77mm vs 82mm Nikon 24-70mm

3 years 11 months ago #683684 by Kenta
Other than the filter size difference, will the larger 82mm 24-70mm be better a low light because more light can get in?


Photo Comments
,
3 years 11 months ago #683686 by Nikon Shooter

Kenta wrote: Other than the filter size difference, will the larger 82mm 24-70mm be better a low light because more light can get in?


To make a lens brighter, the front element is a good
place to start but the whole lens design should be
reviewed… and I don't think that + 5mm∅ is enough.

Light is free… capturing it is not!
Photo Comments
,
3 years 11 months ago - 3 years 11 months ago #683708 by garyrhook

Kenta wrote: Other than the filter size difference, will the larger 82mm 24-70mm be better a low light because more light can get in?


No. f/2.8 is f/2.8. What matters is what's going through the back of the lens. They must have needed to change the size of the lens for some unknown reason.


Photo Comments
,
3 years 11 months ago #683709 by Nikon Shooter
The way I see it is they added VR to it and that alone justifies
the 5mm as the first version was too close to vignetting.

Light is free… capturing it is not!
Photo Comments
,
3 years 11 months ago #683714 by Kenta
Thank you both.  But if the front is larger and able to bring in more light, won't that result in more light , brighter light going out the back?


Photo Comments
,
3 years 11 months ago #683720 by Screamin Scott
No, because aperture controls the amount of light and the maximum aperture is controlled by the focal length. Thus it makes no difference the circumference of the lens. What may be impacted is the resolution....

Scott Ditzel Photography

www.flickr.com/photos/screaminscott/

Photo Comments
,
3 years 11 months ago #684393 by Nikon Shooter

Kenta wrote: Thank you both.  But if the front is larger and able to bring in more light, won't that result in more light , brighter light going out the back?


That would be an "intuitive" conclusion but, in reality, much more
is needed to brighten up any lens than just the front element.

Light is free… capturing it is not!
Photo Comments
,
3 years 11 months ago #684437 by Shadowfixer1

garyrhook wrote:

Kenta wrote: Other than the filter size difference, will the larger 82mm 24-70mm be better a low light because more light can get in?


No. f/2.8 is f/2.8. What matters is what's going through the back of the lens. They must have needed to change the size of the lens for some unknown reason.

Yes, 2.8 is 2.8 because that is a scientific measurement but the brightness of the light coming through that aperture can vary. That is why people discuss T-stops. So in fact the answer to the original question could be yes it matters and the larger front lens could produce a higher T-stop value coming through the aperture to the sensor. The T-stop value would also depend on the coatings on the lens elements, how many elements and what type. Maybe the front element need to be larger because the coatings ate up a tiny bit more light or the shape of an internal lens element need more coverage to produce the same coverage and brightness as it passes through it. Only the designer would know.  
,
3 years 11 months ago #685650 by Ian Stone
Go with the 82mm, much more light and sharper lenses.  A bit heavier.  


Photo Comments
,
3 years 10 months ago #688552 by Kenta
Thank you, 82mm was the winner for me.  


Photo Comments
,

817.3K

241K

  • Facebook

    817,251 / Likes

  • Twitter

    241,000 / Followers

  • Google+

    1,620,816 / Followers

Latest Reviews

The Canon EOS R100 is an entry-level mirrorless camera introduced in 2023. But just because it’s an entry-level camera doesn’t mean it’s a bare-bones camera. Find out why in this review!

Apr 22, 2024

Nikon’s retro-looking Nikon Zfc is anything but retro. Under its classic body is a host of features and amenities that make it a worthwhile compact mirrorless camera for 2024.

Apr 15, 2024

The Canon EOS R50 is one of the newest R-system cameras from Canon. Is it worth your money? Find out all the details you need to know in this comprehensive review.

Apr 10, 2024

The Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II is Sony’s flagship mirrorless zoom lens. As such, it’s loaded with features and has a top-shelf build quality that makes it a top pick!

Mar 27, 2024
Get 600+ Pro photo lessons for $1

Latest Articles

The Canon EOS R100 is an entry-level mirrorless camera introduced in 2023. But just because it’s an entry-level camera doesn’t mean it’s a bare-bones camera. Find out why in this review!

Apr 22, 2024

Are you ready to upgrade your camera? Before buying new, you might consider the value of purchasing used gear to save money.

Apr 18, 2024

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is a micro four thirds camera released in 2020. It’s an entry-level system along with the OM-D E-M5 Mark III. Use this guide to determine which one is best for you!

Apr 17, 2024

Blue hour photography might not be as well known as golden hour photography, but it is every bit as good a time to create epic images of landscapes. Learn how in this quick tutorial!

Apr 17, 2024

Nikon’s retro-looking Nikon Zfc is anything but retro. Under its classic body is a host of features and amenities that make it a worthwhile compact mirrorless camera for 2024.

Apr 15, 2024

Moving from taking snapshots of your dog to creating beautiful images doesn’t have to be that difficult! Use the tips outlined in this dog photography guide, and you’ll get better results in no time.

Apr 15, 2024

Acrylic print photos are a beautiful way to display your favorite images. But they don’t come without some questions. Get all the answers you need about this medium in this guide!

Apr 15, 2024

Where do you get your landscape photography inspiration? Is it from masters like Ansel Adams? Or perhaps viewing art from other genres? We’ve got these and a few other sources for you to check out!

Apr 10, 2024