Why are there not more f/1.8 lenses from Nikon, Canon and Sony?

1 week 3 days ago #654776 by Uplander
Have you noticed how many f/1.8 lenses that Sigma has been spitting out over the years?  Why don't we see Nikon and the rest of the crew cranking these out vs the f/2.8 lenses?  


70-200mm f/1.8  :drool:

Oh damn, you know that would be a work of art!


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 week 3 days ago #654785 by Nikon Shooter
My 200mm ƒ2 cost 5k. A ƒ 1-8 would cost ??? Now
imagine a ƒ 1.8 70~200 mm zoom!!!

Still wondering why are there not more f/1.8 lenses?

Light is free… capturing it is not!
This person is a posting maniac and deserves a #1 badge!Top Poster

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 week 3 days ago #654786 by Nikon Shooter
Addendum

… and my 200~400 mm ƒ 4 was in the area of 6K
A ƒ 1.8 …???

Light is free… capturing it is not!
This person is a posting maniac and deserves a #1 badge!Top Poster

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 week 3 days ago #654883 by garyrhook
There's another thread on here regarding the question of why there isn't a 70-300 f/2.8. The OP asserted that technology could make that happen.

Unfortunately, physics doesn't care about your technology. There are physical requirements to let in enough light, and make the lenses large enough, to allow for that.

Aside from the cost, mentioned above, you'd have a very bulky lens, probably a very heavy lens, and it would very challenging to get the IQ acceptable across the image.

Yes, Sigma is making f/1.8 lenses, but you'll note that the longest is still only 85mm. Which is not that big a deal. Nikon makes an f/1.4 105mm, and a 135mm f/2 lens. After that, no go. (Can't comment on Canon, but since their flange is larger, they maybe could go a bit longer at a wider opening.)

The 300mm f/2.8 Nikon (prime) weighs 8 pounds (3.5kg). It just gets worse from there. There's a limit to what can be done at a given aperture.


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 week 2 days ago #654908 by Sawyer
Dude, can you imagine though a 70-200mm f/1.8???

Hell yeah! 

Canon 5D Mark II | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM | Canon 35L | Sigma 85 1.4 | Helios 44M-6 58mm(M42) | Zeiss 50mm 1.4 (C/Y) | Canon 135L | (2) 430EX II
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 week 1 day ago #655049 by Paris Gal
That would be nice, but it would be so heavy I bet.  Not to mention expenSIVE! 

5D mark II gripped | Canon 100L | Canon 85 1.8 | Sigma 50 1.4 | Tamron 28-75 2.8 | 580ex II | 430ex II x 2 |
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 week 1 day ago #655123 by NickSano
70-200mm is what, $2800 these days?  f/1.8 would push this price close to $4000.  Not to mention, I bet this thing would be HEAVY.  I'll keep my current f/2.8 thank you.


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 week 20 hours ago #655152 by D Hornick
:agree: 


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 week 14 hours ago #655160 by J Photo Man
Dude that would be a crazy heavy lens and expensive.  I don't think the market would support such a lens, not at least from a volume standpoint.  


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 week 4 hours ago #655256 by D Hornick

J Photo Man wrote: Dude that would be a crazy heavy lens and expensive.  I don't think the market would support such a lens, not at least from a volume standpoint.  



Understatement!  After I posted yesterday I was thinking about the weight, it would be nuts.  


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 week 3 hours ago #655262 by garyrhook

D Hornick wrote:

J Photo Man wrote: Dude that would be a crazy heavy lens and expensive.  I don't think the market would support such a lens, not at least from a volume standpoint.  



Understatement!  After I posted yesterday I was thinking about the weight, it would be nuts.  


Right. Because no one mentioned weight earlier in this thread. Or cost.


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 week 3 hours ago #655268 by Nikon Shooter

garyrhook wrote: …Or cost.



No one?

Light is free… capturing it is not!
This person is a posting maniac and deserves a #1 badge!Top Poster

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

6 days 20 hours ago - 6 days 20 hours ago #655297 by garyrhook

Nikon Shooter wrote:

garyrhook wrote: …Or cost.



No one?


Language barrier. I'll let Google Translate help me out here. I can't vouch for grammatical correctness.

Mon commentaire se situait quelque part entre le sarcastique, le facétieux et le sardonique. Je ne suis pas sûr du mot approprié.

I wish people would read the entire thread.


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

5 days 15 hours ago #655394 by D Hornick

garyrhook wrote:

D Hornick wrote:

J Photo Man wrote: Dude that would be a crazy heavy lens and expensive.  I don't think the market would support such a lens, not at least from a volume standpoint.  



Understatement!  After I posted yesterday I was thinking about the weight, it would be nuts.  


Right. Because no one mentioned weight earlier in this thread. Or cost.


Hey why so rude?  I didn't say or suggest I was the first to bring this up.  I was just saying that I had thought about this.  It's a forum, I'm just adding to the discussion based on what was on my mind.  


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

5 days 14 hours ago #655395 by Nikon Shooter

garyrhook wrote: Language barrier. I'll let Google Translate help me out here. I can't vouch for grammatical correctness.

Mon commentaire se situait quelque part entre le sarcastique, le facétieux et le sardonique. Je ne suis pas sûr du mot approprié.

I wish people would read the entire thread.


Sorry Gary but, at my level in your language,
many subtleties are still escaping me.

Light is free… capturing it is not!
This person is a posting maniac and deserves a #1 badge!Top Poster

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

802.3K

205K

1.62M

  • Facebook

    802,251 / Likes

  • Twitter

    205,000 / Followers

  • Google+

    1,620,816 / Followers

Latest Reviews

In this Fujifilm X100F review, learn about its essential features and specs, its pros and cons, and where you can pick one up for a great price.

Aug 16, 2019

The Nikon D500 might be several years old, but it's still a highly capable camera. In this Nikon D500 review, learn why it's still a good investment in 2019.

Aug 16, 2019

In this Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 S review, learn about its specs, features, build quality, handling, price, and more.

Aug 13, 2019

The Fujifilm X-T2 might be three years old, but it's still a highly capable camera with specs and features that will suit just about any photographer in 2019.

Aug 12, 2019
Get 600+ Pro photo lessons for $1

Forum Top Posters

Latest Articles

Where can you see the northern lights? All over the Northern Hemisphere...but the locations listed here are among the best sites to take in the view of the northern lights.

Aug 22, 2019

Shopping for photography insurance isn't exactly an excited venture, but with the best photography insurance companies of 2019/2020, you can at least get affordable coverage you need quickly and easily!

Aug 21, 2019

With a big budget, there's no end to what you can give your favorite photographer this holiday season. See what some of the best gifts for photographers under $2,500 are in 2019!

Aug 20, 2019

Photography clients can be hard to find and even harder to keep, but with these photography business tips, you'll learn how to retain clients for the long-term.

Aug 20, 2019

Though being a new photographer means you probably have a ton of questions, there are some beginner photography questions that professionals are tired of hearing.

Aug 19, 2019

Using a vintage lens with a modern camera is a fun exercise, and can teach you a lot. But before you buy a vintage lens, be sure you know what you're getting yourself into...

Aug 19, 2019

Photo by Jakob Owens on Unsplash Joshua Rosenthal makes a living from taking pictures of strangers in public, legally. Under...

Aug 18, 2019

By Teichnor Bros., Boston - eBayfrontback, Public Domain "It wasn't the first time he utilized a couple of bottles of scotch to get into an area that...

Aug 18, 2019