My latest portraits. Would love for you to see!

4 years 10 months ago #645639 by Kid Fire X
I hope everyone has had a fantastic day thus far. Just thought I'd share some of my latest portraits. These images were all taken on the same day.  I hope you guys like them and I'm 100% open to feedback and constructive criticism from anyone! (amateur-professional). Have a nice day!





,
4 years 10 months ago - 4 years 10 months ago #645654 by Nikon Shooter
You're sure going somewhere with these.

I would dare suggest…
  • Don't cut legs
  • Don't show the roll
  • Leave a forced paragraph between shots

Light is free… capturing it is not!
Photo Comments
,
4 years 10 months ago #645687 by Kid Fire X
Thanks! I appreciate the feedback, but showing the roll was a personal creative choice of mine. I felt like it added more balance to the overall image. I guess it would depend on the context of the image, but as a piece of my personal work I like it there :).


,
4 years 10 months ago #645760 by Steve Rodriguez
Nice set! 

1- the highlights are a bit too much
2- the legs are cropped
3- I think is the most successful. Nice lighting and good colors, but then the legs are cropped.
4- highlights are also a bit blown
5- Good shot with nice lighting, but the crop is a bit too tight. 


,
4 years 10 months ago #645812 by Kid Fire X

Steve Rodriguez wrote: Nice set! 

1- the highlights are a bit too much
2- the legs are cropped
3- I think is the most successful. Nice lighting and good colors, but then the legs are cropped.
4- highlights are also a bit blown
5- Good shot with nice lighting, but the crop is a bit too tight. 


I appreciate the feedback. Thanks!


,
4 years 10 months ago #645928 by Bobby Mitchell
I like the 3rd and the 5th shot. The lighting is really good but the lower crop needs to improve indeed. 


,
4 years 10 months ago #645987 by garyrhook
I don't see a significant highlight problem in any of these. The details are all there. Color, focus, detail are all excellent. Very well done.

The cropping, as has been mentioned, goes against convention. A tiny thing to fix.


Photo Comments
,
4 years 10 months ago #645991 by Kid Fire X

garyrhook wrote: I don't see a significant highlight problem in any of these. The details are all there. Color, focus, detail are all excellent. Very well done.

The cropping, as has been mentioned, goes against convention. A tiny thing to fix.


Thanks!


,
4 years 10 months ago #645992 by Kid Fire X
Some cropping from Vanity Fair. These are some of the images on my wall where I edit my photos.



,
4 years 10 months ago #646018 by Nikon Shooter

Kid Fire X wrote: Some cropping from Vanity Fair.


When magazines are picking in my bank for pictures, they would
be horrified to find "your artistic intent" in terms of cropping.

In their layout, they can do what ever they want but you are wrong
to think it is a signature look. UNLESS the AD is with you in studio
or on location and directs the shooting session.

Light is free… capturing it is not!
Photo Comments
,
4 years 10 months ago #646036 by Troponin
These are better than I could produce, for sure. Let me just start by saying that. xD Overall, I think you're doing really well! A couple comments...

I have discovered that magazine photographers break a lot of rules. It's not because they are necessarily being creative, but because magazine shots don't need to. Their photos aren't studied, peeped, or meant to be hung on the wall as art (well, not in a traditional sense)

Go back and look at those rag shots again though. Look at the crops of the legs. Typically you want your crops just above a joint, not just below. The magazine shots followed this rule for the most part, but only once it didn't. Cropping off at the ankles or below the knee feels a bit awkward. Same with elbows and wrists. 

Personal artistic touches are a tricky thing. I break some every now and then, but it seems like I really only began successfully breaking rules in my area of photography when I finally felt like I was nailing the basic rules for every photo and learned what works and what really doesn't. To me, the black at the bottom of the photo looks more like a flash sync problem than an artistic touch. It looks unintended because it's cutting off your models in bad places. To me, that is the biggest difference between what works and what doesn't. 

Make sure to calibrate your monitor and/or that it's capable of being calibrated. Your monitor's brightness and RBG can greatly alter how others see your work. My monitor is too bright. I use it for gaming as well as photography, so I have to double check all of my exposures on another device before displaying it anywhere. Eventually I would like to have one that I can customize settings so I just flip a switch and it jumps between photo and gaming settings. Just keep this in mind if you are getting feedback about your exposures and can't seem to figure out what the problem is. (Or, it could be their monitor!). If you're using your histogram, the likelihood of getting the wrong exposure is greatly decreased. 

Hope this helps. Your shots look really good! You're at the point of nailing down those final details for amazing shots. They're so close!


Photo Comments
,
4 years 10 months ago #646134 by Kid Fire X

Troponin wrote: These are better than I could produce, for sure. Let me just start by saying that. xD Overall, I think you're doing really well! A couple comments...

I have discovered that magazine photographers break a lot of rules. It's not because they are necessarily being creative, but because magazine shots don't need to. Their photos aren't studied, peeped, or meant to be hung on the wall as art (well, not in a traditional sense)

Go back and look at those rag shots again though. Look at the crops of the legs. Typically you want your crops just above a joint, not just below. The magazine shots followed this rule for the most part, but only once it didn't. Cropping off at the ankles or below the knee feels a bit awkward. Same with elbows and wrists. 

Personal artistic touches are a tricky thing. I break some every now and then, but it seems like I really only began successfully breaking rules in my area of photography when I finally felt like I was nailing the basic rules for every photo and learned what works and what really doesn't. To me, the black at the bottom of the photo looks more like a flash sync problem than an artistic touch. It looks unintended because it's cutting off your models in bad places. To me, that is the biggest difference between what works and what doesn't. 

Make sure to calibrate your monitor and/or that it's capable of being calibrated. Your monitor's brightness and RBG can greatly alter how others see your work. My monitor is too bright. I use it for gaming as well as photography, so I have to double check all of my exposures on another device before displaying it anywhere. Eventually I would like to have one that I can customize settings so I just flip a switch and it jumps between photo and gaming settings. Just keep this in mind if you are getting feedback about your exposures and can't seem to figure out what the problem is. (Or, it could be their monitor!). If you're using your histogram, the likelihood of getting the wrong exposure is greatly decreased. 

Hope this helps. Your shots look really good! You're at the point of nailing down those final details for amazing shots. They're so close!


Thank you for taking the time to write out some feedback. My monitor is indeed calibrated using an X-rite display pro. I appreciate all of the feedback on this forum. It's the only way I can get better.


,

817.3K

241K

  • Facebook

    817,251 / Likes

  • Twitter

    241,000 / Followers

  • Google+

    1,620,816 / Followers

Latest Reviews

The Canon EOS R100 is an entry-level mirrorless camera introduced in 2023. But just because it’s an entry-level camera doesn’t mean it’s a bare-bones camera. Find out why in this review!

Apr 22, 2024

Nikon’s retro-looking Nikon Zfc is anything but retro. Under its classic body is a host of features and amenities that make it a worthwhile compact mirrorless camera for 2024.

Apr 15, 2024

The Canon EOS R50 is one of the newest R-system cameras from Canon. Is it worth your money? Find out all the details you need to know in this comprehensive review.

Apr 10, 2024

The Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II is Sony’s flagship mirrorless zoom lens. As such, it’s loaded with features and has a top-shelf build quality that makes it a top pick!

Mar 27, 2024

Forum Top Posters

Latest Articles

The Canon EOS R100 is an entry-level mirrorless camera introduced in 2023. But just because it’s an entry-level camera doesn’t mean it’s a bare-bones camera. Find out why in this review!

Apr 22, 2024

Are you ready to upgrade your camera? Before buying new, you might consider the value of purchasing used gear to save money.

Apr 18, 2024

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is a micro four thirds camera released in 2020. It’s an entry-level system along with the OM-D E-M5 Mark III. Use this guide to determine which one is best for you!

Apr 17, 2024

Blue hour photography might not be as well known as golden hour photography, but it is every bit as good a time to create epic images of landscapes. Learn how in this quick tutorial!

Apr 17, 2024

Nikon’s retro-looking Nikon Zfc is anything but retro. Under its classic body is a host of features and amenities that make it a worthwhile compact mirrorless camera for 2024.

Apr 15, 2024

Moving from taking snapshots of your dog to creating beautiful images doesn’t have to be that difficult! Use the tips outlined in this dog photography guide, and you’ll get better results in no time.

Apr 15, 2024

Acrylic print photos are a beautiful way to display your favorite images. But they don’t come without some questions. Get all the answers you need about this medium in this guide!

Apr 15, 2024

Where do you get your landscape photography inspiration? Is it from masters like Ansel Adams? Or perhaps viewing art from other genres? We’ve got these and a few other sources for you to check out!

Apr 10, 2024