Why does the Nikkor 18-200mm lens have such a negative reputation?

10 years 6 days ago #54290 by SJM
This morning while surfing around online I came across some bloggers that just talked some serious negativity on the 18-200mm Nikkor lens. I didn't see really any justification towards their claims only that there was a number of people agreeing with them. Frankly I think the 18-200mm is a great every day lens.

Country guy living in the big Apple!
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
10 years 5 days ago #54372 by Zardoz
I ran into a guy using one on a D700, and he had some tasty glass grenades with him. I just read one review and he gave the lens a single thumb up, nothing wrong with that. My D200 came with a 70-300 only and I am happy with it, as I would probably be with the 18-200.

I read about one photographer who shoots with a lens till he knows it very very well, he just does not take it off. In the motorcycle world it is called run what you brung. I am very happy with my kit lens, and to those who say I only use "professional lenses" (read fast) more power to you, Do not listen to what others say about you equipment.


The following user(s) said Thank You: snapshot53

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
10 years 5 days ago #54498 by Joves
Well on an FX camera it vignetts quite abit on the wide end also it is a variable aperture. I dont have one so I dont know. I hear the same thing about my 80-400VR, they complain it is too slow and that it isnt as good as the 200-400VR AF-S. Well yes that maybe true but, if you take time to learn the lenses weak point then it isnt a problem also the price differences give reach to more people. What the 200-400 is like $4K and is a large lens, while my 80-400 is$1500 and to me is nice and light. If you know how to use a lens and optimize its strong points then the IQ is just as good. I find that some people like to complain no matter what.


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
10 years 4 days ago #54724 by effron
If you like the lens, why do you torture yourself by paying any attention to the negative nabobs? I had it, and later sold it. It was just fine, but I got better lenses and didn't use it much.....

Why so serious?
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
10 years 4 days ago #54740 by robbie

effron wrote: If you like the lens, why do you torture yourself by paying any attention to the negative nabobs? I had it, and later sold it. It was just fine, but I got better lenses and didn't use it much.....

Bingo!You use what you have until you can get a lens that suits your shooting style.I bought the 18-55 ii because it`s great for Ir plus if the need for a wider lens should come up it`s there at a price I am willing to pay since I don`t need that wide a lens.For my landscapes I wil stitch which will give as wide
a image as I want.I shoot with the old Nikon 300/4,while at the Alligator Farm shooting birds there were 3 of us with that lens,a guy with a 500mm says that the 300/4 is one of the sharpest lens out there.Knowing your lens will help to get the shot,it took me awhile to figure that out with the 300/4,
my method is prefocus at a distant to where the flying bird will be,put the focusing spot on the bird and press the shutter to focus..that`s all.


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
10 years 2 days ago #56104 by Stealthy Ninja
I heard it's pretty good on a DX body.

In fact I'm considering getting the FX version (28-300 VR) to use on my D3s (for when I'm out and about with my family and don't want to be bothered changing lenses).

I think the 28-300 is a bit sharper, but the 18-200 (from what I've read) isn't a bad lens on DX.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
9 years 11 months ago #57893 by Mike Ayrouth
That is odd, I have heard nothing but good about that lens. It's a great everyday lens IMHO

Getting BETTER one photo at a time!
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
9 years 11 months ago #58062 by Nikonjan
I have the older model and it is my fave all around lens. It may not be as sharp as some of my others but I shoot RAW and sharpen in photoshop. I like the versatility, if I could only have one lens to use it would be this one. Or one similiar. I shoot with a Nikon D300. Would get something different if I go to an FX.

www.betterphoto.com?nikonjan

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
9 years 11 months ago #58251 by Yasko
The wide ranging zooms can get soft and lack contrast at the extreme ends of the range when used wideopen, which causes complaints, but hey it's an 18 TO 200 what do you expect?


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
9 years 11 months ago #58255 by Stealthy Ninja

Yasko wrote: The wide ranging zooms can get soft and lack contrast at the extreme ends of the range when used wideopen, which causes complaints, but hey it's an 18 TO 200 what do you expect?


Exactly.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
9 years 11 months ago #66551 by lfortier
My D200 came w/ the 18-200 and I love how it works. I upgraded to a 17-50 2.8 only for the aperture. Bought my wife a D40 and she immediately took the 18-50 off and put my 18-200 on as it had a better 'reach'. That was two years ago. I still haven't got my 18-200 back. I hope she never finds out that my 70-200 2.8 works on her D40.


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
9 years 11 months ago #77711 by Shadowfixer1
The discussion about FX should never occur with the 18-200 since it is a DX lens. It won't just vignette, you will see a circle on a FX body. I take the majority of my images with the 18-200. I bought the first one in Atlanta. I've tested it against other Nikon lenses and I determined that you may be able to measure a difference with equipment, but you won't see a difference. I didn't test it wide open because that's not how I shoot. It should be weaker wide open and at the 200 end. If you shoot wide open, expect some softness. If you shoot at f-8 and up, it's as sharp as you need. If I could only have one lens, this is it.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
9 years 11 months ago #77919 by Stealthy Ninja

Shadowfixer1 wrote: The discussion about FX should never occur with the 18-200 since it is a DX lens. It won't just vignette, you will see a circle on a FX body. I take the majority of my images with the 18-200. I bought the first one in Atlanta. I've tested it against other Nikon lenses and I determined that you may be able to measure a difference with equipment, but you won't see a difference. I didn't test it wide open because that's not how I shoot. It should be weaker wide open and at the 200 end. If you shoot wide open, expect some softness. If you shoot at f-8 and up, it's as sharp as you need. If I could only have one lens, this is it.


Not with the auto crop feature. You will get a lot less MP, which is why I said it's pretty good on a DX.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
9 years 11 months ago #78055 by Shadowfixer1
Not with the auto crop feature. You will get a lot less MP, which is why I said it's pretty good on a DX.[/quote]
True, but I then consider that to be the same as shooting with a DX camera. That's why I would never put one on a FX body. I guess it would make sense if you upgraded your camera body and had to wait to upgrade the lens. I hadn't considered that. Anyway, I like the lens a lot, especially for DX.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
9 years 11 months ago - 9 years 11 months ago #78089 by MLKstudios
While I still love my film bodies, I went from a D70, to a D200 and now a D700. I have a lot of Nikon lenses I could use with those bodies. Only a few for Canon.

My opinion will be biased as I have some really good primes, including Leitz and Zeiss. The Nikon 18-200mm definitely has an incredible range and focuses very quickly in AF mode. It's best used in the middle range and stopped down a bit.

However, the barrel distortion on the wide end is almost painful to me. Of course, it can be used to an advantage, but as a lens for interior shots, the walls are all going to be warped.

If it were used as a "vacation" lens or what my Aussie students call a "walkabout" lens, then it's fine. For serious photography, I almost always grab my primes. If I happen to go on a "walkabout" now, I'll take the 24-70mm and a macro (both are FX).

Matthew :)

Matthew L Kees
MLK Studios Photography School
www.MLKstudios.com
[email protected]
"Every artist, was once an amateur"

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,

802.3K

205K

  • Facebook

    802,251 / Likes

  • Twitter

    205,000 / Followers

  • Google+

    1,620,816 / Followers

Latest Reviews

In the Sony a6100 vs Sony a6600 debate, there are plenty of similarities. There are also some key differences that could make one or the other a much better option for you.

May 04, 2021

The Pentax KP is an older DSLR with some excellent specs - but are they excellent enough to warrant purchasing this camera in 2021? Let's find out!

May 04, 2021

The Sony RX1R II is a high-end compact camera with loads of features. The question is, is it still worth the price in 2021?

Apr 27, 2021

The FujiFilm X-T20 is an older midrange mirrorless camera that still has plenty of punch for beginner and enthusiast photographers in 2021.

Apr 26, 2021
Get 600+ Pro photo lessons for $1

Forum Top Posters

Latest Articles

In this reMarkable 2 review, learn about its specs and features, as well as its performance over the course of three months of daily use.

May 12, 2021

Use these professional photography tips to learn how to become a pro photographer and improve your appeal to potential clients.

May 12, 2021

In this photography business guide, learn how to get noticed as a photographer with simple, straightforward methods that will bring in more business.

May 12, 2021

Film photography has made a comeback in recent years. But why? Let's discuss five primary reasons why you should shoot on film in 2021.

May 11, 2021

There are many ways to grow your photography business, and one of the most effective is to engage in text-based marketing.

May 11, 2021

There's a lot of beginner photography gear that you can buy. The question is, do you really need a dedicated camera bag to carry it all?

May 10, 2021

Landscape photography is often best seen in large format prints, and for my money metal prints for landscape photos are the best option.

May 10, 2021

Before you sell your old photography gear, consider that there are plenty of other uses for it other than making a few bucks.

May 10, 2021