sigma doesn't). Often I forget to put them back on after I use a CP.

Like Baydream suggested, if you do use them, get the best quality you can, to avoid any possible deterioration in the IQ.


Normally for many people this is true but I rock climb with my camera alot and have had some parts of cliffs get past the hoods. I shattered a few filters, now granted it owuld have only been a minor scratch on a lens but, better to shatter a filter.

:goodpost: Small price to pay.

Shoot, learn and share. It will make you a better photographer.
fineartamerica.com/profiles/john-g-schickler.html?tab=artwork

Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,

817.3K

241K

  • Facebook

    817,251 / Likes

  • Twitter

    241,000 / Followers

  • Google+

    1,620,816 / Followers

Latest Reviews

The Canon PowerShot G5 X II isn't a professional camera by any means, but if you're looking for a small, capable, compact camera, this might be the one for you.

Sep 02, 2021

If you think a nearly decade-old camera can't still hack it, you're wrong. Though it isn't perfect, the Fujifilm X-E2 is still a solid camera.

Sep 02, 2021

The Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 is five years old now, but does it still pass muster as a quality camera in 2021? Find out in this detailed review!

Aug 24, 2021

The original Olympus OM-D E-M10 is still a solid buy in 2021. Check out this complete review to learn why.

Aug 16, 2021

Latest Articles

With these wedding photography accessories, you'll not only look good, but you'll also have gear that helps improve your workflow.

Sep 16, 2021

There are many benefits of buying used lenses, not the least of which is that you can save some money. Check out this guide for even more reasons to buy used.

Sep 15, 2021

Understanding what to charge for commercial real estate photography services is paramount to your success - now and in the future.

Sep 14, 2021

In this year's edition of our holiday gift guides, we've got some fantastic gifts for photographers that will cost you less than $150

Sep 14, 2021

There are many advantages of LED lighting for portraits. Learn a few of the best benefits of this kind of lighting in this portrait photography lighting tutorial.

Sep 13, 2021

Use these beginner photography tips to learn how to get started in photography and how to be comfortable behind the lens.

Sep 13, 2021

In this short guide, learn a few tips on how to print photos so you can get beautiful prints of your favorite images quickly and easily.

Sep 13, 2021

Use these tips for printing on metal, including guidance on the best images for metal prints, to get the most impressive results.

Sep 10, 2021