Do newspapers have to pay for photos or Fair Use includes Editorial?

4 years 8 months ago #654160 by Jackman
I know newspapers do pay for some photos, but technically are they able to use what ever photos they want as Fair Use covers them because of 'Editorial' or Social Commentary use doesn't require the need of permission because this is providing value to the public?  


Photo Comments
,
4 years 8 months ago #654161 by Nikon Shooter
NEVER!

Whichever way, if it is your picture, they MUST have your
agreement to use it after negotiating the conditions.

Light is free… capturing it is not!
Photo Comments
,
4 years 8 months ago - 4 years 8 months ago #654166 by Janos
As I understand, there are a number of items that make up the Fair Use valid.  And if you check off one, but you have other points that aren't lined up, then it's a no go.  If you look around, you'll find court cases that swayed from the newspapers, even though they are editorial, they are profiting and found the short end of the Fair Use stick. 


Photo Comments
,
4 years 8 months ago #654173 by garyrhook
There are 4 conditions/criteria for "fair use" evaluation. You only have to satisfy one of them. Which makes the assertion above incorrect.

Also: keep in mind that copyright applies to any created thing, not just photographs. Free up your thinking when considering aspects of these widely misunderstood subject. And also why people who bitch about copyright generally (a) restrict their focus to one creative area, and (b) often have an agenda that is self-serving.

"Editorial" is about the thing itself. It does not mean an editor/publisher can use something to make some other point. The focus of the use must be about the thing itself to qualify for editorial usage. Thus, e.g., using photos of a riot to illustrate the riot isn't fair use. So compensation would be required.

So: I can take any photograph I find, and use it as a subject for discussion of the photography illustrated in that image. And I don't need permission to do so. Which makes another assertion above incorrect.

The whole point of passing the "fair use" test is that you don't require permission, and you don't compensate. This is why a fair use assessment should be very difficult to pass.


Photo Comments
,
4 years 8 months ago #654182 by Jackman
And did I just read that Facebook is now able to use our photos as they see fit?  

If this is correct, how are they able to get around Fair Use?  


Photo Comments
,
4 years 8 months ago #654188 by garyrhook

Jackman wrote: And did I just read that Facebook is now able to use our photos as they see fit?  

If this is correct, how are they able to get around Fair Use?  


No, I'm pretty sure you did not. That has been floating around for years now, and is no more true than it ever was.

FB (and any other service like it) requires your agreement that they may distribute your images through their system on your behalf. Any attempt to expand that use to "we can do whatever we want" has been met with resistance, and they've backed off. Note that that doesn't eliminate misuse by other parties, over which FB has zero control.

Despite what you may hear, or read, go read their Ts & Cs. They're not complicated, they just require some time and thought. Or perhaps read a reputable source, like this one:
https://www.copytrack.com/does-facebook-own-my-pictures/


Photo Comments
,
4 years 8 months ago #654213 by Carry
:agree:   Yep, it sure has.  


Photo Comments
,
4 years 8 months ago #654494 by Tony Imaging
That FB message is so old.  What happens is a few people will resend it out to get people worked up, and it will die out again soon.  


Photo Comments
,
4 years 8 months ago #654655 by icepics
Like Gary said Fair Use is intended for discussion, etc. If someone was teaching a photography class or workshop, photos could be used for study and discussion.

Newspapers are editorial use and usage is contracted with freelance photographers. Usage should be specific in purpose/usage, timeframe, etc.

Newspapers used to have staff photographers but don't so much anymore. If they do the photographer could be an employee and doing Work for Hire meaning the photos are for the newspaper's use and the paper probably owns the copyright. That should be just for photos taken for the paper, not for the photographer's own work done on their own time.

Sharon
Photo Comments
,
4 years 8 months ago #654679 by Instamixes
If you have the copyright of the image then they can not use your image easily unless the image is unique and of such extreme public interest that they might be able to sustain a “public interest” fair use defense. Some newspapers pay some amount to the owner of the picture to use it in their newspaper or at least take permission from the owner. This is rare; in most cases, they would need to have your permission to use an image you are the copyright holder of. They can not use your image without your permission. 

What to Do When Your Images Are Used Without Permission?


,
4 years 8 months ago #654686 by garyrhook

Instamixes wrote: If you have the copyright of the image then they can not use your image easily unless the image is unique and of such extreme public interest that they might be able to sustain a “public interest” fair use defense.


Um, no. "Public interest" is not one of the fair use factors. Here's a post from Stanford Law:
fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/four-factors/


Photo Comments
,

817.3K

241K

  • Facebook

    817,251 / Likes

  • Twitter

    241,000 / Followers

  • Google+

    1,620,816 / Followers

Latest Reviews

Nikon’s retro-looking Nikon Zfc is anything but retro. Under its classic body is a host of features and amenities that make it a worthwhile compact mirrorless camera for 2024.

Apr 15, 2024

The Canon EOS R50 is one of the newest R-system cameras from Canon. Is it worth your money? Find out all the details you need to know in this comprehensive review.

Apr 10, 2024

The Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II is Sony’s flagship mirrorless zoom lens. As such, it’s loaded with features and has a top-shelf build quality that makes it a top pick!

Mar 27, 2024

The Leica SL2-S is an attractive, premium mirrorless camera with photo and video specs that are sure to impress. And with the legendary Leica name, you know this camera exudes quality!

Mar 26, 2024
Get 600+ Pro photo lessons for $1

Forum Top Posters

Latest Articles

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is a micro four thirds camera released in 2020. It’s an entry-level system along with the OM-D E-M5 Mark III. Use this guide to determine which one is best for you!

Apr 17, 2024

Blue hour photography might not be as well known as golden hour photography, but it is every bit as good a time to create epic images of landscapes. Learn how in this quick tutorial!

Apr 17, 2024

Nikon’s retro-looking Nikon Zfc is anything but retro. Under its classic body is a host of features and amenities that make it a worthwhile compact mirrorless camera for 2024.

Apr 15, 2024

Moving from taking snapshots of your dog to creating beautiful images doesn’t have to be that difficult! Use the tips outlined in this dog photography guide, and you’ll get better results in no time.

Apr 15, 2024

Acrylic print photos are a beautiful way to display your favorite images. But they don’t come without some questions. Get all the answers you need about this medium in this guide!

Apr 15, 2024

Where do you get your landscape photography inspiration? Is it from masters like Ansel Adams? Or perhaps viewing art from other genres? We’ve got these and a few other sources for you to check out!

Apr 10, 2024

The Canon EOS R50 is one of the newest R-system cameras from Canon. Is it worth your money? Find out all the details you need to know in this comprehensive review.

Apr 10, 2024

Too often, affordable online printing companies don’t meet your expectations of what a print should look like. But there are some choices that combine affordability with superb quality!

Apr 09, 2024