Situations where copyright of a photo is legally taken from you?

1 year 3 months ago #601471 by Miss Polly
Random question, so nothing happening here other than curious about this.  


Are there any situations where a photo that you have taken, you own it, and have copyright over it, can legally be taken away from you?


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 year 3 months ago #601474 by Nikon Shooter
Taken? Legally? NEVER!

One may give or sell it but it is right of property… by law.

Light is free… capturing it is not!
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 year 3 months ago #601476 by effron
Yeah, nobody can "take" your copyright legally.

Why so serious?
This person is a posting maniac and deserves a #1 badge!Top Poster
No one kicks up there feet next to the water cooler better than this person.  Top poster - LoungeLounge Guru
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 year 3 months ago - 1 year 3 months ago #601482 by Aeros
The copyright act provides protection to the original author in two forms. Intellectual and moral. Intellectual copyright may be assigned to another party via a contract for use and a signed agreement must be retained by both parties.

Moral copyright, protects the interests of the original author for the life of the original author and in Canada for fifty years beyond the original author’s death. Moral copyright is incontrovertible, a party who has acquired rights to the work via agreement by contract under the rules of Intellectual Copyright, is bound by the doctrine of Moral copyright. To give you an example; a sculptor in Toronto sold a bronze of some flying geese to a very large Canadian retailer. The retailer had the work hung from the ceiling in a downtown Toronto store. One Christmas, the store management decided to wrap red bows around the necks of the sculpture of the Canada Geese.

The sculptor got wind of it and directed the store management to remove the bows to which they refused. There was a suit by the sculptor and he won his legal action on the claim that tying the red bows on the sculpture he created (and was still protected by Moral Copyright), was a copyright infringement by conversion. One can buy an original painting, if it is copyright protected by the original author, the purchaser is bound by the copyright act, not to alter any part of the painting, is prohibited from selling reproductions, the list goes on.

I hope this provides more insight to the Copyright Act as instituted by the Berne Treaty to which most western governments are signatories. I would strongly recommend anyone producing works that qualify for Copyright protection, to read the act. It’s very easy reading, clear and concise.


Photo Comments
The following user(s) said Thank You: Ozzie_Traveller

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 year 3 months ago #601483 by Miss Polly
Well you never know these days.  And honestly, it was just a curious thing for this morning.  I wasn't sure if government could take if sensitive government official was in photo, etc.  


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 year 3 months ago #601484 by Aeros
Not if the sensitive government official was photographed in a public place were there is no reasonable expectation of privacy. This in itself is not a copyright issue. It's more about how the photo is used and if there is financial gain to the photographer without permission from the subject.


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 year 3 months ago #601487 by Miss Polly
Gotcha, OK, well that was just a random example that stemmed one of my thoughts on this.  


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 year 3 months ago - 1 year 3 months ago #601513 by Troponin
Here is what I know, but it doesn’t really relate to
your situation

Copyright laws kinda suck. Although they do
protect you, it’s only
protection in theory. there are also loopholes and the courts have proven they known nothing about the art of photography. 

The law states that if any “reasonable” alteration has been made to a photo, it can be stolen and considered their own work. For instance, a photo can be simply
cropped and now that “art” belongs to someone else. I could also draw a
smiley face on your photos and they are now mine and I can make money from them.

Basically, it cant be used to make money if you don’t have rights to the photo. 

All that being said, the system is broken. It costs
thousands to fight and it most likely won’t be worth it.  


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 year 3 months ago #601977 by garyrhook

Troponin wrote: Here is what I know, but it doesn’t really relate to
your situation

Copyright laws kinda suck.


No, they don't. They are helpful and good.

Although they do protect you, it’s only protection in theory.


No, it's not. Please provide concrete examples supporting your statement.

 there are also loopholes and the courts have proven they known nothing about the art of photography. 


Courts make mistakes. That's why there's an appeals process. Things often get worked out. Again, concrete examples?

The law states that if any “reasonable” alteration has been made to a photo, it can be stolen and considered their own work.


No, it can't. Reasonable courts call that "derivative work", which is covered by copyright. Again, any concrete examples to the contrary?

 For instance, a photo can be simply cropped and now that “art” belongs to someone else. I could also draw a smiley face on your photos and they are now mine and I can make money from them.

Basically, it cant be used to make money if you don’t have rights to the photo. 

All that being said, the system is broken. It costs
thousands to fight and it most likely won’t be worth it.  


Your "examples" (statements, really) are unsupported opinions, without basis in fact. Please cite specific examples, and let's discuss. As for fighting,  please don't conflate. Dealing with the legal system under the current US copyright law is a challenge, yes, which is beginning to become apparent to all. Join the Copyright Alliance and help change the laws.

But that has nothing to do with whether copyright law is useful, valued, and effective. I'll stop there.


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 year 3 months ago #602128 by Francis
What make copyright laws the big evil monster is they intimidate people because the don't understand  them.  Not saying that I do 100%, but there is much to know about them and now to protect yourself/images.  

There are also services out there that you can subscribe too that will safe guard your interests.  


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 year 3 months ago #602392 by icepics
I was thinking that if a person who was some sort of official was in a sensitive situation you probably wouldn't have access to be able to take photos anyway - unless you were a working photojournalist or a photographer hired to cover that person. If an official was out in public I think there's an expectation that you could talk to the person, take a picture, etc. (as Aeros talked about).

If somehow there was a situation that you got a photo of a person who was in a sensitive job of some sort, I don't even know if copyright would be affected as much as usage. You wouldn't be able to use a photo to make money from it without a signed release anyway, at least not for retail or commercial/business use. For editorial use like a newspaper or media outlet typically a release wouldn't be needed (but may be requested).

Anyone can get on the US Copyright Office website and look up how to register copyright. You automatically own the copyright on photos you take, but if you'd be using the photos and want to protect your work, it supposedly can help in dealing with any copyright violations.

Sharon
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 year 3 months ago - 1 year 3 months ago #602393 by Troponin

garyrhook wrote:

Troponin wrote: Here is what I know, but it doesn’t really relate to
your situation

Copyright laws kinda suck.


No, they don't. They are helpful and good.

Although they do protect you, it’s only protection in theory.


No, it's not. Please provide concrete examples supporting your statement.

 there are also loopholes and the courts have proven they known nothing about the art of photography. 


Courts make mistakes. That's why there's an appeals process. Things often get worked out. Again, concrete examples?

The law states that if any “reasonable” alteration has been made to a photo, it can be stolen and considered their own work.


No, it can't. Reasonable courts call that "derivative work", which is covered by copyright. Again, any concrete examples to the contrary?

 For instance, a photo can be simply cropped and now that “art” belongs to someone else. I could also draw a smiley face on your photos and they are now mine and I can make money from them.

Basically, it cant be used to make money if you don’t have rights to the photo. 

All that being said, the system is broken. It costs
thousands to fight and it most likely won’t be worth it.  


Your "examples" (statements, really) are unsupported opinions, without basis in fact. Please cite specific examples, and let's discuss. As for fighting,  please don't conflate. Dealing with the legal system under the current US copyright law is a challenge, yes, which is beginning to become apparent to all. Join the Copyright Alliance and help change the laws.

But that has nothing to do with whether copyright law is useful, valued, and effective. I'll stop there.


Cariou v Prince and look at how much they spent on that case. Overturned or not, it was stupid expensive and the laws are still not fantastic. How can a majority of photographers afford this? 


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 year 3 months ago #602414 by garyrhook

Troponin wrote: Cariou v Prince and look at how much they spent on that case. Overturned or not, it was stupid expensive and the laws are still not fantastic. How can a majority of photographers afford this? 


I don't think any photographer sees that outcome of that one as reasonable in any way. We already know that there are idiot judges on benches (Virginia) and it's going to take time to sort things out. And yes, a big part of the problem is the cost of litigation.

I also don't think we can draw conclusions about copyright based on bad judicial decisions. That case you site is problematic, but it doesn't mean the laws are the problem. Dumb judges are a problem. As is electing them, IMO, FWIW.

Affordability is an issue. That's why we need to support organizations like the Copyright Alliance, where work can be carried out to try to rectify these problems, and educate the public on the value of copyright (and oppose the tech companies that promulgate lies and misinformation in order to abuse creators for their own ends).

I remain hopeful.


Photo Comments
The following user(s) said Thank You: Troponin

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

802.3K

205K

1.62M

  • Facebook

    802,251 / Likes

  • Twitter

    205,000 / Followers

  • Google+

    1,620,816 / Followers

Latest Reviews

In the Nikon Z6 vs Canon EOS R debate, which one is the best buy for you? Get all the details on both these cameras in this detailed comparison review.

Dec 04, 2019

Sure, the Nikon D610 is going on seven years old, but if you want a full frame camera, you'll be hard-pressed to find a cheaper one. Learn about the features and benefits of this camera in our Nikon D610 review.

Nov 27, 2019

The FujiFilm X-Pro 3 is a brand-new camera with distinct retro styling. Is it the right camera for you? Find out in this detailed FujiFilm X-Pro 3 review.

Nov 26, 2019

The Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L is one of the holy trinity of lenses every photographer needs to have. Does it stand up to its huge price tag? Let's find out!

Nov 22, 2019
Get 600+ Pro photo lessons for $1

Forum Top Posters

Latest Articles

Photo by Geo Days on Unsplash If you're scared of going to the dentist, you should probably stop reading now. A dentist in...

Dec 08, 2019

Photo by Victória Kubiaki on Unsplash It's not every day that someone goes out of their way to make strangers smile, but that's...

Dec 08, 2019

Photo by Olenka Kotyk on Unsplash  Brides will always expect photographers to work for free because photography is an...

Dec 07, 2019

The best camera bags of 2019 include duffel bags and slings, backpacks and leather bags. Their common trait? These are some of the most well-designed, rugged, and functional bags available today.

Dec 06, 2019

I'm making the move to Canon mirrorless cameras, specifically the EOS R. Here's a few thoughts on the transition so far, including some pleasant surprises!

Dec 06, 2019

How to sell used camera gear has changed a lot over the last decade. In this article, learn about the future of how to sell your used camera gear for maximum profits.

Dec 05, 2019

If you're starting a photography business, there are a few things you need to research before you open your doors. Tackle the tasks outlined here, and you'll be in better shape to build a successful business.

Dec 05, 2019

GoPros have been around for 15 years, and over the years, many unusual GoPro accessories have come to market. Have a look at some of our favorites.

Dec 05, 2019