Scotty wrote: Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 VR II was my best purchase and most used lens. I'm thinking of selling the 24-70 f/2.8G for the 24-120 f/4 (newest variant). I've heard from some NPS members they prefer it over and i've seen their results, and it's half the price.
effron wrote:
Scotty wrote: Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 VR II was my best purchase and most used lens. I'm thinking of selling the 24-70 f/2.8G for the 24-120 f/4 (newest variant). I've heard from some NPS members they prefer it over and i've seen their results, and it's half the price.
I won't sell mine, however I wish it didn't weigh a half ton. It makes for a pretty heavy "walk around" lens.....
Scotty wrote:
effron wrote:
Scotty wrote: Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 VR II was my best purchase and most used lens. I'm thinking of selling the 24-70 f/2.8G for the 24-120 f/4 (newest variant). I've heard from some NPS members they prefer it over and i've seen their results, and it's half the price.
I won't sell mine, however I wish it didn't weigh a half ton. It makes for a pretty heavy "walk around" lens.....
Do you use the 2.8 enough to warrant not switching to the 24-120?
effron wrote:
Scotty wrote:
effron wrote:
Scotty wrote: Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 VR II was my best purchase and most used lens. I'm thinking of selling the 24-70 f/2.8G for the 24-120 f/4 (newest variant). I've heard from some NPS members they prefer it over and i've seen their results, and it's half the price.
I won't sell mine, however I wish it didn't weigh a half ton. It makes for a pretty heavy "walk around" lens.....
Do you use the 2.8 enough to warrant not switching to the 24-120?
Probably not, but I have a 24-120 f/4 and don't like it as much.
Scotty wrote:
effron wrote:
Scotty wrote:
effron wrote:
Scotty wrote: Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 VR II was my best purchase and most used lens. I'm thinking of selling the 24-70 f/2.8G for the 24-120 f/4 (newest variant). I've heard from some NPS members they prefer it over and i've seen their results, and it's half the price.
I won't sell mine, however I wish it didn't weigh a half ton. It makes for a pretty heavy "walk around" lens.....
Do you use the 2.8 enough to warrant not switching to the 24-120?
Probably not, but I have a 24-120 f/4 and don't like it as much.
The newest variant, and if so why?
effron wrote:
Scotty wrote:
effron wrote:
Scotty wrote:
effron wrote:
Scotty wrote: Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 VR II was my best purchase and most used lens. I'm thinking of selling the 24-70 f/2.8G for the 24-120 f/4 (newest variant). I've heard from some NPS members they prefer it over and i've seen their results, and it's half the price.
I won't sell mine, however I wish it didn't weigh a half ton. It makes for a pretty heavy "walk around" lens.....
Do you use the 2.8 enough to warrant not switching to the 24-120?
Probably not, but I have a 24-120 f/4 and don't like it as much.
The newest variant, and if so why?
Not the newest, but I won't get one. I like my 24-70....(as long as I don't need to carry it all day)....There are other lenses ahead of that on my "want" list....
Scotty wrote:
effron wrote:
Scotty wrote:
effron wrote:
Scotty wrote:
effron wrote:
Scotty wrote: Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 VR II was my best purchase and most used lens. I'm thinking of selling the 24-70 f/2.8G for the 24-120 f/4 (newest variant). I've heard from some NPS members they prefer it over and i've seen their results, and it's half the price.
I won't sell mine, however I wish it didn't weigh a half ton. It makes for a pretty heavy "walk around" lens.....
Do you use the 2.8 enough to warrant not switching to the 24-120?
Probably not, but I have a 24-120 f/4 and don't like it as much.
The newest variant, and if so why?
Not the newest, but I won't get one. I like my 24-70....(as long as I don't need to carry it all day)....There are other lenses ahead of that on my "want" list....
Newer one is supposed to be sharper than the 24-70, lighter and cheaper. You just don't get the f/2.8.
I hear you on the "want" list though.
The Canon EOS R100 is an entry-level mirrorless camera introduced in 2023. But just because it’s an entry-level camera doesn’t mean it’s a bare-bones camera. Find out why in this review!
Nikon’s retro-looking Nikon Zfc is anything but retro. Under its classic body is a host of features and amenities that make it a worthwhile compact mirrorless camera for 2024.
The Canon EOS R50 is one of the newest R-system cameras from Canon. Is it worth your money? Find out all the details you need to know in this comprehensive review.
The Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II is Sony’s flagship mirrorless zoom lens. As such, it’s loaded with features and has a top-shelf build quality that makes it a top pick!
Creating impactful photos of landscapes depends on many factors, not the least of which is your talent behind the lens. This guide explores other elements required for the best product.
The Canon EOS R100 is an entry-level mirrorless camera introduced in 2023. But just because it’s an entry-level camera doesn’t mean it’s a bare-bones camera. Find out why in this review!
Are you ready to upgrade your camera? Before buying new, you might consider the value of purchasing used gear to save money.
The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is a micro four thirds camera released in 2020. It’s an entry-level system along with the OM-D E-M5 Mark III. Use this guide to determine which one is best for you!
Blue hour photography might not be as well known as golden hour photography, but it is every bit as good a time to create epic images of landscapes. Learn how in this quick tutorial!
Nikon’s retro-looking Nikon Zfc is anything but retro. Under its classic body is a host of features and amenities that make it a worthwhile compact mirrorless camera for 2024.
Moving from taking snapshots of your dog to creating beautiful images doesn’t have to be that difficult! Use the tips outlined in this dog photography guide, and you’ll get better results in no time.
Acrylic print photos are a beautiful way to display your favorite images. But they don’t come without some questions. Get all the answers you need about this medium in this guide!