Will a hair line chip in lens front element effect image quality?

4 years 3 months ago #672580 by Sean Lamber
I almost bought a used 24-70mm from someone off Craigslist yesterday, however upon close inspection I noticed a tiny hair line chip about 1/8" long and as thick as very thick hair.  I hope that makes sense.  The guy said that won't make any difference in the photos.  Before buying I just wanted to make sure.  Would that be noticed under any circumstances? 


Photo Comments
,
4 years 3 months ago - 4 years 3 months ago #672605 by Nikon Shooter
On the front lens? That is not worth mentioning it since
it is well away from the minimum focusing distance BUT
that little hairline is a weak point in the structural integri-
ty of the glass and brings unstable properties with it like
reacting in an undesired way to cold etc.

Unless you get it for peanuts, Sean, don't.

Light is free… capturing it is not!
Photo Comments
,
4 years 3 months ago #672607 by Sean Lamber
OK, good to know.  Didn't even think about what that might do to the strength of the glass.  I was more concerned about the image quality, but you bring up a good point.  Now would you say this is still a concern if just surface level deep on the front glass element? 


Photo Comments
,
4 years 3 months ago #672613 by Nikon Shooter
Glass has a crystal structure and so material integrity
is always in balance with the stress within… other wise
it may crack longer or even shatter.

Glass cutters are only "scratching" the surface to brake
it but in a controlled way.

Optically, it won't matter (I wouldn't go for it cause I'm
a freak!) but mechanically may be an other matter.

Light is free… capturing it is not!
Photo Comments
,
4 years 3 months ago #672614 by Nikon Shooter
ADDENDUM

Mind you, I have pros working with what looked
like bottles bottoms more than lenses.

Light is free… capturing it is not!
Photo Comments
,
4 years 3 months ago #672619 by Sean Lamber

Nikon Shooter wrote: ADDENDUM

Mind you, I have pros working with what looked
like bottles bottoms more than lenses.



I'm sorry, I'm not following you here?  


Photo Comments
,
4 years 3 months ago #672621 by Nikon Shooter
By opposition to me wanting my gear to be perfect in
every possible ways, these pros showed themselves to
have all possible tolerances.

Light is free… capturing it is not!
Photo Comments
,
4 years 3 months ago #672625 by Sean Lamber
I see what you are saying.  Pro's are out there using gear that has character scars?  


Photo Comments
,
4 years 3 months ago #672626 by Nikon Shooter
… and I said nothing of smudges, finger prints, dust!   :S  :sick:

Light is free… capturing it is not!
Photo Comments
,
4 years 3 months ago #672642 by Ozzie_Traveller
G'day Sean

Is it possible for you to shoot some test images to confirm the seller's claims?

Shoot towards a bright light - place the lens at an angle to the light such that this tiny crack is in the light and see whether it throws refractions across the image itself

Personally - if it's only a minor crack and remembering that all the lens glass is tightly held by a metal body - it might not make a real difference. Only you can sort this out :)

Hope this helps
Phil from the great land Downunder
www.flickr.com/photos/ozzie_traveller/sets/

Phil from the great land Downunder
www.flickr.com/photos/ozzie_traveller/sets/

,
4 years 3 months ago #672644 by effron

Ozzie_Traveller wrote: G'day Sean

Is it possible for you to shoot some test images to confirm the seller's claims?

Shoot towards a bright light - place the lens at an angle to the light such that this tiny crack is in the light and see whether it throws refractions across the image itself


That makes too much sense, to test it....../s of course.

Why so serious?
Photo Comments
,
4 years 3 months ago #672645 by effron
Also, I still own an old 200 f/4 lens I bought for ten bucks from a dude that showed me a fair sized chip on the front element. I shot an entire roll of film from every light angle and aperture and found NOTHING in the processed images to suggest any defects. 
Like stated above by ozzie, you need to test it, with digital, its a few minutes of time, no?

Why so serious?
Photo Comments
,
4 years 3 months ago #672803 by Ted Baker
You might get some funny business if you are pointing the camera directly at light.


Photo Comments
,
4 years 3 months ago #672817 by Nikon Shooter

Ted Baker wrote: You might get some funny business if you are pointing the camera directly at light.


This is the very first consequence and it is
possibly not easy to correct!

Light is free… capturing it is not!
Photo Comments
,
4 years 3 months ago #673007 by effron

Ted Baker wrote: You might get some funny business if you are pointing the camera directly at light.


Maybe, maybe not...but I didn't use the lens to photograph the sun.

Why so serious?
Photo Comments
,

817.3K

241K

  • Facebook

    817,251 / Likes

  • Twitter

    241,000 / Followers

  • Google+

    1,620,816 / Followers

Latest Reviews

Nikon’s retro-looking Nikon Zfc is anything but retro. Under its classic body is a host of features and amenities that make it a worthwhile compact mirrorless camera for 2024.

Apr 15, 2024

The Canon EOS R50 is one of the newest R-system cameras from Canon. Is it worth your money? Find out all the details you need to know in this comprehensive review.

Apr 10, 2024

The Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II is Sony’s flagship mirrorless zoom lens. As such, it’s loaded with features and has a top-shelf build quality that makes it a top pick!

Mar 27, 2024

The Leica SL2-S is an attractive, premium mirrorless camera with photo and video specs that are sure to impress. And with the legendary Leica name, you know this camera exudes quality!

Mar 26, 2024
Get 600+ Pro photo lessons for $1

Forum Top Posters

Latest Articles

Blue hour photography might not be as well known as golden hour photography, but it is every bit as good a time to create epic images of landscapes. Learn how in this quick tutorial!

Apr 17, 2024

Nikon’s retro-looking Nikon Zfc is anything but retro. Under its classic body is a host of features and amenities that make it a worthwhile compact mirrorless camera for 2024.

Apr 15, 2024

Moving from taking snapshots of your dog to creating beautiful images doesn’t have to be that difficult! Use the tips outlined in this dog photography guide, and you’ll get better results in no time.

Apr 15, 2024

Acrylic print photos are a beautiful way to display your favorite images. But they don’t come without some questions. Get all the answers you need about this medium in this guide!

Apr 15, 2024

Where do you get your landscape photography inspiration? Is it from masters like Ansel Adams? Or perhaps viewing art from other genres? We’ve got these and a few other sources for you to check out!

Apr 10, 2024

The Canon EOS R50 is one of the newest R-system cameras from Canon. Is it worth your money? Find out all the details you need to know in this comprehensive review.

Apr 10, 2024

Too often, affordable online printing companies don’t meet your expectations of what a print should look like. But there are some choices that combine affordability with superb quality!

Apr 09, 2024

Self-critique is an important component of your journey to improving as a photographer. Use these simple tips about critiquing your work as a means to make faster progress with your art.

Apr 08, 2024