$1,500 Camera vs $5,000 Camera - Can You Tell the Difference?
YouTube Screenshot/Duncan Dimanche
My guess is that you can’t…
There have been a lot of crop sensor vs full frame articles written over the years (like this one) that explain the distinct differences between the two kinds of cameras.
And while there is no denying that full frame sensors are larger and crop sensors are less expensive, the argument that full frame sensors are vastly superior in terms of image quality doesn’t always apply.
Sure, at a point in the past, there was a huge gulf between the image quality you could achieve with a pro-level full frame camera and what could be achieved with mid-range setup.
That’s no longer the case.
In the video above, Duncan Dimanche demonstrates the difference (or the lack thereof) between a relatively inexpensive crop sensor setup and a much more pricey full frame setup.
As Duncan notes early in the video, the chances are very good that you won’t be able to tell which images were captured with which camera. Even he got confused as he was editing his photos, so if the dude that took the shots can’t tell, I’m not sure any of us have hope of doing so.
Can you tell which of these images was taken with a full frame camera? YouTube Screenshot/Duncan Dimanche
Serge Ramelli (pictured above), famed photographer and YouTuber extraordinaire couldn’t tell, either…
Have a look at the video and see how you do in terms of identifying the “better” full frame photo and the “worse” crop sensor photo. Good luck!
Learn More:
- See What Happens When a Pulitzer Prize-Winning Photographer Takes Photos With a Toy Camera
- How to Get a High-End Camera Without Paying High-End Prices
$1,500 Camera vs $5,000 Camera Challenge: What Gear Was Used?
Duncan’s crop sensor setup is a Sony a6500 paired with a Kamlan 50mm f/1.1.
At the time of this writing, the a6500 retails for about $1,100, though you can pick up a used body for about $934. Meanwhile, the Kamlan 50mm f/1.1 lens can be purchased brand-new for $180.
Sony a7r ii
The full frame setup that Duncan used for this challenge is the Sony a7R II and a Sony FE 85mm f/1.4 GM.
The a7R II is approximately $1,800 brand-new or you can find used a7R II bodies for as little as $1,400 depending on the condition of the camera. The Sony lens approximately $1,800 brand-new with used versions for about $1,600, again, depending on their condition.
As Duncan mentions in the video, since the a6500 is a crop sensor camera, the effective focal length of the Kamlan 50mm lens is about 75mm with an f/1.6 aperture. This offers a very close comparison from a focal length standpoint with the 85mm f/1.4 lens on the full frame a7R II.
This is an interesting comparison that demonstrates that you don’t have to spend a boatload of money to get gear that helps you take quality photos.
If you have an entry-level setup, you can still create beautiful images. You just have to know how to use your gear to get the most out of it!
In my MPB review, learn how you can get quality used gear for great prices.
Learn More:
- Sony a6400 vs Sony a6500 vs Sony a6300
- The Ultimate Full Frame Showdown: Nikon D810 vs Canon 5D Mark IV vs Sony a7R II
We Recommend
3 Bargain Canon DSLRs for 2021
Photo by Thom Holmes on Unsplash
Everyone is cutting back on their spending right now, but that doesn’t mean you can’t still afford a nice new(ish) Canon DSLR for yourself this year.
There are an abundance of bargain Canon DSLRs available online right now as people start to unload old photography equipment they don’t need to get them through the pandemic.
And these aren’t typical bargain Canon DSLRs, these are insanely inexpensive bargain Canon DSLRs.
Here are the three best deals we could find on cheap Canon DSLRs right now.
Canon 60D
The Canon 60D is one of the most perfect Canon DSLRs for beginners because it is truly a camera you can grow into.
It features an 18MP sensor, a burst speed of 5fps, and a 9-point AF system to ensure you never miss another shot again.
It features a flip-out, rotating screen for vloggers or parents trying to take better self-family portraits.
It can shoot in low light with an ISO range of 100-6,400. While this range isn’t incredibly impressive, for a camera this old it’s to be expected.
Canon 60D Specs:
- 18MP sensor
- 3” vari-angle LCD
- Full HD video capabilities
- ISO range of 100-6,400
- 5.3fps burst mode
- 9-point AF system
- 1,100-shot battery life
Yes, you read that correctly. The Canon 60D features a battery that shoots up to 1,100 shots on a single charge, making it one of the most perfect Canon DSLRs for on-the-go shooters.
The one thing I don’t love about the camera is the fact that it’s pretty loud while shooting, so it definitely isn’t the camera for someone looking to photograph wildlife or a sleeping baby.
Learn More:
Canon T7
The Canon T7 also tops our list of bargain Canon DSLRs for 2021 because it’s cheap while still offering the basics.
The Canon T7 comes with a 24MP sensor and a shooting guide, making it the best option on this bargain Canon DSLRs list for an absolute beginner.
While it doesn’t feature many impressive specs that someone would specifically want to purchase this camera for, it is a Canon T, which means you can purchase this camera with the intention of learning everything there is to know about cameras in this line before upgrading, since the line is known for not updating its design very frequently.
Canon T7 Specs:
- 24MP sensor
- 3” LCD
- 3fps burst mode
- 9-point AF system
- Full HD video capabilities
- Built-in Wi-Fi
- 500-shot battery life
While most of these specs are pretty basic, the 24-megapixel sensor is pretty impressive. The fact that you can source lenses from the massive Canon EF line is also a nice bonus.
Editor’s Tip: To help keep people inspired, MPB is doing a weekly #mpbthrowback Instagram giveaway. It's #tbt with MPB style: share a photo you’ve taken in the past, tell MPB where you were, how you noticed it, and what kit you were using. MPB knows that many people have been reminiscing about their photography adventures as they go through their portfolios, and they want to help amplify that inspiration.
Canon 7D Mark II
The final camera on our bargain Canon DSLRs list is the Canon 7D Mark II. It’s the most impressive camera on our list for still shooters.
For starters, it features a 10fps burst mode, which is great if you’re trying to capture wildlife or the most genuine smile.
It also features a built-in GPS, which none of the other cheap Canon DSLRs do, so you can find the exact spot you loved so much on your last shoot.
Unfortunately, it doesn’t feature built-in Wi-Fi (it is five years old after all), but it’s excellent autofocus system more than makes up for it, in my opinion.
Canon 7D Mark II Specs:
- 20MP sensor
- 10fps burst mode
- Full HD video capabilities
- 3” LCD
- ISO range of 100-16,000
- Weather-sealed body
- 670-shot battery life
If you’re looking for a more robust camera, the 7D Mark II is it thanks to a weather-sealed body. It also features a greater ISO range and faster burst shooting than the other two cameras on this list.
Learn More:
We Recommend
3 Excellent Digital Cameras for Video
photo byhobo_018 via iStock
What are the best cameras for video? That’s a question every person asks themselves countless times when deciding on a new camera.
It’s a difficult question, with the best answer being, it depends! How experienced are you? What are you going to be filming with digital cameras for video? Is shooting video a hobby or a profession for you? What’s your budget? These are all important questions you need to answer before you can decide which of these digital cameras for video will work best for you.
Once you’ve answered those questions, now you are ready to start looking for a camera. And lucky for you, I’ve outlined three excellent digital cameras for video below. One of which will undoubtedly be the perfect camera for you!
Beginner Video Cameras for Sale
If you are a newbie, the Sony Alpha A6000 is the ultimate beginner digital camera for video. It’s pocket-sized, easy to use, incredibly lightweight, and best of all, cheap as can be!
Introduced in 2014, the A6000 is an oldie but ohhhh it’s a goodie. It’s a testament to just how spectacular this camera is that after all these years it’s still considered one of the best beginner digital cameras for video on the market.
Taking a look at the camera specs, the Sony A6000 has a large 24-megapixel APS-C sensor. That’s fantastic in comparison to most other entry-level cameras, and helps deliver terrific quality video. Also, the autofocus has 179 phase detection points and works brilliantly in every test I’ve put it through.
Video is recorded in full HD 1080p, which is not quite the quality of 4K, but is more than sufficient while learning and getting started in videography. If 4K or higher video is really a deal-breaker for you, consider one of the higher-end digital cameras for video I cover later in the article.
On a budget and want an even better bargain? Try checking out MPB.com. They currently have a number of used Sony A6000’s for sale, and are a superb resource for finding video cameras for cheap! Once you’ve found that perfect camera, it’s a wonderful place to pick up lenses for cheap as well!
Here is a more detailed overview of the specifications of this great digital camera for video:
- Model number: ILCE-6000
- Sensor: 24.3 million APS-C (23.5 x 15.6mm) CMOS sensor
- Focal length conversion: 1.5x
- Memory: SD/SDHC/SDXC
- Viewfinder: Electronic viewfinder, 0.39 inches, 1,440,000 dots
- Video: 1080p
- ISO range: 100 to 25,600
- Autofocus points: 179 phase detection points, 25 contrast detect points
- Max burst rate: 11fps
- Screen: 3-inch, 921k-dot tilting LCD
- Shutter speeds: 1/4000-30sec plus Bulb
- Weight: 344g (with battery and memory card)
- Dimensions: 120 x 66.9 x 45.1mm
- Power: NP-FW50 rechargeable lithium-ion battery
What are the Best Video Cameras for Making YouTube Videos?
The Sony Alpha A6600 is Sony’s newest high-end crop censor mirrorless camera. Released in 2019, it’s five years newer than the aforementioned A6000, and this digital camera for video has received some major upgrades for those looking to take the next step as a filmmaker!
The first noteworthy change is that the a6600 can capture video in 4K HDR. Additionally, there are no time restrictions on how long you can record in 4K, and issues involving overheating while recording for extended periods of time have mostly been dealt with.
As long as you have this bad boy plugged in, you can now record as long as you want! This makes it the go-to digital camera for video for many vloggers and YouTubers today.
Furthermore, the camera body itself has some significant upgrades as well. The A6600 has a weather-sealed magnesium alloy body, 5-axis in-body image stabilization, mic/headphone jacks, 425 phase detection points in autofocus, and uses a longer lasting battery.
Take a look at the full camera specs for this intermediate digital camera for video here:
- Sensor: 24.2MP APS-C CMOS
- Image processor: BIONZ X
- AF points: 425 phase/contrast-detection
- ISO range: ISO 100-32,000 (51,000)
- Max image size: 6000x4000 pixels
- Metering modes: Multi-segment, Center-weighted, Spot (standard/large), Average, Highlight
- Video: 4K 30/25/24p, 1080 120/60/30/25/24p
- Viewfinder: EVF, 2,359k dots, 0.39 type
- Memory card: 1x Memory Stick/SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I)
- LCD: 3.0-inch, 922k dots, tilting touchscreen
- Max burst: 11fps, 46 raw, 116 JPEG
- Connectivity: Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC
- Size: 120.0 x 66.9 x 69.3mm
- Weight: 503g
Learn More:
Best Camera for Video
What is at the top of the list of the best digital cameras for video out there today? If price isn’t an issue the answer is simple, it’s the Sony Alpha 1. Just released earlier this year, this mind-blowing digital camera for video seems to have come out of a fantasy land!
It’s without a doubt tops among digital cameras for video Sony has ever released and here is exactly why: It has an out-of-this-world 50-megapixel sensor, dual memory card slots, 15 stops of dynamic range, 759 phase detection points in autofocus, and can shoot video in a staggering 8K!
In addition to recording 8K at 30FPS, it can also capture 4K at up to 120FPS. When filming in 8K, Sony claims the Alpha 1 can run continuously for up to 30 minutes thanks to an all-new passive heat dissipation system.
With a hefty price tag, this digital camera for video is certainly not for everyone. However, if you work professionally with video or are a professional filmmaker, you may see significant improvements in the quality of your work if you decide to switch over to the modern technological marvel that is the Sony Alpha 1!
See below the entire list of specifications for this illustrious digital camera for video:
- Sensor: 50.1MP full-frame EXMOR RS CMOS
- Image processor: BIONZ XR
- AF points: 759 phase detect, 425 contrast detect
- ISO range: 100-32,000 (expandable to 50-102,400)
- Stabilization: 5-axis, up to 5.5 stops
- Max image size: 8640 x 5760px (199MP with multi-shot mode)
- Video: 8K 30p (XAVC HS 8K), 4K (XAVC HS 4K or XAVC S 4K) up to 120p, 10-bit 4:2:0 internal, 16-bit raw via HDMI
- Viewfinder: 9.44m dots, 100% coverage, 0.9x magnification, 240fps refresh rate
- Memory card: 2x CFexpress Type A/UHS-II SD/SDHC/SDXC
- LCD: 3-in tilting touchscreen, 1.44m dots
- Max burst: 10fps mechanical shutter, 30fps electronic shutter
- Connectivity: Wi-Fi 5Ghz and 2.4GHz, Bluetooth
- Size: 128.9 x 96.9 x 80.8mm
- Weight: 737g body only, including battery and memory card
Final Thoughts on Digital Cameras for Video
photo bymixetto via iStock
No matter which of these digital cameras for video you decide to buy, it’s up to you to put in the time and hard work it takes to create amazing videos - the camera you buy isn’t going to make you a video star!
Always remember, it’s the person behind the camera that makes the camera great, not the other way around.
Learn More:
We Recommend
3 Hot Black Friday Cameras You Can Still Get on the Cheap
Photo by Harold Wijnholds on Unsplash
Black Friday may be over, but that doesn’t mean you can’t still get great deals on Black Friday cameras.
As we ramp up for the holidays, camera manufacturers are trying to convince you to spend your money where you most want to, on their products. And the way they are doing so is by making their sales longer and their prices cheaper.
Here are the best cheap cameras you can still get at bargain prices.
Nikon D750
The Nikon D750 may be a few years old, but consumers still love it.
The Nikon D750 tops our cheap DSLRs list because its a full frame DSLR with a 24.3MP sensor. It shoots 1080p video and features 6.5fps burst shooting.
Plus, people went crazy for this Black Friday camera because it was over $1,000 off.
We did a review on the Nikon D750 a few years back. Check it out for a more in-depth review.
You can pick up the Nikon D750 on Amazon for $1,200 right now, which is $800 off.
You can also pick up a used Nikon D750 on MPB starting at $730.
Nikon D3500
The Nikon D3500 is on many “budget cameras” lists, but it’s cheaper than usual right now if you’re interested in purchasing the Nikon D3500.
The Nikon D3500 is a current Nikon model with a 24.2MP sensor. It’s a great camera for someone who is newer to photography because this is the type of budget camera you can grow with.
You can also send photos from your Nikon D3500 directly to your smartphone to edit and upload to social media.
The Nikon D3500 can record Full HD video at 1080p, or shoot in burst mode at up to 5 fps.
As soon as you start to explore the Nikon D3500 more, you’ll see it’s marketed for someone looking to upgrade from their smartphone camera with options like Guide Mode and a huge array of compatible lenses to make this camera a great go to.
It’s currently available on Amazon for just $400. While MPB doesn’t currently have this model in stock, the best thing about MPB is that it’s a used camera site that rotates through hundreds of different products every day, so while it isn’t there today it could be tomorrow!
Learn More:
Sony A7 III
While cheap DSLRs are always fun, cheap mirrorless cameras are even harder to come by which is why I’m so excited about the Sony A7 III sale.
The Sony A7 III comes with a 24.2MP Exmor R CMOS sensor, can shoot 4K video at up to a whopping 30fps and features 15 stops of range.
The Sony A7 III also features a touchscreen, in-body image stabilization and 93% autofocus coverage which means this is easily the most capable of all the Black Friday cameras.
The Sony A7 III is currently available on Amazon for $1,800,which is still 10% off.
Or you can head over to MPB and get one starting at $1,650.
I love using MPB because you can get Black Friday cameras, at Black Friday prices, year round.
Plus, MPB uses an excellent rating system on all of their products, so you know exactly what you are getting.
Don’t feel like you need to be left out of the Black Friday madness because you couldn’t afford what you wanted. Head over to MPB and check out their used selection now and get smokin’ deals on pre-owned gear year-round.
Learn More:
We Recommend
4 Canon Full Frame Cameras for Every Budget
Photo by James Bold on Unsplash
Canon full frame cameras are notoriously expensive, and why shouldn’t they be? They’re some of the best cameras on the market today.
But, not all of us can afford $3,000 Canon camera prices. But, thanks to a flourishing used camera sales industry, you don’t have to. In fact, some of the best Canons from just a few years ago are now budget Canons.
While there are tons of Canon full frame cameras to choose from, we aimed to pick one Canon DSLR from each price bracket that we consider the best of the best.
Canon EOS 6D
Although it’s an older camera, the Canon EOS 6D still features some impressive specs.
For one thing, it features a longer battery life than many of the more expensive Canon full frame cameras on this list at 1,200 shots.
For another, it handles indoor and artificial shooting really well because it has a flicker detection option.
Canon EOS 6D Specs:
- 20MP sensor
- ISO range of 100-25,600
- 4.5fps burst mode
- Full 1080p HD video
- 11-point AF system
- 97% viewfinder coverage
- Built-in Wi-Fi
- 1,200-shot battery life
- 100,000 shutter life expectancy
You can no longer purchase the Canon EOS 6D new since the manufacturer stopped making it, but you can purchase it used from MPB starting at $565.
Canon EOS 5D Mark III
The Canon EOS 5D Mark III dropped in January of 2015, making it 5 years old. Since then, Canon followed up with the 5D Mark IV and is expected to drop the 5D Mark V at the end of this year.
However, the differences between the Canon EOS 5D Mark III and its successor are not so great that the 5D Mark III is no longer worth it.
The Canon EOS 5D Mark III has an impressive ISO range for low light shooting, an autofocus system that can keep up with almost all photographers, and a 950-shot battery life.
Canon EOS 5D Mark III Specs:
- 22MP sensor
- ISO range of 100-25,600
- 6fps burst mode
- Full 1080p HD video
- 3.2” LCD screen
- 61-point AF system
- 100% viewfinder coverage
- Weather-sealed body
- 150,000 shutter life expectancy
The only modern specs the Canon EOS 5D Mark III is really missing are a touchscreen, Wi-Fi and 4K video.
Learn More:
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
Speaking of the Canon 5D Mark IV… this Canon DSLR dropped in September of 2016. While it looks almost identical to the 5D Mark III, it comes with a plethora of upgrades.
Firstly, it features a 30MP sensor, as opposed to the 5D Mark III’s 22MP sensor. It also features an even larger ISO range, from 100-32,000.
Finally, it uses two processors, the DIGIC 6 and the DIGIC 6+. The DIGIC 6 handles metering while the DIGIC 6+ handles everything else. The result is really fast image processing.
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Specs:
- 30MP sensor
- 3.2” touchscreen LCD screen
- 4K video capability
- 7fps burst mode
- 61-point AF system
- Built-in Wi-Fi
- 900-shot battery life
You can purchase the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV new from Amazon for $2,500, or you can shop used Canon EOS 5D Mark IVs on MPB starting at $1,600.
Canon EOS 1DX Mark II
The Canon EOS 1D X Mark II isn’t the cheapest Canon full frame camera on this list, but its impressive list of specs makes it well worth the price if you can afford it.
This Canon shoots 4K video, lasts for up to 400,000 shutter clicks, and captures 14fps in burst mode or 16fps in Live View mode. It’s basically a rockstar.
Canon EOS 1D X Mark II Specs:
- 20MP sensor
- 4K video capability
- ISO range from 100-51,200
- 3.2” LCD touchscreen
- 61-point AF system
- 14fps burst mode
- 100% viewfinder coverage
- Built-in GPS
- 400,000 shutter life expectancy
The Canon EOS 1DX Mark II is now available on Amazon for $5,500. But, there are also multiple Canon EOS 1DX Mark IIs available on MPB for $3,700.
Learn More:
We Recommend
A $1,000 Camera vs. an $8,000 Camera
At first, you might wonder why anyone would compare a $1,000 camera with an $8,000 camera...
That makes sense because there couldn't possibly be any competition between the two, right?
YouTube user Peter McKinnon took up the task of answering that very question in the video below.
The cameras in question are the Canon EOS 80D and the Canon EOS-1DX Mark II - two cameras that represent completely different ends of the spectrum.
Let's meet the players in this epic battle...
Canon EOS 80D
The Canon EOS 80D is a newer entry in the mid-range crop sensor segment of the Canon line.
You can pick up this rig for around $1,000 for just the body or for a bit more money you can get it bundled with an 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM lens like the one shown above.
The 80D has Canon's incredible dual pixel autofocus system that's fast, accurate, and smooth. As Peter explains in the video, this system acquires the subject without a lot of hunting in which the lens struggles to find something on which to focus.
The 80D has a 24.2-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor that was recently developed to combat Nikon's venerable 24.2-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor found in their D7200.
The Canon has a 1.6x crop factor, meaning that the effective focal length of the lens you use is extended by 1.6x. In the video above, Peter explains that his 35mm lens on the 80D acts like a 56mm lens as a result.
The nice thing about crop sensor cameras like the 80D is that if you're into wildlife or sports photography (or otherwise need more length out of your lenses), you get that extra focal length without having to spring for a more expensive, longer lens.
That also means that you can more easily fill the frame with your subject...
Conversely, if you prefer to shoot wide-angle shots that are popular in landscape photography, a crop sensor camera will work against you.
In this case, if you shoot with this camera and a 14mm ultra wide-angle lens, you'll actually be working at roughly 22mm, so you'll miss out on that ultra wide-angle view.
If video is your thing, the Canon EOS 80D does it well.
You can shoot in full 1080p at 60fps, though there is no option for shooting at 120fps to get ultra-smooth slow motion shots, though this is an issue for the majority of Canon cameras, not just the 80D. There's also no option for shooting 4K video, which is becoming more and more ubiquitous on DSLRs at all price points.
Whether you shoot stills or video, the flip-out 3-inch LCD is a nice touch for getting low or high-angle shots, taking selfies, and using live view to compose better videos.
Shutter speed performance isn't terrible at 7fps, but it's not anything to be too excited about, either.
At the end of the day, if you're a beginner or intermediate photographer, and especially if you're into making videos, this is a great first camera.
Canon EOS-1DX Mark II
On the other hand, the Canon EOS-1DX Mark II is a big, heavy camera that's much better suited to the professional photography segment of the market.
That's obvious from its size and features, but also of course from its hefty price tag.
One way in which the 1DX Mark II differs from the 80D is that you have a much greater ability to shoot in varying lighting conditions due to its larger sensor and better ISO performance.
As a 20.9-megapixel full frame camera, the sensor has more surface area to collect light. What's more, the 1DX Mark II's native ISO range goes to 52100 (compared to 25600 for the 80D), and its extended range goes to a whopping ISO 409600.
Also handy is the built-in battery grip which makes for easy switching from horizontal to vertical format, and the battery itself - which is enormous - and gives you an incredible amount of juice for long days of shooting.
Another area where the 1DX Mark II outshines the 80D is in the shutter speed.
Recall that the 80D can only muster a 7fps burst rate; the 1DX Mark II has a 16fps burst rate. If you shoot action shots, it's tough to beat that!
A drawback, however, is that to keep up with such speed, you have to use a cFast card, which are fast, but also very expensive. You can find bundles with the camera and a cFAst card and other goodies, though.
But you can use both a cFast card and a CF card in the 1DX Mark II, which is great for backups because the camera will write the image data to both cards simultaneously.
Professional-grade cameras like the 1DX Mark II also often benefit from weather-sealing. That means you can shoot in the rain, snow, sleet, and so forth, and not worry about your very expensive and fancy camera getting water in its delicate interior compartments.
For video enthusiasts, the 1DX Mark II is capable of 1080 video at 120fps as well as 4K video at 60fps. That makes it a much more capable choice for video than the 80D.
Of course, that's also one of the reasons why this rig is so much more expensive than the 80D...
Wrapping It Up
In the end, it's obvious that the best camera award in this head-to-head matchup goes to the 1DX Mark II.
But that's purely from a capability standpoint.
On the one hand, if you're an experienced photographer or videographer that requires high-end features and performance, yes, the 1DX Mark II is the better camera.
On the other hand, if you're a beginner or intermediate photographer or videographer, the 1DX Mark II is simply WAY too much camera. For you, the 80D is a much better bet.
Either way you slice it, a $1,000 camera like the 80D has more than enough to offer for most photographers and will serve you well. Sure, it can't compete directly with something like the 1DX Mark II, but as Peter says, the best camera is the one you have with you when it counts.
Focus on just having a camera with you, not on having the one with the biggest price tag!
We Recommend
Best APS-C Cameras for 2022
What are the best APS-C cameras we should consider when buying a camera through the rest of 2022? This is a good question!
I have three recommendations for you: a good option, a better option, and a best option for you to examine.
Interestingly, the best APS-C cameras for 2022 may have been introduced from a few years ago up to very recently, but the three I’m listing are either still being made or are so recent that you can find excellent examples from MPB, my favorite online platform for pre-owned photography equipment.
All three of these best APS-C cameras can be found right now at MPB. Part of the reason I shop at MPB is because it’s run by photographers, they carefully examine each item they list for sale, and they describe the exact condition of each item. What’s more, MPB offers a six-month warranty and seven-day return window on virtually everything they sell.
Without further ado, let’s discuss the best APS-C cameras for 2022!
Table of Contents:
- Common Features of the Best APS-C Cameras
- Best APS-C Cameras - Good - Canon EOS 80D
- Best APS-C Cameras - Better - Nikon D7500
- Best APS-C Cameras - Best - Fujifilm X-T4
- Final Thoughts
Common Features of My Best APS-C Cameras
When looking at upgrading to a prosumer-style APS-C camera, there are some certain features that are important.
First off, in order to qualify as a prosumer-quality camera, it should have a level of build quality that engenders confidence for use in professional situations.
The sensor resolution and ISO sensitivity also need to support the case for this type of use and for inclusion on a list of best APS-C cameras. Resolution in the low 20s seems to work out very well for high-quality APS-C crop format cameras. After all, it was cameras in the 8 to 12 MP range that started to equal and surpass small format film for many photographers.
Other features I like to see are extended exposure bracketing, customizable buttons, and top-of-camera exposure setting readouts (or indicators of the same settings, such as physical dials). I also like cameras with faster sequence shooting, more AF points, and higher-capacity batteries (or the capability to add a battery grip).
I also like to have a high-quality video mode, preferably 4K, but Full HD works for a lot of vlog-style video recording.
If these items aren’t present, it isn’t a dealbreaker, but they’re nice to have.
Best APS-C Cameras - Good - Canon EOS 80D
The first camera on the list of best APS-C cameras is the good category with the Canon EOS 80D.
This camera comes with a 24.2MP APS-C sensor and 45 AF points. It is a DSLR type of camera, has a touch screen rear view screen, takes a single SD card, and records video in Full HD resolution.
This camera was released in 2016 and is a fine example of a prosumer camera. A couple of things that keep this camera from the top of this short list of best APS-C cameras are that it only holds one memory card and doesn’t have 4K video capability.
Learn More:
- Digital Camera Features You Need to Know
- Nikon DSLR Camera Price Comparison
- Should You Get a Full Frame or Crop Sensor Camera?
Best APS-C Cameras - Better - Nikon D7500
Next on the list of the best APS-C cameras is the better category with the Nikon D7500. This camera is equipped with a 21MP APS-C sensor and 51 AF points. Also a DSLR style of camera, the Nikon D7500 has much of the electronics and features of the full-fledged pro model D500. It also holds a single SD card and records 4K video.
Released in 2017, the Nikon D7500 is a fine example of the excellent prosumer cameras at reasonable prices for which Nikon is famous. It also has a camera focus motor which opens up more lens availability than Nikon’s intermediate and entry-level cameras have.
A couple of things that keep this camera from being at the top of the short list of best APS-C cameras are that it only has one card slot and there is no in-body image stabilization. Instead, Nikon relies on individual lenses having VR (vibration reduction) technology for their DSLR lenses.
Best APS-C Cameras - Best - Fujifilm X-T4
At the very top of my three-camera list of the best APS-C cameras in the best slot is the Fujifilm X-T4 mirrorless camera. It has a 26MP APS-C format sensor and 425 focus points. Fujifilm does not make any digital cameras with a mirror box - not even in their medium format cameras. This camera is a mirrorless interchangeable lens camera body.
The Fujifilm X-T4 is the newest on my list of the best APS-C cameras, having come out in 2020. It has all of the features of being in my sights as a prosumer camera. In fact, it could be labeled by some as fully professional because of how rugged and capable it is.
Here are the features that put the Fujifilm X-T4 at the top of my list as the best of the bunch…
The camera controls are completely intuitive to operate, and you can instantly see what you’re setting because it uses marked dials instead of buttons or a menu. It records 4K video, has dual SD card slots, and a long battery life.
A feature that the Canon and Nikon DSLRs don’t have is in-body image stabilization (IBIS), which allows shooting and filming in extreme conditions. The Fujifilm IBIS adds 6.5 stops of hand-holdability, which is a fantastic benefit of Fujifilm mirrorless cameras.
Another point in favor of mirrorless cameras is that you are able to use so many different lenses from multiple makers, in different mounts, and from virtually any era of modern photography if you have the right adapter to go from the lens mount to the camera.
Final Thoughts
Well, with the Fujifilm X-T4 winning this little contest, am I recommending that you dump your current Canon or Nikon lenses, flashes, and other accessories that you’ve built up with your entry-level or intermediate-level camera to move into the prosumer category?
Of course not, don't be ridiculous!
Nikon and Canon (Pentax and Sony, too) are excellent cameras, each one capable of outshining the other with the right person at the controls. But, if you’re eager to move into mirrorless cameras and desire prosumer ruggedness and features, the Fujifilm X-T4 is easily one of the best APS-C cameras to use.
And, as I mentioned in the introduction, you can find excellent examples of each of the cameras I’ve discussed here at MPB. Not only does buying pre-owned save you money, but you can also sell or trade in your current gear to MPB to further reduce the cost of your new-to-you gear.
With thousands of items in stock and with stock that is constantly changing, the likelihood that you can find the right camera for your needs at MPB is very high.
Don’t take my word for it, though - head over to MPB today to browse their vast selection of pre-owned camera gear!
Learn More:
- Which Fujifilm Camera Is Right for You?
- How to Save Money When Buying Photography Gear
- What Is a Medium Format Camera?
We Recommend
Best Camera of 2022 for Beginners, Enthusiasts, and Pros
Photo by Cecilie_Arcurs via iStock
What is the best camera of 2022? Well, that's a complicated question...
The best camera for me might not be the best camera for you. It depends on many factors like your skill level, your needs in terms of specs and features, and your budget, to name a few.
So the answer to our question is that it depends!
What we've done, though, is compile a list of cameras for beginners, enthusiasts, and professionals. For each category, we've included multiple cameras, each with detailed information about specs and features, as well as details about the pros and cons of each camera.
In other words, this is a one-stop-shop for you to find the best camera to fit your current situation!
Table of Contents
Best Camera for Beginners
Photo by andresr via iStock
If you're a new photographer and you've outgrown the capabilities of your smartphone or existing DSLR or mirrorless camera, the options listed below give you loads of features without breaking your budget.
What's more, these cameras have enough in the way of specs that you can grow as a photographer in the coming years without necessarily needing to invest in a more robust camera.
Additionally, while this list includes options for the best camera for photography, each beginner camera also offers decent video features. It's the best of both worlds!
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Specs and Features
- 20MP Micro Four Thirds Live MOS sensor
- TruePic VIII processor
- 121-point Contrast Detection AF system
- EVF with 2.36m-dots
- 3” tiltable touchscreen with 1.03m-dots
- 15fps burst mode
- 4K video at 30p, 25p, and 24p; Full HD video at 60p, 50p, IPB
- Built-in WiFi and Bluetooth
- Approximately 360-shot battery life
Pros and Cons
- Pros
- Fantastic sensor
- Image stabilization
- Compact size
- Cons
- Good video capabilities
- No microphone port
- No USB-C
If you want a small, highly capable mirrorless camera that is compatible with hundreds of affordable lenses, the OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is right up your alley.
Though it's a beginner camera, you get some nice features headlined by a fantastic 20.3-megapixel micro four thirds sensor. The TruePic VIII processor makes it a speedy camera as well, offering up to 15fps burst shooting speed.
The camera's flip-down touchscreen is a nice touch for capturing low-angle shots while the image stabilization will help you create tack-sharp images, even when you're holding the camera.
There's no microphone or USB-C ports, and the autofocus isn't the best in this class. However, this camera is loaded with other features, has great ergonomics, and with all those available lenses, you can really build an impressive kit that can grow with you as you gain skills. It's certainly an option for the best camera of 2022!
Learn more in our Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV review.
Sony A6000
Specs and Features
- 24.3-megapixel CMOS APS-C sensor
- Bionz X image processor
- Hybrid autofocus system with 179 phase-detect and 25 contrast-detect AF Points
- 1.44-million dot OLED electronic viewfinder
- 3-inch tilting LCD with 921.6K dots
- 11 fps continuous shooting
- 1080p HD video at 24p and 60p
- Built-in NFC and WiFi
- Approximately 300-shot battery life
Pros and Cons
- Pros
- Excellent autofocus system
- Huge selection of lenses
- Small and lightweight
- Cons
- Old model
- No 4K video
- OLED EVF resolution isn't up to par
Debuting in 2014, the Sony a6000 isn't exactly a new camera. However, it's still one of the top choices for best camera for beginners because it offers excellent features at a great price point (given its age, you can often find it at steep discounts).
Sure, you don't get 4K video, but if you're more focused on stills, you can reap the benefits of a robust 24.3-megapixel sensor, a fast and accurate autofocus system, and 11fps continuous shooting. Additionally, Sony has a huge selection of images for cameras in this range, so you can outfit your a6000 with any lens you could possibly want.
Fujifilm X-T200
- Specs and Features
- 24.2MP APS-C CMOS sensor
- New image processing engine
- 425-point Phase Detection AF system
- EVF with 2.36m-dots
- 3.5” fully-articulated touchscreen with 2.78m-dots
- 8fps burst mode
- 4K video at 30p, 25p, and 24p; Full HD video at 120p, 60p, 50p, 25p, and 24p
- Built-in WiFi and Bluetooth
- Approximately 270-shot battery life
Pros and Cons
- Pros
- Big and bright display
- Excellent uncropped 4K video
- Digital gimbal stabilizes 1080p footage
- Cons
- No video subject tracking
- Small buffer during continuous shooting
- Small joystick
TheFujifilm X-T200 is an entry-level mirrorless camera ideal for hybrid photographers who shoot photos and videos. It was announced in January 2020 and replaced theFujifilm X-T100 as the company’s signature interchangeable lens camera for beginner photographers.
It combines a 24.2-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor with an upgraded image processor, and the pair delivers fantastic results in both photo and video modes. Moreover, the colors in JPEGs are bright, vibrant, and very pleasing to the eye. JPEGs look great straight out of the camera and are perfect for new photographers.
Also, thanks to a new hybrid autofocus system capturing sharp, in-focus images has never been easier. The AF works during photo and video modes, and the face/eye-detection setting is phenomenal for portraits and videos. Manual autofocus is also available for people interested in learning how to use it.
A few more noteworthy features of the Fujifilm X-T200 include a giant fully-articulating touchscreen display, intuitive menus, and uncropped 4K video. The high-resolution video and articulating screen, in particular, make it an excellent camera for beginner YouTubers and filmmakers.
Learn more in our Fujifilm X-T200 review.
Sony ZV-1
Specs and Features
- 20.1MP 1” Exmor RS BSI CMOS sensor
- Bionz X image processor
- 315-point Phase Detection AF system
- No viewfinder
- 3” fully-articulated touchscreen with 921,600-dots
- 24fps burst mode
- 4K video at 30p, 25p, and 24p; Full HD video at 120p, 100p, 60p, 50p, 30p, and 24p
- Built-in WiFi and Bluetooth
- Approximately 260-shot battery life
Pros and Cons
- Pros
- Great for vlogging
- Lightweight and portable design
- Attractive price
- Cons
- No viewfinder
- Weak battery life
- Not weather-sealed
The Sony ZV-1 is an award-winning point-and-shoot camera specifically designed for vloggers, YouTubers, and influencers. It came out in May 2020 and has been flying off the shelves ever since. It has a 1-inch CMOS sensor and a powerful Bionz X image processing engine.
While it does take high-quality still images, video shooting is its bread and butter. It offers 4K video capture at frame rates of 30, 25, and 24 frames per second and has 1080p Full HD options. I recommend 30p for most people, but if you want a more cinematic look to your movies, you should opt for 24p.
More killer video features of the Sony ZV-1 are an in-camera 1080p/120p slow-motion mode, a fully-articulating touchscreen LCD, a strong battery life, and advanced audio controls. The audio controls include a port for an external microphone, a headphone jack, and a built-in directional microphone with a wind protector.
If you like the look and feel of this camera but want an interchangeable lens camera instead, you should consider the Sony ZV-E10. It has a massive lineup of native Sony E Mount lenses and is like a newer version of the Sony Alpha a6100.
Learn more in our Sony ZV-1 review.
Best Enthusiast Camera
Sony a7 IV
Specs and Features
- 33-megapixel full frame EXMOR R back-illuminated CMOS sensor
- Bionz XR image processor
- Hybrid autofocus system with 759 phase-detect and 425 contrast-detect AF Points
- 3.68-million dot EVF with 120fps refresh rate
- 3-inch tilting LCD with 1.036 million dots
- 10 fps continuous shooting
- Up to 4K video at 60p with 7K oversampling at 4K 30p
- Built-in WiFi and Bluetooth
- 5-axis in-body image stabilization
- Approximately 580-shot battery life
Pros and Cons
- Pros
- Amazing 33-megapixel back-illuminated sensor
- Next-level autofocus
- Exceptional EVF
- Cons
- Some menu options are very complex
- 4K video is cropped
- LCD resolution isn't that great
If you're an enthusiast photographer, you'll be hard-pressed to find a better all-around camera than the Sony a7 IV.
This Sony camera has a new 33-megapixel sensor that offers excellent imaging quality and good video performance, though 4K video is heavily cropped. As expected, the a7 IV has a killer autofocus system that is among the leaders in the industry.
This camera also has great battery life, which is estimated at 580 shots.
Of course, all these goodies come at a price. This is not a cheap camera, but with features like a Bionz XR processor, 10-bit video support, and a buffer that's hard to fill, you definitely get what you pay for. That's why we've ranked it as the best enthusiast camera of the year!
Canon EOS R6
Specs and Features
- 20.1MP full frame CMOS sensor
- DIGIC X processor
- 6,072 Dual Pixel CMOS AF II AF points
- 0.5” OLED EVF with 100% coverage and 3.69k-dots
- 3” fully articulating touchscreen
- 12fps burst mode with mechanical shutter, 20fps burst mode with electronic shutter
- 4K video capabilities at 60p, 50p, 30p, 25p and 24p
- Built-in WiFi and built-in Bluetooth
- 5-axis in-body image stabilization
- Approximately 510-shot battery life
Pros and Cons
- Pros
- Superb autofocus system that's easy to set up
- Great ergonomics
- Full frame in-body image stabilization
- Cons
- Rolling shutter is an issue
- Low sensor resolution compared to similar cameras
Another great option for the best enthusiast mirrorless camera is the Canon EOS R6.
One of its biggest draws is that it offers similar capabilities as the Sony a7 IV, but with a smaller price tag. It's also a true hybrid camera, so if you want excellent photo and video performance, it's a solid choice - especially if you're already in the Canon ecosystem.
Aside from the breathtaking autofocus system, the EOS R6 offers top-of-the-line burst shooting, a 5-axis stabilization system, and is compatible with Canon's impressive and ever-growing lineup of RF lenses.
While it is a good performer on the video front, overheating limitations pose a bit of a problem. Rolling shutter is also an issue, and for some, the 20.1-megapixel resolution will be a turn-off. However, despite a few flaws, this is a fantastic option for enthusiast shooters.
Learn more in our Canon EOS R6 review.
Nikon Z6 II
Specs and Features
- 24.5MP full-frame BSI-CMOS sensor
- Dual Expeed 6 image processor
- 273-point Phase Detection AF system
- EVF with 3.69m-dots
- 3.2” tiltable touchscreen with 2.1m-dots
- 14fps burst mode
- 4K video at 30p, 25p, and 24p; Full HD video at 60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, and 24p
- Built-in WiFi and Bluetooth
- Approximately 410-shot battery life
Pros and Cons
- Pros
- Terrific video and image quality
- Two SD card slots
- Excellent ergonomics
- Cons
- AF occasionally “hunts”
- Highest quality video compressions require an external recorder
- Intricate menu system
The Nikon Z6 II is a powerful hybrid mirrorless camera launched in October 2020 to much anticipation. It boasts a 24.5-megapixel full-frame CMOS sensor and two Expeed 6 image processors. The dual processors seriously increase the camera's speed and will improve your overall productivity when in the field.
One fantastic feature of this camera is its autofocus. It covers approximately 90% of the camera's sensor, has 273 selectable focus points, and works equally well in video recording as it does during still shooting. Moreover, the subject tracking in C-AF is superb and is ideal for portrait and wildlife photographers who shoot moving subjects.
On top of that, its low-light performance is far superior to the original Nikon Z6. This improvement is due to the camera’s 5-axis image stabilization technology and wide ISO range. Low-light autofocus is also much more accurate and responsive than its predecessor.
More awesome features of the Z6 II are its fast continuous shooting, dual memory card slots, and a vertical video mode. The 14fps max continuous shooting makes it an excellent camera for sports and action photography. And the vertical video mode is useful for creating content for social media platforms like Instagram and TikTok.
Learn more in our Nikon Z6 II review.
Panasonic Lumix S5
Specs and Features
- 24.2MP full-frame CMOS sensor
- Venus Engine image processor
- 225-point Depth from Defocus AF system
- EVF with 2.36m-dots
- 3” fully-articulated touchscreen with 1.84m-dots
- 7fps burst mode
- 4K video at 60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, and 24p; Full HD video at 60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, and 24p
- Built-in WiFi and Bluetooth
- Approximately 440-shot battery life
Pros and Cons
- Pros
- Great in-body image stabilization
- Unique creative photo modes
- Dual memory card slots
- Cons
- 30-minute video recording limit
- Slow burst shooting
- Awkwardly located AF-On button
The Panasonic Lumix S5 is an advanced yet affordable mirrorless camera that debuted in September 2020. It has the same 24.2-megapixel full-frame CMOS sensor and Venus Engine image processor as its cousin, the Panasonic S1, but is significantly smaller and less expensive.
It is aimed at both photographers and videographers, and new and improved features help to improve the quality of both photos and videos. For starters, it has several unique photo modes, such as the 96MP multi-shot mode. This mode captures multiple frames and compiles them together into one ultra-high-resolution image.
Alternatively, videographers and filmmakers love the video quality of the oversampled 4K/30p footage. Thanks to in-camera image stabilization, it has terrific sharpness and very little camera shake. Also, you can capture 4K/60p clips with this camera. They are ideal for slowing down in post-production and playing back in slow-motion.
Two more great features of the Panasonic Lumix S5 are its weather-sealed body and long-lasting battery. One group, in particular, who loves working with this camera is event photographers. It’s perfect for weddings, concerts, and more!
Learn more in our Panasonic S5 review.
Best Camera for Professional Photography
Nikon Z9
Specs and Features
- 45.7-megapixel full frame stacked CMOS sensor
- EXPEED 7 image processor
- 493 phase-detect autofocus points
- 3.69M dot OLED EVF with reduced lag and greater brightness
- 2.1M dot rear LCD with multi-directional tilt
- 30 fps JPEG shooting
- 20 fps Raw shooting (for over 1000 compressed Raws)
- 120 fps JPEG shooting at 11MP resolution
- 8K/30p capture and 4K/60p-from-8K, with ProRes 422 HQ option
- 8K/60p in 12-bit N-Raw with 4.1K ProRes RAW option
- Internal 10-bit N-Log and HLG capture
- 5-axis sensor shift in-body image stabilization
- Twin CFexpress Type B card slots
- Approximately 700-770-shot battery life
Pros and Cons
- Pros
- Excellent high-resolution sensor
- 120fps continuous shooting
- 8K video at 60p
- Cons
- Absolutely enormous body
- Paltry lens options compared to rival Sony and Canon models
- Rear LCD isn't fully articulating
While it took a while for the Nikon Z9 to debut, it has certainly made a splash in terms of its photography and video capabilities.
Since there's no mechanical shutter, you get up to 120fps continuous shooting, which, along with the 1/32,000 top shutter speed makes this the ideal choice for sports and wildlife photographers.
But this isn't just the best professional camera for those reasons - it has an incredible autofocus system that's powered by Deep Learning AF. This means the Z9 has unsurpassed autofocus capabilities, and can recognize everything from human eyes and faces to cars, motorcycles, and animal features.
On top of that, the Z9 offers 8K 60p video. It's also capable of 8K 30p video with a two-hour time limit.
It's also the cheapest of the three flagship professional cameras - the Canon EOS R3 and Sony a1 being the other two.
Canon EOS R3
Specs and Features
- 24.1-megapixel full frame stacked CMOS sensor
- Digic X image processor
- 4,779-point autofocus system (3,969 points for videos)
- 0.5-inch EVF with 5.76-million dots
- 4.15-million dot 3.2-inch vari-angle touchscreen
- 12fps burst shooting (mechanical shutter), 30fps burst shooting (electronic shutter)
- 6K up to 60p, 4K up to 120p, 1080p up to 60p
- 5-axis in-body image stabilization (up to 8 stops with certain lenses)
- 1 SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot and 1 CFexpress Type B card slot
- Approximately 620-shot battery life
Pros and Cons
- Pros
- Excellent video capabilities
- Superb autofocus
- No blackout
- Cons
- Low resolution compared to competitors
- No 8K video
Another pick for the best professional camera for photography is the Canon EOS R3.
If it looks like a 1D X Mark III, you wouldn't be far off. This is a big camera, but it has the modern functionalities of a high-end mirrorless camera.
While the 24.1-megapixel sensor resolution seems paltry compared to other options at this price point, its stacked design gives you plenty of firepower. In fact, the EOS R3 is capable of 30fps burst shooting in RAW.
Complementing the lightning-quick burst shooting is the autofocus system, which is capable of eye control - just look at the AF point you want and the camera will select it.
Sure, the R3 doesn't have 8K video, but it does offer up to 6K at 60p with internal recording. But, this is not intended to be a video camera - it is a photo-first rig, and it shows. That's why it's on our list for the best camera for photography!
Sony a1
Specs and Features
- 50MP full-frame stacked CMOS sensor
- Dual Bionz XR image processor
- 759-point Phase Detection AF system
- EVF with 9.44m-dots
- 3” tiltable touchscreen with 1.44m-dots
- 30fps burst mode
- 8K video at 30p, 25p, and 24p;4K video at 120p, 100p, 60p, 50p, 30p, and 24p; Full HD video at 120p, 100p, 60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, and 24p
- Built-in WiFi and Bluetooth
- Approximately 530-shot battery life
Pros and Cons
- Pros
- Exquisite 6K video
- Best-in-class AF
- Super-fast continuous shooting
- Cons
- Expensive
- EVF resolution drops slightly when using C-AF
- Top burst shooting speeds only work with some lenses
The Sony Alpha 1 was released in March 2021 and is the most powerful Sony digital camera ever. It is their flagship product and boasts a 50-megapixel full-frame CMOS sensor and dual Bionz XR image processing engines. The trio works together seamlessly and delivers jaw-dropping results.
For photographers, the 50MP image sensor can take pictures with a max resolution of 8640 x 5760 pixels. That is absolutely gigantic and means that your photos will never suffer a drop-off in image quality, even when enlarged for magazines, posters, or billboards. Furthermore, the 30 fps continuous shooting makes the a1 a great camera for sports, wildlife, and adventure photography.
As a video camera, the standout feature is the 8K video. And while the file sizes of these clips are huge, the quality is off-the-charts. Luckily, the camera also has two memory card slots so that you can record more footage. AF tracking during video recording is also industry-leading.
Lastly, this camera has many professional connection ports, including inputs for a full-size HDMI, a microphone, headphones, and more!
Learn more in our Sony a1 review.
Canon EOS R5
Specs and Features
- 45MP full-frame CMOS sensor
- Digic X image processor
- 5,940-point Dual-Pixel II AF system
- EVF with 2.36m-dots
- 3.2” fully-articulated touchscreen with 2.1m-dots
- 20fps burst mode
- 4K video at 30p and 24p;4K video at 120p, 60p, 30p, and 24p
- Built-in WiFi and Bluetooth
- Approximately 320-shot battery life
Pros and Cons
- Pros
- 8K video and Canon EOS Cinema features
- Outstanding AF performance
- Amazing in-body image stabilization
- Cons
- Occasional overheating during extended high-resolution video recording
- You can turn off the noise reduction in RAW files
- Limited customization
Another excellent camera for professionals is the Canon EOS R5. It’s Canon's flagship mirrorless camera for consumers and a direct competitor of the Sony a1. Canon launched it in July 2020, and it has a high-resolution 45-megapixel full-frame sensor and a Digic X image processor.
My favorite thing about this camera is its two unique operating systems—one for photography and one for video shooting. Moreover, the EOS R5 has a nifty new toggle switch that allows you to quickly and easily switch between the two. Also, you can customize the buttons and settings of the two operating systems independently.
The camera functions like a Canon EOS cinema camera in video mode. This means you have tons of professional features such as 8K video, 4K/120p slow-motion video, and advanced codecs. RAW, 10-bit, C-log, and HDR PQ are only a few of the compression formats.
One last amazing feature of the EOS R5 is the Dual Pixel autofocus. It covers 100% of the full-frame sensor and has excellent subject tracking technology. It can even locate and track the faces and eyes of animals!
Learn more in our Canon EOS R5 review.
We Recommend
Budget-Friendly Cameras to Consider for 2021
photo byARTYuSTUDIO via iStock
If you’re like me and have a family, then there’s pretty much no way to run a photography business or even have a photography hobby without searching for budget-friendly cameras.
For starters, almost all cameras now-a-days feature similar specs, and if they don’t, you can get almost any effects that you want in post-production.
While I follow all of the news on the up and coming tech, I’m really a cheap cameras aficionado at heart.
So, here are the top 3 budget-friendly cameras I’m looking at as we head into 2020.
Canon 5D Mark II
If you’re like me and have a family, then there’s pretty much no way to run a photography business or even have a photography hobby without searching for budget-friendly cameras.
For starters, almost all cameras now-a-days feature similar specs, and if they don’t, you can get almost any effects that you want in post-production.
While I follow all of the news on the up and coming tech, I’m really a cheap cameras aficionado at heart.
So, here are the top 3 budget-friendly cameras I’m looking at as we head into 2020.
The Canon 5D Mark II is a phenomenal full-frame camera that is not for beginners. This budget full frame camera dropped back in 2008, but it still features a 21.1MP CMOS sensor, full HD 1080p video, and 3.9fps burst shooting.
If any of these budget-friendly cameras prove my point that technology in professional cameras is no longer evolving so quickly that you need a new one every year, it’s the Canon 5D Mark II.
Other Canon 5D Mark II specs include:
- 21.1MP sensor
- 1080p shooting
- 3.9fps burst shooting
- 1.87 lbs
- ISO range of 100-6400
- 3” fixed LCD screen
- Waterproof and dust resistant
JordanPhotoAudio does a great job of explaining the many benefits this camera still has over a decade later. So, check it out.
Pros of the Canon:
- Crisp visuals, even in burst mode
- Full 1080p video capabilities
- Long battery life
- LCD screen that competes with cameras well into the 2010s
- Self-cleaning sensor
Cons of the Canon:
- No autofocus illuminator
- Less-than-ideal low-light shooting
- Power switch button can be difficult
You can buy the Canon 5D Mark II on Amazon for $1,300, or get it for almost one-third of the cost by buying used. MPB features the Canon 5D Mark II starting at $539.
Olympus OM-D EM-1
On top of my budget-friendly cameras list is this micro four thirds Olympus. It features a 16.3MP Live MOS sensor, 2.36m dot electronic viewfinder, and is very cheap used.
This Olympus dropped back in 2013, and held the highest camera sensor rating of any Olympus cameras for the next year.
Olympus OM-D EM-1 specs:
- 16MP MOS sensor
- ISO range from 100-25,600
- 10fps burst shooting, or 6.5fps burst shooting with continuous AF
- 1.04M-dot 3” LCD touchscreen that tilts
- 2.36M-dot electronic viewfinder
- Built-in Wi-Fi
- Dust, splash and freeze-proof
Pros of the Olympus:
- Incredibly weather sealed
- Clear and crisp photos
- Ergonomic grip
- Accurate AF system
Cons of the Olympus:
- Significant noise introduced at ISO 2000 and above
- Slow Wi-Fi
- AF points are too large
You can purchase the Olympus OM-D EM-1 on Amazon for $850 right now, or head over to MPB to take a look at their used selection where you can find this camera for $339.
Learn More:
Nikon D7100
In an effort to keep this budget-friendly cameras list diverse, I chose the Nikon D7100 as the final camera. This mid-range APS-C camera came out in 2013, just like the Olympus, but features very different strong points.
For example, The Nikon D7100 features a 24.1MP DX-format sensor, shoots incredibly well in low-light, and has one of the best AF systems of any camera from the early 2010s.
Other Nikon D7100 Specs include:
- 24.1MP sensor
- Mobile connectivity
- ISO range of 100 to 6400
- 6fps burst shooting for up to 100 shots
- AF system with 51 points
- 3.2” LCD screen with 1,229K dots
- Full 1080p video capabilities
- 100% frame coverage
- Wi-Fi connectivity
Pros of the Nikon:
- Incredible AF system
- Good LCD screen
- Dust and moisture proof body
- Performs well in low-light situations
Cons of the Nikon:
- RAW shooting is lacking
- Must purchase accessories for Wi-Fi connectivity
- Noise becomes a problem at higher ISOs
You can purchase the Nikon D7100 on Amazon for $900. If you’re looking for a better bargain, though, MPB features the same camera starting at $364.
Where Can I Buy Cheap Cameras in 2020?
While I think these three cameras are the most budget-friendly cameras you can purchase new going into the new year, they’re also the best cheap used cameras you can buy.
These cameras are all older, so you probably won’t find any of them in excellent condition, but if you’re looking to upgrade for half the price and are willing to purchase used, MPB has a wide variety of these cameras for you.
And, if you’re looking for newer used cameras, MPB has those as well. Some of which are in near-mint condition. You just need to browse around.
I trust MPB because of their grading system, which tells me exactly what condition my new-to-me camera is in. They also have one of the biggest selections of any used camera store online, which is helpful for me because I don’t have many physical camera stores nearby.
Learn More:
We Recommend
Canon 5D Mark IV vs Canon 6D Mark II
photo by aetb via iStock
Canon 5D Vs 6D - Detailed Guide
The Canon 6D Mark II and Canon 5D Mark IV are two mid-size digital single-lens reflex cameras, both very popular among semi-professional and enthusiast photographers.
At first glance, these two cameras share a lot in common. They were both built around a full-frame sensor and there are no substantial differences in image resolution. Further, they have a similar ISO range and burst shooting speed, while there is the same autofocus system in both cameras.
With this being said, it might be strange to hear that a brand-new Canon 6D Mark II costs around $1,500 less than the Canon 5D Mark IV. However, there are reasons for this and you will understand why there is such a big difference in price after reading this article.
Canon 5D Mark IV vs Canon 6D Mark II – Image Quality
Photo by James Bold on Unsplash
As we already mentioned, there is the same full-frame CMOS sensor in the Canon 5D Mark IV and Canon 6D Mark II.
The 5D Mark IV offers a bit bigger resolution (30.4 MP) and produces stills of 6720 x 4480 pixels, while there is a 24.2 MP sensor in the 6D Mark II, capable of capturing stills of up to 6240 x 4160 pixels.
Both cameras produce images of outstanding quality and they will preserve all important details even if you decide to make huge prints.
Since the Canon EOS 6D Mark II release date was in July 2017, almost a year after the release date of the 5D Mark IV, this camera sports a processor of a newer generation – the DIGIC 7.
Maybe this is the reason why the 6D MII offers a bit wider native ISO range that goes from 100 to 40,000, in comparison to the 5D MIV’s native ISO range of 100 – 32,000. However, in both cameras, expanded ISO goes from 50 to 102,400.
Once again, this does not make a big difference between these two models since you will rarely have an opportunity to shoot at high ISO settings. What is important is that both cameras produce great results in low-light conditions and images will be vibrant and detailed while shooting at low ISO.
Canon 5D Mark IV vs Canon 6D Mark II – Specs
As we could see, these two models do not differ significantly when it comes to image quality. However, when we focus on other specifications, the Canon 5D Mark IV seems to be much more capable camera.
The first thing where the Canon 5D Mark IV beats Canon 6D Mark II is burst shooting. When looking at numbers you might not observe this difference. The 5D Mark IV offers continuous shooting at up to 7 frames per second, while the 6D Mark II offers burst shooting at up to 6.5 frames per second.
However, what places the 5D on the top is its capability to shoot an infinite number of JPEG files (well, until the memory card fills up!) or up to 30 RAW files, while the 6D offers only up to 150 JPEG or 21 RAW images.
The Canon EOS 5D Mark IV and Canon EOS 6D Mark II also seem to have similar autofocus capabilities. Both cameras feature a Dual Pixel CMOS AF system that works perfectly even in the live view mode and while recording videos. Additionally, they are both able to focus down to EV -3, which means they can acquire subjects even if there is not much light.
What makes the 5D Mark IV better in terms of autofocus capabilities is that this camera has 61 focus points while the 6D Mark II has only 45 focus points. On the other hand, only 41 AF points in the 5D Mark IV are capable of being cross-type, while all of them can become cross type in the 6D Mark II.
Finally, the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV utilizes Dual Pixels Raw technology which helps you to improve sharpness in your images during post-production. This is a convenient feature and one more reason because of which the 5D Mark IV costs much more than the 6D Mark II.
Canon 5D Mark IV vs Canon 6D Mark II – Video Quality
photo byvalio84slvia iStock
If you are not only into capturing stills, but also looking for a camera that has a good video quality, then you should opt for the Canon 5D Mark IV.
Although the Canon 6D Mark II offers Full HD (1080p) video recording, most of the videographers would not be satisfied with this. The technology has advanced and 4K resolution is now more accessible than ever before. Additionally, the 6D Mark II offers only Full HD up to 60p which means you will not have a chance to create slow-motion sequences.
Meanwhile, the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV offers 4K DCI up to 30 fps and possibility to extract 8MP photos from 4K video. It is worth mentioning that 4K video capabilities come with certain disadvantages since there is a 1.6x sensor crop on 4K videos. Also, the camera can make only 1080p videos if you use the external recording. However, this is still much better than what the 6D MII has to offer.
Additionally, the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV allows you to shoot 720p slow-motion videos at 120 fps and it has a headphone port which lacks in the 6D Mark II. Both cameras, however, feature a microphone jack and HDMI output.
The only thing where the 6D Mark II seems to be better than the 5D Mark IV in terms of video is that it has Digital video stabilization.
Learn more about features and capabilities of the Canon 5D Mark IV and Canon 6D Mark II in the video above by Jared Polin.
Canon 5D Mark IV vs Canon 6D Mark II: Body
5D Mark IV
If you are traveling a lot and carrying your camera with yourself everywhere you go, you might want to buy a model that will not be too much of a burden.
Both cameras we are reviewing in this article are mid-size and relatively compact (if you bear in mind they are DSLR models), still, the Canon 6D Mark II has an advantage when it comes to size and weight. The camera has dimensions of 5.67 x 4.35 x 2.94 inches and weight of 24.2 oz (without lens, card, and battery). On the other side, the Canon 5D Mark IV measures 5.93 in × 4.58 in × 2.99 inches and weighs 28 oz (body only).
Although it is a bit bigger and heavier, the Canon 5D Mark IV has much stronger build. Both cameras are weather-sealed, but the 5D Mark IV uses stronger material that makes this camera much more durable.
6D Mark II
Now, let’s compare LCD screens and viewfinders of these two cameras. The Canon 5D Mark IV has a bigger LCD display (3,2“ vs 3“) and higher resolution (1.620k dots vs 1.040k dots), but its screen is fixed. On the other hand, the Canon 6D Mark II has an articulating screen which is definitely of use when you need to shoot images or videos from awkward angles.
With regards to viewfinders, both cameras have the same amount of magnification (0.71x), but the Canon 5D Mark IV features a viewfinder with a coverage of 100%, which means you will shoot exactly what your eye sees. On the other side, the Canon 6D Mark II has a viewfinder with a coverage of 98% which is still quite good but you might not see the edges before you shoot an image.
Canon 5D Mark IV vs Canon 6D Mark II: Connectivity
Both cameras have good connectivity options and you can easily connect them to your smart devices in order to transfer files or conduct remote shooting.
There is a Wi-Fi and NFC capability in both cameras, but only the Canon 6D Mark II uses Bluetooth technology. This is very useful since it is well known that Bluetooth technology sucks up very little energy.
Overall, the Canon 6D Mark II has much longer battery life. On a full charge, you can take 1200 shots with this camera, while you can make only 900 with the Canon 5D Mark IV.
One of the disadvantages of the 6D MII is that it has only one storage slot, while there is a dual card slot in the 5D MIV. Moreover, both cameras support only SDHC and SDXC cards.
Canon 5D Mark IV vs Canon 6D Mark II: Price
Photo by Thom Holmes on Unsplash
Although I can’t say either of these cameras are cheap, luckily, there are platforms such as MPB where you can find well-preserved second-hand cameras at a much lower price than it would be if you decide to buy a new one. See why MPB is my go-to used camera retailer in my MPB review.
For example, the price of a new Canon 5D Mark IV is around $3000.00, but if you decide to buy a used one, you will spend only around $2,299.00.
Also, the price of a new Canon 6D Mark II is around $1800, but you can find a used one on MPB at price as low as $1,099.00.
We Recommend
Canon 5D MIII vs Canon 5D MIV
The Canon 5D MIII and Canon 5D MIV are two semi-pro DSLR cameras. In this article, we will compare their prime specs and features in order to help photographers decide which one better suits their needs.
The 5D MIII is an older model released in 2012, while the 5D MIV came as its successor four years later. Here you can see the scope of improvements from one model to another.
Canon 5D MIII vs Canon 5D MIV - Body comparison
Both cameras reviewed in this article are weather-sealed and built of magnesium-alloy in order to perform well in different types of environments. The Canon 5D MIV has an advantage because it is more compact and better sealed than its predecessor; however, the differences are not substantial.
The Mark III weighs 33.5 oz and has dimensions of 6.0 x 4.6 x 3.0 inches, which is not much heavier or bigger than the Marks IV’s weight of 31.4 oz and dimension of 5.9 x 4.6 x 3.0 inches. Actually, both cameras are relatively heavy, especially when you add a battery and lens.
Each camera incorporates a 3.2″ fixed type screen and optical (pentaprism) viewfinder. The LCD display in the 5D MIV is much better because it uses touchscreen technology and offers 36% more pixels along with a 55% higher resolution screen.
Canon 5D MIII vs Canon 5D MIV – Sensor comparison
There is a full-frame CMOS Sensor (36 x 24 mm) in both cameras, but the Canon 5D IV carries improvements in the resolution and offers 30 megapixels in contrast to 22 megapixels in its older brother.
A bigger resolution of the Mark IV comes at a cost of smaller pixels. The Mark III has a 36% larger pixel area which allows it to collect more light and to produce less noise in images.
The cameras have the same native ISO range of ISO 100 - 25600 (expandable to 50-102400), although the new model has better high ISO performance and higher dynamic range.
Which camera will work better for you? Find an answer in the video above by Jared Polin.
Ready for a new camera? Trade in your old one and upgrade today.
Canon 5D MIII vs Canon 5D MIV – Features comparison
Canon 5D Mark III
Along with a better sensor, the 5D MIV also improves other features of the older model such as speed, autofocus technology, and connectivity.
The DIGIC 5+ in the Mark III was replaced with the DIGIC 6+ processor in the Mark IV. The new processor is substantially faster and allows the camera to capture 4K video.
There are only slight improvements in continuous burst rate. The 5D III offers continuous shooting at 6 fps, while the 5D IV allows 7 frames per second.
Canon 5D Mark IV
Although both cameras feature 61 AF points, the 5D Mark IV introduces a new Dual Pixel Raw mode, which allows you to capture two images at once for the sake of improving focus in the post-production.
Generally, there is a much better AF system in the Mark IV which is not strange since the one in the Canon 5D MIII didn’t perform very well.
Additionally, the Canon 5D MIV offers built-in Wi-Fi which makes things easier if you want to back-up your files or if you need to use smart devices for remote shooting.
Canon 5D MIII vs Canon 5D MIV – Video features comparison
When it comes to video, the Canon 5D MIV beats its predecessor. The main reason for this is that the Mark IV offers 4K/30p capabilities (with a 1.74x crop), while there is no option for this in the Mark III.
All that the old model offers in terms of video is Full HD (1080p) recording at 30 fps. The Mark IV improves this even more, and it offers Full HD video at 60 fps.
Both cameras have microphone/headphone jacks and HDMI output as well.
With this being said, if you are looking for a camera that makes a better video, the Canon 5D M MIV seems to be a better choice.
Check another hands-on comparison review of these cameras in the video above by Zed Pro Media
Canon 5D MIII vs Canon 5D MIV – Lenses
Both the Mark III and Mark IV have a Canon EF mount. If you already own an older model, you can easily replace it with a newer camera and still keep your collection of lenses.
It might be worth mentioning that none of these cameras have image stabilization, so if you require this feature, you will need to buy lenses with Optical stabilization such as the EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM shown above.
There is a wide choice of lenses for both cameras, but you might want to check zoom lenses such as the Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L IS USM, a prime lens such as Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM, or a macro lens such as Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM.
Canon 5D MIII vs Canon 5D MIV – Price comparison
As you can see, the Canon 5D MIV performs much better than its predecessor. It carries improvements in resolution, speed, autofocus, and video, along with enhanced portability and connectivity. Still, this does not make the Mark III outdated.
Although it is already seven years old, the Canon 5D Mark III is still a very good camera and it can be a useful piece of equipment whether you are a professional or enthusiast photographer.
At the moment, the main advantage of the Mark III over the Mark IV is its price. You can buy a new body of the Canon 5D Mark III for $2,385.00, which is around $400 less than you would need to spend for the new Canon 5D Mark IV.
If you don’t mind using pre-owned equipment, you can spare even more. On websites such as MPB, you can buy used Canon EOS 5D III in good condition for around $1,200. A used 5D Mark IV will set you back about $2,379.
Have Canon questions? Ask in the Canon Camera Forum.
We Recommend
Canon 5DMK III vs. 7D MK II Which One Should You Buy?
This a question that many Canon lovers ask themselves every day - is Canon 5D Mark III better than Canon 7D Mark II?. And it's a natural one when you're dealing with two amazing cameras, both capable of meeting the high demands of professionals.
At the end of the day, everybody needs answers to tough questions like this. Let's put these two powerful cameras side by side and see which one is better for you.
(Success tip #1: Help prospective clients find you and make money with your photos of people anywhere.)
Physically, they are both quite similar. They are both solidly built and each of them feel like you're holding a tank. However, since the 7D MK II is a newer camera, it does get better weather sealing, up to the level of the 1Dx.
It also the Digic 6 processor that helps it with a lot of features, but we'll get to that later.
They both have dual memory cards slots, one for a CF card and one for a SDHC card. This is a welcome feature for 7D lovers.
None of them have built in Wi-Fi, but there might not be too many photographers bothered by that. The dial layout is almost similar, but the 7D II does have an additional button for changing the focusing point, one that has proven very useful in the field.
One of the most important physical differences between the two cameras is the absence of the pop-up flash on the 5D III. No matter how much you hate it, it can still be very useful at times.
Moving on to the specs, the 5D III has a 22 megapixel resolution, whereas the 7D II has a 20 megapixel sensor. The difference in image size is obviously insignificant.
The autofocus on the 7D II has 65 points, all of them cross-type, with the middle one being a double cross point. At the other end, the 5DIII has 61 AF points, with 45 of them cross-type. While that might not be bad at all, the clear winner is the 7D II.
(Success Tip #2: Keep your skills sharp with a challenging project for every week of the year.)
The fact that it is a camera that was made to be a speed demon is obvious with the 7DII, and a clear indication of that is the maximum burst speed of 10 fps versus 6 fps on the 5D III. It's not that 6 frames per second isn't fast enough, but the difference in how you shoot is pretty big in the field.
The image quality is very high on both cameras. Make a large photographic print from each camera and you won't know the difference. Part of this is due to the Digic 6 processor. They both behave very well at high ISOs, although being a full frame does give the 5DIII an edge.
Speaking of formats, we probably should have started by saying that one is a crop camera and the other is full frame. Five years ago that would have been a serious difference but it's not anymore, not in terms of image quality at least.
So which camera works best for what photographer? The 7D II is clearly a speed lover. It is a brilliant camera for fast shooting and any photographer who shoots sports or wildlife would love it.
The 5D III keeps the family tradition of being a "creation camera" and it works very well for studio photography and anything that generally requires less speed.
Ultimately, it's up to the kind of work each photographer does and that should be the first thing that determines the winner in this battle.
If you are okay with a little colorful language (which means NSFW), this video comparison from DigitalRev is entertaining:
Purchase the Canon 5D MKIII here
Purchase the 7D MK II here
We Recommend
Canon 5DMK III vs. Nikon D750. Which camera to buy?
The Canon vs. Nikon debate is probably going to last as long as photography will. No matter what type of photographer you are, you've most likely been involved in one of these debates at least once.
(Success Tip #1: Get a new photo challenge for each week of the year.)
As far as the point of it goes, it’s best to let everyone have their own opinion. I for one have used both systems for many years and the only thing I've learned from it is that I need to become a better photographer because neither Canon or Nikon will make me a better photographer.
Table of Contents:
- Which is Better? The Canon 5DMK III or the Nikon D750?
- Comparing the 5DMK III to the D750
- Video Review: Canon 5DMK III vs Nikon D750
Which is Better? The Canon 5DMK III or the Nikon D750?
With all that said, this is a question that has been filling online forums for a few months and I'm sure is getting a fair share of debates in real life as well. Which is better, the Nikon D750 or the Canon 5D MarK III?
First of all, it's important to note that photographers asking this question either have no problem switching from one system to another, or are in the process of upgrading from an entry level DSLR or a compact camera.
It is my personal opinion that if you do own a few lenses from any of the systems, and I'm talking about decent or pro lenses not plastic, stick to that system. It is ultimately the glass that makes the difference in image quality, not the camera.
Moving on in this challenge, let's start by introducing the 5DMK III. It is currently the workhorse of many professionals all around the world. The reason for that is that it can do a lot of stuff at professional level. It is a fantastic tool for stills and it's also the choice of many videographers and cinematographers. While it might not be the latest pro DSLR to hit the market (it was introduced in March 2012), it looks like it's going to be around for at least a couple of more years.
On the other side, we have the recently introduced Nikon D750. There are two things you will first notice when comparing these two cameras: the Nikon has a tilting screen and it costs $1000 less.
Comparing the 5DMK III to the D750
That instantly makes this competition interesting. But comparing two cameras is a game of numbers. Thus, the Canon 5D MK III has a 22 megapixel full frame sensor, a 61 point Autofocus system with 41 of those points being cross type and a respectable burst rate of 6fps.
(Success Tip #1: Get listed here and clients will come to you.)
The D750 has 24 megapixels, giving a very similar image size, a 51 point AF system with 15 of those points being cross type and a slightly faster burst rate of 6.5 fps.
As you can see, some of the most important features are quite close, but no real camera comparison can be valid without a proper field test.
See more specs about theCanon 5DMK III here.
See more specs about theNikon D750 here.
Video Review: Canon 5DMK III vs Nikon D750
MichaelTheMentor has done a thorough comparison between these two cameras that might help you decide which is better for your needs.
Speaking of needs, they are the first thing you should take into account before buying a camera. Forget about how new or how big it is. If it can do a good job and serve you well it is the correct choice for you. Good luck!
We Recommend
Canon 5Ds vs. Nikon D810
The neverending Canon vs. Nikon battle finally has a new highlight. As a confirmation of months-old rumors, Canon announced the introduction of the 5Ds and 5DsR a couple of weeks ago, and ever since then, gear heads have been going crazy trying to compare these two cameras to everything else on the market. Well it's time for us to do the same, and probably the most fearsome competitor for these two beasts is the Nikon D810 camera.
Table of Contents:
- Canon vs Nikon: A Little History
- Nikon D810 Specs
- Canon 5DS Specs
- Canon 5DS vs Nikon D810: How They Compare Head to Head
- Video Review: Canon 5DS and Nikon D810
Canon vs Nikon: A Little History
But let's take it from the top. The current workhorse of the 5D family is the 5D Mk III. It is a camera owned and loved by a great number of photographers worldwide, but many will agree the competition has outdated the MK III. Canon have long led the battle of megapixels, but it seems like forever since they've announced some game changing numbers ,when it comes to resolution. In fact, they've been moving around the industry standard 20+ megapixels for a few good years, while Sony and Nikon have been continuously active in increasing resolution.
The first real industry bang was the Nikon D800 and D800e. For the first time in history, the DSLR photographer would be able to come close and almost sit at the same table with medium format shooters. Then came along the D810, a camera that took everything good about its predecessors and made it sweeter, thus giving Nikon photographers a very lovable and incredibly capable camera.
Nikon D810 Specs
(See full specs and images of the Nikon D810 HERE)
Canon 5DS Specs
Well, it finally seems like Canon have learned from their competition. In fact, you might say they've "borrowed" a few ideas, particularly the introduction of a non AA filter version. It seems to be a very popular trend these days. Anyway, enter the Canon 5Ds and 5DsR with a mind blowing resolution of 50 million active pixels. Now that should get those arrogant medium format users running scared.
(See full specs and images of the Canon 5Ds HERE)
Canon 5DS vs Nikon D810: How They Compare Head to Head
But seriously now, it looks like these two cameras are created for delivering insane image size and detail and that's their number one selling point. In a head to head battle between Canon and Nikon, it's fair to look at the specs of each camera.
Canon 5Ds/ 5DsR | Nikon D810 |
Effective pixels: 51 million | Effective Pixels: 37 million |
Sensor type: CMOS | Sensor type: CMOS |
Processor: Dual Digic 6 | Processor: EXSPEED 4 |
ISO Range: 100-6400 (50-12800) | ISO Range: 64-12800 |
Focusing Points: 61 | Focusing Points: 51 |
Maximum Shutter Speed: 1/8000 | Maximum Shutter Speed: 1/8000 |
Continuous Drive: 5fps | Continuous Drive: 5fps |
Flash Sync: 1/200 | Flash Sync: 1/250 |
Video Resolution: 30p at 1080 | Video Resolution: 60p at 1080 |
These are the main specifications for both cameras. If you were to care only about the numbers, than you have a clear winner with Canon. But that again, it's not all about the numbers, is it?
The clear thing I would keep in mind about the 5Ds/5DsR and one of the key differences between them and the D810 is the targeted user. The Canon cameras are clearly aimed at still photographers, and the low video resolution and lack of a headphone jack are clear evidence of this. Image quality is pretty much similar to what you get from a 5D MK III, but the image size is more than double. The 5Ds and its brother both need to prove their worth on the market. The D810 has already done that and it is a complete camera that does both stills and video at a very high level, and thus you can find it in the bags of all kinds of photographers. The 5Ds is a camera for photographers who make big prints. Think commercial shooters and professionals who can really benefit from cropping parts of the frame. The first impressions are pretty good, but again it all comes down to individual needs. I wouldn't put a clear winner between these two and I think it's a mistake for anyone to do so. They are both excellent cameras and none of them are worth switching systems for. If you're a Canon user still shooting a 5D MK II, this could be the upgrade you're looking for. 5D MK III users will probably be less motivated to switch just yet, but that again, you do get more than double the resolution.
The D810 continues to be a wonderful machine, despite the 14 megapixel gap between it and the 5Ds. The fact about resolution is that 20 megapixels is more than enough for over half the photographers in the world. Both of these cameras offer a lot more than the actual needs of most shooters. I would put a tie between them, simply because they both are great cameras that deliver very good image quality. None of them are quite up there with medium format quality, and it's probably going to be a while longer before the format difference is really gone. However, with both of them you get high resolutions, as well as speed, portability and weather sealing.
Video Review: Canon 5DS and Nikon D810
Here are two videos about these two cameras. One is a D810 review made by Faymusmedia. The second is a quick introduction to the 5Ds from Canon USA.
Video links:
Read more specs about theCanon 5Ds here.
Read more specs about theNikon D810 here.
We Recommend
Canon 5Ds vs. Nikon D810 vs. SonyA7RII
The high resolution battle has never been more interesting and it’s certainly fun to see three cameras from the top three manufacturers competing in this fast growing market that appeals to studio, commercial and fine art photographers.
Before taking a look at what each of these cameras does best and what their strong points and weak spots are, there’s something that has to be said. The fact that this growing segment has massively narrowed the gap between DSLRs/mirrorless cameras and digital medium format cameras is a huge leap forward. Once again we see technical limitations being thrown out the window only to leave room for genuine talent and creativity.
Table of Contents:
- Canon 5Ds vs. Nikon D810 vs. SonyA7RII Sensor Resolution
- Canon 5Ds vs. Nikon D810 vs. SonyA7RII Design & Build
- Canon 5Ds vs. Nikon D810 vs. SonyA7RII Image Quality
- Canon 5Ds vs. Nikon D810 vs. SonyA7RII Videa Capabilities
- Canon 5Ds vs. Nikon D810 vs. SonyA7RII: Which is the Winner?
Canon 5Ds vs. Nikon D810 vs. SonyA7RII Sensor Resolution
But let’s get a little deeper into things. All three cameras produce large files of high resolution that can successfully be used by the top end of the photography industry. The Nikon D810 camera has a 36.3MP sensor, the 5Ds sports an impressive 50.6MP and the newest kid on the block, the A7RII has a 42.4 MP sensor. They’re all full frame cameras obviously and apart from the A7RII they’re built around the same principles as all their predecessors.
Canon 5Ds vs. Nikon D810 vs. SonyA7RII Design & Build
From a design point of view, pretty much everyone is familiar with Canon and Nikon bodies and even the Sony A7 lineup ergonomics have become pretty popular. Of the three, Sony is the smallest and while they market this as an advantage over the competition, it’s fair to note that if you mount a telephoto lens and a battery grip on the A7RII, you’re pretty much going to get the same size and weight of a DSLR.
Canon 5Ds vs. Nikon D810 vs. SonyA7RII Image Quality
But obviously, if you’re looking at any of these cameras, size and weight isn’t the most important factor when making the decision. Image quality is. Apart from the very high resolutions, it’s fair to say all three cameras produce superb image quality. There is no huge gap between one sensor or the other, although there are some differences that might tilt the balance for some pros with a sharp eye.
At base ISO, the D810 and the A7RII score better points at color sensitivity leaving the 5Ds slightly behind. However, things change on print as the gap narrows and the results are a lot more similar.
All three cameras produce exceptional detail in both RAW and JPEG formats and one thing that has to be noted about the size of the images is there isn’t that big of a difference. Sure, the D810 counts 14MP less than the 5Ds but it’s not the kind of difference that would make you jump ship.
When it comes to dynamic range, again the 5Ds fall behind with a score of 12.4EV compared 14.8EV on the D810 and 14.1EV on the A7R II. These values are true for base ISO. However things change significantly at ISO 800 where the difference becomes virtually unnoticeable.
Out of the camera ISO performance puts the Sony A7RII’s back illuminated sensor in top position with the least visible noise. However, once you import all three files in Lightroom and do a basic touch up, the difference once again becomes unnoticeable, which is somewhat surprising given all the talking about the Sony’s low light performance.
Canon 5Ds vs. Nikon D810 vs. SonyA7RII Video Capabilities
While it may not be of interest to all photographers, the video capabilities of a camera are just as important in today’s world of convergence between mediums. This time, the clear winner has to be the Sony as it is the only camera that supports internal 4K shooting. The runner-up is the D810 which does have a decent set of tools for the videographer or amateur filmmaker. The 5Ds is clearly not aimed at professionals who rely on video. Although it records in FHD format, it is obvious it was intended to be a camera purely for photography.
Canon 5Ds vs. Nikon D810 vs. SonyA7RII: Which is the Winner?
With all this in mind, who takes the cake? Although this is disappointing for some folks, the Sony is not a clear winner. Although the future belongs to the mirrorless camera, we’re not there yet. The A7RII is as good as any of the other two and no better. The grass is also no greener on either side of the Canon/Nikon fence. None of these cameras are worth giving up an entire system for. If one would have to come to an absolute verdict, it would have to be that all three are exceptionally capable cameras with very little to set them apart, other than Sony being a mirrorless. This is something to be expected in this price range and while fans from one side or the other will obviously defend their favorite camera, in reality they are all safe purchases for anyone who wants to put together a professional high resolution kit.
Click here for more details about the Canon 5Ds.
Click here for more details about the Nikon D810.
Click here for more details about the Sony A7RII.
We Recommend
Canon 5Ds vs. Nikon D810 Which Is the Clear Winner?
If you're a first time full frame buyer, this question has certainly been on your mind. Between the Canon 5Ds and the Nikon D810, picking the right one can be quite a challenge. Over the past few years, the resolution war has been dominated by Nikon, particularly after the introduction of the D800 and D800E, and later on the Nikon D810 camera. Canon have done their homework, and as a consequence the 5Ds and 5DR were introduced earlier this year. Let's see which of these two monsters is the winner.
Table of Contents:
- Canon 5DS vs Nikon D810 Sensor & ISO Performance
- Canon 5DS vs Nikon D810 Build Quality
- Canon 5DS vs Nikon D810 Autofocus
- Canon 5DS vs Nikon D810 Frame Rate & Video
- Conclusion
Canon 5DS vs Nikon Sensor & ISO Performance
Without doubt, the strongest selling point of both these cameras is resolution. The 36.3 mp on the D810 seemed unbelievable when there was no other option available, but the brand new sensor of the 5Ds has a staggering 50.6 million pixels. That puts it right up there with medium format cameras.
(Success Tip #1:Crazy new way to learn photography when you have little time to spare)
You won't get a low pass filter with the D810, which is fine for some photographers, but you will with the 5Ds. If you don't want one, go for the 5DR but expect quite a lot more moiré.
The ISO of the 5Ds ranges from 100-6400 which is a bit under today's standards but that again, this is the highest resolution DSLR on the market today. The D810 has a wider range, going from ISO 64 to 12, 800.
Canon 5DS vs Nikon D810 Build Quality
They're both built like tanks and that's something you would expect from any camera in this category/price range. The D810 is 35grams heavier than the 5Ds, but the major physical difference between the two is the lack of a pop-up flash on the Canon.
Canon 5DS vs Nikon D810 Autofocus
When it comes to focusing, the 5Ds has a 61 point system, of which 41 are cross-type. The D810 has 51 points, of which 15 are cross type, but it does have 11 f/8 cross type points in comparison to a single f/8 point on the Canon. That allows the Nikon to be more flexible, particularly when focusing with slower and longer lenses.
(Success Tip #2:The secret to selling more photography with less effort)
Canon 5DS vs Nikon D810 Frame Rate & Video
Both cameras have a frame rate of 5fps, however the Nikon's buffer can hold 23 RAW files whereas the 5Ds's buffer can only store 14.
When switching to video mode, it becomes clear that the Nikon D810 was built to meet the needs of both photographers and enthusiast video shooters. It is therefore capable of shooting video at 1080p @60fps versus the 1080p@30fps on the Canon.
Conclusion
It's hard to find something that really stands out in one camera or the other. They are both incredibly capable machines. The Canon 5Ds seems more like a tool clearly aimed at photographers, particularly those who need high resolution stills. The Nikon D810 is a little more versatile and besides the generous resolution, it has better ISO performance and more features for shooting video.
At the end of the day, none of them are worth switching systems. If you want to make the transition to full frame and own Nikon lenses, go for the D810. The same goes for Canon users. None of these cameras will disappoint you.
We Recommend
Canon EOS 80D vs Canon EOS 90D
If you’ve been following PhotographyTalk for a while, then you know there’s nothing we love more than comparing cameras in the same line.
I decided to do this Canon EOS 80D vs Canon EOS 90D review because, despite the fact that these cameras came out 3 years apart, they both cater to the same audience.
In essence, both cameras are competing for your money, so you may as well be informed about what the Canon EOS 80D features are, despite its age, in comparison with the Canon EOS 90D features.
Read this Canon EOS 80D vs Canon EOS 90D review for all of the pros and cons of both cameras, as well as a price comparison of the two.
Canon 80D vs 90D Specs/Features
Let’s talk about the Canon EOS 80D specs first.
The Canon EOS 80D features a 24MP sensor and a DIGIC 6 processor, which means the camera can function in low light situations and produces excellent quality images outside of them.
One of the biggest Canon EOS 80D pros is its autofocus system, which was phenomenal when it came out and still competes with some entry-level cameras. Its AF system features 45 cross-type autofocus points and functions very well during still shooting and video shooting.
Here’s a complete list of the Canon EOS 80D specs:
- 24MP sensor
- DIGIC 6 processor
- 45-point AF system
- ISO range of 100-16,000
- 3” 1.04m-dot articulating touchscreen
- Full HD video capabilities
- 7fps burst mode
- Weather-resistant body
- Built-in Wi-Fi
- 1.61 lbs
Now, onto the Canon EOS 90D specs.
The biggest change between the Canon EOS 80D vs. Canon EOS 90D is that the 90D features a much larger sensor: 33MP vs. 24MP.
The autofocus system hasn’t changed much, and neither has the burst mode. In fact, Canon understood that a lot of the best parts of the Canon EOS 80D also needed to be Canon EOS 90D pros.
For instance, the builds of the two cameras are almost identical. As are many of the specs, like the AF system, the touchscreen resolution, and the built-in Wi-Fi.
Other Canon EOS 90D specs include:
- 33MP sensor
- 45-point AF system
- ISO of 100-25,600
- 11fps burst mode
- 3” 1.04m-dot articulating touchscreen
- Weather-sealed body
- Built-in Wi-Fi
- Built-in Bluetooth
- 1.54 lbs
As you can see, the Canon EOS 80D vs. Canon EOS 90D debate gets pretty contentious because these two cameras are just so similar.
Learn More:
Pros/Cons
You definitely can’t compare the Canon EOS 80D vs Canon EOS 90D without getting a full breakdown of their pros and cons.
Thanks to TbonesTech for the Canon EOS 80D vs Canon EOS 90D video above.
Let’s start out with the Canon EOS 80D pros, because there are a lot of them.
To start, the Canon EOS 80D is a lot quieter than the 70D, even when working with low ISOs, which is great news for photographers who are trying to be discreet.
The sensor that the Canon EOS 80D features is more than enough for your everyday photography.
One thing that I haven’t mentioned so far that I consider a huge plus is the battery life on this camera. It’s rated at 960-shots when you use the optical viewfinder. But, this number jumps to 1,390-shots when you aren’t using the flash.
One of the biggest Canon EOS 80D cons for me is that the video lacks quite a few elements. Obviously, the Canon EOS 80D cannot shoot 4K video, which is a bummer, but understandable considering it came out in 2016.
What’s worse, though, is that the 80D doesn’t come with focus peaking, despite the fact that Canon is trying to market it to videographers. For instance, Canon specifically included a headphone jack in the 80D for videographers, but they also didn’t provide a clean HDMI output.
Furthermore, you can’t shoot in Full HD video with the higher quality ALL-I format, and the full low-light AF spec can only be attained if you’re working with a subject that features high-contrast.
It’s details like these that make me really disappointed as a videographer in the Canon EOS 80D vs Canon EOS 90D debate.
Now, let’s talk about the pros of the Canon EOS 90D.
The first is that the weather-sealing has improved for this model, so you can feel safer taking your camera everywhere you go.
It also includes 4K video, which is a huge improvement over the 80D.
But, the biggest plus of the Canon EOS 90D is its improved AF system.
The Canon EOS 90D is also rated for a whopping 1,300-shot battery life. When you pair this pro with the fact that the weather-sealing is really good on this model, it seems like the perfect travel camera to me.
But, there are many Canon EOS 90D cons as well.
For starters, I don’t think the Canon EOS 90D is the best in its class. I think there are cheaper and lighter competitors available that have similar image quality and AF systems.
For me, that is enough of a reason not to purchase the 90D over the 80D, so it’s easy to see where I fall in the Canon EOS 80D vs Canon EOS 90D debate.
But, it also features less than reliable through-the-finder autofocus, which means it isn’t a great option for sports or wildlife photographers.
Price
Canon EOS 80D
Again, it’s important to remember that it’s not really fair to compare the Nikon EOS 80D vs. Canon EOS 90D based on their prices, since the Canon EOS 80D is a full 3 years older.
If you’re looking to purchase the Canon EOS 80D new, then the Canon EOS 80D price is $1,000. But, you can save some money from that price by opting to purchase a used version from MPB.
Canon EOS 90D
Used Canon EOS 80D bodies go for anywhere between $660 to $800 on MPB.
The Canon EOS 90D price is a little higher. You can pick up a new Canon EOS 90D for $1,200. Or, you can save some money and opt for a “like new” Canon EOS 90D on MPB for $1,139.
Whichever of these cameras you decide to choose, shopping on MPB is the way to go.
I’ve bought numerous camera bodies and lenses from MPB over the years, and I’ve had nothing but good experiences. They have great prices, a superb rating system so you know the exact condition of the item, and fast shipping.
Plus, there’s a 6-month warranty on most items, so you get that peace of mind too.
Don’t roll the dice with the likes of Craigslist. Instead, go with the reputable outfit. Go with MPB!
Learn More:
We Recommend
Canon EOS R vs Canon 5D Mark IV Comparison
photo by nortonrsx via iStock
The Canon EOS R and Canon 5D Mark IV are two different camera types. On the one side, we have mirrorless while on the other we have a DSLR camera.
Nevertheless, these two models share a lot in common. First of all, they are both full-frame cameras with a 30.4 MP CMOS sensor, while there are similarities in other features as well.
This review has an aim to compare and point out the strengths and weaknesses of these two cameras in order to help you decide which one has the potential to do a better job for you.
Canon EOS R vs Canon 5D Mark IV – Sensor, Processor, and ISO
As we already mentioned, these two cameras have the same type of sensor (CMOS) and they share the same resolution (30.4 MP). Additionally, they both feature low pass filter which means there should not be substantial differences in image quality between these two models.
The Canon EOS R sports a new Digic 8 processor, while there is an older Digic 6+ processor in the Canon 5D Mark IV. The updated processor in the newer camera allows slightly different ISO sensitivity and it speeds up other features as well.
Because of the difference in processor, the DSLR model allows native ISO sensitivity from 50 to 32000, while the mirrorless camera has a native ISO range of 50-40000.
Overall, you will rarely use high levels of ISO, so this should not be a difference that matters all that much. Both cameras have good grounds for marvelous photography.
Canon EOS R vs Canon 5D Mark IV – Design
Since we are comparing two different types of camera, there are substantial differences in their design.
First of all, the Canon EOS R is significantly lighter (1.45 lb. vs 1.96 lb.) which is not strange if you take into consideration that it is a mirrorless model.
Additionally, the EOS R is also smaller than the 5D Mark IV (3 x 5.9 x 4.6" vs 5.35 x 3.87 x 3.32"), so it is a lot easier to carry it around.
The differences in size or weight are not minor, so this might be the key factor in deciding which model to buy. Still, you might want to check other features as well since it is generally more important what is inside the camera than how big or heavy it is.
Editor's Tip: Can't quite afford the EOS R or the 5D Mark IV? Sell your old camera and use the proceeds to offset the cost! In my MPB review, I discuss why it's one of the best places to sell (and buy) used cameras and lenses. Check it out, and see why MPB is a top choice for used photography gear.
Canon EOS R vs Canon 5D Mark IV – Viewfinder and LCD
As it is typical for mirrorless cameras, the EOS R has an electronic viewfinder. It has a 23mm eyepoint, approx. 3.69 million dots and magnification of 0.76x.
EOS R
On the other side, the Canon 5D Mark IV uses the optical viewfinder which has a 21mm eyepoint and magnification of 0.71x.
Although the viewfinder on the EOS R seems better, since it is electronic, it will drain the camera’s battery much faster. While you can take 900 shots with the 5D, you can take only 370 shots with the EOS R before your battery runs out (540 if you turn on the Eco mode).
Canon 5D Mark IV
Both cameras incorporate an LCD touchscreen, but the one in the Canon 5D Mark IV is fixed and has lower resolution (1.62M dots) than the one in the Canon EOS R (2.1M dots).
Moreover, the display in the mirrorless model is selfie-friendly and it allows you to take photos from different angles much easier.
Canon EOS R vs Canon 5D Mark IV – Autofocus, Speed, and Video
photo by guruXOOX via iStock
Both cameras we are comparing in this article feature Dual Pixel CMOS autofocus, but the Canon EOS R has much more focus points than its DSLR brother (5655 vs 61).
Additionally, the EOS R also has much better capabilities to acquire focus in lower light. The mirrorless model has a minimum sensitivity of -4Ev, while the 5D Mark IV has a minimum sensitivity of -6Ev.
When it comes to speed, there are no big differences. The EOS R performs a bit better since it offers 8 frames per second, but the 5D Mark IV is not much behind with 7 frames per second.
Both cameras offer 4K video up to 30p (with a 1.7x crop) and Full HD up to 60p.
It is worth mentioning that Canon EOS R has only one SD card slot, which might be annoying if you need a lot of storage space.
Get more information about these two cameras in the video above by Atti Bear.
Canon EOS R vs Canon 5D Mark IV – Lenses
Although they were produced by the same company, being different camera types – the Canon EOS R and Canon 5D Mark IV don’t use the same lens mount.
The EOS R is a mirrorless camera that comes with a new RF mount. This brand new lens mount has the same diameter as the EF mount (54mm), but it has much shorter flange distance (20 mm vs 44mm).
Canon has produced lenses for the EF mount since 1987, so there are hundreds of different ones to choose from. On the contrary, the RF mount was introduced with the EOS R, so there are only four lenses at the moment:
- Canon RF 24–105mm f/4 L IS USM
- Canon RF 28–70mm f/2 L USM
- Canon RF 50mm f/1.2 L USM
- Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 IS STM Macro
Recently, however, Canon has announced that they will release six new RF lenses:
- Canon RF 85mm f/1.2 L USM
- Canon RF 85mm f/1.2 L USM DS
- Canon RF 28–70mm f/2.8 L IS USM
- Canon RF 15–35mm f/2.8 L IS USM
- Canon RF 70–200mm f/2.8 L IS USM
- Canon RF 24–240mm f/4–6.3 IS USM
Canon EOS R vs Canon 5D Mark IV – Price
Finally, the price can be a deciding factor when buying a camera.
Although they are in the same price range, the Canon EOS R is at the moment a bit cheaper than the Canon 5D Mark IV.
The price of a brand-new Canon EOS R is $2,299.99 (for the body only), while you need to spend $2,999.99 for the Canon 5D Mark IV.
You can save some money if you buy used, though. While there isn't a massive selection of used EOS R cameras at the moment, you can sometimes find them for about $2,000 for the body only. Since the 5D Mark IV is older, there are usually many more used models available for well under $2,400.00.
Have Canon questions? Ask in the Canon Camera Forum.
We Recommend
Canon EOS RP vs Nikon Z6
Photo by Jamie Fenn on Unsplash via iStock
In February, Canon refreshed the market of mirrorless cameras by launching its new entry-level full-frame model – the Canon EOS RP.
We already reviewed the primary specs and capabilities of the EOS RP in our Canon EOS RP review and did the same for the Nikon Z6 in our Nikon Z6 review. But in this article, we will compare these two cameras to see which one comes out on top.
The Canon EOS RP and Nikon Z6 share a lot of things in common. They were both released as an alternative to the more powerful mirrorless systems such as Canon EOS R and Nikon Z7. Further, each of them is compact, relatively affordable for its class, and have good all-around in features.
If you are looking to buy a new camera and you are having troubles to decide whether you should opt for the Canon EOS RP or Nikon Z6, you’ve come to the right place.
Editor's Tip: If you're ready to buy a new camera, you might consider offsetting its cost by selling your old gear. I work with MPB to sell my old stuff, and it's been a quick and painless process each time. Learn more about selling used gear (and buying it too) in my MPB review.
Canon EOS RP vs Nikon Z6: Sensor and ISO
It is well known that camera’s sensor determines the image quality and having a full-frame sensor makes both of these cameras great.
Although there are only microscopic differences in the sensor size of the Canon RP and Nikon Z6, mirrorless Canon has a slightly bigger resolution (26.2MP vs 24.3 MP). On the other hand, smaller resolution in the Nikon Z6 provides it with bigger individual pixels (5.74μm versus 5.94μm) that can record more light.
Both cameras work remarkably well in low-light conditions because of their vast ISO range, but the Nikon is much more capable at the high-end of ISO.
The Canon EOS RP has a native sensitivity range of ISO 100 to 40000 (extendable to ISO 50-102400). On the other side, the Nikon Z6 has a native ISO range of 100-51200, and there is a possibility to increase ISO sensitivity up to ISO 204800.
Another advantage the Nikon Z6 has over the Canon EOS RP is it has Sensor-Shift Image Stabilization technology which eliminates the elements of shake during long exposures. This produces less blur on photos when taking images in low-light conditions.
Neither of the cameras has a built-in flash, but there is an external flash shoe in both of them.
In the video above, David Akoubian compares the Canon EOS RP and Nikon Z6 and their performance using a ten stop ND filter.
CANON EOS RP VS NIKON Z6: AUTOFOCUS, BURST SHOOTING, AND VIDEO
Although the Canon EOS RP has lower price-tag than the Nikon Z6, its autofocus is faster and it has much more autofocus points In fact, one of the most impressive Canon EOS RP specs is the number of autofocus points. While there are 4779 autofocus points in the EOS RP, there are only 273 autofocus points in the Nikon Z6.
However, the Nikon Z6 mostly beats the Canon EOS RP in all other features. For example, burst shooting really makes a difference between these two cameras.
The Canon EOS RP has continuous shooting speed at 5 frames per second which is really the low end if you are into action photography. If your primary goal is to use your camera for sport, event or wildlife photography, you will be much more satisfied if you buy the Nikon Z6. This camera captures 12 frames per second and it works great for photographing subjects that are in successive motion.
The Nikon Z6 also performs better when it comes to video capabilities, although the differences are not that substantial. Both cameras can record 4K videos, although the Z6 offers 4K at 30p while the EOS RP offers 4K at 25p. Moreover, both cameras can shoot Full HD at 60p, although the Nikon Z6 has the capability for creating slow-motion sequences.
The only disadvantage of the Nikon Z6 in terms of video is its non-reversible LCD screen. The Canon EOS R has a selfie-friendly LCD screen which is much convenient for those who are making vlogs.
Canon EOS RP vs Nikon Z6: Design
Mirrorless cameras are definitely taking over the market. In the past, full-frame models used to be expensive and heavy, but mirrorless technology profoundly changed this.
The Canon EOS RP is advertised as “the portable performer”. This camera measures only 5.22 x 3.35 x 2.76 inches and weighs only 15.6 ounces. If these numbers don’t mean much to you, let’s simply say this is one of the most compact full-frame cameras on the market today.
If you are looking for a small and light camera, the Canon EOS RP is definitely among the top choices. But, what about the Nikon Z6?
The Nikon Z6 has dimensions of 5.3 x 4.0 x 2.7 inches and weight of 21.8 ounces. As we can see, there is no huge difference in the size of these two cameras, although few ounces can make a difference if you intend to use a camera with heavy lenses during the whole day.
Although it has a nice and compact design, the Canon EOS RP is not weather-sealed. This means you need to be careful while using this camera during heavy rains or freezing temperatures. On the other side, you don’t need to worry about these things if you opt for the Nikon Z6. This camera is weather-sealed against dust and moisture so we can justify a few ounces more than it has in comparison to Canon’s camera.
Why is the Canon EOS RP redefining full-frame mirrorless cameras? Get an answer to this question in the video above by Dan Watson
Canon EOS RP vs Nikon Z6: LCD and Viewfinder
Canon EOS RP
On both cameras, you can use either an electronic viewfinder or LCD screen for composing images.
We already mentioned that EOS RP has fully articulated LCD screen and that it comes as a big advantage over the Nikon Z6 which has a display that can only be tilted up and down.
However, this is the only advantage of the mirrorless Canon when it comes to LCD and viewfinder specifications.
The Nikon Z6 has larger LCD screen (3.2” vs 3.0”) and bigger resolution (2100 vs 1040 dots). Additionally, the Nikon Z6 also has a more detailed viewfinder (3690k vs 2360k) which certainly makes the process of composing images much enjoyable.
One more thing that is good about the Nikon Z6 is that features a top LCD screen which is convenient for quickly checking and adjusting camera settings.
Canon EOS RP vs Nikon Z6: Lenses
By entering the market of mirrorless cameras, Nikon and Canon also launched new lens mounts for their mirrorless products. Since this happened only recently, at the moment there are not many lenses to choose for mirrorless Nikon and Canon cameras, although the companies are extensively working on developing new ones.
For the Canon EOS RP, you will need to use the RF mount lenses and at the moment there are only four of them: Canon RF 24–105 mm f/4 L IS USM, Canon RF 28–70 mm f/2 L USM, Canon RF 50 mm f/1.2 L USM, and Canon RF 35 mm f/1.8 IS STM Macro. However, only during this year, there will be six additional RF mount lenses released by Canon.
The Nikon Z6 lenses use the Z mount. As it is the case with Canon, there are not many lenses for Z-mount. At the moment you can choose among Nikkor Z 50mm f/1.8 S, Nikkor Z 35mm f/1.8 S, Nikkor Z 24-70mm f/4 S, Nikkor Z 14-30mm f/4 S, and Nikkor Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S. The fastest Z-mount lenses (58mm f/0.95 S Noct) should be released any time soon.
While we wait for Canon and Nikon to expand their list of lenses for their mirrorless models, it is worth mentioning that we can still use lenses designed for DSLRs on mirrorless cameras with help of an additional adapter. The FTZ Mount Adapter allows you to use F-mount lenses on the Z system cameras, while the EOS R system adapter does the same by combining the RF mount with Canon EF and EF-S lenses.
Canon EOS RP vs Nikon Z6: Connectivity
Both cameras can easily be connected to any smart devices in your possession via Bluetooth or Wi-Fi. This feature is good if you want to automatically backup your files or if you want to use remote shooting.
If you are in need of an external microphone while recording videos, both cameras are allowing this possibility. Also, both of them have a port for headphones.
None of the cameras has a dual card slot, and while the Nikon Z6 supports XQD cards, the Canon EOS R supports only SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards.
The Z6 has a longer battery life of 330 shots in comparison to only 250 shots estimated for the Canon EOS RP. One more advantage of the Nikon Z6 in terms of connectivity is that it has the support for USB 3.0.
Canon EOS RP vs Nikon Z6: Price
As we could see from this comparison review, the Nikon Z6 seems to be a much better camera. It has better burst shooting speed, larger ISO range, better video capabilities, and weather-sealed protection.
On the other side, the advantages of the Canon EOS RP are more autofocus points, selfie-friendly LCD screen, larger resolution, and finally, lower price!
At the moment, the Canon EOS RP price is $1,299.00, while the Nikon Z6 price is $1,796.95.
We Recommend
Canon EOS T7i vs Nikon D5600 Comparison
photo by structuresxx via iStock
The Canon EOS T7i and Nikon D5600 are cameras that are perfect for beginners in photography. They are both mega popular but it is not because of unbelievable specs or any outstanding features not seen in the camera world. Their secret is simplicity.
Let’s get this straight - both of these cameras are great and photographers who know their stuff can produce art with these two devices. Still, they were developed in order to help novices to start their photography journey. For example, the EOS Rebel T7i camera comes with a user interface called Feature Assistant which helps you to figure out how to use camera settings.
Overall, the Canon T7i and Nikon D5600 are very similar. They have almost identical features and are in the same price range. So, how do you choose which one is better for you?
Fortunately, we prepared this review so you can answer this question more easily.
Ready to upgrade your camera? Get a new-to-you camera and save money by buying used. Read this MPB review to find out why it should be your top choice for finding used gear.
Table of Contents:
- Canon EOS T7i Design vs Nikon D5600 Design
- Canon EOS T7i Sensor vs Nikon D5600 Sensor
- Canon EOS T7i vs Nikon D5600 ISO Comparison
- Canon EOS T7i Autofocus vs Nikon D5600 Autofocus
- Canon EOS T7i Continuous Shooting vs Nikon D5600 Continuous Shooting
- Canon EOS T7i Video vs Nikon D5600 Video
- Canon EOS T7i Price vs Nikon D5600 Price
Canon EOS T7i Design vs Nikon D5600 Design
The Canon EOS T7i and Nikon D5600 are of average size and weight when compared to other DSLR models.
The Nikon D5600 is 0.14 lb. lighter and a little bit smaller than the Canon EOS T7i, but this is not something that should be a deal-breaker if you really want to opt for Canon.
The common weakness of both models is that they lack environmental sealing, so be careful when using these cameras in freezing temperatures or while it is raining.
Both cameras have an optical (pentamirror) viewfinder and a selfie-friendly rear display. The LCD screen in the Nikon D5600 is 0.2 inches bigger, but they both use touchscreen technology which does a good job for acquiring focus.
Additionally, both cameras have a built-in flash, external flash shoe, microphone jack, NFC connection, Wireless, Bluetooth, and support for UHS memory cards.
The Nikon D5600 has longer battery life, and it can make 970 shots, in comparison to 600 shots that can be made on the Canon EOS Rebel T7i.
Canon EOS T7i Sensor vs Nikon D5600 Sensor
There is the same type of sensor (APS-C ) and the same amount of resolution (24 MP) in both cameras. Although professionals prefer to have more resolution because it gives them bigger possibilities for editing or printing photos, 24 megapixels is quite enough for any other purpose.
Canon EOS T7i
The Nikon D5600 has a larger sensor than the Canon EOS T7i. Larger sensors generally allow more control over the depth of field. Still, the difference between the sensor size is not substantial, so you will hardly see its effects in reality. Read in-depth Nikon D5600 review on our website PhotographyTalk.com.
Nikon D5600
The only thing that can make the Nikon D5600 perform better than the Canon T7i is that it does not have an anti-alias filter. The reason is that removing the Low-Pass filter increases sharpness, although it can create some moire on photos.
Overall, the sensors are very similar, but the D5600 has a small advantage in this category.
Canon EOS T7i vs Nikon D5600 ISO comparison
Although they have almost identical sensors, there are differences in ISO sensitivity between these two models. They have the same native ISO range from 100 to 25600, but on the Canon EOS T7i, it can be expanded up to ISO 51200.
The Canon EOS T7i has bigger ISO range which is good for low-light situations, but in some cases, the Nikon D5600 produces less grainy photos at higher levels of ISO. That’s why you shouldn’t always blindly trust numbers.
Which is the right camera to go with when you’re a beginner photographer? The Nikon D5600 or the Canon Rebel T7i? Get an answer to this question in the video above by Jared Polin.
Canon EOS T7i Autofocus vs Nikon D5600 Autofocus
For beginners in photography, it is important that you don’t have to push too many buttons in order to produce a decent photo. That’s why it is important there is a good autofocus system in a camera that will track your subjects without too much effort.
With this being said, you will be happy to know that both cameras come with a great autofocus system. While there is a 39-point Multi-CAM 4800DX AF system in the Nikon D5600, there is a 45-point all cross-type AF system in the Canon EOS T7i.
As you can notice, the Canon T7i has a higher amount of autofocus points which means that it can perform faster and with more precision.
Get more information about these cameras in the hands-on review in the video above by PhotoRec TV.
Canon EOS T7i Continuous Shooting vs Nikon D5600 Continuous Shooting
Impressive autofocus in these two cameras allows them to track moving subjects with high accuracy. This is why they are good for photographing sports events, wildlife, or any other activity where the subjects are moving.
Canon EOS T7i
Along with good autofocus, it is important to have a satisfactory continuous shooting speed if you want to capture the best out of quick-moving objects.
Nikon D5600
With a capability to continuously shoot at six frames per second, the Canon EOS T7i performs slightly better than the Nikon D5600 that can shoot at five frames per second.
Canon EOS T7i Video vs Nikon D5600 Video
When it comes to video, there are some bigger differences than in other aspects. The only reason for this is that Canon’s T7i has Movie Electronic Image Stabilization. Movie Electronic IS reduces the blurring effect of camera shake, consequently creating videos of higher quality.
Canon EOS T7i
Both cameras can record 1080 (Full HD) videos at 60p which is not mind-blowing since there are many cameras of their price that have 4K capabilities. Still, this is not so bad if you take into consideration they are primarily aimed at photography.
Canon EOS T7i Price vs Nikon D5600 Price
At the moment, you can spare few bucks if you opt for the Nikon D5600 instead of the Canon EOS Rebel T7i. You will need to spend $699.00 if you want to buy a new T7i, while you can get new D5600 for $596.95 (body only).
Nikon D5600
If you don’t mind buying used cameras, you can get both models at even lower price.
For example, the T7i can be found for under $600 in like new condition. The D5600, meanwhile, is well under $500 in excellent condition.
We Recommend
Canon vs. Nikon DSLR Comparison: Which is Best For You?
When it comes down to it, Canon and Nikon are the big boys in the camera market.
Sure, Sony, Panasonic, FujiFilm, and many other manufacturers make some really stellar cameras.
But none match the market share that Canon and Nikon enjoy.
Both companies are constantly updating their cameras or coming out with completely new models.
That can make for some confusing shopping...
Additionally, with so many new functions and features coming out with every wave of new models, Canon and Nikon are tempting photographers from the other side to ditch their current systems and give their latest, greatest models a try.
No matter if you're a beginner looking for your first camera or an advanced photographer in need of a full frame camera, we've got the head-to-head battles between Canon and Nikon to help inform your purchasing decisions.
Without further ado, let's get to it!
Table of Contents:
- Canon vs Nikon: Beginner Cameras
- Canon vs Nikon: Mid-Level Cameras
- Canon vs Nikon: Enthusiast Cameras
- Canon vs Nikon: Top-of-the-Line Cameras
Canon vs Nikon: Beginner Cameras
Let me preface this by saying that there are two facets to the label of "beginner DSLR" that I've used to categorize the following cameras as such.
First, for these purposes, a beginner DSLR is one that can be purchased for less than $500-$600, complete with a kit lens.
Though there are certainly other options for beginners, I've opted to go with a lower price point.
Secondly, this list includes DSLRs that don't have the same functions and features as higher-end cameras.
Again, they are easy to use and have plenty of functionality, but not so much that a beginner would be totally overwhelmed.
There are four top models in this category: The Canon EOS Rebel SL1, the Canon EOS Rebel T6, the Nikon D3300, and its close cousin, the Nikon D3400.
Again, each of these cameras comes in at less than $500, making any of them an excellent buy.
The Canon EOS SL1 is a tiny thing, which might be a draw for younger photographers with smaller hands or for new photographers that don't want to carry a heavy camera around.
The EOS Rebel T6 has Wi-Fi and NFC capabilities to its credit, as well as an upgraded LCD with nearly 1 million dots of resolution.
Both of these Rebel models have an 18-megapixel sensor, which is fine, but when compared to the 24-megapixel sensor in the Nikon D3300 and D3400, the Canons lag behind.
Additionally, the Nikons have faster continuous shooting by a margin of 2fps, as well as a more refined autofocus system with 11 autofocus points (as compared to just 9 points for the Canons).
Granted, these are relatively minor differences that likely won't make a huge difference for many beginner photographers.
But down the road when you have more photography understanding and skills at your disposal, it might be worth investing in a camera that has more potential to grow along with you.
The Verdict: The Nikons offer more in the way of features, including a more sophisticated sensor. Since the D3400 is newer and really doesn't have much in the way of significant new features, the best bet here is likely the Nikon D3300.
Read more: The Best DSLRs for Beginners in 2017
Canon vs Nikon: Mid-Level Cameras
Mid-level cameras fall squarely in between the beginner models discussed above and the more advanced models discussed below.
These cameras require a bit more of a budget but come with many more features than a standard entry-level camera.
As a result, if you have a bit of time under your belt as a photographer and find that your current camera just can't do everything you need it to do, consider a Canon EOS Rebel T6i, a Canon EOS Rebel T6s, a Nikon D5500, or a Nikon D5600.
The Canon models are very similar. In fact, the only major difference between the two is that the T6s has a top LCD panel and a rear thumbwheel that give it extra versatility.
What both Canons share is a 24.2-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor that sports Canon's DIGIC-6 processor.
That means both models are significantly faster than their junior counterparts discussed earlier. What's more, they produce much higher resolution images with this sensor than with the 18-megapixel sensor in the introductory Canon cameras.
With Wi-Fi, NFC, a tilting touch screen LCD, 5fps continuous shooting, and an ISO range to 25600, the Canons have plenty of features to satisfy your photography needs.
Don't count out the Nikons, however.
Like the Canons, the Nikon D5500 and D5600 are virtually identical.
Like the Canons, they also sport a 24.2-megapixel sensor, though the Nikons produce images with better detail. Both Nikons also sport a 39-point autofocus system that works well for mid-range action photography.
Both Nikons are also well built. That's not to say that the Canons aren't well built, but when holding the Nikons, they feel great in your hand and have a button and dial layout that makes sense.
The only major difference between the D5500 and D5600 is that the latter has Nikon's new SnapBridge technology, which allows you to connect your camera to a smart device via Bluetooth.
The Verdict: Though the Nikons produce more detailed images and feel better in your hand, the Canons have the Nikons beat in terms of features and pricing. It's a tough call, but the Canon EOS Rebel T6s is the best bet of the bunch for most advanced beginner photographers.
Read More: Canon's EOS Line is 30 Years Old and Still Going Strong
Canon vs Nikon: Enthusiast Cameras
The next step up in our sequence is enthusiast cameras, models that offer even more in the way of features, but which also have much higher price tags than many of those found in the entry-level and mid-range segments.
Enthusiast cameras come in many shapes and sizes from both Canon and Nikon. And though there are plenty of choices, for me, the best of this group are the Canon EOS 80D, the Nikon D7200, the Canon EOS 7D Mark II, and the Nikon D500.
Let's examine the 80D and D7200 first.
Both of these cameras pack plenty of punch from a technical standpoint.
The 80D has an articulating touch screen LCD that makes taking photos in Live View a great experience. It also features an advanced Dual Pixel CMOS AF system that offers outstanding focus for both still photos and videos. Helping that cause is a 45-point autofocus system in which all 45 AF points are of the cross-type variety.
Add to that 7fps continuous shooting, a top LCD panel, and an upgraded shutter mechanism that reduces vibrations, and you've got a recipe for a solid enthusiast camera.
The question is, how does it stack up to the competition, the Nikon D7200?
With a 24.2-megapixel DX-format sensor, the D7200 has the same resolution as the 80D, though test images are consistently more detailed due to the absence of an anti-aliasing filter.
The D7200 has plenty of features too, including Wi-Fi, an excellent buffer, improved battery life over its predecessors, and a robust 51-point autofocus system that gives you better low-light shooting capabilities than comparable models.
The new EXPEED-4 processor is worth mentioning as well because it gives the D7200 faster performance that an enthusiast-level photographer will appreciate.
The Verdict: This one's a draw. Both the Canon EOS 80D and the Nikon D7200 have excellent features for the money. If you're a Canon shooter, stick with Canon. Likewise, if you're a Nikon shooter stick with Nikon.
Read More: Nikon D7100 vs. Nikon D7200 vs. Nikon D7300
A bit of a step up, yet still in the enthusiast segment are two more cameras, the Canon EOS 7D Mark II and the Nikon D500.
Like other head-to-head matchups between Canon and Nikon, we have two well-matched cameras in the 7D Mark II and the Nikon D500.
Both offer advanced features like 10fps continuous shooting, lightning-fast processors, and expanded ISO ranges that give them improved low-light shooting performance, even over the enthusiast models outlined earlier.
Both of these cameras have similar sensors as well, with the Canon's 20.2-megapixel sensor slightly underperforming the Nikon's 20.9-megapixel sensor.
And while the Canon has a 65-point autofocus system with all cross-type AF points, the Nikon's has 153-points, 99 of which are cross-type.
What's more, where the Canon offers 31 frames of RAW at 10fps, the Nikon promises an astounding 200 RAW frames.
Throw in better resolution, a tilting touch screen, and 4K video, and the Nikon becomes something that offers many more features than the Canon.
The Verdict: Again, this has to be a draw. The Canon represents a much better value at this point, but the Nikon offers more robust features that make it a camera that is more likely to handle future growth.
Read More: Canon EOS 7D Mark II: The Best Action Rig for the Money?
Canon vs Nikon: Top-of-the-Line Cameras
If money is no object (wouldn't that be nice?!), a full frame camera is the way to go.
Like the other tiers of cameras, full frame models run the gamut from "entry-level" to full on pro-spec models.
At the lower end of these top-of-the-line cameras are the Canon EOS 6D and the Nikon D610.
Though these cameras are priced very closely to one another, the D610 sports a better sensor (24.3-megapixel versus 20.2-megapixel).
The Nikon has a better autofocus system as well, with 39-autofocus points compared to just 11 points on the EOS 6D.
The EOS 6D has nice add-ons like GPS and Wi-Fi and has better low-light performance than the Nikon due to its slightly wider range of ISO.
The Verdict: Another tie. Given that these cameras are priced so closely together, and their features match up very well, this one is simply a matter of taste for Canon or Nikon.
Read More: Is the Nikon D610 the Best Value Full Frame Camera?
Check out a head-to-head comparison of the EOS 6D, the D610, and several other cameras from this list in the video below by Jared Polin:
When it comes down to it, no matter which camera you choose from this list, these Canon and Nikon models offer excellent features for all experience levels. Better yet, you can find any of these cameras for an excellent price when you shop used.
If you're looking to get your first camera or need an upgrade, why not get something that someone else enjoyed while saving yourself some money at the same time? It's the best of both worlds if you ask me!
We Recommend
Canon vs. Nikon. So what’s the conclusion?
Canon Vs Nikon is one of the most controversial and heated debates in the photography world. There are entire websites and forums dedicated to it and the fans of each brand seem to be tireless in this age old struggle. When you have two photographic equipment manufacturers that have written history like these two have, it’s bound to happen.
Table of Contents:
- Which is Better? Canon or Nikon?
- Why Brand Doesn't Matter
- Factors That Influence the Canon vs Nikon Decision
Which is Better? Canon or Nikon?
Practically, out of ten cameras, about eight are Canon and Nikon. This isn’t based on any statistics, but if you have a look around, I think you’ll agree. Both of these brands have had a tremendous influence on how photography is being practiced and perceived today. They both have a long history, and the tradition of the highest Japanese quality behind them. They are ultimately the designers and builders of the cameras that we love so much today, or of iconic machines we look back to with nostalgia.
I don’t believe there is any true way of nominating one in front of the other because both brands are incredibly good at what they do, and they give us magnificent tools to perform our art. However, at the end of the day, the question still remains on the lips of many photography and camera enthusiasts: “which one is best for me”?
Why Brand Doesn't Matter
Many people would prefer someone telling them exactly the brand or the camera they should shoot with. It would spare them the time and energy they are already spending trying to decide what the best system is, or what camera takes the best pictures. The truth is a lot further than many would expect. In their restless quest for the best camera or the best brand, many people lose sight of the big picture, of what is truly important in becoming a successful photographer. It is undeniable that being a successful photographer means using the right tools, but that is the last item on a longer list of things that need to be checked. Having the best image quality has never been an issue with either Nikon or Canon.
I have said this many times, and I am just one of many voices who keep repeating it: no matter what camera you have, it will not make you a better or a lesser photographer. The cameras that we own and love, or that we think of buying, are wonderful instruments filled with amazing technology, but at the end of the day, it’s important to remember that that is all they are…instruments. The value behind a great photograph lies not in the camera it was taken with, but in the hands that used the camera. 1DX, D4, D5200, T4i…Olympus, it doesn’t really matter. It might sound strange or even wrong, but think about it this way: you are a creative person, maybe a professional, much like a writer or an artist. Will your work be admired or bought because of your gear, or because of what you are capable of? The most important investment you will make in your quest for becoming a successful, highly regarded photographer, is in yourself, not your gear. The most advanced technology and the most impeccable glass in the world will be no substitute for good education, esthetic sense, vision and determination. At the end of the day, this is what truly counts. A talented, experienced and confident photographer has no problem shooting with any kind of camera, regardless of the name on it, because he masters the principles by which all cameras work.
It is just as true that once you reach a certain level, your clients demand nothing short of top quality and Canon and Nikon are the most popular choices among professionals. This is in response to the popular question: “if a pro can work with anything, why do they all have the expensive stuff?”
Factors That Influence the Canon vs Nikon Decision
I believe there is no real difference between these two brands in terms of quality. When you buy a DSLR, you buy a system. You marry into the whole family. If you already own a Canon or a Nikon and have doubts about it, you might want to look for the real problem somewhere else. If you’re wondering what to buy, consider if you have any older lenses you might use because it would be an important factor in the decision. If not, you might as well flip a coin because you won’t go wrong either way.
Recommended Reading:
- 2013 Photographer's Market: The Most Trusted Guide to Selling Your Photography
- Best Business Practices for Photographers
- The Fast Track Photographer Business Plan: Build a Successful Photography Venture from the Ground Up
- Group Portrait Photography Handbook
- The Best of Family Portrait Photography: Professional Techniques and Images
- 500 Poses for Photographing Group Portraits
- 500 Poses for Photographing Women
- Selling Your Photography: How to Make Money in New and Traditional Markets
- Starting Your Career as a Freelance Photographer
- Photographer's Survival Manual: A Legal Guide for Artists in the Digital Age
- Legal Handbook for Photographers: The Rights and Liabilities of Making Images
- Taking Stock: Make money in microstock creating photos that sell
- Going Pro: How to Make the Leap from Aspiring to Professional Photographer
Written By Sergiu Aursulesei
Compact Camera Comparison: Canon Powershot G9 X Mark II vs Panasonic DMC-LX100
Canon Powershot G9 X Mark II vs Panasonic DMC-LX100
Not everyone needs a full frame professional DSLR or a fancy mirrorless camera with interchangeable lenses.
In fact, many beginner and enthusiast photographers simply need something more powerful and capable than their smartphone. A compact camera fits the bill.
The market is flooded with excellent compact cameras from Sony, Canon, Panasonic, Fujifilm, and more.
In this compact camera comparison, we pit two excellent options against one another - the Canon Powershot G9 X Mark II vs the Panasonic DMC-LX100.
Canon Powershot G9 X Mark II Overview
The Canon Powershot G9 X Mark II is a small, lightweight, and slim camera that makes it an ideal for both still photography and videography.
Its 1-inch sensor has 20.1 megapixels of resolution, and paired with Canon’s DIGIC 7 image processor, the camera operates quickly and efficiently.
The Powershot’s sensor has an impressive ability to capture a wide dynamic range, which means your photos will retain detail in both highlighted and shadowed areas. This is aided by the back-illuminated sensor, which helps improve low-light shooting performance.
Image sharpness with this camera is exceptional as well. This is due to several factors, not the least of which is the built-in optical image stabilization system.
The aforementioned DIGIC 7 processor makes this camera a speed demon. It has a lightning-fast startup time so you’re less likely to miss critical shots, and with 8.2 fps continuous shooting, you can capture fast motion in beautiful detail.
Canon has also given this camera enhanced tracking and detection capabilities, which allows the camera to lock onto the subject. Paired with face tracking, this means that you can keep moving subjects in focus with greater ease and minimize blurry, out-of-focus shots.
The wide aperture 28-84mm f/2.0-2.9 zoom lens means you can take photos in low light situations without boosting the ISO. Shooting at a wide aperture like this also enables you to create nice background blur that helps set portrait subjects apart from the rest of the image.
Other features of note in the G9 are Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and NFC, an ISO range of 125-12800 and a 3-inch fixed touchscreen LCD.
Get a full hands-on look at this camera in the video above by Backpacking Videos.
Panasonic DMC-LX100 Overview
Though the DMC-LX100 has been replaced with the DMC-LX100 II, the original version is still a highly capable camera. A look at its specs demonstrates this fact.
Armed with a 12.8-megapixel micro 4/3” sensor, this camera doesn’t have the resolution of the Canon, yet it still produces excellent results with images that are detailed, sharp, and rich in color.
Paired with a 24-75mm Leica DC Vario-Summilux zoom lens, you have the capability of photographing wide-angle landscapes, intimate portraits, street scenes, and even wildlife.
What’s more, with an aperture range of f/1.7-f/2.8, you get excellent low-light performance. The nine-blade aperture also creates smooth background blur.
This camera has manual controls that allow you to take greater initiative in creating your photos. There are dedicated aperture and focus rings, as well as controls for shutter speed and exposure compensation.
This little camera is also a champ with video. With 4K recording capabilities, you can create detail-rich footage. Additionally, when shooting at 30 fps in 4K, each individual frame can be extracted as an 8-megapixel still image.
Unlike the Canon, the Panasonic has a viewfinder, and an electronic one at that. With 2.764-million-dots of resolution, the viewfinder affords you another level of control when composing your images.
Other features of note in the LX100 include 11 fps burst shooting, an ISO range of 200-25600, an optical image stabilization system, and a fixed 3-inch LCD.
See a detailed review of the Panasonic LX100 in the video above by Adam Savage’s Tested.
Canon Powershot G9 X Mark II vs Panasonic DMC-LX100
Canon Powershot G9 X Mark II
When comparing these cameras head-to-head, there are many similarities.
Both cameras have a small form factor and are lightweight. Both also have built-in zoom lenses with comparable focal range and apertures.
Additionally, both cameras have optical image stabilization and similar ISO ranges that give you improved low light performance. Both cameras have Wi-Fi, RAW image support, face detection focus, and manual focusing modes too.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100
NFC is a common feature, as is remote control via a smartphone app. Both cameras also have manual exposure controls, timelapse recording modes, and high-resolution LCDs.
The primary difference between these cameras is the sensor.
In the Canon, you find a more resolute 20-megapixel sensor, which is great if you want to make large prints, but it’s a 1-inch sensor. By comparison, the Panasonic’s sensor is 1.9 times larger. Even though it’s less resolute with 12.8-megapixels, the larger sensor means improved low-light performance and large pixels for better image quality. Larger sensors also give you more control over depth of field.
If action photography is what you’re after, the Panasonic wins. It has a faster maximum shutter speed of 1/4000 seconds (compared to 1/2000 seconds in the Canon) and has a faster burst shooting rate (11 fps vs 8.2 fps).
The fact that the Panasonic has an electronic viewfinder is a big deal as well, especially considering there is no viewfinder in the Canon. As noted earlier, a viewfinder can greatly assist you with composition, and electronic viewfinders provide information and feedback that help you perfect your shots.
The Canon wins out in a few areas, too.
The touchscreen LCD is a nice touch, and it is more resolute than the LCD found on the Panasonic. This is advantageous for inspecting the details of the photos you take. It also means a brighter, crisper display that’s easier to see during daytime shooting.
Furthermore, the Canon has a greater reach with its lens (84mm vs 75mm in the Panasonic), which can make a difference when shooting far-off subjects. The Canon also has Bluetooth and is slightly smaller and lighter than the Panasonic.
Canon Powershot G9 X Mark II and Panasonic DMC-LX100 Prices
These cameras are evenly matched when it comes to features, but the same cannot be said for their prices.
At the time of this writing, the Canon Powershot G9 X Mark II price is $479.99. The Panasonic DMC-LX100 price is currently $599.99, which is a $200.00 savings.
Since price is often the overriding factor for many photographers, the question is, is the Panasonic so much better that it warrants spending an additional $120.00?
For me, the answer to that question is yes.
The Panasonic has a larger sensor, better features for action photography, better ISO performance, and a beautiful electronic viewfinder. Those things alone are enough for me to spend another $120.00.
However, when it comes to image quality, build quality, features, and lens performance, these cameras are very evenly matched. That makes the Canon an excellent choice as well.
In that case, it will likely come down to feel. Get your hands on both cameras, test them out, see how they fit in your hand, and examine their features, controls, and so forth. Sometimes how a camera works and feels can be the deciding factor.
We Recommend
DSLR vs. Mirrorless: Which is Top Dog in 2017?
It wasn't that long ago that mirrorless cameras were a new-fangled gadget just hitting the shelves.
And though DSLR cameras are still more popular and common, mirrorless has certainly made a name for itself.
The question is, if you're in the market for a new camera, should you go with a DSLR or a mirrorless system?
Let's pit these two types of cameras against each other in a head-to-head matchup.
DSLRs vs. Mirrorless: Head-to-Head Specs
Size & Weight
In offering a general overview of what most DSLRs are about, you need to start with size and weight.
Compared to mirrorless systems, DSLRs like the Canon 5D Mark IV (shown above) are bigger, heavier, and bulkier.
That means that for folks that just want a camera for casual shooting or travel photography that a smaller, more compact mirrorless camera like the Olympus PEN-F (shown below) might be a better bet.
Of course, there are photographers that prefer the heft of a DSLR.
A DSLR just feels good in your hands, with a large grip that fills your palm and gives you the sensation that you've got a really good camera in your hands.
The Winner: It's a draw. Some photographers like the bigger-bodied DSLR, others prefer the smaller, more compact feel of a mirrorless. What's "best" is simply a matter of personal choice.
Lens Selection
Another thing that photographers like about DSLRs is that they have an incredible range of lenses.
Since they've been around for awhile, DSLRs are compatible with a myriad of lenses, so no matter what camera system you have, there's a good chance that you'll be able to find any kind of lens you want.
The same can't necessarily be said for mirrorless systems...
Though there are many more lenses available for mirrorless cameras like the Sony Alpha a6300 than there were just a couple of years ago, there is still not the vast selection that DSLR owners enjoy.
The Winner: DSLRs win this one. The lens selection is simply much better.
Viewfinder Quality
DSLRs rely on optical viewfinders that are essentially unchanged since the days of film photography.
Though there is something to be said for the familiarity of that technology, it's somewhat limited in scope.
For starters, unless you invest in a top-of-the-line DSLR, the optical viewfinder likely won't have full coverage, meaning you might only see 95% of the scene.
What's more, mirrorless cameras often have an electronic viewfinder that's not only brighter and crisper but displays much more information.
For example, some mirrorless cameras like the Sony a7R II have an electronic viewfinder that displays a live histogram.
See the components of Sony's viewfinder in the video above from Sony Canada Training.
What's more, electronic viewfinders often look far more natural, that is, they more closely match what you'd actually see with your eyes, than an optical viewfinder.
The Winner: Mirrorless cameras take the cake here. Their electronic viewfinders simply outperform the older optical viewfinders of DSLRs.
Image Quality
Image Quality is obviously one of the most important factors when considering a DSLR or mirrorless camera.
Fortunately, no matter which camp you're in, you'll be able to find a high-quality camera that produces gorgeously resolute images.
On the DSLR side, it's tough to beat the Canon EOS 5D S with its enormous 50.6-megapixel sensor.
Granted, not all DSLRs have that many megapixels, but even entry-level rigs like the Nikon D3300 produce pretty darn good images.
The same can be said for mirrorless setups.
On the high end, the Sony a7R sports a 36.2-megapixel full frame sensor, an ISO range to 25600, and a maximum shutter speed of 1/8000 seconds.
That means that no matter if you're shooting in bright or dim lighting, have a subject that's stationary or on the move, this camera will be able to accommodate without any trouble at all.
Entry-level models like the Olympus OM-D E-M10 II have a 16.1-megapixel sensor paired with 5-axis image stabilization to help you get nicely detailed, sharp photos.
What's more, this particular camera also has one of the best viewfinders out there with 1.037 million dots of resolution, so you'll be able to see your subject in clear, sharp detail to get those high-quality shots you desire.
The Winner: It's another draw. Either way you go, DSLRs and mirrorless cameras both have the technology to help you take high-quality shots.
Other Factors
There are other things to consider when buying a camera, too.
Price, for example, is likely the first and foremost on people's mind.
There are well-priced entry-level models on both sides of the aisle, as well as high-priced professional rigs, too.
But buying a used camera can stretch your budget whether you're in the market for a DSLR or a mirrorless setup.
Autofocus systems should be of interest to you as you look at buying a camera as well.
Again, there are many DSLRs and mirrorless cameras with phenomenal autofocus systems.
The Nikon D810, though a couple of years old now, still has one of the best AF systems amongst the DSLR crowd.
On the mirrorless side, it's tough to beat the Sony Alpha A9 in terms of AF performance, with its eye-tracking capabilities and a whopping 693 AF points.
You also want a camera that's fun, and that can certainly be accomplished with a DSLR or a mirrorless camera.
Sure, you might want to opt for a smaller, lighter mirrorless if you spend a lot of time outdoors hiking around. But if you're in the studio, a bigger DSLR might not be a bad idea.
Either way, you can have loads of fun with either type of camera, assuming you take the time to learn how to use it!
Learn More:
- The Ultimate Full Frame Showdown: Nikon D810 vs Canon EOS 5D Mark IV vs Sony A7R II
- 3 Mirrorless Cameras That Will Rock Your Boat
My Favorites
Granted, there are some DSLRs and mirrorless cameras that are better than others. I've mentioned a few above, but here's a quick summary with technical specs for simplicity's sake.
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
- System Type: DSLR
- Sensor: 30.4-Megapixel Full Frame
- Autofocus: 61-Point AF with 41 Cross-Type Points
- LCD: 3-inch Touchscreen with 1.62 Million Dots
- Burst Rate: 7fps
- Video: 1080p
Best feature: Image quality. The combination of the all-new sensor and advanced autofocus system means you can capture tack-sharp, detailed images no matter the subject.
Learn more: Check the specs and pricing on the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
Nikon D3300
- System Type: DSLR
- Sensor: 24.2-Megapixel APS-C
- Autofocus: 11-Point AF with 1 Cross-Type Point
- LCD: 3-inch with 921K Dots
- Burst Rate: 5fps
- Video: 1080p
Best feature: The D3300 is well-priced, well-equipped, and performs well for any photographer, though it is ideally suited for beginners.
Learn more: Check the specs and pricing on the Nikon D3300
Fuji X-T2
- System Type: Mirrorless
- Sensor: 24.3-Megapixel APS-C
- Autofocus: Hybrid AF with 169 Phase-Detect Points 325 Total AF points
- LCD: 3-inch Tilt-Angle with 1.04 Million Dots
- Burst Rate: 8fps
- Video: 4K
Best feature: The X-T2 has a lightning-quick autofocus system with excellent coverage, meaning you can get sharp photos of still and moving subjects anywhere in the field of view.
Learn more: Check the specs and pricing on the Fuji X-T2
Olympus OM-D EM-10 II
- System Type: Mirrorless
- Sensor: 16.1-Megapixel Micro Four-Thirds
- Autofocus: 81-Point AF
- LCD: 3-inch Tilt-Angle with 1.37 Million Dots
- Burst Rate: 8.5fps
- Video: 1080p
Best feature: This camera has an excellent viewfinder, and is small enough to carry just about anywhere.
Learn more: Check the specs and pricing on the Olympus OM-D EM-10 II
The Final Verdict
So, which is better in 2017? DSLRs or mirrorless cameras?
The answer is...it depends.
As I've pointed out throughout this article, there are things to like about both sides.
What it will probably come down to is your personal preference and what you feel most comfortable using.
Fortunately, there's more selection today than ever before, and you can find incredible deals on used DSLR and mirrorless cameras to stretch your budget as far as possible.
That's not a bad deal, is it?!
We Recommend
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Panasonic Lumix G9: Which is the Better Camera for Enthusiasts?
If you've graduated from being a beginner photographer and you're ready to upgrade your camera gear, doing so can be quite the decision because there are so many choices for cameras these days.
For many enthusiast photographers, that means poring over dozens and dozens of possibilities.
To help narrow your search, I've selected two very capable and feature-packed enthusiast-level cameras - the Fujifilm X-H1 and the Panasonic Lumix G9 - to highlight in detail.
Both cameras are mirrorless and bring plenty of punch to the table, so let's get started comparing these two excellent cameras!
Editor's Tip: Buying a new camera means spending a good chunk of change, but you can stretch your budget further by buying pre-owned gear.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Panasonic Lumix G9: Common Features
As noted above, both of these cameras are mirrorless, which, in turn, means that they both have small bodies that make them easy to carry around.
The Fujifilm X-H1 weighs in at 1.48 pounds (without a lens attached) and the Panasonic Lumix G9 comes in at 1.45 pounds (without a lens attached).
These cameras are similarly sized as well, with the Fujifilm measuring 5.5x3.8x3.4 inches and the Panasonic measuring 5.4x3.8x3.6 inches.
So, in terms of size and weight, these cameras are highly comparable, and give you a portable, easy-to-use camera body for just about any shooting situation.
These cameras also come loaded with modern conveniences that any photographer will appreciate:
- WiFi
- Bluetooth
- Smartphone remote control
- Electronic viewfinder
- 1.040-dot articulating touchscreen LCD
- Sensor-shift image stabilization
- Weather-sealed body
So, not only do both cameras offer things like WiFi and Bluetooth for easy connectivity with other devices, but you can also control the camera via your smartphone.
In both cases you'll find a large, high-resolution articulating touchscreen for making low-angle and high-angle shots a little easier to get.
You'll undoubtedly appreciate the built-in image stabilization for sharper photos when shooting handheld and the weather-sealed bodies when shooting in adverse weather.
In terms of many of their features, these camera are neck-and-neck. Let's discuss a few differences between the two that could sway your opinion one way or the other.
Learn More:
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Panasonic Lumix: Differences
To make these comparisons easiest, let's examine a few specific features in a head-to-head format.
Sensor
The Fujifilm comes with a 24.3-megapixel X-Trans III CMOS APS-C sensor, which is widely regarded as one of the best sensors on the market today.
The images that the sensor can produce are crystal clear, beautifully contrasty, have excellent colors, and are highly detailed. If you're looking for a high-quality sensor that can handle anything you can throw at it, this is it.
And while the Fujifilm might have a better sensor, it's not like the Panasonic is a slouch.
With a 20.3-megapixel micro four-thirds sensor, the Panasonic doesn't have the megapixel count as its rival, however, its pixels are roughly the same size as the Fujifilm's, so the output quality of both cameras is also similar.
Still, if I had to choose the better of the two sensors, my vote would go to the Fujifilm.
Get more details about the Fujifilm X-H1 in the video above by Kai W.
Autofocus System
Another important feature to compare is the autofocus system.
Again, the Fujifilm outguns the Panasonic with 325 autofocus points compare to 225 autofocus points.
I'd happily shoot with 225 autofocus points any day, but the Fujifilm has phase-detection autofocus where the Panasonic does not. Phase-detect autofocus can significantly aid in getting sharper, focused images.
Learn More:
ISO Performance
If you tend to shoot in low-light situations, you might want to inspect the Panasonic a little more thoroughly.
With a maximum ISO of 25600, it can accommodate better low-light performance more so than the Fujifilm, which maxes out at 12800.
That's a significant disparity that could make the difference between getting well-exposed low-light shots or not.
Continuous Shooting
If action shooting is something you typically pursue, again, the Panasonic might be the better choice.
It can accommodate 20fps shooting where the Fujifilm can muster "only" 14fps.
Either way, both cameras offer excellent burst shooting speed, but it's hard to deny how impactful that extra 6fps could be when the moment matters.
Editor's Tip: Do you have old gear just collecting dust? Sell your old camera and lenses and use the proceeds to fund a new kit. Get started here.
Video Features
For video enthusiasts, it's important to note that the Panasonic is a much more capable camera.
Not only is the Panasonic the only one of the two to offer 4K video, but it also has 6K video capabilities as well.
Additionally, the Panasonic has a headphone port so you can monitor audio quality while you shoot video.
You can even extract 8-megapixel still images from videos that you shoot in 4K and 18-megapixel still images from videos that you shoot in 6K.
Learn more about the Panasonic G9 in the video above by the Hybrid Shooter.
Wrapping It Up: Which is Better?
Now that I've outlined some of the essential features of these cameras, it's time to declare a winner.
The problem is, these are both really good cameras, so pegging one as the winner is virtually impossible.
Likely what it will come down to in determining which of these cameras is best for you is the specific type of work you do.
That is, if you're heavy into video, the Panasonic is the better choice. If you need a higher-resolution sensor for creating large, detailed prints, the Fujifilm is the better choice.
Likewise, pricing is undoubtedly a significant factor in making your decision.
The Fujifilm will set you back $1,649 for the body only (at the time of writing) while the Panasonic is similarly priced at $1,698 (again, at the time of writing).
That means that unless you can find one or the other at significant savings - like buying used - price isn't really a factor here.
Instead, making a decision between these two highly capable cameras will come down to which one suits your specific needs the best.
Learn More
- Why the Canon 6D Mark II is the Most Underrated Camera on the Market
- Why Every Photographer Should Have a 24-70mm Lens
We Recommend
Fujifilm X-T2 vs Fujifilm X-T3
Photo by Marcus Wallis on Unsplash
In terms of cameras that professional photographers love, the Fujifilm X-T series has been at the top of the list, and Fujifilm knows it.
Both the Fujifilm X-T2 and Fujifilm X-T3 are incredibly similar because Fujifim knows it has a winning formula.
But, when it comes down to it, the price difference between the Fujifilm X-T2 vs. Fujifilm X-T3 is not enough of a reason to choose one over the other.
So, the question then becomes which camera should you buy and what does the full Fujifilm X-T2 vs. Fujifilm X-T3 comparison look like?
Editor’s Note: MPB has launched an #AskMPBAnything content series: they’re inviting photographers and filmmakers to ask them anything they want to know about photo and video kit, and the MPB team will answer as many questions as they can. MPB’s goal is to provide as many answers as they can while we're stuck at home! Check Youtube, Facebook, Twitter for answers from the MPB team.
Fujifilm X-T2 vs Fujifilm X-T3 Specs
Photo by Christian Lambert on Unsplash
The Fujifilm X-T2 vs. Fujifilm X-T3 debate is so heated because the cameras are near carbon copies of one another. Both cameras feature commendable autofocus systems, weather-sealed bodies, and 4K video capabilities.
Neither feature a built-in flash and they’re both laid out in the same manner. So, what are their differences?
Fujifilm X-T2 Specs
- 24MP sensor
- 8fps burst mode
- 4K video capabilities
- ISO range of 200-6,400
- 3” tilting LCD
- Built-in Wi-Fi
- Weather-sealed body
- 340-shot battery life
Fujifilm X-T3 Specs
- 26MP sensor
- 11fps burst mode
- 4K video capabilities
- ISO range of 160-12,800
- 3” tilting touchscreen LCD
- Built-in Wi-Fi
- Weather-sealed body
- 390-shot battery life
As you can see, the Fujifilm X-T3 features a slightly larger sensor, a slightly faster burst mode, and a slightly longer battery life.
The main difference between the two is the autofocus system, which features 325 points in the X-T2 and 425 points in the X-T3. It’s a sizable improvement.
Recommended Photography Reading
- National Geographic Photo Basics: The Ultimate Beginner's Guide to Great Photography
- Photography: The Definitive Visual History
- Read This if You Want to Take Great Photographs
Fujifilm X-T2 vs Fujifilm X-T3 Body & Design
X-T2
All of the changes Fujifilm made between the Fujifilm X-T2 and Fujifilm X-T3 bodies are minimal. In fact, they look exactly alike.
Both cameras have a micro HDMI port, and the Fujifilm X-T3 uses a USB 3.1 Type C port instead of the X-T2’s 3.0 port.
Both cameras can be purchased in two colors: black and graphite silver.
X-T3
The command dials on the X-T3 are a bit more pronounced, which is a big improvement over the X-T2. I was shocked to realize just how much of a difference such a small change made.
Finally, the real reason I land on the X-T3 side of the Fujifilm X-T2 vs. Fujifilm X-T3 debate is that the X-T3 features a touchscreen and the X-T2 does not.
Learn More:
Fujifilm X-T2 vs Fujifilm X-T3 Build & Handling
X-T3
The Fujifilm X-T3 weighs a bit more than its predecessor at 1.19 pounds vs. 1.11 pounds. But, this really isn’t enough of a difference to change the handling of either camera.
Both cameras are weather-sealed against dust, splashes, and temperatures down to 14 degrees.
The buttons on the rear of the X-T3 are bigger and deeper, which is helpful when you’re shooting in inclimate weather and already can’t feel your fingers.
Fujifilm X-T2 vs Fujifilm X-T3 Video Performance
You can see the Fujifilm X-T2 in action in the video above by Mitch Lally.
And, you can see the Fujifilm X-T3 in action in the video above by Kjetil Kvien Madsen
As the videos explain, the Fujifilm X-T2 shoots 4K video at up to 30p. Meanwhile, the Fujifilm X-T3 shoots 4K video at up to 60p. That’s not a small difference!
Fujifilm X-T2 vs Fujifilm X-T3 Price
X-T2
The Fujifilm X-T2 is available on Amazon for $1,600. Or, you can save over $1,000 by buying a used Fujifilm X-T2 on MPB. They start at $580.
The Fujifilm X-T3, on the other hand, is $1,500 new. But, there are a ton of options on MPB for used Fujifilm X-T3s for just $1,000.
Learn More:
We Recommend
Fujifilm X-T3 vs Fujifilm X-T30 Comparison
photo by recep-bg via iStock
The X-T30 is a new APS-C mirrorless camera released by Fujifilm. Although the camera was launched only a week ago, everyone is already talking about its outstanding capabilities.
Since it came out shortly after the Fujifilm X-T3, these two cameras are very similar and those who are looking for a new camera might have a problem deciding which one is the better choice.
The Fujifilm X-T30 offers similar features as the Fujifilm X-T3, but it is much smaller and costs less. Of course, the lower price implies that it can’t be as good as its older brother, but if it has all the features you are looking for, why should you waste money on the more expensive model?
In this comparison review, we will help you to decide which one of these two cameras better suits your needs.
The Fujifilm X-T3 or Fujifilm X-T30?
Need a new camera? BUY USED AND SAVE YOURSELF SOME CASH!
Fujifilm X-T3 vs Fujifilm X-T30 – Design
To begin with, let’s compare the design of these two cameras.
Both of them are compact and lightweight, but the Fujifilm X-T30 clearly wins in this battle. The camera has a weight of 13.5 oz, while it is 4.66 inches wide, 3.26 inches long, and 1.84 inches deep.
FujiFilm X-T3
Actually, the X-T30 looks like a miniature X-T3 and it is so light that you will barely feel it in your hand.
While there are good sides that come with compact size, there are also certain disadvantages. For example, the grip is far more comfortable in the X-T3, especially if you use telephoto lenses that can be quite heavy.
FujiFilm X-T30
Moreover, the X-T3 is weather-proofed which it is not the case with the X-T30. While you don’t need to worry about dust, moisture, and snow while using the Fujifilm X-T3, the new camera is not very resistant to these things so it needs additional care when used in harsh weather conditions.
Learn More:
Fujifilm X-T3 vs Fujifilm X-T30 - LCD and Viewfinder comparison
FujiFilm X-T3
The X-T3 has a better electronic viewfinder because it has a bigger resolution (3.69 vs 2.36 million dots) and higher magnification (0.75x vs 0.62x).
Additionally, there are differences in the LCD screen. Although they both incorporate a 3-inch LCD screen with a 1040K resolution, the X-T30 can be tilted in two ways, while the display on the X-T3 can be angled up, down, and to the side.
FujiFilm X-T30
The LCD screen on the X-T30 has an advantage because its touchscreen technology seems to be quicker reacting, consequently making it easier to use.
Fujifilm X-T3 vs Fujifilm X-T30 – Main Specs
The Fujifilm X-T30 has many similar features as its high-end sibling.
First of all, they both have a 26.1MP X-Trans sensor and X-Processor 4 Quad Core-CPU. This combination allows a native ISO from 160 to 12800, while it can be expanded down to 80 and up to 51200.
FujiFilm X-T3
Additionally, they both offer phase detection AF with 99% coverage, 4K video capabilities, continuous shooting speed of 30 frames per second, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, and other similar options for creating and editing stills and videos.
FujiFilm X-T30
It is worth mentioning the X-T30 has Advanced SR Auto mode which is aimed to make things easier for those who are not experienced photographers.
When using this mode, the camera will arrange the settings such as exposure and shutter speed automatically, so all you need to do is to press the button in order to make a clear photo.
Learn More:
- Bad Photography Habits You Need to Break
- If You’re Planning to Travel in 2019, This is the Camera You Need
Fujifilm X-T3 vs Fujifilm X-T30 - Continuous Shooting
Both cameras produce excellent results when it comes to burst shooting with the electronic shutter. On each camera, you can shoot at up to 30 frames per second, although at this speed the resolution will be compressed to 16MP and there will be a 1.25x crop.
If you want to avoid this, you can still shoot at 20fps (which is still quite impressive) and you will preserve full resolution and there will be no crop.
There are minor differences if you are using the mechanical shutter. The Fujifilm X-T3 allows continuous shooting at up to 11fps, while the X-T30 offers only eight frames per second.
Get a hands-on look at the Fujifilm X-T30 in the video above by Mathieu Gasquet.
Fujifilm X-T3 vs Fujifilm X-T30 – Autofocus
Both cameras have very impressive phase detection autofocus system. Still, since it is a newer model, the X-T30 improves some of the things that were not so good on the X-T3.
For example, face and eye tracking will be much easier and more accurate. Now you can choose the face you want to lock on and it will be much harder to lose track of it as it was the case with the X-T3.
Fujifilm X-T3 vs Fujifilm X-T30 – 4K Video Comparison
Although they both offer 4K video, the Fujifilm X-T3 is much more capable in this domain. This camera offers 4K video recording at 60fps (with a 1.18 crop), while it also allows longer recording times.
For example, the X-T3 can record 4K at 30 frames per second, but there is a time limit of ten minutes per clip.
Although the X-T3 also has a time limit for 4K videos, the clips can be 20 minutes long in 4K at 60fps, and 30 minutes long in 4K at 30fps.
Both cameras improve the quality of 4K videos by recording 6K and then downsampling them to 4K.
Furthermore, each of them offers Full HD recording at 120 fps, but as it is the case with 4K recordings, the X-T3 allows you to make longer videos. The Full HD recordings made by the X-T3 have a time limit of 30 minutes, while those made on the X-T30 have a time limit of 15 minutes.
Finally, the X-T3 allows a 10-bit internal option, while this is not the case with the X-T30.
See the Fujifilm X-T3 in action in the video above by The Art of Photography.
Fujifilm X-T3 vs Fujifilm X-T30 – Price Comparison
You can the Fujifilm X-T3 for $1,399.00 brand-new while you can pick up a used one for about $1,289. You will need to spend $899 for the Fujifilm X-T30.
Overall, they are both really great cameras that can be used for versatile purposes. The only big advantage of the X-T3 is that it provides much better options for making videos. Also, the camera is built of stronger material so it has bigger chances to survive in different weather conditions.
On the other side, the X-T30 is a great camera for street photography. It is so small and lightweight that you can carry it with yourself every time you leave the house.
And if that is not enough, its price is quite affordable if you take into consideration what this camera has to offer.
Save even more cash by buying used. Read our MPB review to learn why MPB should be your source for used camera gear.
We Recommend
Head to Head: Nikon D5600 vs Canon EOS Rebel T7i
So, you've tested your photography skills for a few months with your smartphone or point-and-shoot camera. Now it's time to upgrade.
The question is, what entry-level DSLR is best for you?
Naturally, the answer to that question depends on a wide-range of factors, but for most beginner photographers, it really comes down to a few factors, not the least of which are ease of use and price.
Two of the best entry-level DSLRs on the market today come from Nikon and Canon.
In the review below, we have a head to head matchup of the Nikon D5600 vs Canon T7i to help you determine which of these beginner cameras is best for you.
Editor's Tip: Looking for a new camera but don't want to spend your life savings? Consider buying a pre-owned camera to stretch your budget.
Table of Contents:
- Essential Specs of the Nikon D5600 and Canon T7i
- Sensor Comparison
- Autofocus System
- ISO Performance
- LCD Features
- Continuous Shooting Speed
- Battery Life
- Video Capabilities
- Connectivity Features
- Nikon D5600 vs Canon T7i Price
- Nikon Compared to Canon: Which is Best?
Essential Specs of the Nikon D5600 and Canon T7i
It would be a really, really long article if I gave an overview of how these cameras compared on every single feature, so I've boiled it down to some of the most essential specifications:
- Sensor
- Autofocus system
- ISO performance
- LCD features
- Continuous shooting speed
- Battery life
- Video capabilities
- Connectivity features
- Price
Sensor Comparison
To begin, both of these cameras have 24-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensors, a level of resolution that's excellent for beginner photographers (and enthusiasts and pros, too!).
The Nikon's sensor lacks an anti-aliasing filter, which improves sharpness, so in a head-to-head matchup on sharpness, the Nikon wins out.
The Nikon also has a slightly larger sensor, though the difference is negligible and won't have much impact on the quality of your photos.
Sensor Winner: Nikon D5600
Autofocus System
The autofocus systems on these cameras are also highly similar.
Both have contrast-detect and phase-detect capabilities, which improves the ability of the cameras to focus, even in more challenging lighting conditions.
Both also have face detection technology with the ability to tap to touch for focus in live view.
The major difference, however, is that the Canon T7i has 45 autofocus points compared to the Nikon D5600's 39 autofocus points.
Autofocus Winner: Canon T7i
ISO Performance
The Nikon and the Canon have identical native ISO ranges of 100-25600.
With that range, you can push the ISO to brighten your images in dark situations, and while digital noise can become a problem on both cameras as you push the ISO higher, a well-exposed image with a little noise is better than no image at all.
Speaking of pushing the ISO higher, the Canon offers an expanded ISO range to 51200 where the Nikon doesn't even have an extended range.
Though you might not use that extended ISO range very often, it's still nice to have that feature.
ISO Winner: Canon T7i
LCD Features
These camera share similar LCD features that make them tough to differentiate at first glance.
Both have fully articulating touch screen LCDs that allow you to tilt them up or down for better low-angle and high-angle shots. You can even flip the screen around so you can see what you're doing when taking a selfie!
The Nikon D5600 has a 3.2-inch LCD with 1.037K dots of resolution. The Canon T7i has a 3-inch LCD with 1.040K dots of resolution.
So, on the one hand, the Nikon's display is slightly bigger, but on the other hand, the Canon's has slightly more resolution.
Either way, these LCDs offer flexibility, brightness, and touch capabilities, too. The negligible difference in size and resolution is not likely to play much of a factor at all.
LCD Winner: Draw
Continuous Shooting Speed
Continuous shooting speed refers to how many frames the camera can take rapid-fire fashion when shooting in burst mode.
The Canon T79 is capable of taking up to 6 frames per second (fps), which is excellent for an entry-level camera. The Nikon D5600 isn't far behind with the ability to shoot at 5fps.
The difference in continuous shooting speed between these cameras is small enough that you likely won't notice a difference in performance when shooting action shots of things like wildlife or sports. Either way, you get solid performance, even if the Canon is slightly faster.
Get a complete review of the Canon T7i in the video above by Chris Winter. Read in-depth Nikon D5600 review on our website PhotographyTalk.com.
Continuous Shooting Speed Winner: Canon T7i
Battery Life
One of the features of cameras that beginners often neglect is how many shots they can take on a single battery charge.
The Nikon D5600 has good battery life with 820 shots possible per charge. The Canon, however, offers just 600 shots per charge.
It's always good to have a spare battery or two when you go out to shoot, but understanding how much mileage you can get from each battery is a good thing to know.
Battery Life Winner: Nikon D5600
Video Capabilities
These entry-level DSLRs have identical video capabilities.
They both shoot in full HD at 1920x1080 resolution in MPEG-4, H.264 format.
Both cameras also have a microphone port (though, for higher-quality video you'll want to invest in an aftermarket mic). Neither camera has a headphone port.
You aren't going to make cinematic-quality videos with either camera, but for casual videography - including producing videos for YouTube - either of these cameras can suit you well.
Video Capabilities Winner: Draw
Editor's Tip: Your old gear isn't doing you any good sitting in your closet. Sell your old camera and lenses and upgrade your kit using the proceeds. Start the process here.
Connectivity Features
Again, these cameras are well-matched with identical connectivity features.
Both cameras have WiFi, Bluetooth, and NFC, making it easy to connect to other devices.
Learn more about the Nikon D5600 in the video above by Chris Winter.
Connectivity Features Winner: Draw
Nikon D5600 vs Canon T7i Price
For many photographers, the price of gear is the overriding factor when deciding what to buy, and in the case of these cameras, their prices are more than reasonable.
A brand-new Nikon D5600 with an 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR and 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3G ED kit lens runs just under $800. A brand-new Canon T7i with an EF-S 18-55 IS STM kit lens runs just under $750.
And since these are popular cameras that have been out for about a year-and-a-half (in the case of the Canon) and nearly two years (in the case of the Nikon), there are plentiful opportunities to save money and buy a pre-owned rig.
Buying pre-owned obviously helps you stretch your budget, so perhaps you can get a solid DSLR like the Nikon D5600 or the Canon T7i and still afford to get an upgraded lens or another accessory.
Price Winner: Draw
Nikon Compared to Canon: Which is Best?
As demonstrated in the head-to-head matchups above, the Nikon D5600 and Canon T7i are very evenly matched with just a few minor differences between them.
In fact, the biggest difference between these cameras is the fact that one is a Nikon and one is a Canon.
With virtually identical technical specs and features, and used and new pricing that's very similar as well, it's hard to determine a clear winner in the Nikon D5600 vs Canon T7i battle.
Technically, the Canon T7i won three matchups while the Nikon D5600 won only two, so if we're going by that margin, the Canon gets the slight edge.
However, either way, you're getting a solid entry-level camera that has a good feature set, solid capabilities, and can grow with you for the next few years.
In the end, it will likely come down to whether you're drawn more to the Nikon or the Canon environment.
See a head-to-head matchup between these two cameras in the video above by Jared Polin.
We Recommend
Head to Head: Nikon D7500 vs. Nikon D750
If you've been at this photography thing for a while and you're considering an upgrade to a semi-professional camera, there's certainly plenty of choices out there.
For those of you that shoot with Nikon (and for those of you that might want to switch from another manufacturer), there's two mid-range cameras you might consider as your next camera body: the Nikon D7500 or the Nikon D750.
Naturally, both being Nikons, they have some shared benefits and some shared detriments as well.
Likewise, there are some similarities between the two that might make it tough to make a decision. There are also some glaring differences.
Let's take a closer look at these cameras to help you decide which one might be best for you.
Essential Specs: Nikon D7500
Announced earlier this month, the Nikon D7500 replaced the D7200, and features plenty of specifications that should make an experienced photographer take note and we also did Nikon D7500 vs Nikon D7200:
- 21-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor
- 8fps continuous shooting
- Maximum ISO 164000
- 3.2-inch tilting touch screen LCD with 922,000 dots
- Pentaprism optical viewfinder
- Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, smartphone remote
- Weather-sealed body
Essential Specs: Nikon D750
Announced in the fall of 2014, the Nikon D750 isn't as new as the D7500, but as a full frame camera, it comes with specs that still make it competitive for Nikon shooters' attention:
- 24-megapixel full frame CMOS sensor
- 6.5fps continuous shooting
- Maximum ISO 51200
- 3.2-inch tilting LCD with 1,229,000 dots
- Pentaprism optical viewfinder
- Wi-Fi
- Weather-sealed body
Head-to-Head: Common Features
As you can see in the brief specifications above, both the D7500 and the D750 share many commonalities.
Both are weather-sealed, so you can shoot in adverse conditions without worry of what'll happen to your camera. Both also have top LCD panels for quickly viewing and setting your camera settings, as seen on the D7500 above.
Other commonalities include a microphone port and a headphone port for videography, time lapse recording, AE bracketing for overcoming difficult lighting situations, and a shutter life of around 150,000 cycles.
There are other common features, but with enough of a difference between the models to warrant mention.
For example, both are Wi-Fi enabled for easier sharing of photos and videos, though the D7500 also features Bluetooth connectivity and smartphone remote capabilities. With the market heading more and more toward smart cameras, the D7500 is the winner on this front.
Both cameras also have a 3.2-inch tilting LCD for easier viewing, but the D7500 has a touch screen LCD that offers more flexibility and pinpoint control. However, the D750's LCD (shown above) is higher resolution with about 33 percent more dots than the D7500. Which camera wins this battle depends on what you're looking for.
If you want a modern touch screen that enables you to navigate the autofocus system and menu system with greater ease, the D7500 is a better choice. However, if the screen resolution is what you're after, clearly the D750 is the one to beat.
The D7500 has a maximum continuous shooting rate of 8fps to the D750's 6.5fps. Though neither one is especially fast, if action shots are what you're after, that extra 1.5fps could make a significant difference.
Head-to-Head: Major Differences
There are, of course, some significant differences between the D7500 and the D750...
For starters, the D750 is a full frame camera with a 24-megapixel sensor. That means you get improved resolution and better coverage than you do with the D7500's 21-megapixel APS-C sensor. That 14 percent difference in resolution might not sound like much, but if you're in the market to start selling prints, the D750 is the way to go.
The D750's full frame sensor has another advantage too: better depth of field.
Since the size of the camera sensor is one factor in determining depth of field, the D750 gives you more control over how that bokeh looks. If you're planning on taking a lot of portraits, that might be something to consider.
Furthermore, the D750 has a much beefier battery that allows for up to 1,230 shots on a single charge. The D7500 can only muster 950 shots.
Those two features alone might be enough for photographers with designs on entering the professional market to choose the D750.
The D7500 shouldn't be discounted just yet, though.
With a maximum ISO of 164000, the D7500 outpaces the ISO performance of the D750 by more than 3,100 percent. Likewise, the D7500 has a maximum shutter speed of 1/8000 seconds, double that of the D750. Needless to say, those are features that will interest photographers that shoot indoor and outdoor sporting events, wildlife, and other fast-paced subject matter.
Also of interest to photographers that shoot fast subjects is the processing speed of the cameras. The D750 sports an Expeed 4 processor while the D7500 has an upgraded Expeed 5 processor. Again, if speed is what you need, the D7500 is the winner.
Weight is another factor that many photographers consider to be important, and on that measure, the D7500 wins.
As an APS-C camera, the body is smaller, making it 640 grams. The D750 weighs a full 200 grams more. The D7500 is also smaller, with a body that's 5mm narrower, 5mm thinner, and 9mm shorter than the D750.
It's also important to take into consideration the size and weight of the lenses one is likely to use with these cameras. APS-C cameras tend to have lenses that are smaller and lighter, further making the D7500 the better choice if weight is a concern. On the flip side, the higher-end D750 has higher-end glass available, so for a little more weight (and more money), you can get better lenses that produce sharper results.
The Verdict: Which is Best For You?
Though there are plenty of major differences between these two cameras, both offer a lot of photographing power to people of various skill levels and interests.
If you enjoy portraits, both cameras are well-suited to that pursuit, though the D750 wins on the depth of field front and in terms of the resolution the sensor offers for creating large prints.
If you're into something more mobile, like street photography, the D7500 is a better choice simply because of it's smaller form factor and lighter weight.
Sports and wildlife photographers have something to appreciate about both cameras.On the one hand, the D7500 offers faster processing, better ISO range, faster continuous shooting, and double the maximum shutter speed. On the other hand, the D750 is no slouch, and though it's outperformed by the D7500, the full frame sensor, improved lens selection, and better battery life cannot be overlooked.
On the one hand, the D7500 offers faster processing, better ISO range, faster continuous shooting, and double the maximum shutter speed. On the other hand, the D750 is no slouch, and though it's outperformed by the D7500, the full frame sensor, improved lens selection, and better battery life cannot be overlooked.
For landscape enthusiasts, it's a bit of a draw.The crop sensor D7500 gives you more effective focal length out of your lenses, which can be advantageous when you wish to get more intimate shots of landscapes. Likewise, the
The crop sensor D7500 gives you more effective focal length out of your lenses, which can be advantageous when you wish to get more intimate shots of landscapes. Likewise, the 200-gram difference in weight means you can carry the D7500 for longer periods of time with less fatigue.
At the same time, the D750's larger sensor makes creating large prints more likely, and for shooters that like a bulkier body for a feeling that you've got a solid grip, the D750 (shown above) is a good choice. The weather sealing is a crucial feature as well, though the D7500 has weather sealing too.
When it comes down to it, though, the price is likely going to be the overriding factor when choosing between these cameras.
Brand new, the Nikon D7500 body is about $1,250 and the Nikon D750 is around $1,900.
However, since the D750 is a couple of years old, you can find great deals on quality used bodies. In fact, you can find them for well under $1,400, making it an attractive and affordable choice if you want to get into the full frame market without paying new prices.
No matter which of these cameras makes it into your camera bag, there's plenty to like with lots of features that will make getting those fantastic shots you dream of an easier process.
We Recommend
Head-to-Head: Nikon D500 vs. D750
It might not make sense to compare a crop sensor Nikon D500 camera to a full frame D750 at first. But while there are some substantial differences between these two venerable Nikons, one very important factor is common to them both: the price.
At around $2,000 apiece, these cameras represent good choices for photographers that want a solid camera but without having to take out a second mortgage to pay for it.
The question is, which one is better?
Kai and Paul of DigitalRev TV take up this issue in the video below. They put both cameras to the test, comparing them side-by-side to determine which camera is the best buy. Watch as they compare the cameras on all fronts, from processing power to megapixels and everything in between.
Amazon Recommendations
Nikon D500 DX-Format Digital SLR (Body Only)
D750Nikon D750 FX-format Digital SLR Camera Body
We Recommend
Mirrorless or DSLR for Beginners in 2021?
photo byhsyncoban via iStock
A mirrorless or DSLR camera is a must if you want to develop your own style in photography. Both types of camera allow you to use a wide range of high-quality lenses. Moreover, they are rich in features and highly adaptable for different needs.
DSLRs have ruled the market for nearly two decades. However, in the past few years, mirrorless cameras have become much more popular. In this article, we will explain the main differences between DSLR and mirrorless cameras and point out their strengths and weaknesses.
Table of Contents:
- DSLR and Mirrorless Defined
- DSLR vs Mirrorless: Size and Weight
- DSLR vs Mirrorless: Which Has Better Autofocus?
- DSLR vs Mirrorless: Optical vs Electronic Viewfinder
- DSLR vs Mirrorless: Image Stabilization
- DSLR vs Mirrorless: Image and Video Quality
- DSLR vs Mirrorless: Shooting Speed
- DSLR vs Mirrorless: Battery Life
DSLR and Mirrorless Defined
DSLR is an acronym for a digital single-lens reflex camera, but what does that really mean? In simple words, a DSLR camera uses a mirror system in order to reflect the light from the lens into the viewfinder. Additionally, it uses a digital sensor to produce images instead of a photographic film. You can see this process work in the video above by Fstoppers.
Every DSLR camera has a mirror which is placed just in front of the camera’s image sensor. Since it is positioned under 45 degrees, this mirror transmits everything that passes through the lens into an optical viewfinder. With a press of the shutter button, the mirror folds and exposes the sensor to the light (hence creating an image).
Ashley Pomeroy [CC BY 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0)] via Wikimedia Commons.
The first professional DSLR was introduced by the Nikon Corporation in 1999. This camera (Nikon D1) had only 2.74 megapixels, but it changed the rules of the game in photography.
DSLR cameras share the same design and mechanism as analog SLR cameras, but they offer much more capabilities in terms of image procession. Nowadays, most professional photographers use this type of camera. However, the reign of DSLR seems to be coming to an end.
Mirrorless cameras are becoming increasingly popular, especially since Nikon and Canon released the Nikon Z7 and Canon EOS R. It should be obvious from the name, but this type of camera does not feature an internal mirror. This is basically the main characteristic that distinguishes it from a DSLR camera model.
As is the case with DSLRs, mirrorless cameras feature a digital sensor and use interchangeable lenses, but their sensor is not hidden behind the mirror and it is exposed to the light all the time. As we will see, this is a big game-changer.
In the video above, Sony discusses a few differences between DSLRs and mirrorless cameras.
DSLR vs Mirrorless: Size and Weight
Since they don’t have a mirror within their body, mirrorless cameras are usually very compact and lightweight. An average DSLR weighs 1.7lbs. Although this is not too heavy for carrying around, an average mirrorless model weighs significantly less.
For example, the mirrorless Sony a6300 weighs only 0.89 lb. Moreover, this camera measures just 4.7 x 2.6 x 1.9 inches. Because of this, it can easily fit into a smaller bag and you will still have plenty of space for different types of lenses and other photography equipment.
In comparison, one of the most popular DSLRs in recent years - the Nikon D810 - weighs 2.16 lb. Although it is a bit bulky, this camera is super strong and these few pounds and inches do not mean a lot for many photographers who enjoy using this camera.
DSLR vs Mirrorless: Which Has Better Autofocus?
photo by MarioGuti via iStock
The first mirrorless cameras used only contrast detection technology for autofocusing. DSLRs use phase-detection technology which is faster and more precise. Because of this, they are usually associated with better autofocusing capabilities.
However, mirrorless cameras are evolving and getting better with each passing day. Nowadays, there are mirrorless cameras that combine phase detection and contrast detection technology in order to provide the best results in terms of autofocus accuracy and speed.
The Sony A6300 is a mirrorless model with the world’s fastest autofocus speed and it can lock the subject in 0.05 seconds. Additionally, this camera has 425 phase-detection AF points. The autofocus of this camera is impressive, but in the years to come, it’s a given that mirrorless cameras will have even better autofocus systems.
Some people in the photography industry believe that DSLRs will soon be relics in a market dominated by mirrorless cameras.
Find out why this might be the case in the video above by Engadget.
DSLR vs Mirrorless: Optical vs Electronic Viewfinder
As we already touched upon, DSLR cameras use an optical viewfinder, while mirrorless cameras use an electronic viewfinder. Both types of viewfinder have their own advantages and disadvantages, as Jared Polin discusses in the video below.
The optical viewfinder works better in low-light situations. In a very dark environment, the electronic viewfinder produces grain and noise while DSLR allows you to see exactly what you are about to shoot (without digital interference). Additionally, the optical viewfinder is also better for tracking fast-moving objects.
On the other hand, a mirrorless camera provides you with a unique option to see the effect of the exposure settings through the viewfinder. In this way, a mirrorless viewfinder gives you a possibility to see a preview of the image you are about to take.
Learn more:
- Why You Should Switch to a Mirrorless Camera for Landscape Photography
- DSLRs are Still in the Game: Top 5 DSLR Cameras of 2018
DSLR vs Mirrorless: Image Stabilization
Image stabilization works as a mechanism that reduces blurring as an effect of the camera’s motion. If you have a shaky hand, then you will need to look for a camera that has a good image stabilization function.
Both DSLR and mirrorless cameras have image-stabilization systems. However, some of the mirrorless cameras such as the Sony a7R III offer 5-axis sensor-based image stabilization (IBIS) while there is no such feature in DSLR cameras. Because of this, mirrorless cameras have an advantage in this category.
DSLR vs Mirrorless: Image and Video Quality
photo by structuresxx via iStock
When it comes to image quality, there are no profound differences between DSLR and mirrorless cameras.
The first mirrorless cameras had smaller sensors so they couldn’t produce the same image quality as DSLRs. However, this has changed. In the past few years, there are many full-frame mirrorless models such as the Sony a7R III, Nikon Z7, and Canon EOS R.
Mirrorless cameras, on the other hand, do perform better in terms of video. High-end mirrorless cameras usually have a more accurate focus and larger video resolution than DSLRs of the same class. Even the entry-level mirrorless cameras, such as the Fujifilm X-A5, offer 4K video recording. DSLR camera manufacturers are still struggling to reach this level. Only a few high-end DSLR cameras, such as the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV, shoot 4K video.
Some people still prefer to use DSLR cameras because they come with a wide offer of lenses. Mirrorless cameras are relatively new so there are not as many lens choices. Although new ones are being released every year, DSLRs are still more versatile for image and video because of the much bigger choice of lenses available.
DSLR vs Mirrorless: Shooting Speed
photo by EXTREME-PHOTOGRAPHER via iStock
Since mirrorless cameras have simple mechanics, they can produce more photos per second. This is particularly useful for those interested in sports, wildlife, or event photography. DSLR cameras are also good for burst shooting, but it's mirror makes things a bit more complicated.
Additionally, mirrorless cameras usually offer silent burst shooting mode which is convenient if you don’t want to disturb an environment with the sound of the shutter.
Learn more:
DSLR vs Mirrorless: Battery Life
photo by MarioGuti via iStock
Finally, mirrorless cameras still can’t compete with DSLRs in terms of battery life. The battery life of a DSLR, like the Nikon D5600, is around 970 shots per charge. In comparison, the Nikon Z7 makes only 330 shots before the battery runs out.
Mirrorless cameras usually have lower battery life because its electronic viewfinder drains the battery. If you are not using Live View, DSLR cameras can shoot for hours. This makes them more practical for most situations.
photo by Vershinin via iStock
As you can see, mirrorless cameras are more compact and better for video, but DSLRs come with a bigger choice of lenses and their battery life is much stronger. In other words, each has its unique benefits.
Ultimately, the choice between a modern DSLR and mirrorless camera will come down to what you need in terms of specific features. Either way, you can get a high-quality camera that offers tons of functionality.
Whatever you decide - at MPB, you can get a great DSLR or mirrorless camera for a good deal.
Buying a new camera is an expensive investment, but buying used helps soften the blow to your pocketbook. Moreover, you can trade-in or sell your old gear at MPB, so you can finance a new-to-you camera by getting rid of your old one. Not bad, right?
If you're not familiar with MPB, check out my MPB review for full details.
We Recommend
Mirrorless vs DSLR: Which is Best for You in 2021?
photo bymirsad sarajlic via iStock
The mirrorless vs. DSLR debate has been raging for nearly a decade now, which is surprising to me because it felt like the longest decade ever.
But, do you know whether to buy a mirrorless or DSLR in 2021?
With this guide, you’ll learn all about the differences between these types of cameras so you can make an informed decision.
Let’s get started!
So, What’s a DSLR?
Photo by Chris F from Pexels
I suppose before we can get into the mirrorless vs. DSLR debate, you need to understand what each camera is and does.
A DSLR can be thought of like a step up from the 35mm film cameras you may have used to shoot with back in the day. There is a mirror located inside a DSLR that allows light to bounce onto a prism and then into the viewfinder so that you can see what your shot looks like.
Whenever you’re ready to take your photo and press the shutter button, the mirror flips up to allow light in through your lens so the image can be recorded on the camera’s sensor.
Because of the space needed to incorporate the mirror, DSLRs tend to have larger, bulkier bodies than their mirrorless counterparts.
Sure, So What’s a Mirrorless?
Well, it’s obviously a camera without a mirror. As such, mirrorless bodies tend to be smaller and lighter than DSLRs.
Additionally, a mirrorless camera allows light to stream in through your lens directly onto the image sensor, which is then displayed on the rear LCD or the electronic viewfinder. This allows you to see the image preview and make necessary adjustments to the camera settings before you take the shot.
Recommended Photography Reading
- National Geographic Photo Basics: The Ultimate Beginner's Guide to Great Photography
- Photography: The Definitive Visual History
- Read This if You Want to Take Great Photo
Mirrorless Vs DSLR Size and Weight
photo byEXTREME-PHOTOGRAPHER via iStock
If you’re looking to purchase either a mirrorless or DSLR in 2021, then there are multiple factors you need to consider, one of which is the relative size of each camera.
Since DSLRs technically have more parts, they are usually slightly larger than mirrorless cameras.
However, you also need to consider the other camera gear you will be using with your cameras, like lenses. While mirrorless cameras are technically smaller, most of their lenses are about the same size as the more conventional DSLR lenses.
So, while you may be saving yourself a few ounces or inches when it comes to the camera body, it may not matter much considering your other photography gear.
Mirrorless Vs DSLR in Low Light
photo bygeorgeclerk via iStock
Traditionally, DSLRs have had much better low light shooting capacity, but this is changing as the mirrorless vs. DSLR debate rages on and manufacturers are racing to create better products.
For instance, the Sony Alpha a6500is a mirrorless camera known for its low-light shooting, with an ISO range of up to 51,000.
But, it truly depends upon the type of camera you have. Whenever you purchase a camera with a larger sensor, whether it’s a mirrorless or DSLR, that camera will be better able to shoot without much natural light. This means that a camera with a full frame sensor will have greater low-light capabilities than one with an APS-C sensor.
Learn More:
Mirrorless vs DSLR Video Quality
photo bySladic via iStock
This is the first category where mirrorless cameras reign supreme in the mirrorless vs. DSLR debate.
Mirrorless cameras are typically much better for shooting film because they can use phase detection while shooting, whereas a DSLR’s mirror gets in the way so it has to use the less accurate contrast-detection focus method of shooting.
This is why most mirrorless cameras, like the Fujifilm X-T30, can shoot incredible 4K video with high-end AF systems.
Now, just because mirrorless cameras are typically better for shooting video, that doesn’t mean DSLRs are completely out of the race.
For instance, the Nikon D780 was just named as the “most serious DSLR for video yet” by Engadget.
It can shoot in 4K with eye-tracking phase-detect autofocus and full pixel readout.
Mirrorless vs DSLR Shooting Speed
Photo by Jakob Owens on Unsplash
Again, this is one subject that mirrorless cameras typically rock out. Because of the lack of a mirror to get in the way of taking one photo after another after another, mirrorless cameras typically have faster shutter speeds and higher frames per second.
For example, the Canon EOS R mirrorless camera features the world’s fastest high-speed focusing at just 0.05 seconds and can shoot as fast as 1/8000th second for up to 8fps.
However, high-end DSLRs can compete with mirrorless cameras, you may just need to pay a little more for it.
For instance, the Canon EOS 7D Mark II, which I think is the best DSLR for 2021, also shoots as fast as 1/8000th second at up to 10fps.
Mirrorless vs DSLR Battery Life
photo byAlexthq via iStock
If you’re looking for photography gear to travel with, and you’re concerned about having access to power regularly, then you should definitely purchase a DSLR.
DSLRs last much longer on each battery charge because they don’t need to use an EVF or LCD screen, whereas a mirrorless camera does, and those features use a ton of power.
However, I always recommend having an extra battery regardless of the type of camera you purchase, so it doesn’t make that much difference in the long run.
Mirrorless vs DSLR Lenses
Photo by ShareGrid on Unsplash
This is yet another reason to side with DSLRs in 2021, they’ve simply been around longer so there are way more lenses to choose from.
Granted, this is bound to change with the influx of mirrorless cameras the market is seeing.
You might be able to pick up any of the cameras I’ve mentioned in this article on Gear Focus. Since Gear Focus is a used camera resale store, you’ll find cheaper options than anywhere else.
But, since Gear Focus is run by professional photographers, you won’t need to give up quality for a discount. Their team constantly monitors listings in the site to ensure that each transaction is legitimate and satisfies both the seller and the buyer.
Try searching for any of the above cameras right here on their site.
Learn More:
We Recommend
Nikon D4s vs. Nikon D5
Photo by Julian Santa Ana on Unsplash
Nikon D4S Vs Nikon D5 Comparison
The Nikon D line, despite the age of most of the cameras within it, is in high demand. These cameras feature extremely powerful sensors and processors, top of the line LCD screens, and crisp, clear photos, audio, and video.
The nikon D4s, which came out in 2014, is still one of my favorite cameras to this day. But, some of my friends absolutely swear by the Nikon D5.
So, when it comes down to a Nikon D4s vs. Nikon D5 argument, which side are you on? Well, let’s dive into our Nikon D4s vs. Nikon D5 comparison so you can get a better feel for each camera.
Nikon D4s vs. Nikon D5 Specs
*Nikon D4s pictured above
Let’s start with the specs on the Nikon D4s.
The Nikon D4s features an average 16.2MP FX-Format CMOS sensor, which is paired with an EXPEED 4 processor. It cannot shoot 4K video, but it shoots 1080p Full HD video.
Other Nikon D4s Specs:
- 16.2MP sensor
- EXPEED 4 processor
- Full 1080p HD video capabilities
- 3.2” LCD screen with 921-k dots
- 100% viewfinder coverage
- 2.98 lbs
- 51-point AF system
- 3,020-shot battery life
- 400K shutter-life expectancy
*Nikon D5 pictured above
As for the Nikon D5, it can shoot 4K video at up to 30fps.
It features a 20.8MP FX-Format CMOS sensor and an EXPEED 5 processor. Additionally, it features a better screen - a much better screen - a 3.2” LCD with 2.36-m dots.
Other Nikon D5 Specs:
- 20.8MP sensor
- EXPEED 5 processor
- 4K video at up to 30fps
- 3.2” touchscreen LCD with 2.36-m dots
- 153-point AF system
- 100% viewfinder coverage
- 3.11 lbs
- 3,840-shot battery life
- 400K shutter-life expectancy
One spec that is noticeably missing from each of these cameras is in-body image stabilization.
Jared Polin covered the Nikon D4s vs. Nikon D5 debate a few years ago when the Nikon D5 first dropped. He makes some excellent points about similarities, differences, pros, and cons
Nikon D4s vs. Nikon D5 Body & Design
*Nikon D4s pictured above
The Nikon D4s is a tiny bit lighter than the Nikon D5, but most photographers won’t notice the difference since it’s about a tenth of a pound.
For the most part, both the Nikon D4s and the Nikon D5 are very similar in terms of their designs.
In fact, their dimensions are exactly alike at 6.3” x 3.6” x 6.2”.
*Nikon D5 pictured above
Both the Nikon D4s and the Nikon D5 feature an external flash shoe, microphone and headphone ports, environmental sealing, a top LCD display, and 2 storage slots.
Additionally, both cameras feature fixed screens.
I suppose Nikon’s thinking with the design of the Nikon D5 features was “if it ain’t broke…”
Nikon D4s vs. Nikon D5 Build & Handling
*Nikon D4s pictured above
When it comes to the Nikon D4s vs. Nikon D5 ergonomics, a few changes have been made. For starters, the Nikon D4s is a bit curvier. The grip is more pronounced and better fits your hand.
However, the Nikon D4s features a front dial that is less than ideally placed, which Nikon fixed by pushing it closer to the lens on the Nikon D5.
*Nikon D5 pictured above
The Nikon D5 also features an additional function button on the front of the camera, so may feel cramped to photographers used to the function buttons on the D4s. But, it could also provide a new ease of use. It just depends on what you prefer.
Nikon D4s vs. Nikon D5 Video Performance
CamerArena.com features some of the best video comparison videos on YouTube, because they test all of their cameras in studio shooting the exact same footage before putting the videos side by side for comparison.
But, for a little bit more flair, watch the two videos below, by Nikon Asia and Nikon Europe.
The Nikon D4s features full HD video capture at 50p, so it is definitely enough for a photographer who simply dabbles in videography, but videographers may want to go with the more capable D5.
The Nikon D5, on the other hand, features 4K video at 30fps for up to 3 minutes. This is a large increase from the first Nikon camera that featured 4K video capabilities, the Nikon 1J5, which could only shoot 4K at 15fps.
The Nikon D5 video also features a Flat Picture Profile and time-lapse footage capabilities.
Nikon D4s vs. Nikon D5 Price
Photo by Annie Spratt on Unsplash
Since the Nikon D4s came out in 2014, two years before the Nikon D5 dropped, it’s exponentially cheaper.
You can no longer purchase the Nikon D4s new, since it has been discontinued, but you can buy it used on camera resale sites, like MPB.
The cheapest Nikon D4s I could find on MPB was $1,750 (but it was well used). Otherwise, the Nikon D4s price on MPB starts at $2,250 for a camera in good shape, or $2,600 for a camera in excellent shape.
For the fairest comparison, let’s start with the Nikon D5 price on MPB. You can purchase one starting at just over $4,000.
Or, you can purchase a Nikon D5 new from Amazon for $5,500.
Either way, this camera is still a significant investment, but if you buy used, that investment will be far less than new!
These cameras might be showing their age, but pros around the world use them in great numbers for a reason. Both cameras are highly capable, offer the right features, and are durable workhorses that will last decades.
We Recommend
Nikon D5 vs. D4s. Did Nikon Get it Right?
Every time a camera manufacturer announces a flagship camera, it gets the fans excited, even though it’s always the most advanced model and most of the times it’s the most expensive. The flagship is by definition a niche camera, but it’s also that camera that incorporates the company’s newest and best technology. It’s therefore no surprise the Nikon D5, a fairly anticipated camera, raised a few eyebrows and cracked a few smiles.
Unlike the enthusiast, amateur and entry-level segments of the market, there are rarely giant leaps in the spec lists of pro cameras. Let’s see if the D5is really that much better than the now outdated flagship D4s.
For starters, they’re almost identical in size, although the D5 weighs about 150 grams more and has a weight of 1,405g. There’s a predictable increase in resolution that brings the D5 closer to today’s standards with a resolution of 20 MP versus the D4s’s 16.2MP. Many are probably wondering why a flagship camera that costs $6,500 has such low resolution when the D810 that’s almost three times cheaper sports 36MP. The answer to that is pretty straight forward. The fewer pixels you have on the surface of the sensor, the better low light performance you will get from the chip, at least in theory. If we follow that rule, that means the D4s should be better in low light simply because it has fewer pixels. That’s shouldn’t be the case though because the D5 has a native ISO range of 100-102,400 and a boosted sensitivity of ISO 204,800-3,280,000. These numbers are absolutely crazy and almost surreal. If indeed the Nikon D5 can pull off good image quality at these values, it is a pretty big step that’s going to shake things up in the industry. The camera’s “brain” is the new EXPEED 5 processor which should play a major role in image quality.
But probably the most important reason for anyone to buy any of these two cameras is speed. They’re designed for professional photographers who need lighting fast response and high frame rates. The D5 brings and extra frame/second to the table with 12fps vs. 11 fps. This is crucial for sports and news photographers. The buffer size is also significantly larger as the D5 can take 200 lossless 14 bit RAW shots without stopping.
Another major improvement is in the AF system. The D5has a 153 point system, with 99 cross-type points.
Nikon is also making it clear they want their flagship to be a versatile camera, not just a speed demon. Its native 4k video recording capabilities make it an even more attractive camera for photographers who also shoot video.
The D5 comes with either 2 XQD memory card slots or 2 CF slots which means you don’t have to make further investments in changing your storage options.
It’s hard to say how great this camera really is in the field because Nikon says it’s only going to be available starting March. It’s clearly something different from the D4s and it brings significant improvements. Whether or not it’s worth making the switch is something that remains to be seen. However if everything on the spec sheet is correct, the D5 will most likely be the one of, if not the best DSLRs on the market.
We Recommend
Nikon D500 vs Nikon D7500
Photo by Oliver Koh on Unsplash
The Nikon D500 vs Nikon D7500 debate is another one that’s been raging on for years. The Nikon D7500 is just a few years older than the Nikon D500. But, they’re both a few years and are a pretty good bargain at this point.
Both of these Nikons are crop sensor DSLRs and they are both incredibly well-respected cameras within their classes. I, for instance, have shot with both of these and haven’t had many problems with either.
Still, if you’re thinking about purchasing either of these cameras, a full Nikon D500 vs. Nikon D7500 review would be helpful. Here we will break down the different specs, design features and price points of both of these Nikons.
Nikon D500 vs Nikon D7500 Specs
Nikon D7500
I’m going to break down the Nikon D500 vs. Nikon D7500 specs, but I’m going to start with the D7500 since this camera came out first in 2017.
When you pick up a Nikon D7500 you can expect a 20MP sensor, 8fps burst mode, and a hearty ISO range of 100-51,200.
This is the sort of camera people would have called a workhorse when it first came out.
But, my favorite thing about the Nikon D7500 is its 4K video capabilities. You can shoot 4K at up to 30p.
Nikon D7500
Other Nikon D7500 specs include:
- 20MP sensor
- Expeed 5 processor
- 100% viewfinder coverage
- 4K video capabilities
- 8fps burst mode
- ISO range of 100-51,200
- 51-point AF system
- 3.2” tilting LCD with 922-k dots
Nikon D500
The Nikon D500, like the Nikon D7500, also features a 20MP sensor and Expeed 5 image processor. In essence, the image quality from both of these cameras is going to be the same across the board.
Unlike theNikon D7500, though, the Nikon D500 features a more advanced screen with 2.35m-dots, a faster burst mode at 10fps, and a 1,240-shot battery life.
Nikon D500
Other Nikon D500 specs include:
- 20MP sensor
- 10fps burst mode
- ISO range of 100-51,200
- Expeed 5 processor
- 4K video capabilities
- 3.2” tilting touchscreen with 2.35m-dots
- Built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth
- 1,240-shot battery life
When it comes to the Nikon D500 vs Nikon D7500 specs, these two cameras are rather similar. Of course, if you’re looking for a camera that’s going to be with you for years to come, then you should probably go with the Nikon D500 since it’s rated at 200,000 shutter actuations and the Nikon D750 is more of an enthusiast model and is only rated for 150,000.
Nikon D500 vs Nikon D7500 Body & Design
Nikon D7500
However, the Nikon D500 vs Nikon D7500 debate gets much more interesting when it comes to their designs. The two cameras are relatively similar, except for the fact that the Nikon D500 is obviously built for more serious photography enthusiasts.
What I mean by this is that the Nikon D500 body is bigger, with a thicker grip that feels more comfortable naturally in your hands. It also generally feels sturdier. I’m not scared to hand a Nikon D500 to my son who has been messing around with cameras since he was a toddler.
Nikon D500
As aforementioned in the Nikon D500 vs Nikon D7500 specs section, both of these cameras feature tilting screens, but the Nikon D500’s screen is surrounded by a more rugged setting.
Importantly, the Nikon D500 features illuminated buttons, which is a feature the Nikon D7500 doesn’t. This isn’t a huge buzzkill for all photographers, but if your current camera model features illuminated buttons I’d say it’s definitely hard to revert to a camera body that doesn’t.
Overall, you can expect the Nikon D7500 to have a simpler layout, one built for amateurs, while the Nikon D500 is going to feature more in-depth options. You can see this through the addition of function buttons on the D500, and the fact that the D500 features a dedicated AF-ON button. Both of these features are missing from the D7500.
Nikon D500 vs Nikon D7500 Build & Handling
Nikon D7500
Whenever I get into a Nikon D500 vs Nikon D7500 debate with my friends the first thing they always bring up is the fact that you can’t use the Nikon D7500 with a battery pack. Nikon took this capability away with this model and it makes handling the camera all day a much bigger hassle.
However, it seems that wherever there is a small inconvenience with one of these models there is a similar small inconvenience with the other. The Nikon D500 doesn’t feature a built-in flash, but the Nikon D7500 does.
I don’t find myself using a built-in flash all that often, but it’s still always nice to have the option if I accidentally find myself without my external flash kit.
Nikon D500
A big part of the Nikon D500 vs Nikon D7500 handling debate is discussing how well both of these models work with Nikon’s radio-enabled speedlights that came out recently.
Both of these cameras are capable of working with them, but if you’re thinking of picking up the SB-5000 speedlight you’re going to need a wireless transmitter to do so.
One thing I’ve failed to mention thus far in this Nikon D500 vs Nikon D7500 article is the weather-sealing on either model. Since the Nikon D500 is the model that sits on the cusp of an amateur/professional model I would expect it to have better weather-sealing. However, Nikon claimed that it updated the weather-sealing specifically for the Nikon D7500 model, so they’re both pretty similar.
Nikon D7500
There are also some differences between these models that you’ll notice immediately upon picking them up. The Nikon D500 body is made up of magnesium alloy, whereas the Nikon D7500 is made up of carbon fiber composite. So, the Nikon D7500 is noticeably lighter.
Further, the ergonomics of the Nikon D500 are obviously better. For instance, if you’ve been in the photography industry for a while, you’re going to have a simpler time working with the Nikon D500 simply because it has more options than the Nikon D7500, which is built with a simpler, traditional layout.
Nikon D500 vs Nikon D7500 Video Performance
Photo by Harrison Kugler on Unsplash
This is yet another section that essentially outlines the extreme similarities between these two cameras. The Nikon D500 vs Nikon D7500 video performance is a discussion almost not worth having.
Both of these cameras feature 4K UHD output. Both of these cameras feature a 1.5x crop of their sensors in order to do so. They also both feature a Flat Picture Profile.
The only true difference in the video performance of these two models is that the Nikon D7500 has power aperture which allows you to control the aperture of the camera when it's in live view mode. While this feature is nice to have, it’s going to go unnoticed by a photographer who only dabbles in videography work.
You could also argue that the Nikon D500 should win the Nikon D500 vs Nikon D7500 debate when it comes to video simply because it comes with a clip to retain an HDMI lead when you’re recording video externally.
It’s a rather small feature, but it’s definitely nice to have.
I, of course, understand that sometimes you just need to see a side by side comparison in order to truly judge any two cameras.
This is why I’ve included a video comparison test by CamerArena.com just above.
Nikon D500 vs Nikon D7500 Price
In the Nikon D500 vs Nikon D7500 debate, the price point of the two cameras is probably the thing that’s most different about them. That’s why this section, the Nikon D500 vs Nikon D7500 price section, is so important.
You can find a used Nikon D500 on MPB starting at $800 for a well-used version, or $1,040 for a version in excellent condition.
On the other hand, you can usually pick up a Nikon D7500 for much cheaper than this. MPB currently doesn’t have any used Nikon D7500s listed, but you should definitely check backbecause they rotate through hundreds of new products every single day.
Comment your thoughts on the Nikon D500 vs Nikon D750 debate below.
We Recommend
Nikon D500 vs. Canon 7D MK II
By now the news about the D500 should have had time to sink in. And what a great piece of news it was! Nikon users who loved the D300s and remained faithful to the APS-C format begged, shouted and demanded a successor for that legendary camera. After years that ended with a lot of them abandoning hope, CES 2016 brought the most exciting piece of news in years Along with the new flagship, the D5, the company proudly presented the Nikon D500 camera. No one really cares what happened to the D400 anymore because this new DX DSLR is every bit as exciting as we expected.
Table of Contents:
- Nikon D500 vs Canon 7D Mark II Specs
- Head to Head: Nikon D500 vs Canon 7D Mark II
- Nikon D500 vs Canon 7D Mark II: There's a Clear Winner
NIKON D500 vs Canon 7D Mark II Specs
It is clearly designed to be a workhorse that can handle professional demands admirably. In terms of competition, it finally looks like there is a direct competitor for the Canon 7D Mark II. The Nikon D7200, while still an excellent camera is not quite in the same class with Canon’s popular 7D II. Let’s have a look at some of the most important specs of these two cameras and put them side by side to see if we have a clear winner that could tilt the balance for users who are not yet committed to one system or the other.
|
||
Resolution |
20.9 MP |
20.2MP |
Magnification |
1.5x |
1.6x |
Sensor type |
CMOS |
CMOS |
Low Pass Filter |
No |
Yes |
Image processor |
EXPEED 5 |
Dual Digic 6 |
Viewfinder coverage |
100% |
100% |
Built-in Flash |
No |
Yes |
Storage |
1x XQD, 1xSD |
1xCF,1xSD |
Continuous High Speed |
10fps |
10fps |
Buffer size (RAW) |
200 |
31 |
Native ISO |
ISO 100-51,200 |
ISO 100-16,000 |
Boosted ISO |
ISO 102,400-1,160,000 |
ISO 25,600 |
AF |
153 points, 99 cross-type |
65 point all cross-type |
Video Resolution |
4k at 30p |
1080p up to 60p |
Articulated LCD |
Yes |
No |
Weather sealing |
Yes |
Yes |
Head to Head: Nikon D500 vs Canon 7D Mark II
It only takes a quick look to realize these cameras are intended for almost identical purposes. They’re both top of the line crop cameras designed to work in tough environments and they’re both extremely fast. However, the fact that the D500 is a newer camera and that it borrows a lot of the technology found in the brand new D5 flagship is something that gives it an edge. While both the 7D II and the D500 shoot at an amazing 10fps, the buffer size of the D500 is an astonishing 200 shots (just like the D5), whereas the 7D II can only shoot 31 RAW files before it freezes.
The AF system of the D500is also more advanced with 153 total focusing points.
The video capabilities of the D500make it clear that Nikon wants to focus on the part of the market that wants to shoot both stills and video professionally. The camera has native 4K recording and the ability to record uncompressed footage via HDMI. With this in mind, you can’t really compare the two when it comes to shooting video.
The articulated LCD screen of the D500comes in very handy and although not every photographer needs it, it’s just better to know it’s there. While both cameras are rugged machines and there’s an obvious tie in terms of build quality, you can’t say the same for battery life. The D500 lets you take twice as many shots on one charge- approximately 1,240 vs. 670 on the 7DII.
Nikon D500 vs Canon 7D Mark II: There's a Clear Winner
Even from a simple run through the spec sheet, it’s quite clear the D500is the better camera. Whether or not it’s worth switching systems is something that each photographer has to decide for himself. We have to admit we love the D500 already and it’s hard not to take its side in the battle. After all, it kind of brought back an entire category in Nikon’s lineup. But without doubt, both of these cameras are excellent tools and while the newer model might be a little better, the difference in real life use is far from being significant.
We Recommend
Nikon D5300 vs Nikon D5600 Comparison
Nikon D5300 Vs Nikon D5600
The Nikon D5300 and Nikon D5600 are two entry-level DSLR cameras. Both of them are budget-friendly and easy to use which makes them a good choice for those with a limited budget or for novices in photography.
Although they are relatively cheap when you compare them to other DSLR models, the D5300 and D5600 can still make great photos and videos, so they are both on the top of the list of the most popular consumer cameras ever.
As you would have guessed by looking at model numbers, the Nikon D5600 is a newer model. It was released in 2016, almost three years after its predecessor - the Nikon D5300 (the D5400 was never released).
The D5600 is a great deal for its price, but how much better is it than its older brother? Should you spare a few bucks and opt for the older camera?
Check out this comparison and find answers to these questions.
Ready to get your hands on a Nikon D5300 or Nikon D5600? In my MPB review, you'll learn why buying a used D5300 or D5600 is a great option.
Nikon D5300 vs Nikon D5600 – Features comparison
There are no differences in sensor size and resolution between the Nikon D5300 and Nikon D5600. Both models were built around a 24MP CMOS sensor (23.5 x 15.6 mm) with no optical low-pass filter. Additionally, they both have the same EXPEED 4 processor.
Nikon D5300
Although they share an identical sensor and processor, these two cameras differ in terms of the ISO sensitivity range. The D5300 has a native ISO range from 100 to 12,800, while its successor allows a native ISO range of 100 to 25,600.
The cameras also have very similar capabilities when it comes to other features. They allow 5 fps continuous frame rate and Full HD (1920x1080p) recording up to 60 fps.
Nikon D5600
Additionally, they both have Multi-CAM 4800DX autofocus sensor module with TTL phase detection and 39 focus points (including 9 cross-type sensor).
Get a detailed comparison of these cameras in the video above by TechMizan+.
Nikon D5300 vs Nikon D5600 – Body Comparison
Since they come from the same series, it is not strange that the D5300 and D5600 have a very similar design.
There are no substantial differences in size and weight between the two models. The Nikon D5600 is only a bit smaller (2%) and moderately lighter (3%).
While the D5300 has dimensions of 4.9 x 3.9 x 3.0 inches and weight of 17.1 oz., its successor has a size of 4.9 x 3.8 x 2.8 inches and weighs 15.0 oz.
Both cameras are relatively compact and light-weight, although you should bear in mind that neither of them is weather sealed.
Nikon D5300
While a few drops of water or snow should not do much harm to these cameras, they are not recommended to use in freezing conditions or during a storm.
Both cameras have a 3.2″ rear LCD screen (1.037k dots) that can be turned for 180 degrees. This allows you flexible shooting positions and makes your life a lot easier if you are a vlogger or selfie-lover.
The only difference in display is that the D5600 has a touchscreen instead of a conventional panel. This is really important because touchscreen technology makes focusing a lot easier.
Additionally, both cameras include an optical viewfinder with 95% coverage and 0.55 magnification, along with a built-in flash.
Nikon D5600
The optical viewfinder can be of help if you want to take photos in overly bright conditions. On the contrary, the built-in flash is handy if you want to take photos when it is very dark.
If you don’t find built-in flash useful enough, there is an option to attach external flash on both cameras.
Nikon D5300 vs Nikon D5600 – Connectivity Comparison
First, we should say the Nikon D5300 has very good connectivity options. It has built-in Wi-Fi and GPS, and it lacks only Bluetooth technology.
As everyone expected, the D5600 adds Bluetooth capabilities, but strangely – it ditches GPS tracking.
Additionally, both cameras have HDMI output so you can watch your photos or videos on an external screen.
If you are into video recording, it is useful to know that both models have a built-in microphone, but there is also a port for connecting an external one.
Still, none of them has a jack for external headphones or speakers.
It might be worth mentioning the D5600 has longer battery life. While the D5300 allows you to take 600 shots per battery charge, you can take 970 shots with the D5600.
Nikon D5300 vs Nikon D5600 – Price Comparison
The best thing about these two cameras is their price. You can buy the Nikon D5300 for only $473.59 (body only), while Nikon D5600 price is around $596.95.
Both cameras have been on the market for many years, so there is an option for you to buy used models and save a lot of money. For example, you can find the D5300 for only $325.00. For this price, you will get a quite capable camera.
Should you buy the Nikon D5300, D5500 or D5600? Get an answer to this question in the video above by BVC Co.
Nikon D5300 vs Nikon D5600 – Final Thoughts
If you are a beginner in photography and you don’t want to spend a lot of money on equipment before you overcome the basics, you can’t go wrong whether you opt for the Nikon D5300 or Nikon D5600.
Although the newer model has slightly better features for photography, there are not a lot of differences between these two models. Learn more about Nikon D3300 price on our website PhotographyTalk.com.
Nikon D5300
The D5300 has an advantage over the D5600 only because of the price and GPS tracking. The D5600 is better in any other category, but not in a mind-blowing way.
If you want to buy a new camera, then maybe it is better to opt for the Nikon D5600. In case you don’t mind buying a used one, the D5300 can also be a quite good solution. Read detailed Nikon D5600 review on our website PhotographyTalk.com.
Nikon D5600
Either way, you will have a decent DSLR camera that can take you into the world of photography. Additionally, each of these two cameras can fulfill your needs for creativity until you are ready to spend a few more bucks to buy a more professional camera.
Have Nikon questions? Ask in Nikon Camera Forum.
We Recommend
Nikon D7100 vs. D7200 vs. D7300
When Nikon introduced the D7100 as the D7000 replacement back in 2013, Nikon shooters rejoiced - and rightfully so.
The D7100 became one of the most popular high-end DSLRs on the market.
So, when the Nikon D7200 came out in the spring of 2015, it had big shoes to fill.
And though the D7200 wasn’t as big of an improvement as the D7100 was, it still offers plenty of features that make it a highly sought-after camera for advanced amateurs, enthusiasts, and many pros.
Now that the traditional two-year upgrade cycle is drawing near, we can expect to see the newest version in this line - the D7300 - within a matter of weeks, at least according to all the latest rumors.
The question is, will the D7300 continue to make the necessary improvements to keep this line of cameras relevant?
In this article, we explore the features, pros, and cons of the D7100 and D7200, and offer up some tantalizing details of what could be coming with the D7300.
D7100
When the Nikon D7100 came out in February 2013, it was a home run right out of the gate because it combined the best features of its predecessor, the D7000, and some higher end features borrowed from Nikon’s professional grade D4.
As a top-end APS-C camera, the D7100 offers features that enthusiast photographers can appreciate:
- 24.1MP CMOS sensor
- Expeed 3 processing
- ISO range of 100-6400, up to 25600 expanded
- 6 fps continuous shooting in DX mode, 7fps in 1.3X crop mode
- 51 point AF system with 15 cross type AF sensors
- 1080 60i/30p video recording
- 3.2", 1.2m-dot LCD screen
- Front and rear IR receivers
- Water and dust resistant body
Get the low-down on the D7100’s features and performance in the video above, as Dan Watson gives us an overview of his field test.
Of note is the fact that the 24.1MP CMOS sensor comes without the optical low-pass filter, the first Nikon DSLR to omit it. The result is higher resolution from the sensor, particularly when the camera is paired with a top-end lens.
The D7100’s AF system is another bright spot. With 51 AF points, of which 15 are cross-type, and focusing algorithms from the excellent Nikon D4, the D7100 has top-notch low-light focusing ability, all the way down to -2EV. On the downside, when shooting video or shooting stills in live view, the AF system is painfully slow.
The camera also comes with an Auto ISO feature from the Nikon D800 lets you set the desired minimum shutter speed based on the focal length of the lens, meaning you can select among five settings that shift the ISO towards slower of faster speeds. ISO performance is very good through ISO 1600, and potentially to ISO 6400, especially if shooting in RAW.
The upgraded LCD panel allows you to see the photos you take better as well. The 3.2-inch screen has 1.2 million dots and includes an RGBW display. The addition of white dots means the screen is much brighter for easier use in daytime shooting. It also means the D7100’s LCD can be used at lower power without sacrificing the ability to see the screen well.
With the addition of Wi-Fi capabilities via Nikon’s WU-1a Wi-Fi unit, D7100 owners can easily transfer images to a laptop, tablet, or smartphone for quick sharing or post-processing. The Wi-Fi unit also means users can control the camera using a smartphone.
The D7100 doesn’t just have upgrades for still photographers, either. The video capabilities are greatly expanded, offering 30p, 25p, and 24p recording modes. Furthermore, the D7100 has a built-in stereo microphone with jacks for an external microphone and audio monitoring. Video output is on the soft side, however.
Also for video and still shooters alike is the option to switch out of DX mode and shoot in 1.3x crop mode. Not only does this double the effective focal length of the lens being used, but it allows for 50/60i video recording and 7fps continuous shooting for still photos at 15MP. It’s important to note, however, that the D7100 has a relatively small image buffer which reduces the camera’s burst abilities when shooting in RAW.
Image quality with the D7100 gets good, but not great marks. The images are sharper than the D7100’s less expensive cousin, the D5200, but ultimately the image quality of both cameras is quite similar. However, when in matrix-metering mode, the D7100 creates exposures that are about ⅔ of a stop brighter than the D5200. Focusing is better as well as a result of the improved AF system noted above.
In the end, the upgrades seen in the D7100 make it a great choice for enthusiast photographers. It’s built well, is ergonomically sound, has dual memory card slots, in-camera RAW processing, and 100% viewfinder coverage, among other practical features. With many things in common with Nikon’s full frame cameras, it’s no surprise that the D7100 has been a big hit.
Pros: Excellent sensor, superb low-light performance, weather sealing, and good video shooting capabilities. You can also easily find quality, used D7100 bodies for an excellent price.
Cons: Small image buffer, slow AF in live view and video mode, and soft video output.
The final verdict: This is a great camera for landscape and portrait photographers that need excellent low-light shooting capabilities. However, if you have designs on shooting high-quality video or need to shoot in burst mode in RAW, this camera will disappoint.
D7200
The replacement for the D7100, the Nikon D7200, came out in March, 2015 to much fanfare. Like its predecessor, the D7200 had a lot to live up to given the excellent performance of the D7100 and the D7000 before that.
The D7200 isn’t an enormous departure from the D7100, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing given the quality of the D7100 and it’s robust set of features. That said, the D7200 offered some nice additions to the already high-quality features of the D7100:
- 24.2MP CMOS sensor
- Expeed 4 processing
- ISO 100-25,600, expanded to ISO 51,200 and 102,400
- 6 fps continuous shooting with improved buffering
- 51-point AF system, sensitive to -3EV
- 1080/60p video (1.3x crop only)
- 3.2", 1.2M dot RGBW LCD display
- Wi-Fi with NFC
- Magnesium alloy weather-sealed body
For a review of the D7200’s features and how they compare to the D7100, check out the video above with Chris Niccolls of the Camera Store TV.
The D7200’s 24.2-megapixel CMOS sensor is just slightly different than its predecessor. In this case, the sensor has a slightly larger pixel count and shows an improved dynamic range as well, with better image quality in the shadowed areas of the image.
When it comes to the D7200’s AF system, it’s a noted improvement over the D7100. It’s a Multi-CAM 3500DX II system with 51 AF points and 15 cross-type like the D7100’s, however, each AF point is sensitive to -3EV compared to -2EV for the D7100. It’s got better subject tracking capabilities as well, making this an improved camera for action shooters, though it still isn’t an ideal camera for sports, wildlife, and other fast shooting genres.
Sensitivity to -3EV means that as good as the D7100 is in low-light shooting situations, the D7200 is even better. In fact, focusing is easier throughout the entire frame because each AF point has improved low-light focusing capabilities.
ISO performance is also expanded, though with a bit of an asterisk. Where the D7100 had an expanded range to ISO 25600, the D7200 lets you go as high as 51200 or 102400. However, those values are for black and white shooting only, considering there is so little color detail at those values.
One feature that’s unchanged from the D7100 is the LCD. Again, we see a 3.2-inch, 1.2M dot RGBW screen with excellent brightness and the capability of functioning at low power.
Wi-Fi capabilities get an upgrade in the D7200 as well. Rather than relying on an external unit as was the case in the D7100, the D7200 has built-in Wi-Fi as well as NFC capabilities. Nikon also incorporates SnapBridge, a wireless image transfer program that also gives you remote control over the camera.
Video gets a boost in the D7200 as well, with 60p shooting now available, if only in the 1.3x crop shooting mode. Though that’s an improvement over the D7100, other models from competing brands offer much more in the way of video capabilities. For example, the AF system isn’t as quick when shooting video when compared to the D7200’s competitors like the Canon 70D.
As good as the preceding features are, the biggest improvement of the D7200 over the D7100 is the buffer. As noted in the D7100 review, the buffer is tiny, preventing shoots from continuously shooting with much speed, especially in RAW.
Now, that issue has been resolved with a much-improved buffer: Shoot over 100 JPEGs or 27 12-bit compressed RAW images quickly and easily. The frame rate stands at 6fps, though that can be extended to 7fps when shooting in 1.3x crop mode.
When it comes to image quality, the D7200 performs as you’d expect based on the results of images taken with the D7100 and the D7000 before that. Whether you shoot in JPEG or RAW, you’ll find little noise, an excellent dynamic range, and superb details.
Like the D7100, the D7200 is a feature-packed camera ideal for enthusiast photographers. D7100 owners will appreciate the familiar build and ergonomics, but enjoy the many upgrades over previous models, most notably the improved buffer, better AF performance, and expanded weatherproofing.
Pros: Top-of-the-line image quality, fantastic ISO performance, much-improved battery life, and an image buffer that far outpaces the D7100’s.
Cons: Still lags in the video department, poor live view AF performance, and no ability to control aperture when shooting in live view.
The final verdict: The D7200 isn’t a groundbreaking camera by any means, but the improvements made to it continue the tradition of the D7000 and D7100 as being a prime choice for still shooters that seek superb low-light performance. Though video capabilities are improved, the D7200 still lags behind other similarly priced cameras.
D7300
Judging from the release schedule of previous models (spring 2013, spring 2015), we can reasonably assume that the D7300 will be released this spring (although some rumors point to a 2018 release date).
That’s just conjecture, however, as there is no firm word from Nikon on a release date just yet.
Bearing that in mind, the rumor mill is certainly in full swing with the D7300. Based on past decisions by Nikon and current features on the D7200, it’s assumed that the D7300 will have features similar to those listed below:
- 24 MP CMOS Sensor
- EXPEED 5 Image Processor
- ISO up to 1 million
- 153-Point AF System
- 7 fps Shooting
- 4K Video Recording at 30 fps
- Built-In Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth and NFC capabilities
Many of these specs are reasonable to assume based on what’s currently available in the D7200.
Take the sensor, for instance. The D7200’s 24.2MP CMOS sensor will likely be a hold over for the D7300 at the very least, but Nikon might elect to opt for a whole new sensor, which it’s safe to say would have a larger megapixel count.
As far as image processing goes, the D7200’s Expeed 4 processor should see an upgrade to Expeed 5, which would allow for the better ISO performance and 4K video capabilities noted above.
Another interesting possibility is the notion that the D7300 might inherit a few features from the Nikon D500 (shown above).
This includes its amazing 153-point AF system (although there is some argument about this). The Multi-CAM 20K AF system would be a good improvement for this line of cameras, though the D7200’s AF system, which is a Multi-CAM 3500 II DX with 51 AF points, is outstanding. In the video above, Matt from the Art of the Image explores these and other D500 specs that might find their way into the D7300.
Given that the D7100 and D7200 are about the same size, we can assume that the D7300 will be similarly sized with the same excellent ergonomics as its predecessors.
Based on these rumored specs, I’d say that Nikon is setting the D7300 up to be a phenomenal camera that continues the excellent performance of this prosumer line of cameras.
We’ll just have to wait and see what Nikon’s official word is on this camera, which will hopefully be in the very near future!
We Recommend
Nikon D750 vs Nikon D810: Are They Still Worth It in 2019?
Photo by chuttersnap on Unsplash
In this review, we will compare the Nikon D750 and Nikon D810, two full-frame cameras released by Nikon in 2014.
In the year they were launched, these two models were among the best semi-pro full-frame cameras on the market. However, five years have passed and technology has advanced so it is reasonable to have doubts if they are still worth buying in 2019.
Let’s answer this question immediately. The Nikon D750 and Nikon D810 still have a lot of things to offer and you will not get disappointed if you decide to buy one of these two models.
Now, let’s see what is so great about these cameras.
Nikon D750 vs Nikon D810 Image Quality
Nikon D750
The D810 was one of the most successful cameras released by Nikon. The primary reason for this is outstanding image quality you get for the invested money.
What makes the Nikon D810 so great in the first place is its 36MP - full-frame CMOS sensor without an anti-aliasing filter. The images you make on this camera will be rich in details even if you perform cropping or decide to make large prints.
Nikon D810
On the other hand, the Nikon D750 has a 24.3 MP sensor. Although this is 12 million pixels less in comparison to the Nikon D850, it will be perfectly enough for most of the photographers. However, the D750 uses anti-alias (Low-Pass) filter to reduce moire in images, which comes at a cost since it can make your photos lose few details.
Overall, there is no significant difference in image quality between these two cameras. Although there is a bigger resolution in the D810, in most cases you don’t need more than 24 megapixels that can be found in the D710.
Nikon D750 vs Nikon D810 Low Light Evaluation
photo byArtem Peretiatko via iStock
Another thing that makes the Nikon D750 and Nikon D810 still relevant for those who are looking for a full-frame DSLR model is their impressive low-light capability.
With a native ISO range of 64-12,800 (expandable to ISO 32 - 51,200), the Nikon D810 allows better flexibility than the Nikon D750 which has a native ISO sensitivity of 100-12,800 (expandable to ISO 50 - 51,200).
At the high-end of ISO, both models produce good results and this makes them particularly effective if you enjoy photographing at night. However, although the Nikon D750 has lower price it seems that it performs a bit better than the Nikon D810 when there is not much light around.
The Nikon D750 produces less noise on images when they are shot at high ISO levels. This is, among other things, because of the lower resolution of this camera and bigger individual pixels that can gather more light.
This does not mean the Nikon D810 performs badly in low-light, and in the end, the difference is not that significant. Given its price, it comes as a surprise that the Nikon D750 produces better results in low-light than its more expensive sibling.
In the video above, Heather Lahtinen compares ISO performance of the Nikon D750 and Nikon D850.
Nikon D750 Specs vs Nikon D810 Specs
photo bystonena7 via iStock
Now, let’s compare other important features of these two models.
There are no substantial differences in terms of autofocus capabilities. Both cameras feature a Multi-CAM 3500 AF module with 51 AF points (15 cross-type points). The Nikon D750 can autofocus down to -3 EV, while the Nikon D810 goes down to EV -2.
When it comes to burst shooting, the Nikon D750 seems to be a better performer. This camera offers 6 shutter flaps per second, while the Nikon D810 has continuous shooting speed of 5 frames per second.
However, what is good about the Nikon D810 is that it has a faster shutter, bigger RAW buffer, and finally it is much less noisy than the Nikon D750.
Additionally, both cameras can record videos up to 1080p at 60fps.
Get more information about Nikon D750 or Nikon D810 in the video above by ArtoftheImage. You can also read indepth Nikon D750 review on our website PhotographyTalk.com.
Nikon D750 Body vs Nikon D810 Body
When it comes to design, both cameras are pretty comfortable and easy to use. The Nikon D810 has a slightly stronger body although both cameras are weather-sealed and built to have a long life.
The Nikon D750 is smaller and lighter than the Nikon D810. The camera measures 5.55 x 4.45 x 3.07 inches and weighs 1.7 pounds, in comparison to the Nikon D810 which has dimensions of 5.75 × 4.84 × 3.21 inches and weight of almost two pounds.
Both cameras have displays of the same size (3.2”) and resolution (1.229k dots) and none of them provides touchscreen technology. However, there are certain differences in LCD screens.
Nikon D750
If you are looking for a camera that has an articulating screen, you might get disappointed to hear that the Nikon D810 has a fixed LCD . The Nikon D750 allows better flexibility in shooting images from different angles since it is equipped with a tilting LCD monitor.
Nikon D810
One more thing where the Nikon D750 wins over its sibling is in terms of connectivity. This camera has a built-in Wi-Fi connection while you would need to buy an optional Wi-Fi dongle if you want to connect the Nikon D810 used to smart devices.
Nikon D750 Price vs Nikon D810 Price
Photo by Kamil Feczko on Unsplash
Overall, the Nikon D810 and Nikon D750 share a lot of common features, and both cameras produce great results in different environments.
Since they were released almost five years ago, at the moment you don’t need to spend a fortune to get one of these models for yourself.
If you don’t mind using an old camera, you can find the Nikon D810 for a price as low as $939.00.
If you opt for the Nikon D750, you can spare even more money since you can find a used model on websites such as MPB, for only $879.00.
See why MPB is a top-rated used camera store in my MPB review.
We Recommend
Nikon D780 vs D850
Comparing the Nikon D780 vs D850 DSLR style cameras, we see an interesting thing Nikon does with their cameras - blurring the lines between levels of user intent.
We tend to think in terms of four levels of cameras, but Nikon DSLRs have a lot of overlap in terms of intended use.
In today’s article, we’ll take a look at two of Nikon’s most popular DSLRs - the D780 and D850 - to highlight how the lines between Nikon cameras are blurred.
Table of Contents:
- Nikon DSLRs Hierarchy
- Nikon D780 vs D850 User Levels
- Features of Nikon D780 vs D850
- Nikon D780 Pro and Cons
- Nikon D850 Pros and Cons
- Nikon D780 Best Uses
- Nikon D850 Best Uses
- Nikon D780 vs D850 Final Thoughts
Nikon DSLRs Hierarchy
Nikon D780
We’re used to looking at digital cameras and thinking of them as Entry-Level, Intermediate, Prosumer, and Professional. Nikon DSLRs follow a long-standing methodology of creating overlap in these levels.
Considering the Nikon D780 vs D850 cameras, we see that they could easily be adapted in any of several different levels. Current Nikon DSLRs remind me how Nikon had the Nikkormat FT at the same time as the Nikon F, the FE, and FM. Nikon also offered the F2, the FA, and N8008 at the same time as the F3 and F4.
Nikon D850
Working professionals and other serious photographers could use any of these fine cameras for paid photography work or their personal fun picture taking. They were all durable, high-quality, and user-friendly. The same thing is going on today with the Nikon D780 vs D850.
Camera prices were (and still are) a good indicator of what level under which a camera would normally fall, but even there, Nikon blurs those lines. I like blurring the lines even more for my own budget by shopping online platforms such as MPB, which offer like-new condition used cameras and lenses at substantially reduced prices.
Nikon D780 vs D850 User Levels
Nikon D780
So, let’s see what type of photography and photographer could benefit from owning and using the Nikon D780 vs D850.
Both cameras are extremely high-quality imaging tools. The Nikon D780 seems more targeted to an advanced intermediate user, but this camera is fully capable of being used professionally. It could also be used as an entry-level camera into the Full Frame digital format, with its smaller size, lighter weight, and lower price compared with the D850.
Nikon D850
The Nikon D850 DSLR camera is intended for professional use, but since it is lower priced and smaller in size compared to the D5 and D6 cameras, it is very appealing to advanced amateurs desiring its extremely high-megapixel sensor.
So both cameras in our Nikon D780 vs D850 comparison could be considered as partially fulfilling all four of the levels we labeled earlier. I would probably skew the D780 closer to the intermediate side of the spectrum, with the D850 covering more fully professional needs.
Features of Nikon D780 vs D850
Nikon D780
Since we opened that door, let’s have a look at the features of the Nikon D780 vs D850.
Both cameras are DSLR style and digital single lens reflex, meaning they use a mirror box and prism to give through-the-lens viewing.
They also both have the Nikon F lens mount, and both have autofocus and advanced metering modes. Neither camera has a built-in flash, but they do support full flash automation with dedicated flash units and controllers.
Both cameras have excellent video capability, recording 4K at up to 30p with full sensor width recording area, so there are no crop factors when shooting video. The D780 and D850 also have tilting touchscreen rear view screens.
And now the differences…
Nikon D850
The Nikon D780 has 24.5MP Full Frame sensor (FX in Nikon language) with a native ISO range of 100 - 51,200 (expandable to 50 - 204,800), while the Nikon D850 has a 45.7MP Full Frame sensor and native ISO range of 64 - 25,600 (expandable to 32 - 102,400).
To simplify the comparison of the Nikon D780 vs D850, the D780 has better low-light performance and is designed for action, and the D850 has higher resolution available and is designed for extremely high-resolution imaging.
Either camera can give you high-resolution images and be useful for action photography. Keep blurring those lines, Nikon!
Learn More:
Nikon D780 Pro and Cons
Nikon D780
Pros:
- Great low-light performance
- 4K video with no crop
- Lightweight for FX format
- Semi compact size
- Handling and features are perfect for action photography
- FX format gives images great enlargability
- Super long battery life
- Dual SD card slots
- Takes most older F-mount lenses
- Mid-range price
Cons:
- Not as high resolution
- No battery grip
- No built-in flash
- Non-AI lenses won’t mount
Nikon D850 Pros and Cons
Nikon D850
Pros:
- Extremely high resolution
- FX format gives images great enlargability
- 4K video with no crop
- Super long battery life
- Dual SD card slots
- Takes most older F-mount lenses
- ISO 64 mode (ISO 32 expanded)
- Very rugged build
- Battery grip option
Cons:
- Slightly less low-light performance
- Larger and heavier
- More expensive
- Non-AI lenses won’t mount
- No built-in flash
Nikon D780 Best Uses
Nikon D780
Some of the ideal candidates for who would prefer the Nikon D780 vs D850, or just like this camera in general, are photographers wanting to move into or stay in Full Frame format but have a smaller, lighter, more action-oriented camera.
Since the D780 also sports a lower megapixel sensor, that means that the low light performance is absolutely outstanding. That makes this camera a perfect choice for wedding photographers and other event photographers or those shooting sports in lower light.
Nikon D850 Best Uses
Nikon D850
The main reason for the existence of this series of cameras is ultra-high resolution. Photographers needing enlargements and extremely fine images will love both the sensor resolution plus the lower ISO than most other cameras.
Fine art photographers, advertising photographers, and anyone wanting huge enlargements are a good target for this camera. Additionally, working pros also needing high-resolution in a second body in addition to their full-fledged pro camera, such as D4, D5, D6 will be able to take advantage of what this camera provides.
Nikon D780 vs D850 Final Thoughts
Nikon D780
Comparing Nikon DSLRs like the Nikon D780 vs D850 is a fun exercise.
When it comes down to the real-world purchasing of these cameras, it’s an investment of a significant amount of money. But, an online platform such as MPB definitely helps you save your cash, no matter your budget. You can choose from items that are like-new to well-used, depending on your needs and the amount of money you wish to spend.
With MPB, you still get a great in-store warranty (six months) as well as a generous seven-day return window.
Additionally, you can trade in your current gear and use the proceeds from that to help further defray the cost of your D780 or D850 purchase. MPB makes it quick, easy, and painless - just what you want when you’re shopping for camera gear!
Either way you end up going, you will soon be using one of these Nikon DSLRs to capture outstanding images and superb video. Sure, DSLRs might not be around much longer, but these two excellent cameras offer more than enough capability for you to create beautiful images now and long into the future.
Check out MPB’s inventory today to see what other camera gear you can get at a great discount.
Learn More:
We Recommend
Nikon D850 vs Canon 5D Mark IV vs Sony A7R II
When it comes to high-end, full frame cameras, there's a lot of excellent choices on the market today.
The Canon 5D Mark IV has been around for awhile now and has established itself as one of Canon's best-ever cameras.
The same can be said for the Sony A7R II...
With their D810 a few years old now, Nikon wanted to step up their game and did so with the new D850. Here is PhotographyTalk.com Nikon D850 review.
The question is, how do these cameras stack up against one another?
Table of Contents:
- Nikon D850 vs Canon 5D Mark IV vs Sony A7R II: Specs Comparison
- Nikon D850 Overview
- Canon 5D Mark IV Overview
- Sony A7R II Overview
- Nikon D850 vs Canon 5D Mark IV vs Sony A7R II: Final Thoughts
Nikon D850 vs Canon 5D Mark IV vs Sony A7R II: Specs Comparison
As you can see in the chart above, there's many ways that these cameras are similar. There's also plenty that sets them apart from each other.
I've got each camera outlined below. Check it out and see if you can choose which among them is the best!
Nikon D850 Overview
Essential Specifications:
- 45.7-megapixel BSI CMOS FX sensor
- Expeed 5 image processor
- 153-point autofocus system
- ISO range 64-25,600 (expandable to 102,400)
- 7fps burst shooting speed (9fps with optional battery grip)
- 4K video at 30fps and 1080p video at 120fps
Looking at the specs on the Nikon D850, you can tell that Nikon came to play with the big boys.
Not only is the BSI CMOS sensor a first for Nikon FX cameras, but the new Expeed 5 image processor offers faster performance than its predecessor, the Expeed 4, which Nikon D810 owners know is already lightning quick.
As a Nikon D810 owner myself, I can attest to its stellar autofocus capabilities. But the D850 blows the D810 away in that department with a 153-point system, 99 of which are cross-type (up from 51-points with 15 cross-type in the D810) and 15 AF detect sensors (up from 1 sensor in the D810).
Something else that makes the D850 the top Nikon camera is that it has a tilting touchscreen-enabled LCD that has nearly 2.4-million dots of resolution.
With a tilting screen, you have a greater ability to get shots from odd angles, and with the touchscreen capability, you're better equipped to set focus points, zoom in on shots to check focus, examine the photos you've taken, and so forth.
It's also got an unbelievable buffer that accommodates 170 12-bit RAW Files (as compared to just 47 for the D810).
But the D850 isn't just for stills, as Nikon's flagship model has 4K video at 30fps.
Naturally, what everyone is talking about on the Nikon D850 is its sensor, which garnered a perfect score of 100 from DxOMark.
In fact, DxO stated in their review that the D850's sensor "breaks new ground for image quality." If that's not a ringing endorsement, I don't know what is!
For more insights into the D850 and how it stacks up to the Canon 5D Mark IV, check out the video above by Dan Watson.
And for more details on this camera, be sure to check out the Learn More section below to see our in-depth analysis of the D850.
Canon 5D Mark IV Overview
Essential Specifications:
- 30.4-megapixel CMOS sensor
- DIGIC 6+ image processor
- 61-point autofocus system
- ISO range 100-32,000 (expandable to 50-102,400)
- 7fps burst shooting speed
- 4K video at 30fps and 1080p video at 120fps
Just by looking at the specifications above, you can tell that there are a couple of ways that the Canon 5D Mark IV lags behind the other cameras on this list.
For starters, it has the smallest sensor, though at 30.4-megapixels with a DxOMark score of 91, it's not exactly a bad sensor by any stretch of the imagination.
In fact, this Canon produces excellent image quality with superb dynamic range and low noise levels, even when you push the ISO into its expanded range.
Additionally, the 5D Mark IV's sensor has Canon's Dual Pixel Raw technology, which essentially allows you to manipulate the area of sharpness in your image. You can do that because each pixel has dual photodiodes so that each image can have two different versions of a pixel, each with a different focus point. That's really helpful if you have a photo that's a bit on the blurry side.
And though the 5D Mark IV doesn't have as many autofocus points as its competitors, its 61-point system with 41 cross-type sensors is both fast and accurate. And with Canon's Dual Pixel AF system, you get phase-detection points on the imaging sensor for even faster performance.
Add in dual image processors - a DIGIC 6 for metering and a DIGIC 6+ for all other tasks, and you have the makings of a camera that gets the job done and does so in quick fashion.
Like the Nikon D850, the 5D Mark IV has a touchscreen-enabled LCD, although it's fixed.
At 1.62-million dots, it's not as highly resolute as Nikons, but, still, it's certainly nothing to shake a stick at.
With other goodies like an electronic level, flicker detection, dual SD and CF card slots, built-in GPS, and external microphone and headphone ports for shooting video, the Canon 5D Mark IV has all the tools you need to take high-quality photos and videos.
Is it able to match the Nikon D850's performance? Not quite. But it's still a great camera!
Get more details on the 5D Mark IV's specifications in the Learn More links below.
Sony A7R II Overview
Essential Specifications:
- 42-megapixel Exmor R BSI CMOS sensor
- BIONZ X image processor
- 399-point autofocus system
- ISO range 100-25,600 (expandable to 50-102,400)
- 5fps burst shooting speed
- UHD 4K video at 24fps or 30fps
Sony undoubtedly didn't appreciate the arrival of the Nikon D850, because up to that point, the Sony A7R II held DxOMark's top spot for the best sensor (with a rating of 98/100).
That tells us two things. First, the Nikon D850's sensor is absolutely amazing. And second, the Sony A7R II's sensor is absolutely amazing as well.
Like the Nikon, the Sony has a back-illuminated sensor that gives it stunning resolution.
Perhaps the best feature of the A7R II is its hybrid autofocus system, which has 399 phase-detect AF points.
In other words, no matter what you're shooting, this camera will give you the best chance of capturing it in focus.
Helping its fast performance is the BIONZ X image processor and the built-in 5-axis image stabilization, which generates images that are clean and crisp.
The built-in Wi-Fi and NFC are nice touches as well.
This sony has a gorgeous OLED Tru-Finder electronic viewfinder as well as a tilting LCD with 1.228-million dots.
Granted, the LCD is not touch-enabled, but the tilting feature is nice for low-angle shots.
Like the Canon and Nikon, the Sony has a weather-sealed body for improved durability, an ISO range that extends to 102,400 for low-light shooting, and user-friendly buttons and dials.
There are plenty more similarities and differences, which are outlined in the video above by Jared Polin.
For more details about the Sony A7R II, check out the Learn More links below.
Nikon D850 vs Canon 5D Mark IV vs Sony A7R II: Final Thoughts
As you can see, each of these cameras certainly has their strong suits.
The Nikon D850 has the best sensor ever made, the Canon 5D Mark IV has Dual Pixel Raw technology and other bells and whistles to help you improve your images, and the Sony A7R II has an incredible autofocus system.
Naturally, there's a lot more to each of these cameras than just those features, as well.
If you're in the market to buy a new camera, I suggest you check out both videos in this article as well as the Learn More links so you have all the details you need to make an informed decision.
But, ultimately, it's hard to go wrong with any of these bad boys if you ask me!
We Recommend
Nikon D850 vs Nikon D810
photo by AdrianHancu via iStock
In this article, we will compare two giants among DSLR full frame cameras: the Nikon D810 and Nikon D850.
Both models are very popular among photographers, as they have shown to be a great companion and worthy money-making equipment.
The D810 was already established as one of the best semi-pro cameras at the time of the release of its successor, the D850. Many users fell in love with the D810 and almost five years later, they are still not willing to replace it with any other camera.
The D850 was released in 2017, as the successor to the D810. It comes with many improvements over the older camera but at a higher price. While you can buy the D810’s body for just under $2,800.00, you will need to spend $3,300.00 for the Nikon D850.
In this comparison article, we see if the D850 is a worthy replacement of its older sibling or if it is better for you to save $500 and opt for the D810.
Nikon D850 vs Nikon D810 Body Comparison
Nikon D850
If you put the Nikon D850 and D810 beside one another, you will hardly notice any difference in their design. They are both weather-sealed and mostly built of magnesium-alloy which makes them capable of enduring harsh weather conditions and gives them a longer lifespan.
Both cameras weigh around 2 pounds without a lens or accessories attaches, and although the D850 is a bit heavier, it will be hard to notice this difference in reality.
Nikon D810
Generally speaking, both models are professionally built and they feel good in hand because of the deep grip and intelligent ergonomics.
Although there are few minor differences in button positions, if you are already familiar with the D810, you will get accustomed to the D850 in no time.
The main physical difference between the D810 and D850 is that the newer camera lacks a pop-up flash which was a nice feature enjoyed by users of the D810.
On the other hand, the D850 incorporates a tilting LCD display instead of the flat screen that could be found on the older model. The new display in the D850 also adds touchscreen technology and offers a higher resolution as well.
Get a detailed hands-on review of this camera in the video above by Park Cameras.
Nikon D850 vs Nikon D810 Features
Although they closely resemble each other, the D850 is a worthy upgrade to the Nikon D810 as it adds a lot of new features while improving the old ones.
To start with, the D850 offers a 45.7MP full frame sensor which is an impressive upgrade over the already astonishing 36.3MP sensor that is in the core of the D810.
Additionally, there are huge differences in video recording capabilities between these two models. If you are more into making movies than into taking stills, you will definitely need to stick to the D850.
The Nikon D850 offers 4K UHD (3840 x 2160p) video recording at frame rates up to 30fps and full HD footage at up to 120 fps. If you compare it with the D810’s capability to capture Full HD footage at up to 60p, you will understand why it can’t compete with video features offered in the D850.
Decide which camera better suits your needs by watching the video above by Finding Middle Earth.
Save money and buy a pre-owned Nikon D850 or Nikon D810
The cameras also differ in terms of speed.
The Nikon D810 offers 5fps continuous shooting. This is an average speed, but the D850 improves it even more, as it offers 7fps continuous speed and up to 9fps with an optional battery grip.
Along with speed, the D850 also carries improvements in autofocus technology.
While there is a 51-point AF system with 15 cross-type points in the D810, there is now a 153-point AF system with 93 cross-type points in the Nikon D850.
Additionally, the D850 works better while focusing subjects in low-light conditions, as it can focus down to -4EV, in comparison to the D810 that can focus as low as -2EV.
Nikon D850 vs Nikon D810 ISO Comparison
At the time of its release, the D810 was one of the best DSLR models on the market because of its 36.3MP full-frame sensor with no low-pass filter.
Five years later, it is still a major player and there are only a few new cameras that offer a bigger resolution for the same amount of money as you would need to spend on the D810.
Nikon D810
Although it provides superb image quality, the D810 hardly competes with its successor that offers a stunning 45.7MP back-illuminated, full-frame sensor.
The back-illuminated (BI) sensor technology in the D850 improves its low-light performance, while a larger amount of megapixels allow you to preserve more details if you decide to crop your images or make huge prints.
Nikon D850
The D850 also tops out its predecessor in terms of offering a better ISO range.
The Nikon D850 has a native ISO range from 64 to 25,600 (expandable to 32-102,400) in comparison to the D810 that offers a native ISO range from 64 to 12,800 (expandable to 32-51,200).
For another hands-on look at these cameras, check out the video above by Matt Granger.
Nikon D850 vs Nikon D810 Long Exposure Photography
Nikon D850
Before you ditch your D810 because of higher ISO capabilities and bigger amount of megapixels in its successor, bear in mind there are no substantial differences in image quality produced by these two cameras.
While the D850 offers a better ISO range and higher image quality at high ISO, both cameras produce noise on high ISO settings so you will want to stick to the lower levels.
Nikon D810
At the low end of ISO, both cameras produce similar results and it will be hard for you to find any differences in quality between images.
To get a better understanding of what we are talking about, you can watch the video below by Attilio Ruffo, where he tests long exposure photography on both camera models.
Nikon D850 vs Nikon D810 Lenses
If you own a Nikon D810, it is a good thing that you can use your old lenses if you decide to switch to the D850.
Both cameras have the same Nikon F lens mount, and this gives you a possibility to choose among 400 different NIKKOR products.
Nikon D810
The type of lenses you decide to attach to your camera should match your photography style.
One of the best options to choose from is definitely the Nikon 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR lens because of its mix of versatility with affordable price ($946.95).
The Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8E ED VR is a bit more pricey ($2396.95), but aimed to produce great results in any situation.
Nikon D850
If you are into Macro photography you might want to go with the Nikon 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED VR Micro,while the Sigma 85mm f/1.4 DG HSMworks great for shooting portraits.
Nikon D850 vs Nikon D810 Comparison
At the end of the day, the choice between these cameras is quite close.
In terms of performance, the D850 has some chits in its favor, but the D810 is certainly no slouch.
If you're into shooting video, the D850 is a better choice, but if you're on a tighter budget, the D810 is the better option.
Either way, both of these full frame cameras offer tons of features and versatility and will be a rock-solid camera for you.
We Recommend
Nikon D850 vs Sony A7R III
Photo by Sylwia Bartyzel on Unsplash
Let’s be clear from the start: Whether you go with the Nikon D850 or Sony a7R III, you will not have any regrets. Both cameras offer great features for versatile activities, and each of them has a lot to offer in terms of quality and capabilities.
But, which one is better? The Nikon D850 or Sony a7R III?
As they are both ranked pretty high among photographers, it will not be very easy to answer this question. Still, there are certain situations in which one model performs better than the other.
In this comparison article, you can see which camera better suits your needs!
Nikon D850 vs Sony A7R III - Body Comparison
The first big distinction between the Nikon D850 and Sony a7R III is that they are a different type of cameras. While we have DSLR Nikon on one side, on the other we have mirrorless Sony.
Mirrorless cameras have become very popular during the past few years because they provide DSLR-like features in a compact and lightweight body. This is why Sony’s camera has a big advantage when it comes to size and weight.
The Nikon D850 is 32% bigger and 35% heavier than the Sony A7R III, although the camera does not seem to be burdensome with the weight of 2.22 lb and size of 5.75 x 4.88 x 3.11 inches.
However, if enhanced portability is all that you are looking for, you will probably opt for the Sony A7R III.
Bear in mind that DSLR cameras still have some advantages over mirrorless models and one of them is longer battery life. The D850 will allow you to make 1840 shots before your battery runs dead in comparison to only 650 shots with the A7R III. You will notice this is a huge difference, so Nikon’s camera clearly wins in this battle. Read more about Nikon D850 review on our website PhotographyTalk.com.
One of the reasons because of which mirrorless models have smaller battery life is that they use an electronic viewfinder that allows you to see a sample of your footage before you press the shutter button. On the contrary, DSLR models have an optical viewfinder which gives a clearer and lag-free picture. Whether you prefer an electronic or optical viewfinder, in any case, it should not be a deal-breaking criterion.
Both cameras are dust-proof, weather-sealed, and built to have a long life. There is a tilting LCD touch-screen on each camera, although the one in the Nikon D850 provides better resolution and it’s bigger by 0.2 inches.
The Nikon D850 also incorporates a top deck display which can be useful to view or make changes to settings while you are in the process of shooting.
Decide which camera works better for you after watching the video above by Tony & Chelsea Northrup.
Nikon D850 vs Sony A7R III - Features
Although they are different types of camera, the Nikon D850 and Sony A7R III produce similar results when they are put in practice.
The Nikon D850 offers a 45.7 MP BSI-CMOS full-frame sensor while there is the same type of sensor of 42 MP in the Sony A7R III. Despite of minor differences in sensor size and resolution, each camera makes images of great quality so it would be a tough decision to decide which sensor performs better.
The Sony a7R III, however, beats the Nikon D850 at continuous shooting and autofocus performance.
Sony’s mirrorless model offers continuous shooting at 10fps, while the Nikon D850 shoots at only 7fps. This is not a huge difference, but more frames per second can be of use for action photographers. Also, the silent mode works better in the a7R, although the D850 also has an option for silent shooting.
Need to finance a new Nikon D850 or Sony a7R III? SELL YOUR OLD GEAR AND USE THE PROCEEDS TO UPGRADE YOUR KIT.
When it comes to autofocus, the Sony a7R III has 425 focus points, which is much more in comparison to 153 autofocus points in the Nikon D850. Still, it is worth mentioning that both cameras have an impressive autofocus system.
One more thing that Sony a7R III has and the Nikon D850 lacks is in-camera image stabilization system which is helpful in reducing the effects of camera shake.
The Nikon D850 is a more capable camera when it comes to video. Both cameras offer 3480 x 2160 video resolution and 4K features. Still, the D850 allows you to create 8K-resolution time-lapse videos, which is not possible with Sony’s camera.
Get a detailed hands-on review of this camera in the video above by Finding Middle Earth.
Nikon D850 vs Sony A7R III – ISO comparison
If you are looking for a camera with a higher ISO setting, then you would opt for Sony’s model. The Sony A7R III has a native ISO range from 100-32,000 (expandable to 50-102,400). The Nikon D850, in comparison, has a max ISO of 25,600 (expandable to 102,400).
On the other hand, the Nikon D850 excels at the low end of ISO, and it can go as low as 64 ISO (expandable down to ISO 32). According to Nikon, this is the lowest base ISO of any DSLR or mirrorless camera.
While the D850 has greater dynamic range, the a7R III takes photos in low light with less noise.
Nikon D850 vs Sony A7R III – Lenses
For both cameras, you will need to use interchangeable lenses. The D850 has a larger flange-to-focal-plane distance which means that its lenses are bigger and heavier than those built for the mirrorless Sony.
However, you will have much better lens selection if you choose to go with the Nikon D850. A wide array of lens choice for Nikon’s cameras is a big advantage of the D850 over the Sony a7R III.
Still, what is good is that you can use an adapter on Sony’s camera to attach lenses made by other companies such as Canon or Nikon.
Nikon D850 vs Sony A7R III – Price Comparison
There is no big difference in Nikon D850 price and Sony a7R III price. While you can buy the body of D850 for just under $3,100.000, you will need to spend $3,200.00 for the a7R III.
The Nikon D850 with AF-S NIKKOR 105mm f/1.4E ED Lens is priced at $5,300.00, while the Sony a7R III with 24-70mm f/4 Vario-Tessar T FE OSS Full Frame Zoom Lens costs $4,100.00.
Of course, you can buy either of these cameras used and save yourself a good bit of money.
For example, a used Sony a7R III in like new condition is currently going for $2,679.00, a savings of over $500 from the new price. Likewise, a used Nikon D850 in like new condition can be found for $2,909.00, a savings of just under $200.
Ultimately, your choice between the two may very well come down to brand preference and whether you want a DSLR or a mirrorless camera. Otherwise, these cameras are quite well matched!
We Recommend
Nikon D850 vs Sony A7R III: Which One Wins an Epic Shootout?
Whether you prefer DSLRs or mirrorless cameras, there are plenty of choices on the market today that will serve you well.
Better still, with Canon, Nikon, Sony, and other camera manufacturers locked in an epic battle to outdo one another, we get the benefit of having some truly epic cameras to choose from.
When it comes to epic cameras, there's none better than the Nikon D850 and the Sony A7R III.
The question is, which one is best? You can check out Sony A7RIII vs Nikon D850 post done by PhotographyTalk.com.
Essential Specs: Nikon D850 vs Sony A7R III
Let's begin with the Nikon D850:
- 45.7-megapixel BSI CMOS FX sensor
- Expeed 5 image processor
- 153-point autofocus system
- ISO range 64-25,600 (expandable to 102,400)
- 7fps burst shooting speed (9fps with optional battery grip)
- 4K video at 30fps and 1080p video at 120fps
The first thing you notice is the 45.7-megapixel back-illuminated sensor.
Though it doesn't have the same resolution as, say, the Canon 5DS or 5DS R, what it does have is virtually unmatched image quality.
In fact, the sensor in the Nikon D850 was the first ever to get a perfect score from DxOMark testing.
Not only does the D850 have an excellent sensor, but paired with the Expeed 5 image processor, you get ultra-fast performance.
Speaking of fast performance, the autofocus system in the D850 has a number of upgrades from its predecessor, the Nikon D810.
Editor's Tip: Looking to upgrade your camera without breaking the bank? See how far you can stretch your dollar.
For starters, there's more autofocus points - 153 in all - and they have improved detection range, too.
Add to that the fact that this camera has 7fps shooting capabilities that expand to 9fps with an optional battery grip, a native ISO range of 100-25,600, and robust 4K video capabilities, and you have the makings of a camera that was purpose-built for photographing and filming subjects of all kinds.
And now, the Sony's basic specs:
- 42.4-megapixel BSI CMOS full frame sensor
- BIONZ X image processor
- 399-point autofocus system
- ISO range 50-32,000 (expandable to 102,400)
- 10fps burst shooting speed
- 4K video at 24fps or 30fps and 1080p at 120fps
As good as the D850's sensor is, Sony found a way to match it.
Though the megapixel count is slightly less, the Sony's sensor is also back-illuminated to produce incredible image quality.
In fact, this sensor also earned a perfect score from DxOMark, so at least on the image quality front, these cameras couldn't be better matched.
The Sony more than matches up with the D850 in other areas as well.
In fact, the Sony's 399-point autofocus system is even more capable, with more than twice the AF points.
It actually has 399 phase-detect points and 425 contrast-detect points, which, according to Sony, makes it twice as fast as the A7R II when shooting in low-light situations. The ISO range of 50-32,000 (expandable to 102,400) certainly helps in that department as well.
It should also be noted that the A7R III has a ludicrously fast 10fps burst speed.
Not only that, you can shoot at 10fps in RAW or JPEG while utilizing autofocus tracking at the same time.
With similar 4K video shooting capabilities as the D850, this is an equally good camera for tackling still photography and videography.
Breaking Down the Specs
So, we know both these cameras have superb back-illuminated full frame sensors. We also know that both cameras have lightning-fast processors.
There are other similarities as well.
Both cameras offer similar autofocus EV range. Both cameras also have touch-enabled tilting LCDs with touch autofocus. Features like Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, weather-sealing, and ISO range are similar as well. And provided the D850 is equipped with an optional battery grip, the burst shooting speed is close, too.
The Sony A7R III and Nikon D850 have similar color depth and dynamic range, similar sensor pixel areas, microphone and headphone ports, NFC, and smartphone remote control capabilities.
But there are plenty of differences between the cameras that might help distinguish which is best.
Most obviously, there's a massive difference in the size of these cameras.
The D850 weighs in at 2.24 pounds and measures 5.75 x 4.88 x 3.11 inches.
The A7R III, on the other hand, weighs just 1.45 pounds and measures 5 x 3.78 x 2.91 inches.
Clearly, as a mirrorless camera, the A7R III is going to be a smaller rig than the D850, but the difference is quite significant.
If working fast and light is a priority, the clear winner here is the A7R III.
Another major difference between these two cameras is the viewfinder.
On the D850, you'll find an optical viewfinder that affords you a bright, clear view of the subject with zero lag, a 0.75x magnification, and a 100 percent field of view.
On the A7R III, you'll find an OLED electronic viewfinder with a magnification of 0.78x and a 100 percent field of view.
Editor's Tip: Not happy with your photography skills? Taking a class or participating in a photography adventure are great ways to develop photography skills. See what you can learn.
The major difference here is that the Sony's EVF gives you a real-time preview of the image's exposure and features like white balance and color. So, rather than pulling the camera from your eye to see those features on the LCD, you get them right in the viewfinder.
Some people love EVFs; others hate them. In this case, though, I give the A7R III the advantage.
An important, albeit less exciting feature to discuss is battery life.
Sony cameras are not known for offering you a ton of shots per charge, and the A7R III is no different. You can squeeze about 650 shots out of a single charge.
By comparison, the Nikon offers 1,840 shots per charge, so there's really no competition here.
Sure, you can add additional batteries to your bag if you opt for the Sony, but for pursuits like wildlife photography or sports photography when every moment matters, swapping out your batteries three times to get the same number of shots as the Nikon can muster with one battery might be a bit of a turn-off.
The Nikon D850 also outperforms the Sony with a couple of technological features that make taking great photos a little easier.
First, the D850 has illuminated buttons, which is obviously handy when shooting in low-light situations.
Secondly, the D850 has built-in focus stacking and built-in focus peaking as well.
And while both cameras have two storage slots, the Sony has one UHS-I and one UHS-II slot while the Nikon sports a single XQD slot and one UHS-II slot. If faster read/write speed is what you're after, the Nikon's QXD slot will certainly be appealing.
Final Thoughts
There's no mistaking that both of these cameras represent the pinnacle of modern photography technology. Either way, you're getting a fantastic, capable camera.
As with many things in photography, the decision of whether the Nikon D850 or Sony A7R III is better will likely come down to a couple of very practical factors.
First, if you're already in the Nikon or Sony environment, it makes a lot of sense to stay there.
I have a Nikon D810 (and a D800 before that, and a D750 before that...), so I bought a D850 when it was released. If I'd been in the Sony ecosystem, I'd probably have opted for the A7R III instead.
Second, I see weight and size as a factor that can sway photographers one way or the other.
If you're a studio portrait photographer, for example, and moving around a lot isn't in the cards, the bigger Nikon might be a better bet.
However, if you're a travel photographer, having the smaller A7R III could prove to be quite advantageous.
Lastly, price is always a factor. These cameras are comparably priced, with the Nikon's $3,300 price tag slightly higher than the A7R III's at $3,000.
In the end, the differences between these cameras aren't especially significant, and their shared strengths are spectacular.
My recommendation is to read up as much as you can about both cameras, watch a few YouTube reviews on each one, and ask an expert to determine what camera is best for you.
We Recommend
Nikon Z5 vs Canon EOS R8
Two of the most popular and affordable full-frame mirrorless cameras currently on the market are the Nikon Z5 and the Canon EOS R8. With that in mind, if you have whittled down your camera search to these two amazing cameras and are looking for the final push toward one or the other, this article is for you!
In this camera comparison guide, we’ll start by sharing basic overviews of the cameras. Then, we’ll examine their photo and video capabilities and recommend our favorite Canon and Nikon lenses. Additionally, thanks to innovative online platforms like MPB, buying a used mirrorless camera has never been cheaper and easier.
Who is MPB? It is a trustworthy and reliable online platform selling pre-owned photography and videography gear at unbeatable prices. Better yet, all of its cameras and lenses are hand-inspected by highly-trained product specialists with years of experience and backed by six-month warranties, allowing you to make your purchases confidently and worry-free.
We love MPB because, over the years, we have saved thousands of dollars buying, selling, and trading in photography equipment on their one-of-a-kind online marketplace. You can start saving, too, by visiting their website today. Now, join us as we explore these two powerful cameras and determine which suits you and your needs best!
Check out the video above by The Slanted Lens for an even deeper look at the similarities and differences between the Canon EOS R8 and the Nikon Z5 camera.
Table of Contents
- Nikon Z5 vs Canon EOS R8: Overview
- Nikon Z5 vs Canon EOS R8: Imaging Performance
- Nikon Z5 vs Canon EOS R8: Video Performance
- Recommended Nikon & Canon Lenses
- Final Thoughts on the Nikon Z5 vs Canon EOS R8
Nikon Z5 vs Canon EOS R8: Overview
Nikon Z5
Nikon released the Nikon Z5 in 2020. It’s an entry-level mirrorless camera featuring a 24.3-megapixel full-frame sensor and an Expeed 6 image processing engine. While the body closely resembles professional Nikon cameras like the Z7, one of the biggest differences is that its sensor lacks BSI (back-side illuminated) technology, hurting its low-light performance.
In contrast, the Canon EOS R8 debuted in 2023, making it one of the company’s newest Canon R mirrorless cameras. It holds a 24.2-megapixel full-frame sensor and a Digic X image processing engine, identical to those inside the high-end Canon EOS R6 II. The upgraded components boost the camera’s speed, performance, and handling.
Canon EOS R8
One area where the Canon R8 has a decisive advantage is portability. Even though it’s not much smaller than the Nikon Z5, it’s over 200 grams lighter, making it better for travel and street photography.
Alternatively, the Z5 has the upper hand in battery life and can shoot nearly twice as many photos on a fully charged battery. The extended battery life is a huge plus for landscape and wildlife photography.
Now, here’s a head-to-head look at the key features and specs of the Nikon Z5 vs Canon EOS R8 to see how they stack up:
Nikon Z5 vs Canon EOS R8: Imaging Performance
Nikon Z5
The Nikon Z5 full-frame camera and the Canon EOS R8 both excel at still photography. Regardless of which one you use, you can expect high-quality photos with excellent sharpness and vibrant colors. The color algorithms of Nikon and Canon have long been considered the best in the photography industry, and that trend continues with these cameras.
Two advantages of the Z5 are its bigger pixels and the wider dynamic range for RAW images. The larger pixels mean it performs better in low-light conditions and produces photos with less noise. At the same time, the wider dynamic range provides more control during editing. Also, it has an anti-aliasing filter, which helps reduce moiré.
Canon EOS R8
The R8 outpaces the Z5 in burst shooting and autofocus, though. Whereas the Z5 has a below-average 4.5 fps max continuous shooting speed, the R8 tops out at 40 fps! This makes it a great choice for adventure and sports photography. Moreover, its AF boasts advanced subject-tracking, which can recognize, lock onto, and track people, animals, and vehicles.
Which is the best camera for photos? It’s a tie.
Learn More:
Nikon Z5 vs Canon EOS R8: Video Performance
Nikon Z5
While the two cameras are neck and neck when it comes to photography, unfortunately, the Nikon Z5 can’t keep up with the Canon EOS R8 once you switch to video mode. Even though both cameras have 4K video capabilities, everything from how they record the footage to the final video quality is drastically different.
For example, the Z5 has 4K/30p video recorded with a giant 1.7x crop factor, making it nearly impossible to capture wide-angle scenes. In comparison, the R8 has 4K/60p video that it oversamples from a 6K capture. As a bonus, the R8 also records 1080p/120p slow-motion video or super-slow-motion 1080p/180p. Slow-mo clips are perfect for YouTube and social media.
Canon EOS R8
One video-friendly feature we greatly applaud on the Z5 is the in-body image stabilization. Its stabilization significantly reduces camera shake, especially during handheld video capture. To get similar results from the R8, you must use Canon RF lenses with optical image stabilization.
Which is the best camera for video? The Canon EOS R8.
Recommended Nikon & Canon Lenses
Nikon Z5 with 24-70mm lens
Here are two quick lists of the best Nikon Z and Canon RF lenses to pair with the Nikon Z5 mirrorless camera and the Canon EOS R8 mirrorless camera.
Nikon Z5 Lenses
- Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/4 S
- Nikon Nikkor Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
- Nikon Nikkor Z 14-30mm f/4 S
- Nikon Nikkor Z 50mm f/1.8 S
- Nikon Nikkor Z 85mm f/1.8 S
Canon R8 Lenses
- Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM
- Canon RF 15-30mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM
- Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM
- Canon RF 50mm f/1.8 STM
- Canon RF 600mm f/11 IS STM
Final Thoughts on the Nikon Z5 vs Canon EOS R8
Photographer shooting with the Canon EOS R8
Truth be told, you can’t go wrong with either of these full-frame mirrorless cameras. However, since you must choose one, here are our final recommendations. People on a budget and photographers who strictly shoot photos should choose the Nikon Z5. On the other hand, video-first shooters and hybrid content creators will be better off with the Canon EOS R8.
We hope you have found our Nikon Z5 vs Canon EOS R8 camera review informative and are now one step closer to deciding on a camera. If not, no worries! You can compare them with other options by checking out the list below of similarly priced mirrorless cameras in stock now at MPB:
Heads up: Clicking on our affiliate links and exploring our sponsored content helps us at no extra cost to you, and we only recommend gear we're absolutely crazy about!
Learn More:
- Step Up Your Game in 2024 With the Canon Holy Trinity of Lenses
- What is the Best Nikon Camera Under $1000?
We Recommend
Nikon Z6 II vs Z7 II
Nikon Z6 II
Examining the Nikon Z6 II vs Z7 II, we see many similarities with some major differences. Those differences will likely influence who looks at each camera and what type of photographer or photography is intended for the Nikon Z6 II and the Nikon Z7 II.
Regardless of which of these fine cameras you prefer, you can purchase a quality pre-owned version at the online platform MPB? Purchasing from MPB will save you money while you still have the peace of mind of excellent warranty coverage. More on that in a bit.
Here is a breakdown of what you need to know when considering the Nikon Z6 II vs Z7 II.
Table of Contents:
- Similarities of Nikon Z6 II vs Z7 II
- Nikon Z6 II vs Z7 II - Where They Differ
- Nikon Z6 II vs Z7 II - Low Light vs High Resolution
- The Photographer That Wants a Nikon Z6 II
- The Photographer That Wants a Nikon Z7 II
- How to Use MPB
- Final Thoughts: Nikon Z6 II vs Z7 II
Similarities of Nikon Z6 II vs Z7 II
Nikon’s entry into Full Frame format mirrorless cameras came in 2018 with the professional-caliber Nikon Z6 and Z7 cameras. Along with these new cameras came a new line of Nikon Nikkor Z-mount lenses.
These mirrorless cameras and the new lens mount represented the direction Nikon would take with regard to interchangeable lens cameras for the future. Nikon’s outstanding DSLRs are still being made (as of this printing) as entry-level, intermediate, prosumer, and full-fledged professional models, but mirrorless is clearly the future for camera companies.
The Z6 was fitted with a 24.5MP Full Frame sensor, and the Z7 had a 45.7MP Full Frame sensor. Released in 2020, the Nikon Z6 II and Nikon Z7 II cameras are upgrades of those originals with some welcome improvements, such as having a second card slot for SD cards in addition to the original single XQD slot, which also accepts CFE cards.
They have the same very solid and mostly metal weather-sealed bodies, tilting rear view screens, and electronic eye-level viewfinders. Likewise, both cameras offer rapid sequencing of still shots, 4K video, and 5-axis in-camera sensor-shift image stabilization. Add the following to the list of similarities as well:
- Silent modes
- Exposure bracketing
- Special flash modes
- Superb autofocusing
- Comfortable ergonomics
Nikon Z6 II vs Z7 II - Where They Differ
Nikon Z7 II
Where these two cameras differ the most obviously is in the sensors. The sensor resolution differences also create some other differences that aren’t initially as obvious.
Since the Nikon Z6 II has a lower megapixel count than the Nikon Z7 II, the Z6 II has a slightly faster still image sequencing speed of 14 fps vs 10 fps. The Z6 II has a bigger image buffer, too. This makes sense due to the image files being larger from the Nikon Z7 II. The Z6 II buffer holds 124 RAW images, while the Z7 II accommodates 77 RAW files.
In our Nikon Z6 II vs Z7 II comparison, we also need to look at AF points. The Z7 II has almost double (493) what the Z6 II has (273). ISO differences aren’t huge, but the Nikon Z6 II holds an edge in low-light performance. Another difference is that the Nikon Z7 II has no anti-aliasing filter, which results in a sharpness advantage.
Nikon Z6 II vs Z7 II - Low Light vs High Resolution
So, we’ve discussed the main differences between these cameras. Basically, we have a low-light superstar vs a high-resolution superstar. Since the Nikon Z6 II has better low-light performance, this would mean that photographers heavy into videography would likely prefer it over the Nikon Z7 II.
This isn’t to say that the Z6 II is low resolution or that the Z7 II can’t handle low light. Both are excellent cameras all around cameras, capable of being used as professional tools for any type of photography.
Learn More:
The Photographer That Wants a Nikon Z6 II
Who is the photographer that would prefer the Nikon Z6 II vs the Z7 II?
The Nikon Z6 II is the perfect camera for a wedding photographer. It has excellent sharpness for making large images, and the outstanding low-light performance lets you capture those beautiful image files in virtually any type of lighting conditions.
Mixed lighting is an area in which the Nikon Z6 II excels just as much as it does in low light. Since the megapixel count is lower than the Nikon Z7 II, the pixels themselves are larger. This means each individual pixel holds an enormous amount of exposure and color information. This translates into the Z6 II being an excellent low-light and mixed-light camera.
Photographers heavily into videography might also prefer the Nikon Z6 II vs Z7 II. Since the video resolution is based on more than mere megapixel count, having top-end low-light performance and color rendition allows for more detailed video post-production. Again, a wedding photographer might be inclined to lean this way.
The Nikon Z6 II is no slouch where image resolution comes in, however. It is totally capable of absolutely blowing away cameras from just a couple of years ago in terms of image files that can be printed at virtually any size you want or need. Besides wedding photogs, a real estate professional, sports and wildlife photographer, or a portrait photographer will love this camera.
The Photographer That Wants a Nikon Z7 II
A short and sweet answer to this question is that landscape photographers and advertising photographers will adore the full scope of the resources the Nikon Z7 II brings to bear. Again, this camera is not a deficient camera regarding low light, color rendition, or video performance. It’s excellent in all regards.
The image sharpness capability is the main reason this camera exists. Not only is there a huge amount of megapixels in the Full Frame sensor, but Nikon also decided to remove the anti-aliasing filter from this camera. That equates to a slight bump in image-resolving power.
What does this mean? Well, it all adds up to the Nikon Z7 II being among the top cameras in the world of Full Frame format with regard to producing high-resolution image files. The mirrorless design permits lenses with a maximum aperture faster than anything Nikon has ever made, so the Z7 II also produces outstanding images in lower light levels.
How to Use MPB
MPBMPB is my preferred way to get new (to me) cameras and lenses along with all sorts of important accessories - flash units, grips, teleconverters…you name it.
One of the great things about MPB being a premier platform for pre-owned photography equipment is that you can trade in your existing gear for credit towards a Nikon Z6 II or Nikon Z7 II camera body. MPB even handles the shipping!
Not only do you get fantastic pricing on high-quality gear, but MPB also offers a six-month warranty on most items in their huge inventory of used cameras and lenses. On top of that, you enjoy a seven-day return window on most items.
In other words, MPB is the best of all worlds. You can choose from excellent gear, save some money, and have peace of mind that should something go awry, you have a warranty to rely on and a week-long return window of which to take advantage.
Buying pre-owned gear is a great way to upgrade your kit without busting your budget. And as I mentioned a moment ago, you can trade in your old gear, too, to make room for your new-to-you gear. It’s a great setup - and one I highly recommend you check out!
Final Thoughts Nikon Z6 II vs Z7 II
Figuring out what camera to choose between the Nikon Z6 II vs Z7 II will be simple for some photographers and a little difficult for some of us. Since they both take the same lenses, flash units, and other accessories, using both cameras is an excellent option for many pros and photo enthusiasts.
The Z6 II costs about two-thirds of what the Z7 II does. Bottom line: Nikon Z6 II vs Z7 II comparison reveals that both cameras are excellent, and you will benefit from either one. Or both!
Learn More:
We Recommend
Nikon Z6 vs Nikon Z6 II
The Nikon Z6, and its successor, the Nikon Z6 II, are two of the most popular hybrid digital cameras on sale today. And if you are new to photography or trying to upgrade your current camera, they are two powerful and affordable options you absolutely should consider investing in.
In this Nikon Z6 vs Z6 II camera guide, we make a detailed head-to-head comparison of these advanced Nikon Z mirrorless cameras to determine which is the best Nikon camera. We compare them in terms of specs and features, photo performance, video performance, and more! Furthermore, because of innovative online platforms like MPB, buying a used Nikon Z6 or a used Nikon Z6 II has never been cheaper and easier.
MPB is a trustworthy and reliable online platform selling used photo and video gear at unbeatable prices. All their cameras and lenses are rigorously hand-inspected by skilled product specialists and backed by six-month warranties, allowing you to make your purchases confidently and worry-free.
We have bought, sold, and traded in countless photography equipment throughout the years using MPB’s online platform and have always been thrilled with the end result. That’s why we couldn’t be prouder to recommend them here today. With that said, let’s dive in and discover which of these great mirrorless cameras best matches your budget and needs in 2023!
Check out the video above by Jared Polin to learn more about the similarities and differences between these two amazing cameras.
Table of Contents
- Nikon Z6 vs Nikon Z6 II: Overview
- Nikon Z6 vs Nikon Z6 II: Imaging Performance
- Nikon Z6 vs Nikon Z6 II: Video Performance
- Final Thoughts on the Nikon Z6 vs Nikon Z6 II
Nikon Z6 vs Nikon Z6 II: Overview
Nikon Z6
The Nikon Z6 debuted in 2018, and the Z6 II came out in 2020. Internally, both cameras boast a high-resolution 24.5-megapixel Full-Frame BSI-CMOS sensor (so if you’re looking for a Nikon film camera, you’re out of luck!). The Z6 pairs the sensor with one Expeed 6 image processor, while the Z6 II has dual Expeed 6 processors. The extra processor increases the camera's overall speed everywhere from start time to autofocus.
Speaking of autofocus, both of these best Nikon camera options utilize a hybrid AF system and share the same amount of phase detection focus points – 273. While that’s way fewer points than the 693 on the similarly priced Sony Alpha A7 III, the AF is still very effective, and subject tracking is solid. The one big difference in AF is that the Z6 II has face/eye-detection autofocus (for people and animals) when selecting the “Wide Area” AF mode.
Nikon Z6 II
Stylistically, the two cameras are very similar. Their dimensions are nearly identical (the Z6 II is 2mm thicker), and they weigh nearly the same (the Z6 II is 30g heavier). Nikon made these tiny differences to incorporate the new EN-EL15C battery, which lasts 100 shots longer than the old battery.
A few more notable similarities include the tilting touchscreen LCD, the button layout, the customization options, and the menu system. Alternatively, one important design difference is that the Z6 II has dual memory card slots, whereas the Z6 only has one.
Here’s an in-depth look at the key features and specs of the Nikon Z6 vs Z6 II to show how these best Nikon camera options stack up:
Nikon Z6 vs Z6 II: Imaging Performance
Nikon Z6
When it comes to still photography, these two cameras are dead even in my eyes (although the Z6 II does have some minor upgrades). That’s no knock against the newer model, though, because the Z6 was already one of the highest-performing mirrorless cameras for photography on the market!
Pictures from both cameras have excellent image quality, regardless of whether you shoot JPEGs or RAW images. JPEGs have slightly bolder out-of-the-box colors courtesy of an algorithm that auto-sharpens and boosts the color science of photos. On the other hand, RAW files have a greater dynamic range, save more internal data, and are better for editing.
Nikon Z6 II
The only substantial difference between the Z6 vs Z6 II is in terms of max continuous shooting speed. While the original camera tops out at an impressive 12 frames per second (fps), the Z6 II shoots at speeds as high as 14 fps. That makes it the superior camera if you are a sports, action, adventure, or wildlife photographer.
Other imaging similarities worth highlighting are that the two cameras share the same high-resolution 3.68M-dot electronic viewfinder (EVF), they have huge native ISO ranges, and they excel in low-light conditions.
Which is the best Nikon camera for imaging? It’s a tie.
Learn More:
Nikon Z6 vs Z6 II: Video Performance
Nikon Z6 II
Here is where the Nikon Z6 II finally starts to separate itself from its predecessor. If you’ve read reviews or camera comparisons written right after the Z6 II debuted, most say these two Nikon cameras have the same 4K video capabilities. And while that was true initially, that’s no longer the case!
Thanks to a firmware update in 2021, the Z6 can now record UHD 4K video at 24, 30, and 60p frame rates. That’s double the max speed of the Nikon Z6, which films 4K at 24 and 30 fps. The one downside of the 4K/60p video is that the Z6 II applies a significant 1.5x crop factor to the footage, which limits its wide-angle shooting capabilities.
Nikon Z6
Another advantage of shooting video with the Z6 II is that Nikon expanded its video output options. While both cameras can output 10-bit Log footage, the Z6 II also has professional video formats such as N-Log, HLG HDR video, and 12-bit line-skipped 4K Raw. After export, you can encode the footage as BlackMagic Raw or ProRes Raw codecs.
Shared video features include 5-Axis in-body image stabilization (IBIS), beautiful slow-motion video, and advanced audio controls. The IBIS enhances low-light performance and reduces camera shake, allowing you to record stunningly smooth handheld video. Slo-mo clips are filmed in 1080p/120p. And the audio controls help you capture crystal-clear sound.
Which is the best Nikon camera for video? The Z6 II takes it!
Final Thoughts on the Nikon Z6 vs Nikon Z6 II
Thanks for taking time out of your busy schedule to read our Nikon Z6 vs Z6 II camera comparison guide. While the two cameras are similar in many ways, we feel the professional upgrades of the Z6 II make it worth the higher price and worthy of the title of the best Nikon camera (at least in this head-to-head matchup).
With that said, the Z6 is no slouch and is a fantastic option for people on a budget!
Finally, here’s a list of a few of our favorite used Nikon Z Fit Lenses for photo and video to pair with your new-to-you Nikon Z mirrorless camera. You can now find incredibly low prices on all these lenses and more at MPB!
- Nikon Nikkor Z 24-70mm f.2.8 S
- Nikon Nikkor Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
- Nikon Nikkor Z 14-30mm f/4 S
- Nikon Nikkor Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S
- Nikon Nikkor Z 35mm f/1.8 S
Learn More:
- Get One of These Three Budget Nikon Z50 Lenses for Under $500
- Nikon Z Camera Comparison: Is the Z5 or Z6 a Better Bet?
We Recommend
Nikon Z6 vs Sony a7 III Comparison
Photo by Banter Snaps on Unsplash
Nikon Z6 vs Sony a7III
In this review, we will be comparing the Nikon Z6 and Sony a7 III, two all-rounder cameras released during the last year (2018).
These two models share a lot in common, although they were designed and produced by two competitive companies, Nikon and Sony.
First of all, they are both mirrorless cameras built around a 24 MP full-frame sensor. Moreover, they have similar features, price range, and target group.
Despite resembling each other in some respects, there are things that can make difference between these two camera models and we’ll point them out in this article.
Need a new camera but can't afford new prices? Read my MPB review to learn why it's one of your best options for finding great used cameras.
Nikon Z6 vs Sony a7 III – History
Last year, the major companies in the photography world, Canon and Nikon, released their first full-frame mirrorless cameras. By doing this, they ended a long-lasting reign of Sony on the mirrorless market.
For years, Sony was the leader in producing full-frame mirrorless cameras. By removing the internal mirror that is characteristic for DSLR cameras, the company was able to create very compact devices that have the same features as DSLR models produced by its competitors.
With this being said, it is not strange there are similarities between the Nikon 76 and Sony a7 III.
The Z6 was released six months after the a7 III, and Nikon probably had in mind Sony’s model when they prepared their first semi-pro full-frame camera.
This becomes even more obvious if you take into consideration the Nikon Z6 came in pair with the high-end Nikon Z7.
It was the same move as Sony did earlier by launching the Sony a7 III shortly after its high-end twin, the a7R III.
The Nikon Z6 was obviously made to challenge Sony’s camera, but how successfully it fulfilled its purpose?
Nikon Z6 vs Sony a7 III – Design
Sony a7 III
Mirrorless cameras are often associated with compact size and lightweight, but the Nikon Z6 and Sony a7 III are not among the most compact cameras ever made. We have done in-depth Nikon Z6 review on our website PhotographyTalk.com.
With dimensions of 5.0 x 3.8 x 2.9 inches and weight of 23.0 ounces, the Sony a7 III is only a hair smaller and lighter than the Z6. The difference is microscopic so we can’t say there are disparities in the size and weight of these cameras.
Nikon Z6
When it comes to design, the Sony a7 III might be inconvenient in certain situations, since they made the handgrip too small. Okay, it is not the smallest ever, but if you are using heavy lenses you might feel exhausted after handling the camera too long.
Nikon learned from Sony’s mistakes and made the grip a bit larger which made the camera feeling more comfortable after a long day of shooting.
Nikon Z6 vs Sony a7 III – EVF and LCD
Sony a7 III
Both cameras incorporate an EVF and a rear LCD screen. Unfortunately, none of them have a display that fully articulates.
The LCD screen is tiltable on both cameras, but you can’t turn it around to make a selfie. Vloggers will hate this, but I am sure they will find their way to use these cameras nevertheless.
So, what are differences in the LCD screen and EVF? For the beginning, let’s just say that Nikon’s camera clearly wins in this battle.
NIKON Z6
The LCD screen on the Nikon Z6 is a bit larger (3.2 inches vs 3.0 inches) and it has a bigger resolution (2100k vs 922k). Additionally, its touchscreen allows you bigger possibilities than Sony’s model.
The EVF in the Nikon Z6 also has better resolution than the one in the Sony a7 III (3690k dots vs 2359k) and just a slightly higher magnification (0.8x vs 0.78x).
Finally, the Nikon Z6 also has a top OLED screen which is handy for quickly checking camera settings, while the Sony a7 III doesn’t have this feature.
Nikon Z6 vs Sony a7 III – Common Specs
Sony a7 III
Before we focus on specs that distinguish these two cameras, let’s see what they share in common.
First of all, they both feature a 24 MP BSI sensor (35mm) with optical low pass filter, 5-axis in-body stabilization, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and other connectivity options such as HDMI, microphone port, and headphone jack.
NIKON Z6
The Nikon Z6 and Sony a7 III also have the same native ISO sensitivity range from 100 to 51,200.
Additionally, both cameras can record 4K videos up to 30fps and Full HD videos up to 120fps.
If you are interested to know more about video features of these two cameras, check out the video above by Gerald Undone.
Nikon Z6 vs Sony a7 III – SD Card and Battery Life
The Nikon Z6 has only one XQD card slot, while Sony’s model accepts two SD cards. Although XQD cards perform better, having two SD cards can be of great assistance especially if you are a wedding photographer or a videographer.
Double card slot has shown to be very useful and practical so it is a big disadvantage for the Z6 that it lacks one.
Along with bigger storage, the Sony a7 III also has longer battery life. It is possible to make 610 viewfinder shots with Sony’s camera, while Nikon’s model makes only 310.
Nikon Z6 vs Sony a7 III – Autofocus
The other thing where the Sony a7 III has an advantage over the Nikon Z6 is autofocus. It is not a huge difference and both cameras have impressive autofocus system, but – to start with - the Sony a7 III has more autofocus points.
While there are 273 hybrid autofocus points in Nikon, there are 693 phase-detect points and 425 contrast-detect points in Sony’s camera.
Although the number of autofocus points doesn’t necessarily imply bigger precision and speed, users have expressed more satisfaction with the autofocus system in the Sony a7 III.
The Nikon Z6 has shown to be unpredictable in certain situations. For example, it might have issues to acquire the target in continuous autofocus tracking.
Nikon Z6 vs Sony a7 III – Continuous Shooting Speed
When it comes to continuous shooting speed, the Nikon Z6 appears to perform a bit better than the Sony a7 III.
The Z6 offers 12 fps continuous shooting, while the a7 III allows only 10 fps.
Once again, the difference is not substantial, but since the cameras are very similar it might make a difference to those who are into sports or wildlife photography.
It is worth mentioning that continuous shooting at 12fps while using the Nikon Z6 comes with certain limitations. The exposure will be locked on the first frame, and viewfinder will not keep up with live view.
You will need to reduce the speed to 5.5 fps if you want live view without blackouts on Nikon’s camera.
The same thing goes for the a7 III, although this camera allows live view without blackouts up to 8fps.
In the video above, The Slanted Lens compared the picture quality, video quality, dynamic range and autofocus testing of the Nikon Z6 and Sony A7III.
Nikon Z6 vs Sony a7 III – Lenses
Since we are comparing two cameras developed by different companies, you won’t find strange they have different lens mounts.
The Nikon Z-mount has a diameter of 55mm and flange distance of 16mm. On the other hand, the Sony E-mount has a diameter of 46mm and flange distance of 18mm.
As we already touched upon, Sony has a long history of creating mirrorless models, so there is a wider choice of lenses for mirrorless cameras produced by this company.
At the moment, there are 48 E-mount lenses that you can choose for your mirrorless Sony. Additionally, you can buy the A-mount adapter for E-mount cameras in order to use lenses that were designed for Sony’s DSLR models.
The situation is a bit different with Nikon’s camera.
By launching the Z6 and Z7, Nikon introduced the new Z-mount system and four types of lenses that were specifically designed for these two cameras and for all other mirrorless models that will follow-up.
Since there hasn’t passed much time since Nikon unveiled its new mount system, at the moment there are only five lenses to choose from.
The company is preparing new lenses, and the Nikkor Z 58mm f/0.95 Noct should be released any day soon. In the meantime, you can also use the F-Mount Nikkor lenses if you buy the optional Mount Adapter FTZ.
Nikon Z6 vs Sony a7 III – Price
There is virtually no difference in price between these two cameras.
If you want to buy a new Nikon Z6 (body only) you will need to spend just under $2,000, while the Sony a7 III (body only) costs $1998.00.
If a couple of bucks makes a difference, then we can say the Sony a7 III is the more affordable one. You could always buy used, too, and save a little cash!
Still, don’t forget you will need to buy a lens too.
The Sony a7 III with 28-70mm lens costs $2,198.00, which is around $400 less than you would need to spend on the Nikon Z6 with 24-70mm lens.
If you take this into consideration, the Sony a7 III seems to be more affordable option. Another comparison you'll enjoy: Sony a6400 vs Sony a6500 vs Sony a6300.
We Recommend
Nikon Z6 vs Z7: Deciding Which is Best for Your Needs
I think we can all agree that Nikon knocked it out of the park with their Z6 and Z7 cameras.
I've field tested both of these rigs and found them to have many similarities, yet enough differences that make them distinct cameras on their own with distinct advantages over the other.
You can check out my Nikon Z6 review and my Nikon Z7 review for in-depth discussions of these cameras and their individual merits.
In this article, however, I want to put these cameras head-to-head on a number of different metrics so you can make an informed decision about which one is best for your needs.
Nikon Z6 vs Nikon Z7: Essential Specs
In looking at the primary specifications of these cameras, you'll note a lot of similarities. In fact, both cameras share the following specs:
- EXPEED 6 image processor
- 3.69-million-dot OLED electronic viewfinder with 100% coverage
- 3.2-inch tilting touchscreen LCD with 2.1-million-dots
- OLED top plate display
- 5-axis Sensor-Shift image stabilization
- Bluetooth & Wi-Fi
- Magnesium alloy body
- Full weather sealing
- Smartphone remote control
- One XQD memory card slot
- 200,000 shutter life
Additionally, the Nikon Z6 and Z7 are the same size and weight with the same dimensions, the same grip, the same button layout, and offer the same functionality in terms of ease of use and handling.
Both cameras use the new Z-mount lenses from Nikon as well.
So, at least from these perspectives, these cameras are all but indistinguishable.
There are, however, some significant differences.
Nikon Z6 vs Nikon Z7 Sensor
Though both of these cameras have 35mm high-resolution backside-illuminated sensors, the Z6 has "only" 24.5-megapixels while the Z7 has 45.7-megapixels.
It's important to note that the Z6's sensor has a low-pass filter and the Z7's does not.
This is important because the lack of a low-pass in the Z7 means its sensor produces images with improved details and added sharpness. See the Z7 in action in the video below by AdoramaTV:
In that regard, the Z7 is a better camera from an image quality standpoint. This isn't to say that the Z6 isn't also capable of producing beautifully detailed, sharp photos, but the Z7 is a step above.
Winner: Nikon Z7. If you intend to create large prints, its sensor is better equipped to create the image files needed to do so.
Nikon Z6 vs Nikon Z7: Autofocus
Nikon Z7
Both the Z6 and the Z7 sport a hybrid autofocus system that makes use of contrast-detect and phase-detect autofocus points. These autofocus systems have identical 90-percent sensor coverage, multiple settings to customize the focus area, and excellent subject-tracking performance.
Additionally, both cameras have face detection focus for both still photography and video.
Nikon Z6
The major difference is in the number of autofocus points. The Z6 is well-equipped with 273 autofocus points, but the Z7 has 220 more for a total of 493.
So, on paper, the Z7 would be the camera to get if you're looking for premium autofocus performance.
However, most photographers won't notice a difference between these two cameras from an autofocus standpoint. After all, once you get into the hundreds of AF points, you've got plenty of capability!
Winner: Nikon Z7. The nod goes to the Z7 simply for the sheer number of AF points, but the Z6 is no slouch.
Nikon Z6 vs Nikon Z7: Continuous Shooting Speed
Nikon Z6
These cameras are both equipped with superb continuous shooting speeds - the Z6 clocks in at 12 fps while the Z7 offers a more than respectable 9 fps.
Again, most photographers won't notice a difference in performance here, but if you're a sports or wildlife photographer, that extra 3 fps can make a world of difference.
Having said that, both of these cameras have some idiosyncrasies that make their continuous shooting speeds not all that great in practice.
Nikon Z7
First, both cameras have a minuscule buffer, so neither camera can hold their maximum shooting speeds for more than a couple of seconds before significant slowdown occurs.
Second, both of these cameras lock the exposure before continuous shooting commences, meaning, if you need to reset the exposure, you'll have to wait until burst shooting ends.
Winner: Nikon Z6. That extra 3 fps wins it for the Z6.
Nikon Z6 vs Nikon Z7: Video Capabilities
Nikon Z6
Aside from their sensor resolution, perhaps the biggest difference between these cameras is in their video capabilities.
I dive deep into this topic in my article on filmmaking with the Nikon Z6 and Nikon Z7, so for a full comparison, check that out.
For our purposes, here, just know that the Z6 is a much better camera for shooting video.
Both cameras have 4K UHD recording at 30 fps and 1080p video at 120 fps.
However, the Z6 is capable of shooting full frame video and the Z7 is not. Instead, the Z7 shoots 4K UHD video with a significant crop, which means reduced video quality.
Get a detailed look at the Nikon Z6 in the video above by AdoramaTV.
Winner: Nikon Z6. It's hard to beat full frame 4K UHD!
Nikon Z6 vs Nikon Z7: Price
Nikon Z6
Since these cameras are so close on so many measures, it might come down to price as the determining factor in your decision.
Currently, Adorama has the Nikon Z6 is $1,996.95 for the body only while the Nikon Z7 is $3,396.95 for the body only.
That's obviously not a small difference...
For some shooters, the traits that make the Nikon Z7 a better camera for some photography pursuits are worth the additional $1,400.00. For many other photographers, though, the added expense cannot be justified.
Winner: Nikon Z6. It's a fantastic camera with an excellent price.
Nikon Z6 vs Nikon Z7: Which is Best for You?
As noted earlier, there are plenty of features common to both of these cameras that make them indistinguishable in many ways.
But as we've seen in this head-to-head comparison, the Z7 has a more resolute sensor that results in better image quality. This makes it a better choice for landscape photographers and portrait photographers that want superb detail and the ability to make huge prints.
However, if video or continuous shooting speed are high on your list of priorities, the Z6 is clearly the better choice with 12 fps continuous shooting and full frame video.
Ultimately, either of these cameras is well worth the investment. The one you get will most likely depend on the purpose for which you need it and/or the size of your budget.
We Recommend
Nikon Z7 vs Canon EOS R
Nikon and Canon finally got into the mirrorless game in earnest last fall, and so far, both the Z7 and EOS R have gotten rave reviews.
For most of us, these cameras represent upgrade possibilities from our current DSLRs - from a Nikon D850, for example, to the Z7, or the Canon 5D Mark IV to the EOS R.
However, jumping ship from Nikon to Canon or vice versa probably isn’t in the cards. These cameras are good, but not that good.
Still, it’s nice to know how these cameras stack up against each other. Let’s find out who winds the Nikon Z7 vs Canon EOS R battle.
Table of Contents:
- Nikon Z7 Sensor vs Canon EOS R Sensor
- Nikon Z7 Autofocus vs Canon EOS R Autofocus
- Nikon Z7 Image Stabilization vs Canon EOS R Image Stabilization
- Nikon Z7 EVF vs Canon EOS R EVF
- Nikon Z7 LCD vs Canon EOS R LCD
- Nikon Z7 Lenses vs Canon EOS R Lenses
- Nikon Z7 vs Canon EOS R: Final Thoughts
Nikon Z7 Sensor vs Canon EOS R Sensor
Both of these cameras feature full frame sensors - the Nikon’s has 45-megapixels of resolution while the Canon sports “only” 30.3-megapixels.
There are differences beyond resolution, though.
The Nikon’s sensor is back-illuminated, which improves low-light performance. Additionally, the Z7 does not have an optical low-pass filter, which improves image sharpness, too.
Add to that the fact that the EOS R does have an optical low-pass filter, and the winner in the sensor department is clear - it’s the Nikon.
That being said, both of these cameras produce excellent image quality. The EOS R is certainly no slouch here, but the Z7 is just a bit better.
Winner: Nikon Z7
Nikon Z7 Autofocus vs Canon EOS R Autofocus
The autofocus systems on these cameras are quite different, yet both provide good performance.
The 493-point autofocus system in the Z7 is all-new, yet is built on Nikon’s lineage of autofocus systems. This is a good and a bad thing, though.
On the one hand, it uses phase-detect autofocus points that improve accuracy, particularly when using the viewfinder. The on-sensor phase-detect pixels allow the camera to focus rapidly while also giving you excellent low-light autofocus abilities and above-average subject-tracking.
However, when using autofocus in live view, it’s a different story, especially with tracking a subject.
The EOS R has a new autofocus system as well, though thankfully it includes Canon’s spectacular Dual Pixel design.
The system has 88% coverage of the frame horizontally and 100% coverage vertically. There’s also an astounding 5,655 autofocus points.
All those AF points mean the EOS R is excellent at tracking subjects from edge to edge. Additionally, the system can work all the way down to -6EV, depending on the lens being used. That’s double of the Z7.
Winner: Canon EOS R
Nikon Z7 Image Stabilization vs Canon EOS R Image Stabilization
The Nikon Z7’s image stabilization system is sensor-based, so you can reap the benefits of stabilization regardless of the lens you’re using.
This is a huge benefit to Nikon shooters that have older F-mount lenses that they want to keep and use after upgrading to the Z7 (which can be done using the FTZ adapter).
Beyond that, the Nikon’s image stabilization system offers up to five stops of compensation in addition to five-axis stabilization both for the new Z-Mount lenses and older F-mount lenses, to
Canon, meanwhile, did not incorporate in-body image stabilization in the EOS R. Instead, Canon opted to include stabilization in the EOS R lenses - at least two of them, anyway.
That in-lens system works great, but the fact that it’s only offered in two lenses thus far is disappointing.
Winner: Nikon Z7
Nikon Z7 EVF vs Canon EOS R EVF
The Nikon Z7 has a 3.6-million-dot Quad-VGA OLED electronic viewfinder. It has 100% frame coverage and offers a wide 37-degree diagonal viewing angle.
There’s a fluorine coating on the eyepiece to reduce flare and repel dirt, while the EVF itself is clear, crisp, and bright.
In using the Nikon Z7, it’s evident that blackout and lag are minimal compared to other mirrorless cameras.
The EOS R has a similar EVF that offers similar performance as well.
It has a 3.69-million-dot OLED EVF that offers a 100% view of the subject. When used with an aspherical lens, the EVF is gorgeously crisp and vivid.
Canon has worked hard to minimize distortion and aberrations, and has developed the EVF to be bright enough to view comfortably, even when shooting in sunny conditions.
Ultimately, the EVFs on these cameras are so similar that it’s difficult to pick a winner.
Winner: Draw
Nikon Z7 LCD vs Canon EOS R LCD
Both the Nikon Z7 and Canon EOS R come with a 2.1-million-dot LCD. Where the Nikon’s LCD is 3.2-inches, the Canon’s is 3.15-inches.
The primary difference between the two is that the Nikon’s LCD tilts up and down, where the Canon’s is fully articulating.
Having a fully articulating screen is a nice touch as it makes things like vlogging, selfies, and group photos an easier task.
Winner: Canon EOS R
Nikon Z7 Lenses vs Canon EOS R Lenses
When the Z7 was introduced, three lenses were introduced along with it: a 24-70mm f/4 S, a 35mm f/1.8 S, and a 50mm f/1.8 S. Since then, Nikon has unveiled two more lenses, the 14-30 f/4 S and the 24-70 f/2.8 S, bringing the current total to five (with more on the way).
As noted earlier, the Z7 isn’t limited to these five lenses, thanks to the FTZ adapter that allows you to use F-mount lenses with the camera.
Canon has done the same, so EF-mount lenses work with the EOS R.
The EOS R lens lineup includes an RF 35mm f/1.8 IS STM Macro, an RF 50mm f/1.2L USM, an RF 28-70mm f/2L USM, and an RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, again, with more on the way.
In terms of selection, both companies have ensured that buyers have the essentials available to them from the get-go. And with the next couple of years worth of lenses already mapped out, both Nikon and Canon aim to keep mirrorless camera owners happy with an increasingly large selection of glass
Winner: Draw
Nikon Z7 vs Canon EOS R: Final Thoughts
Both of these cameras are excellent and offer top-notch performance, features, and lens options.
As I said earlier, neither one is so good that it will convince someone to jump ship from one manufacturer to the next.
Likely the biggest question is do you want to upgrade now or wait until the second generation of these mirrorless cameras is released? The video above by Brett Garamella might help you answer that question.
You can pick up a Nikon Z7 (body only) for $3,396.95 at Adorama. The Canon EOS R (body only) will set you back $2,299.00 at Adorama.
We Recommend
Nikon Z7 vs Nikon D850
I've used a Nikon D850 as my primary camera since picking one up in late 2017.
It has been such a joy to use and such an impressive camera that I honestly didn't think anything could rival it.
That is, until I got my hands on a Nikon Z7...
Sure, there are lots of similarities between these cameras that make them unmistakable cousins in the Nikon lineup. But there are also many differences that make each camera particularly suited to specific photographic pursuits.
In this Nikon Z7 vs Nikon D850 matchup, I'll explore the essential specs, features, and performance of these mighty cameras to help you decide which one is best for you.
Nikon Z7 vs Nikon D850 Essential Specs
First things first, let's go over some of the essential specifications for these cameras.
Nikon Z7 Specs
- 46-megapixel full frame BSI CMOS sensor
- EXPEED 6 image processor
- Native ISO Range: 64-25,600 (expandable to 32-102400)
- 5-axis SensorShift image stabilization
- 3.69-million dot OLED electronic viewfinder with 100% coverage
- 3.2-inch tilting touchscreen LCD with 2.1-million dots
- 9 fps burst shooting (12-bit RAW)
- Hybrid PDAF autofocus system with 493 AF points
- AF Sensitivity: -1 to +19 EV
- 4K UHD video at 30 fps
- Magnesium alloy body
- Full weather sealing
- 200,000 shutter life
Nikon D850 Specs
- 46-megapixel full frame BSI CMOS sensor
- EXPEED 5 image processor
- Native ISO Range: 64-25,600 (expandable to 32-102400)
- Optical pentaprism viewfinder with 100% coverage
- 3.2-inch tilting touchscreen LCD with 2.36-million dots
- 7 fps burst shooting (up to 9 fps with optional battery grip)
- 153-point autofocus system with contrast-detect and phase-detect points
- AF Sensitivity: +/-5 EV
- 4K UHD video at 30, 25, and 24 fps
- Magnesium alloy body
- Full weather sealing
- 200,000 shutter life
Clearly, in comparing these lists of features, these cameras are evenly matched on paper.
Both feature a 46-megapixel back-illuminated full frame sensor, but as I point out in this Nikon Z7 Review, the Z7, armed with a newer EXPEED 6 processor, produces images with less noise.
And while both cameras sport the same native and expanded ISO ranges, the Z7 has in-body 5-axis image stabilization, which affords you a greater capability of capturing sharp images when the lighting is not ideal.
Both cameras have weather-sealed, magnesium alloy bodies that I can personally attest are ruggedly built.
I dropped my D850 while I was in Norway, and it bounced around on some jagged boulders near the sea. I'll be darned if it came away from that incident with just a couple of scratches!
Other similarities between these cameras include the expected 200,000 shutter life, 4K UHD video capabilities, and burst shooting that is identical at 9 fps, assuming you add an optional battery grip to the D850.
Let's explore some of the crucial differences between these cameras in more detail below.
Nikon Z7 vs Nikon D850 Design and Build
Nikon Z7
Clearly, there are significant differences in the manner in which these cameras were designed and built.
Since it's a full frame DSLR, the D850 is much larger and heavier than the Z7. At 2.24 pounds, the D850 outweighs the Z7 by three-quarters of a pound. Yet, despite its size, it's a joy to use, even on long days, as I note in this Nikon D850 review. Naturally, the Z7 has a smaller body since it doesn't need to accommodate a mirror.
Despite its smaller size, the Nikon Z7 still has a nice, big, chunky grip, which as a guy with big hands, I appreciate.
Nikon D850
Both cameras have a 3.2-inch tilting touchscreen on the back, which is a welcome addition to the Z7.
When the Z7 was rumored, there was a question as to whether they could squeeze such a big LCD on the back, but they managed to do so, much to the benefit of the end-user.
I've found the LCD on the D850 to be bright, detailed, and responsive, and the same holds true on the Z7.
Nikon Z7
One of the Z7's best features, though, is its 3.69-million dot OLED electronic viewfinder.
It is, in a word, gorgeous.
One of the worries of Nikon enthusiasts is that this first foray into mirrorless cameras would mean diminished quality of the electronic viewfinder. This is simply not the case, though.
I've tested mirrorless cameras from Sony, Panasonic, and Fuji, and the Z7's EVF can more than hold its own against top-shelf models from other companies.
Nikon D850
This isn't to say that the D850's optical viewfinder is a slouch.
It has 0.75x magnification, which is the largest ever offered by Nikon.
And while it doesn't offer the wide array of information that's available on the Z7's EVF, it still has 100 percent coverage, so what you see through the viewfinder is exactly what you'll see in your images.
Nikon Z7
Another key difference between these cameras are their autofocus systems.
The D850 has an impressive 153-point autofocus system, but the Z7 wins out with 493 points. Combined with its in-body image stabilization, the Z7 is loaded for bear for helping you get clear, sharp images.
If shooting with the D850 (which lacks in-body stabilization), you have to rely instead on the lenses you use having stabilization.
Nikon Z7 vs Nikon D850 Image Quality
Since these cameras have the same 46-megapixel BSI CMOS sensor, their image quality is highly comparable.
As noted above, the Z7 produces images that are cleaner with less noise thanks to its updated EXPEED 6 processor.
But since both sensors produce images up to 8,256x5,504 pixels in size, either one will allow you to create very large prints, or, alternatively, heavily crop images without diminishing the quality of the photo.
I've been a Nikon shooter for a long time now, and I have a long history of owning Nikon's best cameras.
I can say without a doubt that the D850 and Z7 have the best image quality of any Nikon camera I've owned. Furthermore, these cameras can go toe-to-toe with any other camera on the market in terms of image quality, hands-down.
Nikon Z7 vs Nikon D850 Features Comparison
In addition to the primary specifications discussed above, both the Z7 and the D850 offer plenty of other features that make them top-shelf cameras.
Something I really appreciate about the D850 are its illuminated buttons, which have come in very handy as of late as I've gotten more involved in nighttime photography.
And though I don't use it often, I also really like the D850's built-in focus stacking capability.
The Z7, on the other hand, has that 5-axis image stabilization system I noted earlier, and that's proven to be invaluable as I've spent a lot of time with the Z7 running and gunning without a tripod.
I'm also shooting more video these days, and I've found the Z7 to be preferable for those pursuits simply because it's smaller and lighter than the D850.
Of course, the Z7's battery life can't compare to the D850's (1,840 shots to 330).
Ultimately, the choice between these cameras will likely come down to the type of photography you undertake. The difference between Nikon D850 price and Nikon Z7 price is very less.
Street photographers, sports photographers, and travel photographers will likely prefer the Z7 because of its size and image stabilization. Landscape photographers might prefer the D850 given its crazy-long battery life and chunky, comfortable grip.
But honestly, either way you go, you're getting a hell of a camera.
We Recommend
Nikon Z7 vs Sony a7R III
Mirrorless cameras are king right now, and for Nikon and Sony, their Z7 and a7R III cameras represent the pinnacle of performance.
These cameras have plenty in common, too…I’ve said it before in my full Nikon Z7 hands-on review that the Z7 is unmistakably a Nikon.
Both sport high-resolution sensors. Both are fully capable of still photography and 4K video. Both cameras, Sony A7 Riii and Nikon Z7, also have a similar price point.
There are numerous differences between these high-powered mirrorless cameras as well. Let’s explore how they stack up against each other.
Nikon Z7 vs Sony a7R III Specs
Here’s a quick glance at the Nikon Z7 specs:
- 45.7-megapixel full frame BSI CMOS sensor
- EXPEED 6 image processor
- Native ISO Range: 64-25,600 (expandable to 32-102400)
- 3.69-million dot OLED electronic viewfinder
- 3.2-inch tilting touchscreen LCD with 2.1-million dots
- 9 fps burst shooting (12-bit RAW)
- 493-point autofocus system
- 5-axis image stabilization
- 4K UHD video at 30 fps
- Magnesium alloy body
- Full weather sealing
And here are the Sony a7R III specs:
- 42.4-megapixel full frame BSI CMOS sensor
- BIONZ X image processor
- Native ISO range 50-32,000 (expandable to 102,400)
- 3.69-million dot OLED electronic viewfinder
- 3-inch tilting touchscreen LCD with 1.44-million dots
- 10 fps burst shooting
- 399-point autofocus system
- 5-axis image stabilization
- 4K UHD video at 30 fps
- Magnesium alloy body
- Full weather sealing
Nikon Z7 vs Sony a7R III Design & Build
Coming from a Nikon D810 and a Nikon D850, I was concerned that the Z7 would feel like a little toy in my hand, but that’s simply not the case.
The chunky grip on the Z7 is surprisingly deep and feels familiar if you’re a Nikon shooter. That familiarity is extended thanks to the buttons and joystick that are well-placed on the body and the top-plate information display Nikon shooters have grown to love on DSLRs (though this one is OLED rather than LCD).
The Z7 has full weather sealing, including around the battery door. The sealing feels substantial and gives you the confidence that if you encounter rain, your camera won’t be destroyed.
The 2.1-million-dot touchscreen LCD on the Z7 is big, bright, and resolute. It lets you tackle a variety of tasks, from interacting with the menu to sorting through images to setting the autofocus point.
The LCD also uses Nikon’s touch-friendly i menu, which can be used to change settings by simply tapping the screen.
The Z7’s 3.68-million-dot OLED EVF is something to behold. Not only is it beautifully bright and sharp, but it maintains full resolution while shooting (which the a7R III’s EVF does not).
I’ve had a Sony a6300 for quite some time, so I wasn’t as worried about the design of the a7R III and how I would adapt to it.
That being the case, I wasn’t surprised to find the a7R III’s grip on the smallish side. Granted, Sony has increased the size of the grip over the years, but it’s still small, particularly on the vertical plane.
Like the Z7, the a7R III is fully weather sealed, though in comparing the two cameras, I have to say that the Nikon’s weather sealing feels more substantial, though I still wouldn’t hesitate to use the a7R III in inclement weather.
In the touchscreen department, the Sony has a tilting one like the Nikon, but it isn’t nearly as functional, and that’s not just because it has just 1.44-million-dots of resolution.
In fact, Sony shooters know that the touchscreen is disabled by default - which honestly makes zero sense - and shows that the company simply hasn’t embraced touch-enabled screens like Nikon has. Furthermore, when it is enabled, it’s easy to accidentally trigger something with the LCD, which is even more frustrating than it being off by default.
The a7R III’s EVF has 3.68-million-dots of resolution just like the Nikon. As noted above, though, the full resolution of the EVF is only available in playback mode. When shooting the resolution drops, and it drops even more when shooting in burst mode.
That being the case, from a design and build standpoint, the Nikon is the winner for me.
Nikon Z7 vs Sony a7R III Image Quality
This will be a short discussion because both of these cameras offer impeccable image quality.
Yes, there’s a slight difference in resolution, but it’s so minimal that it really doesn’t matter.
Both cameras offer superb dynamic range, excellent color rendition, and ISO performance that rivals anything on the market today. You can see these elements in action with the Z7 in the video above by AdoramaTV.
Likewise, both cameras have excellent on-sensor phase-detect autofocus systems that offer top-notch performance and image quality when tracking moving subjects. The Z7 has face detection that works quite well, though the Sony’s Eye AF system is impossible to beat from a performance standpoint. See a live demo of the Sony a7RIII in Adorama’s video above.
Honestly, the only knock I have is that the Sony’s autofocus points are grey, which can be difficult to see, while the Nikon has super bright AF points that are easily noticeable.
This is one measure in which these cameras are very, very evenly matched, so it’s difficult to determine a winner.
Nikon Z7 vs Sony a7R III Video Specs
In years past, video has been an afterthought on Nikon cameras. And though the Nikon Z6 is a much better camera for video than the Z7, the Z7 can hold its own.
Both the Z7 and the a7R III are capable of 4K UHD recording at 30p. Both cameras also offer 1080/120p recording for slow motion.
Additionally, both of these cameras can capture full sensor 4K video, albeit with limited sampling. In the case of the Z7, that takes the form of line skipping while on the a7R III pixel binning is used.
In either case, to get the best-quality video, it’s better to record in APS-C format, which crops the video but gives you the highest quality results.
You’ll find further similarities between these cameras on the video front.
Both the Nikon and Sony have zebra warnings and internal LUTs, as well as focus peaking and five-axis image stabilization systems. The phase-detect autofocus systems on both cameras offer excellent autofocus when shooting video as well.
Nikon Z7 vs Sony a7R III Ease of Use
Nikon didn’t just work on making the Z7 feel right from an ergonomics standpoint. They also wanted to ensure Nikon users found the camera easy to use.
They’ve achieved that with the camera’s user interface, which comes from Nikon’s DSLR systems.
In fact, the Z7’s menu is nearly a tit-for-tat copy of the D850’s menu, which I’ve grown to love over the two years I’ve had the D850.
By comparison, the a7R III’s menu system is characteristically Sony.
I’ll give props to Sony for improving their menu systems over the years to make them easier to use, but they can still be on the confusing side.
In particular, Sony likes to bury some features deep in the menu system, which causes you to have to search and search for that one thing you need to change. That being said, you can customize the menus to your liking (you can do the same on the Nikon), so you can minimize the frustration of trying to find the hidden feature you need.
From a customization standpoint, the a7R III, though its menu is far less user-friendly, does offer far more customization options. If you’re willing to spend the time to get it just how you want it, the Sony’s menu could end up being far more functional for you than what’s offered by the Z7.
However, the Z7 is far easier to use right out of the box, and for that reason, it’s the winner in the ease of use department.
Nikon Z7 vs Sony a7R III Performance
Unsurprisingly, both of these cameras offer top-flight performance on a number of metrics.
The Z7, for example, can shoot 5.5 fps out of the box, which isn’t terribly spectacular, but live view is updated in between shots, which is a nice feature.
Besides, if you need a higher frame rate, you simply put the camera in High+ mode which gets you 8 fps image capture in 14-bit RAW. You can bump that up to 9 fps in 12-bit RAW. It’s important to note that when shooting in High+, autofocus is adjusted between shots but the exposure is locked.
The biggest performance issue with the Z7 is its buffer. It holds just 23 12-bit RAW files and 18 14-bit RAW files. I’ll be the first to admit that the XQD card makes quick work of clearing the buffer, but it’s still easy to reach the buffer’s limit.
The a7R III has an advantage in the performance department because it can shoot at 10 fps out of the box. Likewise, the Sony offers continuous AF/AE when shooting in continuous mode.
The Sony outperforms the Nikon when it comes to the buffer as well: it can accommodate 28 uncompressed RAW files or 76 compressed RAW files.
The better performance trend for the Sony continues with battery life. The a7R III is rated to 650 shots while the Z7 is rated to just 330.
While real-world testing often reveals better battery life than the rating, that’s still a mighty big difference between these cameras.
Nikon Z7 vs Sony a7R III Price
Given that these cameras are so evenly matched across the board, the determining factor for which one you purchase might well be the price.
The Nikon Z7 sells for a shade under $3,400.00 (body only). The Sony a7R III is currently on sale for $2,800.00.
Ultimately, most Nikon shooters aren’t going to switch to the a7R III to save $600. Likewise, I can’t imagine many Sony shooters spending an extra $600 for the Z7. Instead, I imagine brand loyalty will win out with folks who have already committed to one ecosystem or the other.
Regardless of which you choose, you’ll be getting a fantastic, highly capable camera.
We Recommend
Nikon Z9 vs Sony A1
If you are a professional photographer shopping for your next camera and have narrowed it down to the Nikon Z9 and Sony A1 but still aren’t 100% sure which one to get, you’ve come to the right place!
In this Nikon vs Sony camera comparison guide, we’ll share overviews of the cameras, compare their photo and video performance, recommend our favorite lenses to pair with them, and more! Additionally, thanks to innovative online platforms like MPB, buying a used mirrorless camera has never been cheaper and easier than it is today.
Who is MPB? They are a trustworthy and reliable online platform selling pre-owned photography and videography gear at unbeatable prices. Better yet, all their cameras and lenses are meticulously hand-inspected by expert product specialists with years of experience and backed by six-month warranties, allowing you to make your purchases confidently and worry-free.
Over the years, we’ve saved thousands of dollars buying, selling, and trading in camera equipment using MPB’s online marketplace. That’s why we are excited to recommend them to you today. That said, it’s time to find out which of these amazing mirrorless cameras best suits your needs and budget!
Check out the video above by The Slanted Lens for an even deeper look at the similarities and differences between the Nikon Z9 camera and the Sony A1 camera.
Table of Contents
- Nikon Z9 vs Sony A1: Overview
- Nikon Z9 vs Sony A1: Imaging Performance
- Nikon Z9 vs Sony A1: Video Performance
- Recommended Nikon Z9 & Sony A1 Lenses
- Final Thoughts on the Sony A1 vs Nikon Z9
Nikon Z9 vs Sony A1: Overview
Nikon Z9
The Nikon Z9 was announced in 2021 and hit stores in early 2022. It replaced the Nikon Z7 II as the company's flagship mirrorless camera, and the current Nikon Z9 price sits at around $5,500 new. A 45.7-megapixel stacked CMOS sensor and an Expeed 7 image processing engine are at its core.
The first thing you will notice about the Z9 is its monster size. It’s designed to mirror the look and feel of larger-bodied DSLR cameras, which may or may not be a plus for you. However, one definite positive of its big body is its great battery life. So while the camera weighs more than most competitors, the 740-shot battery life is the best of any mirrorless camera on sale today.
Sony A1
On the other hand, the Sony A1 debuted in January 2021 and is currently retailing for $6,500. It’s Sony’s flagship product and combines the best photo features found in the Sony Alpha a7R V with the top video features of the Sony a7S III. It houses a 50.1-megapixel stacked CMOS sensor and dual Bionz XR image processing engines.
The A1 camera body is much smaller and lighter than the Z9. At 737 grams, it weighs only about half of what the Z9 does, making it a better choice for travel and street photography. Another noteworthy design feature of the Alpha 1 is its large 9.44M-Dot electronic viewfinder (EVF).
Here’s a head-to-head look at the key features and specs of the Nikon Z9 and Sony A1 to see how they stack up:
Nikon Z9 vs Sony A1: Imaging Performance
Nikon Z9
Regarding photography, let’s start with the similarities between the Nikon Z9 and the Sony A1. Both have incredibly high-resolution image sensors (45.7MP on the Z9 and 50.1 on the A1) that produce gorgeous RAW and JPEG images. The high pixel counts of these two cameras make them ideal choices for professionals who need to enlarge their images for printing.
Other highlight-worthy similarities include 30 frames per second (fps) continuous shooting, outstanding autofocus performance, and customizable controls. Their industry-leading burst shooting is perfect for wildlife and sports photography. Their responsive AF systems can lock onto and track various subjects (people, animals, cars, etc.). And the customization options allow you to set up the camera in a way that best suits your shooting style.
Sony A1
Now for the differences between the Nikon Z9 vs Sony A1. The biggest one is that the A1 has a BSI (Back Side Illuminated) sensor, which gives it the upper hand when shooting in low-light conditions. Another plus of the A1 is its unique pixel shifting mode which compiles 16 exposures into one super-high-resolution 199MP still image.
Alternatively, a strength of the Z9 is its all-new electronic shutter-only design. It’s the first digital camera to completely ditch the mechanical shutter, giving it a longer lifespan and making the camera completely silent in every shooting mode.
Which is the best camera for photos? It’s extremely close, but we like the Sony A1.
Learn More:
Nikon Z9 vs Sony A1: Video Performance
Nikon Z9
As great as the Nikon Z9 and the Sony A1 perform during still photography, they are equally (if not more) impressive when used as video cameras! Both of them boast stunning 8K video capabilities, along with 4K and 1080p Full HD recording modes. The Z9 has 8K/60p video, and the A1 tops out at 8K/30p.
Furthermore, both cameras can shoot 4K/120 slow-motion video directly in the camera. And while the Z9 maintains that frame rate when filming Full HD slow-motion clips, the A1 can record 1080p/240p super-slow-motion video. That’s an advantage for YouTubers, vloggers, and social media influencers.
Sony A1
Another difference is that the Z9 is capable of recording 12-bit color, but the max on the A1 is 10-bit color. Although this sounds like a minor difference, it can have a big impact when color-correcting your footage in post-production, particularly if you are a professional creating content that wide audiences will watch.
The two cameras share a few more common features that deserve to be mentioned: dual memory card slots, unlimited recording, live streaming capabilities, and in-body image stabilization technology.
Which is the best camera for video? It’s another tough call, but we’ll give the Nikon Z9 the slight edge this time.
Recommended Nikon Z9 & Sony A1 Lenses
Nikon Z9
Here are two quick lists of the best Nikon Z Mount lenses and the best Sony E Mount lenses to pair with the Nikon Z9 and Sony Alpha 1.
Nikon Z9 Lenses
- Nikon Nikkor Z 35mm f/1.8 S
- Nikon Nikkor Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S
- Nikon Nikkor Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S
- Nikon Nikkor Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
- Nikon Nikkor Z 85mm f/1.2 S
Sony A1 Lenses
- Sony FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM
- Sony FE 14mm f/1.8 GM
- Sony FE 50mm f/1.2 GM
- Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 G OSS
- Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II
Final Thoughts on the Sony A1 vs Nikon Z9
Sony A1
As you can see, both of these flagship cameras are powerhouses, and you really can’t go wrong with either of them if you are a professional photographer, videographer, or filmmaker. Ultimately, the biggest differences between the Nikon Z9 and Sony A1 are the size and weight of the two cameras.
With that in mind, here are our final recommendations. If you travel a lot and having a compact and portable camera is important to you, go with theSony A1. On the flip side, if you want a mirrorless camera with a DSLR's classic look and feel, theNikon Z9 is the better choice.
Still not 100% sold on either of these cameras? No Worries! Check out the list below of other high-end mirrorless cameras currently available at MPB:
Learn More:
We Recommend
Now Is the Time to Buy a Sony a7S II
Photo by ShareGrid on Unsplash
Sony a7SII Camera
As many of you probably know, the Sony a7S III just dropped in July, and while this is exciting for those who can afford to spend a ton of money on a top of the line camera, it’s also exciting for those of us who are on more of a budget because the Sony a7S II is now cheaper than ever.
The Sony a7S III that just dropped costs a whopping $3,500, whereas you can purchase a Sony a7S II for less than half of that price.
This is because the two cameras are quite different.
Sony a7S III
The Sony a7S III features a 12MP sensor, an incredible base ISO range of 40-409600 and 4K video. While you may expect 8K video at this price range, Sony decided to forego lower-quality 8K video in favor of incredible 4K video. In fact, most people who are opting to purchase this camera right now are videographers.
But, that doesn’t mean that the Sony a7S III can’t shoot incredible still images (especially in low light shooting). The camera can perform at 10fps, comes with a phase-detect autofocus system with 759-AF points, and is the first high-end Sony camera in a while to receive a major improvement to its menu system. I may go so far as to say that the menu system is intuitive.
Sony a7S II
As for the Sony a7S II, it is a full-frame mirrorless with a 12MP sensor and 4K video capabilities, which is, unsurprisingly, also known for its low-light shooting. In many ways, the Sony a7S II is incredibly similar to its new sister.
So, where does it differ? We are going to show you in this Sony a7S II vs. Sony a7S III review.
Sony a7S II vs a7S III Specs
Sony a7S II
Since the Sony a7S II and the Sony a7S III look so similar on paper, it can be difficult to differentiate the two unless you get much more in-depth.
One major difference between the two is that, while they can both shoot 4K video, the Sony a7S III can shoot it at 120p, while the Sony a7S II can only shoot it at 30 or 24p.
Another major difference is that the Sony a7S II has a much slower burst mode at 5fps as opposed to 10fps.
Sony a7S II Specs:
- 12MP sensor
- ISO range of 100-102,400
- 4K video
- 3” tilting LCD with 1.22M-dots
- 100% EVF coverage
- 5fps burst mode
- 1.38 lbs
- Environmentally-sealed body
Sony a7s III
Sony a7S III Specs:
- 12MP sensor
- ISO range of 40-409,600
- 4K video
- 3” articulating LCD with 1.44M-dots
- 10fps burst mode
- 1.35 lbs
- Environmentally-sealed body
As you can see through the side by side spec comparison of these two camera bodies, they have nearly all of the same selling points, which is why you are in luck if you’re currently looking to pick up a steeply discounted Sony a7S II… everyone who can afford to is ditching them in favor of the newest version.
Learn More:
Sony a7S II vs a7S III Body & Design
Sony a7S II
The Sony a7S II was the first camera in this lineup to come with a reduced-vibration shutter, which made it one of my favorite releases by Sony in years.
The Sony a7S II is also mostly built out of magnesium alloy so the camera was able to approach the 1 lb mark while remaining very sturdy in your hands.
Moreover, this magnesium alloy allowed the Sony a7S II to be one of the most weather-resistant camera bodies on the market.
Sony a7S III
The Sony a7S III body isn’t much different, except for the fact that it now features a fully articulating LCD, which is a first for cameras in this lineup. The LCD on this version is also much more touch sensitive than any other camera Sony has ever produced.
The Sony a7S III also comes with a full-size HDMI connector, which only furthers my belief that this camera is built for serious videographers.
The cable retainer that the camera body comes with will also protect the head of your HDMI lead, while keeping the cable in place, so that if your cable is accidentally tugged on while you’re shooting, it will be at a right-angle to the socket. It prevents the screen from getting messed with during shooting.
Sony a7S II vs a7S III Build & Handling
Sony a7S II
The Sony a7S II is an ergonomically-designed camera. It feels much like the A7 II and the A7R II, if you’ve ever worked with either of those cameras before.
It comes with a lot of different customization options, and it made some small adjustments from previous versions. For instance, the shutter release on the sony a7S II is located closer to the top of the grip (which is helpful) and its grip is larger.
The biggest difference between the handling of the Sony a7S II and the Sony a7S III is that the III features much better ergonomics. It comes with a better grip, a larger joystick and an AF-On button that is easier to feel out while paying attention to whatever you’re shooting.
Sony a7S III
If you’re a fan of toggleable locks, then you’re also in luck because the exposure comp dial finally features one.
But, the biggest improvement to the Sony a7S III is its new menu. This menu features better categorization and color coding (so that the menu is easily readable). It also features a ton of indexing which allows a very complex menu system to feel easy to manage through the use of vertical tabs.
And, if you noticed in the Sony a7S II specs, Sony has never been one to heavily rely on touchscreens. This is slowly changing with this updated camera body. You can now control either the main menu or the Fn menu through touchscreen.
Finally, the sony a7S III features a battery life of 600-shots, which is pretty impressive considering all of the other things this camera can do. As compared to the Sony a7S II’s 270-shots, it's pretty crazy.
Sony a7S II vs a7S III Video Performance
As I discussed earlier, the Sony a7S II features 4K video at either 30 or 24p. You can see this 4K video in action in Armando Ferreira’s video test above.
The Sony a7S II can only shoot 8-bit video, rather than 10 or 12-bit video, though.
4K video at 30p cannot compete with 4K video at 120p, which is what the Sony a7S III features. It also shoots 12-bit video, which is something, many argued, its predecessor should have been able to do. You can watch a short video test by DPReview above.
Sony a7S II vs a7S III Price
Sony a7S II
Since half of the reason we are recommending you purchase a Sony a7S II right now is because it’s a lot cheaper than the Sony a7S III, it makes the most sense to purchase it used.
MPB, one of our favorite used camera retailers, currently has three Sony a7S II camera bodies listed for sale starting at $1,479. As compared to the Sony a7S II price when it was just released, $1,500 is a steal.
And, as other photographers try to purchase the new version, you can expect more Sony a7S II bodies to become available over the next few weeks, which will probably further the competition on that price point so make sure you keep checking back.
Since the Sony a7S III is so brand new (it literally dropped last month), MPB doesn’t yet have any for sale.
Learn More:
We Recommend
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II vs OM-D E-M10 Mark II
Today, two of the most popular mirrorless cameras on the market are the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II. And while they have been superseded by newer models (the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III and the OM-D E-M10 Mark III, respectively), they remain powerful cameras in 2022.
One reason they continue to fly off shelves is their incredibly low prices. Since the release of the newer models, the costs of the two cameras have dropped significantly, and now they are two of the best value buys out there.
For even better bargains, I recommend buying a used camera. Not only are there tons of high-quality used cameras out there, but it’s also a great way to save money to spend on additional gear like lenses, tripods, etc.
One place that has tons of used Olympus cameras in stock is MPB. They are a trustworthy and reliable online platform that sells used photo and video kits at unbeatable prices. Furthermore, all of their cameras are carefully hand-inspected by experienced product specialists and backed by warranties, allowing you to make your purchases confidently and worry-free.
Below, I compare the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and the OM-D E-M10 Mark II. First, I’ll cover their key features, and then we’ll look at their image and video performance. Now, without further ado, let’s dive in and check out these two amazing cameras!
Table of Contents
- Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II vs OM-D E-M10 Mark II: Specs and Key Features
- Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II vs OM-D E-M10 Mark II: Imaging Performance
- Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II vs OM-D E-M10 Mark II: Video Performance
- Final Thoughts on the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II vs the OM-D E-M10 Mark II
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II vs OM-D E-M10 Mark II: Specs and Key Features
OM-D E-M1 Mark II
For starters, the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II (shown above) was released in 2016, while the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II came out one year earlier, in 2015.
Both cameras feature high-resolution Four Thirds sensors, with the OM-D E-M1 Mark II having a slightly higher megapixel count (20MP vs 16MP). Additionally, the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II has an upgraded TruePic VIII image processor, making it faster and giving it more substantial video capabilities.
One area where the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II has the upper hand is size and portability. It measures 120 x 80 x 47 mm, while the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II is a more robust 134 x 91 x 67 mm. At least part of this can be attributed to the fact that the OM-D E-M1 Mark II is weather-sealed, whereas the more compact OM-D E-M10 Mark II is not.
Here’s a more in-depth look at the key specs and features of the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II vs Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II.
Learn More:
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II vs OM-D E-M10 Mark II: Imaging Performance
OM-D E-M10 Mark II
Both cameras consistently deliver detailed still images with excellent edge-to-edge sharpness thanks to their high-resolution sensors. Moreover, they have identical ISO ranges of 200 - 25,600. While low-light performance can’t compare to full-frame cameras, images remain relatively noise-free through ISO 6400.
Also, both cameras boast 5-Axis in-body image stabilization technology that Olympus claims adds up to 5.5 stops of exposure. This is particularly useful for photographers who like to shoot macro and wildlife photography.
Two areas where the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II tops the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II (shown above) are autofocus and continuous shooting. The OM-D E-M1 Mark II uses a hybrid AF system featuring 121 phase-detection points and 121 contrast-detection points. On the other hand, the OM-D E-M10 Mark II AF system only uses contrast-detection points, employing 81 of them.
In terms of continuous shooting, the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II is no slouch (8.5 fps), but the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II has one of the fastest drives of any camera on the planet. Using its electronic shutter, it has a ridiculous 60 fps max burst rate, making it a terrific choice for sport and action photography.
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II vs OM-D E-M10 Mark II: Video Performance
OM-D E-M1 Mark II
The Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II (shown above) is a far superior video camera for serious videographers, filmmakers, YouTubers, and vloggers. It captures UHD and DCI 4K video at speeds of up to 30 frames per second and 1080p Full HD at 60 fps.
The video quality of the 4K footage is excellent, no additional crop factor is applied, and rolling shutter issues are non-existent. Colors are bold and vibrant and need little or no correction in post-production. On top of that, it can output uncompressed 4:2:2 video using an HDMI.
Alternatively, the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II has a max video resolution of 1080p Full HD. Although 4K video would have been nice, the 1080p video quality is sharp and more than enough for non-professionals. Other cool video features of the OM-D E-M10 Mark II are a dedicated slow-motion mode and the option to record shareable clips of different lengths (1, 2, 4, and 8 seconds).
Thanks to image stabilization, camera shake is reduced, and handheld shooting with both cameras is possible. One final thing I wanted to highlight is the rear LCD screens. The Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II has a fully articulating screen, while the OM-D E-M10 Mark II has a tilting screen. Vloggers and Youtubers especially will benefit immensely from the ability to see themselves on the articulating screen of the OM-D E-M1 Mark II.
Final Thoughts on the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II vs the OM-D E-M10 Mark II
Without a doubt, both of these fantastic cameras have a place in 2022. No matter which one you go with, you really can’t go wrong! With that said, here are my final recommendations.
Courtesy of its higher resolution and better video capabilities, the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II is the better choice for advanced and professional photographers. On the other hand, beginner photographers will love the cheaper, more compact, and easy-to-use Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II (shown above).
Finally, don’t forget to check out MPB.com if you want to find killer Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II used deals and Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II used deals!
Learn More:
We Recommend
OM-1 vs OM-5: Overview
Many of you might be familiar with the brand Olympus, but what about OM System? Well, you might be surprised to learn that they are now one and the same! The two companies merged in 2021, and since then, all of their interchangeable lens mirrorless cameras have fallen under the OM System label. The first two cameras they’ve launched since then are the OM-1 and OM-5.
In this OM-1 vs OM-5 camera review, we’ll share a basic overview of the two cameras before comparing and contrasting their photo and video capabilities. After that, we’ll recommend our favorite compatible micro four thirds lenses. Moreover, thanks to innovative online platforms like MPB, buying a used mirrorless camera has never been cheaper and easier.
Who is MPB? It is a trustworthy and reliable online platform selling pre-owned photography and videography gear at affordable prices. Better yet, every one of its cameras and lenses is hand-inspected by expert product specialists with years of experience and backed by a six-month warranty, allowing you to make your purchases confidently and worry-free.
We highly encourage you to visit MPB because of its state-of-the-art online marketplace. It’s a remarkable tool that has helped us save thousands of dollars buying, selling, and trading in high-quality photography equipment over the years, and we believe it can help you do the same. Now, let’s jump in and explore everything there is to know about the OM-1 vs OM-5!
Check out the video above on the MPB YouTube Channel to discover which Olympus/OM System camera is right for you.
Table of Contents
- OM-1 vs OM-5: Overview
- OM-1 vs OM-5: Imaging Performance
- OM-1 vs OM-5: Video Performance
- Recommended Olympus Lenses
- Final Thoughts on the OM-1 vs OM-5
OM-1 vs OM-5: Overview
OM System OM-1
The OM System OM-1 and OM System OM-5 both debuted in 2022. The OM-5 is a versatile mid-range camera designed for everyone, from people who have never picked up a camera to semi-professionals. On the other hand, the OM-1 is a high-end camera aimed more toward professional content creators (photo and video).
Although both cameras feature 20-megapixel MFT sensors, the two sensors are totally different outside of resolution. For example, the OM-5 has one Live MOS CMOS sensor, while the OM-1 boasts a stacked BSI Live MOS sensor. Additionally, the OM-5 uses a TruePix IX image processor, while the OM-1 has an upgraded TruePic X Dual Quad Core Processor.
OM System OM-5
Design-wise, the OM-1 is like the beefed-up big brother who hit the gym all summer. Some pros and cons come with that. One advantage is that it has more customizable buttons and dials, which can boost productivity. Another benefit is that the OM-1 holds a larger battery, providing significantly better life.
However, a disadvantage is that it’s noticeably bigger and heavier than the OM-5. With that in mind, the OM-5 is popular for travel photography and vlogging. Here’s a head-to-head comparison of the OM-1 vs OM-5 specs and key features to see how they stack up.
OM-1 vs OM-5: Imaging Performance
OM System OM-1
As micro four thirds (MFT) cameras, the OM System OM-1 and OM System OM-5 have smaller sensors than their APS-C and full-frame competitors. Don’t let that scare you away, though. The truth is that photos taken with both of these cameras have excellent image quality, detail retention, and colors.
One of the first things people look at when deciding on a new camera, and one of the keys to consistently capturing sharp, in-focus images, is autofocus. Both cameras have solid autofocus, but only one is worth bragging about—the OM-1. It has over eight times the number of focus points and markedly better subject recognition and tracking than the OM-5.
OM System OM-5
Other differences include max burst shooting speed and low-light performance. The OM-5 has a better-than-average 30 fps max continuous shooting speed, but the OM-1 boasts an out-of-this-world 120 fps continuous shooting. When working in low-light situations, the stacked sensor and wider ISO range of the OM-1 yield sharper images with less noise.
One cool feature the two cameras share is their high-res shooting modes. They can both capture 50MP handheld stills and 80MP stills when the cameras are on a tripod. These modes are perfect for creating impressive images of landscapes and cityscapes.
Which is the best camera for photos? The OM System OM-1
Learn More:
- What Should You Have in a Beginner Photography Kit?
- The Olympus OM-D E-M1X is the Budget Pro-Level Camera You Need
OM-1 vs OM-5: Video Performance
OM System OM-1
The OM System OM-1 and OM System OM-5 are hybrid mirrorless cameras. This means that, unlike many older cameras, they can take photos and record videos, so you don’t have to buy two cameras! Furthermore, both boast 1080p Full HD and 4K video capabilities.
The OM-1 can film 4K video at 24, 30, and 60 fps, while the highest frame rate of the OM-5 is 30 fps. Are you a fan of slow motion? If you are, we have good news for you! And if you aren’t…well, you should be! The OM-5 records 1080p/120p slow-motion videos and the OM-1 1080p/240p super-slow-motion movies.
OM System OM-5
Two other differences are that the OM-1 offers 10-bit video compared to 8-bit video on the OM-1 and that the OM-1 has uncropped 4K video while the OM-5 applies a 1.19x crop factor to footage. The crop factor isn’t huge, but it does make capturing wide-angle video slightly harder.
Conversely, mutual video similarities include in-camera image stabilization and fully articulating rear screens. Stabilization adds up to eight stops of exposure on the OM-1 and 7.5 stops on the OM-5, making it easier to film handheld video. At the same time, the cameras articulating screens make them popular choices for YouTubers and social media influencers.
Which is the best camera for video? The OM System OM-1
Recommended Olympus Lenses
OM System OM-1 with 12-40mm f/2.8 lens
Here are some of the best micro four thirds lenses for photo and video to pair with the Olympus OM-1 or OM System OM-5.
- OM SYSTEM M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8 PRO II
- OM SYSTEM M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/4 PRO
- Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm f/2.8 PRO
- Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 45mm f/1.2 PRO
- Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm f/4 IS PRO
Final Thoughts on the OM-1 vs OM-5
A group of friends with the OM System OM-5
The OM System OM-1 is clearly the more advanced camera, but that doesn’t mean it’s better than the OM System OM-5 for everyone. Actually, the target market for these two cameras is completely different.
Beginners, people on a budget, and photographers prioritizing portability will prefer the OM-5. Alternatively, professionals, video-oriented shooters, and photographers who often shoot in low-light conditions will see better results with the flagship OM-1.
As wonderful as these two cameras are, we understand if you don’t feel either is quite the right fit for you. That said, see the links below to compare the OM-1 and OM-5 with other popular Olympus/OM System cameras currently available at MPB.
- Olympus PEN-F
- Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
- Olympus OM-D E-M1X
- Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III
- Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Disclaimer: Just so you know, some of the cool stuff we mention comes with affiliate links, meaning we earn a commission if you buy (no extra charge to you!). Plus, we occasionally feature sponsored content, but rest assured, we only shout out products we genuinely stand behind.
Learn More:
- 5 Reasons the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III is the Best Micro Four Thirds Camera for 2024
- Which Sony APS-C Camera Should You Get in 2024?
We Recommend
Panasonic GH5 vs GH5S
Two of Panasonic’s most sought-after mirrorless cameras currently on sale are the Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5 and the Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5S. If you are on the fence and can’t decide which one to buy, you’ve come to the right place.
In this article, we break down both cameras and make a detailed head-to-head comparison of the GH5 vs GH5S. First, we review the key features and specs before later talking about the imaging and video performance of these two fantastic Panasonic cameras.
One killer resource with tons of used cameras in stock is MPB. They’re a trustworthy and reliable online platform that sells used photo and video kit at unbeatable prices.
I’ve bought and sold countless items on their marketplace over the years, and it’s always been a wonderful experience. That’s why I can proudly and confidently recommend you go to check them out.
You can also use MPB to trade-in gear you no longer need or want to fund gear that you do want. It's a quick, easy process, and a great way to get rid of stuff you don't need while reducing the price on stuff you do need!
Without further ado, let’s dive in and figure out which used Panasonic mirrorless camera will take your photography and videography skills to the next level!
Table of Contents
- Panasonic Lumix GH5 vs GH5S: Key Features and Specs
- Panasonic Lumix GH5 vs GH5S: Imaging Performance
- Panasonic Lumix GH5 vs GH5S: Video Performance
- Final Thoughts on the Panasonic Lumix GH5 vs GH5S
Panasonic Lumix GH5 vs GH5S: Key Features and Specs
GH5
First things first, the GH5 debuted in March 2017, while the GH5S was released shortly after in January 2018. In the years since, the two cameras have been replaced by the Panasonic GH5 Mark II and the Panasonic GH6. There is no denying that the newer models are technologically superior in many ways, but the GH5 vs GH5S remain capable cameras today.
Better yet, the prices of the GH5 and GH5S have dropped drastically since the newer cameras hit the market. Because of this, they are excellent options for both beginners and professionals looking for great deals.
GH5S
Both cameras have Micro Four Thirds sensors and powerful Venus Engine 10 image processors at their cores. The GH5 has the upper hand in terms of sensor resolution (20.3 megapixels vs 10.2 megapixels), but the GH5S significantly outperforms it during low-light shooting.
Looking at their bodies, while the GH5 is slightly heavier, they are identical in size. The extra weight is due to the fact that the GH5 has built-in image stabilization, but the GH5S does not. Another similarity the two bodies share is that they are both weather-sealed, protecting the cameras from moisture, dust, and extreme temperatures.
Here’s a more in-depth look at the key specs and features of the Panasonic Lumix GH5S vs GH5.
Panasonic Lumix GH5 vs GH5S: Imaging Performance
Panasonic GH5
While the Panasonic GH5 vs GH5S are both hybrid digital cameras (meaning they shoot photos and videos) and have excellent edge-to-edge sharpness in pictures, the GH5 beats the GH5S in overall image quality. This is primarily because of the substantial difference in pixel count between the two cameras.
Courtesy of its higher resolution sensor, images captured with the GH5 retain noticeably more detail. If you only publish your photos on Instagram or other social media websites, this is not a big issue, but if you regularly need to enlarge your images for print, the GH5 has a clear advantage.
Panasonic GH5S
Alternatively, one area where the GH5S outperforms its counterpart is dynamic range. Its 14 stops of dynamic range are industry-leading for Micro Four Thirds cameras and easily trump the 12 stops found on the GH5.
If you typically use JPEGs, this won’t have a huge impact. However, if you shoot RAW files, a wide dynamic range means more information in the shadows and highlights and more control in post-production.
Winner: Panasonic GH5
Learn More:
Panasonic Lumix GH5 vs GH5S: Video Performance
Panasonic GH5
As far as video is concerned, both the Panasonic GH5S and GH5 are award-winning mirrorless cameras. With that said, the “S” stands for sensitivity, and the GH5S was explicitly designed with low-light and video shooters in mind. It’s the same concept that Sony uses with the Sony Alpha a7 III and the Sony Alpha a7S III.
The GH5S uses an upgraded Dual Native ISO and has more than double the ISO range of the GH5 (160-51,200 vs 200-25,600). Moreover, the larger size of every individual pixel on the GH5S further improves its low-light performance during video recording.
Panasonic GH5S
Both cameras have DCI and UHD 4K video capabilities and the same maximum frame rate of 60p when filming in 4K. When shooting 1080p Full HD footage, the GH5S can go up to 240 frames per second, whereas the GH5 tops out at 180 fps. Both speeds are well above industry standards and produce stunningly smooth slow-motion movies.
Lastly, even though the GH5 has in-camera stabilization technology and the GH5S doesn’t, don’t be worried. All native Micro Four Thirds lenses feature optical image stabilization, helping eliminate camera shake when shooting handheld.
Winner: Panasonic GH5S
Final Thoughts on the Panasonic Lumix GH5 vs GH5S
photo bysimonkr via iStock
The Panasonic GH5 and GH5S are two of the most popular mirrorless cameras on the planet and for good reasons. Regardless of which camera you ultimately choose, I promise you will be blown away by the results. With that in mind, here are my final recommendations.
Thanks to its higher resolution still images, photographers and hybrid shooters should go for the Panasonic GH5. Wedding and event photographers, in particular, are two groups who will love the GH5. On the other hand, video-oriented content creators (videographers, filmmakers, vloggers, etc.) will see better results from the Panasonic GH5S.
Thanks for taking the time to read our Panasonic GH5 vs GH5S review, and I hope it has helped you come to a decision. However, if you still aren’t convinced one way or the other, check out these other amazing used Panasonic cameras currently in stock at MPB:
- Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85
- Panasonic Lumix DC-G9
- Panasonic Lumix DC-S5
- Panasonic Lumix DC-S1
- Panasonic Lumix DC-S1H
Learn More:
- Why the Panasonic GH4 is Still a Great Camera for Video
- What is the Best Cheap Mirrorless Camera for Video?
We Recommend
Panasonic S1 vs S1R Camera Review
photo by JacobLund via iStock
Panasonic has launched its new LUMIX S Series full-frame mirrorless cameras - LUMIX S1R and LUMIX S1. These two cameras were already announced at Photokina in 2018, but after a long time of waiting, the company finally introduced the full specifications of these models.
Both cameras feature a full-frame sensor and new L-mount, but they have different specs aimed at different types of photographers. While the S1R offers bigger resolution and features more suitable for professional photography, the videographers will probably have more interest in the S1 which is also more affordable than its high-resolution twin.
The Panasonic S1 and S1R will be on sale at the beginning of April (2019). This leaves you with plenty of time to decide if one of them might be the camera you were waiting for. This review article will help you to make the right choice, so let’s begin!
FIND GREAT DEALS ON PANASONIC CAMERAS AND OTHER MAJOR BRANDS!
Panasonic S1 VS S1R – Sensor and ISO
The main difference between the S1R and S1 is their sensor.
The Lumix S1R incorporates a stunning 47.3-megapixel CMOS sensor (36mm x 24mm) without Low Pass Filter. Supported with a Venus processing engine, the camera offers a maximum native ISO of 25600 (expandable to 51200).
With this amount of megapixels, the S1R stands out as the highest resolution full-frame mirrorless camera ever. If this is not enough, the camera also features a High-Resolution mode which allows you to make 187-megapixel photos.
On the other side, we have the Lumix S1 which incorporates a 24.2-megapixel full-frame CMOS sensor (35.6mm x 23.8mm) with a maximum native ISO of 51,200 (expandable to 204800).
Although the other model has a smaller sensor and resolution, the S1 is quite capable – especially for those who are more into recording videos than into shooting stills.
Panasonic S1 VS S1R – Features
The two cameras share a lot of common features. They have the same Venus Engine, Dual I.S. (image stabilization), 4K video recording up to 60fps, contrast-detection 225-area depth-from-defocus autofocus system, shutter rated for 400K actuations, and 9fps continuous shooting.
Panasonic S1
Additionally, both cameras offer WiFi and Bluetooth 4.2 technologies so you can easily transfer your data to smart devices such as a smartphone or laptop.
Get a detailed hands-on review of this camera in the video above by B&H Photo Video.
Learn More:
Panasonic S1 VS S1R – Video
As we already mentioned in the introduction, the Panasonic S1 is much better for video recording. Both cameras offer 4K 60p/50p video recording, and Panasonic claims it is the first time ever for Digital Single Lens Mirrorless camera.
Panasonic S1
The Panasonic S1 beats S1R in terms of video recording because it doesn’t have a crop and enables full-pixel readout of signals in 4K 30p/25p. Also, the S1 has a much smaller time-limit for video clips.
Each camera is time-limited while recording 4K video at 60fps. The only difference is that the S1 allows you to make recordings up to 30 minutes, while the S1R limits you to only 15 minutes. Additionally, there is no recording time limit on the S1 for 4K at 30 or 24p.
Panasonic SR1
The S1 is expected to have an upgrade in 2019 which will allow 4:2:2 10-bit 4K 30p/20p internal video recording and 4K 60p/50p HDMI output as well as V-Log, but this will come at a certain price.
Furthermore, both cameras offer a slow motion in FHD at 150/180 fps.
Check out another hands-on review of the Panasonic Lumix S1 in the video above by Park Cameras.
Panasonic S1 VS S1R – Design
The S1 and S1R look almost identical. Both cameras have the same weight of 2.25 pounds when you add a battery and XQD card. Although this might seem a little bit heavy in comparison to other similar camera models such as the Nikon Z7, Canon EOS R, or even Nikon D850, the company claims it is because of its great in-body stabilization system.
Panasonic S1
Both cameras are weather-sealed and built to have a long life. Each of them has a 5.76-million-dot viewfinder along with a 2.1-million-dot 3.2-inch triaxial tilting touchscreen LCD. Additionally, there is also a top LCD display which is useful for quickly checking settings.
Panasonic S1R
There are two card storage slots in both cameras and you can use either a UHS-II SD or XQD card.
Learn More:
Panasonic S1 VS S1R – Lenses
The Panasonic LUMIX S Series will have the new L-Mount which was developed by Leica Camera.
In 2018, Panasonic, Leica Camera, and Sigma joined the new L-Mount Alliance in order to create a cross-format lens mount that will allow lenses made by different manufacturers to be used on each other’s system cameras.
The L-Mount has a diameter of 51.6 millimeters and flange distance of 20 millimeters, and it is suitable for both full-frame and APS-C cameras.
Panasonic S1
Along with publishing the two new camera models, Panasonic unveils three new interchangeable lenses based on the L-Mount system:
- the LUMIX S PRO 50mm F1.4 (S-X50) / large-aperture lens
- the LUMIX S PRO 70-200mm F4 O.I.S. (S-R70200) / sport, action and wildlife lens, and LUMIX S 24-105mm F4 MACRO O.I.S. (S-R24105) / general purpose lens.
At this moment, there are already fifteen L-mount lenses produced by Leica. Panasonic announced they will release even more L-Mount lenses by the end of the year, while they have promised to release a total of ten lenses by the end of 2020.
Panasonic S1 VS S1R – Price
Panasonic S1R
Both cameras will be released at the beginning of April. The Panasonic S1 is priced at $2,499.99 for the body only.
The Panasonic S1R is a bit more expensive and you will need to spend $3,699.99 for the body only. Of course, when bundled with lenses, both cameras are more expensive.
Naturally, if you can find used Panasonic S1's or S1R's, you can save some cash as well.
We Recommend
Should You Buy a Canon M6 Mark II or M50 Mark II?
Canon EOS M6 Mark II
Before the EOS R Series of mirrorless cameras, Canon had a lineup of APS-C format mirrorless cameras known as the Canon EOS M Series. The two most recent versions are the Canon M6 Mark II, which has rangefinder styling, and the Canon M50 Mark II, which more closely resembles SLR styling.
Since these cameras are mirrorless, and neither one is actually an SLR or rangefinder camera, it’s simply a way to describe the body styles and how we might use them. The through-the-lens (TTL) viewing is accomplished by the imaging sensor and electronic viewfinders, both at eye level and as rearview screens.
Both of these cameras represent good forays into the mirrorless realm for beginners and enthusiasts alike. Additionally, you can find both cameras as used bodies on websites like MPB, our preferred online platform for purchasing pre-owned gear.
Let’s get into the details of both cameras and explore why MPB is a fine choice for purchasing cameras and accessories.
Table of Contents:
- Canon M6 Mark II Features
- Canon M50 Mark II Features
- Canon M6 Mark II vs M50 Mark II Comparison
- Lens Options for Canon M6 Mark II and M50 Mark II
- How to Decide
- Final Thoughts
Canon M6 Mark II Features
Canon EOS M6 Mark II
The Canon M6 Mark II was introduced in 2019, replacing the original Canon M6, which was released in 2017. At the heart of the Canon M6 Mark II is an APS-C format 32.5MP sensor. A firmware update in 2020 added 4K video to this camera’s features list.
One of the first things you’ll notice about this camera is its compact size. Even for APS-C format cameras, this camera is very compact. Another thing photographers will notice right away is that the body itself has no eye-level viewfinder. There is an optional eye-level finder that can be attached to the camera accessory shoe.
The 32.5MP you get with this APS-C format sensor is a lot of resolution. In fact, this is the same sensor that is in the DSLR-style Canon EOS 90D. It is capable of delivering extremely high-quality still images as well as 4K video with no cropping.
Canon EOS M6 Mark II
Other features of the Canon M6 Mark II are an ISO range of 100-51,200, 143 AF points, and a tilting LCD rear viewscreen. The camera is capable of shutter speeds from 30 seconds to 1/16000th, has a small built-in flash, and offers exposure compensation and AE bracketing. Also available are 14 fps still imaging sequencing and multiple metering and exposure modes.
While this camera produces fantastic still image files, many photographers will probably look at this camera for their videography needs. The Canon M6 Mark II really excels as a small, yet fully-featured video camera. The uncropped 4K recording plus the excellent quality of Canon lenses means you can use this camera as a serious videography tool.
Canon M50 Mark II Features
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
The Canon M50 Mark II appeals to many photographers as well as vloggers and other serious videographers. The form factor makes the camera feel like a DSLR, but it has the compactness and light weight we expect from a mirrorless APS-C format camera.
Inside this camera is a 24MP APS-C sensor with a 1.6X crop factor. The ISO range is 100-51,200, and there are 143 AF points, a fully articulated LCD rear viewscreen, and exposure bracketing and exposure compensation. You get a built-in eye-level viewfinder, shutter seeds from 30 to 1/4000th, and a small built-in flash.
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
The 24MP of resolution is pretty standard for a better APS-C format camera. It’s capable of outputting excellent still image files, and this camera also has 4K video recording, though there is a fairly heavy crop for 4K vs 1080p.
Learn More:
Canon M6 Mark II vs M50 Mark II Comparison
Canon EOS M6 Mark II
Comparing Canon M6 Mark II vs M50 Mark II, we see a few major differences and many similarities.
The similarities include:
- Canon EOS M lens mount
- Excellent video features
- High-quality imaging
- A lightweight but strong camera body
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
Differences will likely make the decision regarding which camera to get. They include:
- The Canon M6 Mark II has superior videography features (4K with no crop)
- The Canon M50 Mark II has slightly better handling for still imaging with its slight bulge of a handgrip and a built-in eye-level EFV
Lens Options for the Canon M6 Mark II and M50 Mark II
Canon EF-M 18-150mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM
There aren’t many lenses for the Canon M6 Mark II or Canon M50 Mark II, but what is available natively are superbly designed and very high quality. An adapter from Canon allows you to mount EF and EF-S lenses without any loss of function.
Other manufacturers make a wide variety of adapters, but not all of them allow full functions of autofocus or lens aperture. Some operate in a stopped-down mode only. Chances are you’ll opt for the Canon M-mount lenses since they fit and function so perfectly with the EOS M cameras. A few options include:
How to Decide
Canon EOS M6 Mark II
The best way to decide between these two cameras is to consider how much you want to spend and how much uncropped 4K you want.
Videographers who want 4K will easily choose the Canon M6 Mark II. Vloggers will be comfortable with the video of the Canon M50 Mark II. Shooters primarily interested in still photography may prefer the DSLR handling of M50 Mark II as well camera.
Final Thoughts
Canon EOS M6 Mark II
The Canon M6 Mark II vs M50 Mark II debate shows that both are excellent cameras. For the highest quality still imaging and video, the Canon M6 Mark II is a great choice. Slightly less costly is the Canon M50 Mark II, though it offers slightly less for still images and a pretty big hit for 4K video due to the crop.
A way to maximize your photography equipment dollars is to visit the online platform MPB for pre-owned photography gear. I use MPB so much, they seem to anticipate my calls! Just kidding.
But still, what makes MPB a favorite place for my own equipment needs is that they provide a six-month warranty on most items they sell, and there’s a seven-day return/exchange window on those items as well.
MPB also lists the exact condition of the cameras they have in stock because they thoroughly inspect each and every item before putting it online. So, if you want a like-new camera, that’s what you’ll get if MPB has labeled it as such.
Plus, the fine folks at MPB are photographers and photography enthusiasts, so they know what to look for in the first place. You can get great gear and save quite a bit in your photography gear budget by using MPB, too!
Learn More:
We Recommend
Should You Get a Full Frame or Crop Sensor Camera?
photo bynd3000 via iStock
Whether you are starting out in serious photography or you are ready to upgrade your photography gear, you are faced with the question of getting either a Full Frame or crop sensor camera.
There are so many good reasons for choosing Full Frame or crop sensor cameras, so let’s see a few good examples of cameras in the various types and sizes.
There are actually two major formats for crop sensor cameras, APS-C and MFT (Micro Four Thirds), but I’m going to concentrate on APS-C for a couple of good reasons (which I’ll explain in a bit).
Table of Contents
- Full Frame or Crop Sensor Format - the Differences
- Full Frame or Crop Sensor Cameras - What’s Available?
- Nikon Z7 II
- Nikon Z6
- Canon EOS R6
- Full Frame or Crop Sensor Lower Cost Options
- Fujifilm X-T4
- Sony Alpha a6000
Full Frame or Crop Sensor Format - the Differences
photo byLightFieldStudios via iStock
“Should I buy a crop sensor camera or Full Frame camera?” is a question with many valid and correct answers. One thing is for sure - whether you opt for crop sensor or Full Frame format, you want the best tool for your needs and the best value for your budget.
Many of the best cameras in Full Frame or crop sensor formats are mirrorless. Most of these can be found on an online platform for used photographic gear such as MPB.
I really like MPB for finding discounted pricing on fantastic cameras and lenses. Many of the items for sale are still in current production, and MPB also offers a six-month warranty on most items they sell.
Since so many modern cameras in Full Frame or crop sensor format have excellent resolution, one of the major differences has more to do with low-light sensitivity than image resolution.
All other things being equal, a Full Frame sensor has better low-light performance than a comparable resolution crop sensor camera.
photo bygeogif via iStock
With the different film and digital sensor formats, the larger the size of your image capture, the more information it holds. This encompasses pure resolution but also includes color information and exposure detail.
However, another axiom is that the bigger your base format, the pricier things get. This applies to lenses as much as it does to camera bodies.
An exception to this rule seems to be in regards to MFT equipment. Most of the MFT cameras and lenses are firmly in the intermediate, prosumer, and pro categories, with prices reflecting that placement.
If we were discussing Full Format or crop video only for videography, I would list all three formats, with MFT having a very strong showing. For general photographic use, though, I’ll focus on APS-C as the crop format.
Full Frame or Crop Sensor Cameras - What’s Available?
photo bystructuresxx via iStock
A lot more could be said about Full Frame or crop sensor cameras. In fact, we’ve said a lot more on Photography Talk, so check out some of our other articles for complete details.
In the meantime, let’s take a look at some of the great choices we have available in Full Frame or crop sensor mirrorless cameras.
Nikon Z7 II
One of the premier Full Frame mirrorless cameras is the Nikon Z7 II. It’s a professional-level camera with a super-high resolution 45.7MP Full Frame sensor that also provides superior video with 4K recording.
It uses dual Expeed 6 image processors, has a 493 point autofocus system, 5-axis in-body image stabilization, dual card slots (CFExpress and SD), and the ability to work with close to 70 years worth of Nikon and Nikkor lenses with the optional lens mount adapters.
The MPB price for a Like New condition camera body at the time of this writing is $2,939.00. Considering this camera is the current camera model, it’s a very good value, especially with all that this camera can do.
Nikon Z6
The original Nikon Z6 is a fantastic bargain for a Full Frame format mirrorless camera, coming in at $1229.00 for a Like New condition camera body at the time of this writing.
While it doesn’t have the extreme resolution of the Z7 or Z9 cameras, 24MP is great for all sorts of still photography and videography. Remember, we used full-fledged pro models with 12MP just a few short years ago.
One of the most desirable results from this Full Frame sensor is the superb low-light performance it provides. This camera is a great choice if you like street photography, wedding photography, or similar genres. Low-light performance remains one of the performance issues separating Full Frame or crop sensor cameras.
Canon EOS R6
Another fantastic option for low-light performance and general professional performance in Full Frame mirrorless is the Canon EOS R6 camera, which can be found in Like New for only $2469.00 at this time.
This camera is definitely a low-light champ with sensor sensitivity reaching all the way up to ISO 102,400.
Other great features are an extremely quick and accurate AF in all light levels and super-fast still image capture cycling with the camera reaching speeds of 12 fps. It also boasts 4K video capability.
Learn More:
Full Frame or Crop Sensor Lower Cost Options
Answering the question of whether Full Frame or crop sensor cameras are best, any of these cameras make a good case for opting for Full Frame. Now let’s see some great APS-C sensor camera choices.
Fujifilm X-T4
The Fujifilm X-T4 is a fully pro-capable APS-C format camera with a 26.1MP sensor and an amazing 6.5 stop in-camera image stabilization feature. This camera firmly makes a great case for the smaller format in the Full Frame or crop sensor competition.
Since it’s an APS-C format camera, it is smaller and lighter than comparable Full Frame, as are many of the lenses available in Fujifilm X-Mount. In Like New condition, you can find this camera for only $1489.00 at the moment, in either a chrome or black finish.
Besides the savings in size, weight, and money, you also gain several valuable features such as 4K video, 15 fps still imaging speed, ISO of 160-12,800, and 425 AF points.
Sony Alpha a6000
Anyone searching for a super bargain in a fine mirrorless APS-C camera should definitely consider the Sony Alpha a6000 APS-C 24MP camera. In Excellent condition, you can find this camera at MPB for $409.00 right now.
It’s really compact yet has a pleasing form factor and is comfortable to handhold. Combined with a Sony E-Mount lens, you can answer the question of Full Frame or crop sensor camera with a nod towards substantially lower prices with high-end performance.
As we explained at the start, there are many valid and correct answers concerning whether Full Frame or crop sensor mirrorless cameras are the way to go. Shopping at an online platform such as MPB helps make any decision a little easier.
Learn More:
- Fujifilm X-Pro 2 vs X-Pro 3
- How to Save Money when Buying Photography Gear
- 4 Benefits of Buying Used Cameras
We Recommend
Sony a5100 vs Sony a6000
Sony a5100 Vs Sony a6000 Comparison
The Sony a6000 is the most popular mirrorless camera of all time, and the Sony a5100 hasn’t done too bad with sales either.
What makes this line one of the most popular in the world is that the cameras in it offer high-quality shooting at amateur-pricing, especially now that both of these cameras are over 5 years old. In fact, they actually both came out in 2014, just a few months apart.
So, what makes the Sony a6000 more popular than the Sony a5100? What makes this line popular at all?
Let’s dive right into our Sony a5100 vs Sony a6000 article to find out.
Sony a5100 vs Sony a6000 Specs
Sony a5100
The Sony a5100 vs Sony a6000 debate begins where every great camera debate should: at the specs.
I’m going to start by giving an overview of the Sony a5100 specs before discussing the Sony a6000 specs, and finally giving a breakdown about what the (very few) differences are.
The Sony a5100 is a relatively small camera at 2.5 x 4.3 x 1.4 inches. That means that a lot of parts to this camera are also small, like its small and shallow grip.
While I don’t personally own a Sony a5100, I have shot with one before and I found it sort of off-putting because I tried to shoot with a large lens and didn’t feel like the size of the camera body was adequate enough to handle it.
The Sony a5100 screen is actually quite impressive. It’s a 3” LCD touchscreen, which functions pretty well for how old its technology is.
Sony a5100
Other Sony Alpha 5100 Specs:
- 24MP sensor
- ISO range of 100-25,600
- 3” tilting touchscreen with 921k-dots
- 6fps burst mode
- Full HD video
- Built-in Wi-Fi
- .62 lbs
Sony a6000
Now, onto the Sony a6000. The biggest difference in these two cameras is that the Sony a6000 has an electronic viewfinder, whereas the Sony a5100 doesn’t have one at all.
However, the Sony a6000 also has a better burst mode at 11fps.
Other Sony a6000 Specs:
- 24MP sensor
- ISO range of 100-25,600
- 3” tilting touchscreen with 921k-dots
- Full HD video
- 11fps burst mode
- Built-in Wi-Fi
- .76 lbs
So, as you can tell, the only major differences between the Sony a5100 vs. Sony a6000 is the presence of a viewfinder in the Sony a6000 and the higher burst rate.
Sony a5100 vs Sony a6000 Body & Design
Sony a5100
I talked about the Sony a5100 body a little bit in the section on specs above. But, suffice it to say, this is a really small camera. It isn’t large and it barely weighs anything, and I can echo these exact thoughts with the Sony a6000 body.
A lot of the similarities of these cameras lie in their designs. Both of these cameras feature the same tilting LCD touchscreen. They both have built-in flash and they both have UHS card support.
Sony a6000
Unfortunately, neither of these cameras come with either in-body image stabilization or environmental sealing, so I wouldn’t recommend them for photographers who are constantly shooting on the go.
The Sony a6000 comes with an external flash shoe, while the Sony a5100 doesn’t. I personally believe it’s a Sony a5100 design flaw.
Sony a5100 vs Sony a6000 Build & Handling
Sony a6000
As for the Sony a6000 design, it shares the exact same problems. Sony a6000 handling is definitely a challenge with larger lenses thanks to the tiny size of its body.
It comes with a ton of different buttons and dials and is customizable, so if you’ve worked with any other camera in this line then you pretty much know what to expect.
However, the grip on the Sony a6000 is more pronounced, which I thought was a welcome reprieve from the tiny grip on the Sony a5100.
Sony a5100 vs Sony a6000 Video Performance
Thanks to T-Gasolina blog for the above video comparing the video performances of the Sony a5100 vs Sony a6000.
I personally believe the Sony a5100 video performance is better than the Sony a6000, just for a few reasons listed in the video, like the fact that the Sony a5100 has an easily accessible SD card and the fact that it's cheaper and it really makes more sense to just save some money on the body to buy a better lens.
But, the Sony a6000 video performance isn’t too shabby…
I mean they both shoot Full HD video, and while the absence of an electronic viewfinder may turn you off from the Sony a5100, the end product of each of these cameras turns out pretty similar.
Sony a5100 vs Sony a6000 Price
Sony a5100
Since both of these cameras are now six years old, you can pick one up for a great price. A new Sony a5100 with a kit lens can be found for around $450 while a new a6000 with a kit lens will set you back around $550.
For even more savings, you might consider buying used. Since these cameras have been on the market for a while, there is an excellent used market.
Sony a6000
For example, you can get an a6000 body in excellent condition for $379 at MPB. MPB is my used gear retailer of choice because they have such a wide selection of gear at great prices.
MPB doesn’t have any a5100’s in stock at the moment, but if you check back on a regular basis, you’ll likely find that more have come in.
Whether you go with an a5100 or an a6000, you’ll get a well-featured camera that doesn’t break the bank - especially if you buy used. And if you’re wary of buying used, don’t be! Sites like MPB go through a painstaking process of inspecting each camera and grading it, that way you know the precise condition of the camera before you buy.
And since MPB offers a 6-month warranty on many of their items, you can rest assured that if something goes awry, they’ll be there to fix the problem!
We Recommend
Sony a6400 vs Sony a6500 vs Sony a6300
photo by ArisSu via iStock
Sony a6400 vs Sony a6500 vs Sony a6300 Comparison
Only a few days ago, Sony has announced the a6400, its new APS-C camera which will be available for purchase in February. We already made areview on the Sony a6400, where we introduced its primary specs and features. In this article, we will compare this camera to its siblings – the a6300 and a6500. Oldest camera in this series is Sony A6000 for which we have provided detailed review on our website PhotographyTalk.com.
Don’t be confused with the numbers; the a6300 and a6500 are both preceding the a6400, as they were announced and released in 2016. Two years later, many photographers continue to find these models useful for wide range of applications, but will it stay like this after the release of the new model?
After the announcement of the a6400, we want to see if it is really good enough to replace its predecessors. So, before you decide to put away your old Sony cameras in the corner, take your time to read this article and decide if it is really worth it.
The Sony a6400 Has the Largest ISO Range
All three cameras we are comparing in this article feature an APS-C sensor of the same size and offer an identical resolution of 24 megapixels. Still, because of technological advancements over the last two years, the A6400 has the largest ISO range that goes from 100 to 32000 (expandable to 102400).
This seems like a great improvement over the other two models that offer native ISO range of 100 - 25600 (expandable to 51200).
One more distinction among these cameras is that the A6300 does not have a front-end LSI chip which boosts the processing speed.
Additionally, all three cameras incorporate the same BIONZ X image processing engine.
The Sony a6500 Has 5-Axis Image Stabilization
Sony a6500
The 6500 stands out as the only camera in Sony a6000 series that incorporates 5-axis in-body sensor stabilization. This makes things a lot easier while shooting handheld because it eliminates or reduces the blur in images.
The other two cameras will need to use Sony lenses with built-in optical image stabilization in order to achieve the same effect.
Impressive Autofocus in the Sony a6400
photo by threespeedjones via iStock
All three cameras have impressive autofocus features, but the a6400 is definitely the winner in this category. It acquires focus in 0.02 seconds, in comparison to the a6300 and a6500 that have autofocus acquisition speed of 0.05 seconds.
This autofocus speed does not only put a6400 in front of its siblings, but in front of all other cameras in the world.
In addition, all three cameras have 425 phase detection points, but while the new camera has the same amount of contrast-detection AF points, two other models have only 169 contrast detection areas.
The 6400 also uses the latest autofocus technology, so its Real-time Eye AF and Real-time Tracking features promise to accomplish great results.
If You Want the Biggest Buffer, You'll Find It in the a6500
photo by smolaw11 via iStock
When it comes to shooting speed, there are only slight differences...
All three models offer 11fps continuous shooting with the mechanical shutter and an option for silent shooting mode. The A6400 stands out as the best performer when using the electronic shutter since it can shoot at 8 fps. In comparison, the a6300 and a6500 offer only 3 fps continuous shooting in silent mode.
The a6500 has the biggest buffer depth and it can record 233 JPGs or 107 RAW frames at full speed. This is a much better performance than that of the a6300 which can record only 99 JPGs and 46 RAW frames at full speed. The new camera stands in the middle and it can record 99 JPGs or 46 RAW frames.
4K Video Upgrades
At the time of its release, the A6300 was very popular because of its 4K video capabilities. The camera offered 4K recording with full pixel readout and Full HD video recording at up to 120 fps.
The a6500 added new “Slow and Quick” mode which allowed users to record up to 5x Slow Motion and up to 60x Quick Motion FULL HD video internally. Also, it added an option to extract 8MP stills from 4K recordings directly on the camera.
What is new about the 6400 is that it includes SLog2, SLog3, and HLG modes, making it an even more capable camera for video work.
Sony Alpha a6300 vs a6400 vs a6500: Dimensions and Weight
Sony a6500
At the first look, the 6300, 6400 and 6500 share the same design. Still, those with a good eye for detail will spot minor differences. While the 6300 and 6400 share the same weight of 14.3 ounces, the A6500 is almost 2 ounces heavier.
The dimensions of the new camera are 4.8 x 2.8 x 2.4 inches, which is 0.2 inches longer and 0.5 inches thicker than the 6300 and 0.2 inches longer than the 6500.
Of course, these differences are relatively irrelevant and what is important is that all three cameras have a lightweight and compact size so they can be carried around without a fear that they will become a burden.
There are also slight differences in grip size and controls, but not as important to write about them in this article.
The a6400 Has the Best LCD
Sony a6400
There have been substantial upgrades in LCD display from one model to another.
The Sony A6300 incorporates a tilting 3-inch LCD screen, but without touchscreen technology.
The A6500 adds touchscreen features which make using autofocus a lot easier, but although tiltable – the screen can be angled only by 90 degrees.
Finally, the A6400 improves the disadvantages of earlier models and adds 180 degrees tiltable LCD display so now you can rotate the screen to face the same direction as lenses. This feature will be particularly appealing to vloggers who couldn’t use earlier two models to fully accomplish their needs.
Looking for the Lowest Price? Go With the Sony a6300
Sony a6300
With a brand-new price of $748, the Sony A6300 is the most affordable camera among these three siblings. The reason for this is not a mystery – this camera can’t compete with the other two in any of the above-mentioned categories.
Still, for this price, you will get a great camera that can perform similarly well as the other two. You can save even more money if you decide to buy a used one.
The Sony a6400 goes on sale next month for about $900 (body only) or you can opt for the bundled version with a 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 lens for about $1,000. It seems that it is worth spending $200 more and buying the a6400 instead of the a6300 because it definitely brings a lot of improvements in features and usability.
The most expensive among the reviewed cameras is the a6500. With the price of $1,198.00 (about $934 if you buy used), this camera is a good option if you want to have 5-axis image stabilization, a feature that lacks in the 6300/6400.
Have Sony questions? Ask in the Sony Camera Forum.
We Recommend
Sony a7 III vs a7R II
Today, two of Sony’s most popular cameras are the Sony Alpha a7 III and the Sony Alpha a7R II. And while they have been superseded by newer models (the Sony Alpha a7 IV and the Sony Alpha a7R IV, respectively), they remain powerful cameras in 2022.
Better yet, their prices have dropped dramatically since their release dates, and now they are some of the best bargains in the camera world. Even though they are still available new from some retailers, I recommend looking for a used camera.
One place that has tons of both in stock is MPB. They are a trustworthy and reliable platform for used photo and video kit with unbeatable low prices. Additionally, all their cameras are carefully hand-inspected by experienced product specialists and backed by warranties.
In this article, I’ll break down and compare the Sony a7 III vs a7R II. First, I’ll cover their key features, and then we’ll take a look at their image and video performance. Now, without further ado, let’s dive in and check out these two fantastic cameras!
Table of Contents
- Sony a7 III vs a7R II: Specs & Features
- Sony a7 III vs a7R II: Imaging Performance
- Sony a7 III vs a7R II: Video Performance
- Final Thoughts on the Sony a7 III vs a7R II Debate
Sony a7 III vs a7R II: Specs & Features
For starters, the a7R II (shown above) came out in 2015, and the a7 III hit the shelves in 2018. In the universe of cameras and tech, three years is a lifetime. Therefore, it’s inevitable that the a7 III is a more advanced camera. However, the a7R II does top it in some aspects.
At the heart of each camera, you will find a full-frame BSI CMOS sensor and a BIONZ X image processor. While the two sensors are nearly identical in size (35.8 x 23.8 mm vs 35.9 x 24 mm), the a7R II blows the a7 III out of the water in terms of megapixel count. At 42MP compared to 24MP, it is nearly double the total pixel count.
As far as design is concerned, the two cameras are incredibly similar. They have the same height and length, with the a7 III (shown above) being ever so slightly thicker and heavier thanks to a larger grip. Personally, I’m a big fan of the new extended grip and find it helps improve the overall ergonomics of the a7 III.
One last thing I’d like to highlight here is the massive difference in battery life. The a7R ii can only shoot roughly 300 images per charge, while the a7 iii gets over 600. This is courtesy of a new, larger battery and is a major difference-maker out in the field.
Here’s a more in-depth look at the key specs and features of the Sony a7 III vs a7R II.
Learn More:
Sony a7 III vs a7R II: Imaging Performance
If you only look at the megapixel count, the Sony a7R II (shown above) is the clear winner. With almost twice as many pixels, it generates stunning, high-resolution images. Another advantage of all those extra pixels is that you can effortlessly enlarge and crop your photos while maintaining extraordinary sharpness.
With that said, the a7 III is by no means a slouch in terms of image quality. It takes crystal clear images and is the go-to camera of many professional photographers. In fact, to the untrained eye, most people won’t be able to tell the difference between the two cameras.
Furthermore, there’s much more to imaging performance than just pixel count. Two areas where the new tech inside the a7 III really stands out are autofocus and low-light performance. While the AF system of the a7R II is still great, on the a7 III, it’s industry-leading. The same goes with ISO and low light performance. While on the a7R II, it’s good, on the A7 III, it’s simply better.
For a more in-depth comparison regarding imaging performance, check out the terrific video above by Unconventional Media. They have a fantastic feed full of helpful information for photographers and videographers.
My pick: This is a tie. The two cameras are just so close!
Sony a7 III vs a7R II: Video Performance
Although you can’t compare these cameras to mirrorless cameras like the Sony a7S III or Sony a1, they are still phenomenal video cameras in their own right. Both cameras shoot 4K video at 24, 25, and 30 fps frame rates.
However, where the a7 III (shown above) has the upper hand is with video quality. At 4K/24p, the camera uses the entire sensor, and at 4K/30p, it only applies a 1.2x crop. On the flip side, if you want the same picture quality on the a7R II, you’ll need to shoot in Super 35mm mode. This limits the sensor and applies a 1.5x crop to the footage.
Another perk of the a7 III is it shoots 1080p/120p slow-motion video directly in the camera, whereas the a7R tops out at 1080p/60p. This is by no means a deal-breaker since you can easily slow down the footage yourself during the editing process, but it is nice to have.
Lastly, let’s talk about the video autofocus. Once again, this is a strength of the Sony a7 III.
While they both work great, with 693 phase-detection points and 425 contrast-detection points (compared to 399 and 25 on the a7R II), the a7 III does a better job of holding focus on moving subjects.
For more information on the two AF systems, watch the fabulous comparison video above by Maik Hansen.
My Pick: Sony a7 III
Final Thoughts on the Sony a7 III vs a7R II Debate
photo byMarioGuti via iStock
Both of these are professional-level cameras that undoubtedly have a place in 2022. No matter which one you go with, you really can’t go wrong!
With that said, if you are a landscape photographer, someone who blows up your images to large sizes, or someone who requires the highest image quality possible, I’d go with the a7R II.
For just about anybody else, including video and hybrid shooters, I’d opt for the a7 III.
Finally, don’t forget to check out MPB if you want to find killer Sony a7 III deals and Sony a7R II deals!
Learn More:
We Recommend
Sony A7 III vs. Nikon D500
The Sony A7 III vs. Nikon D500 argument has been raging on since Sony dropped the A7 III in 2018.
To give props to Nikon, the D500 is 2 years older than Sony’s and it pretty much took the rest of the camera manufacturers a few years to catch up to its lightning-fast burst mode and incredible autofocus system.
But, since these cameras have both held their resale value like no others, which should you buy if you’ve got the money? This is our Sony A7 III VS. Nikon D500 review.
Sony A7 III vs Nikon D500 Specs
The Sony A7 III has a lot going for it, namely it’s 24MP full frame sensor and it’s image stabilization.
In the Sony A7 III vs. Nikon D500 argument, the Sony A7 III features a slew of better features simply because it’s newer.
Other Sony A7 III specs include:
- 24 MP full frame sensor
- ISO range of 100-51200
- Sensor-shift image stabilization
- 3” tilting screen
- 4K video capabilities
- 10fps burst mode
- Built-in Wi-Fi
- Weather-sealed body
I think the Sony A7 III vs. Nikon D500 argument should really boil down to a list of Sony A7 III vs. Nikon D500 specs, so here are the specs for the Nikon.
The Nikon D500 features a 21MP sensor, a 3.2” tilting screen, and 10fps burst shooting, which are all extremely similar to the Sony A7 III specs.
Other Nikon D500 specs include:
- 21MP sensor
- ISO range of 100-51200
- 3.2” tilting screen
- 10fps burst mode
- Weather-sealed body
- Built-in Wi-Fi
Sony a7 III vs Nikon D500 Body & Design
The Sony A7 III has its faults, and they all lie in its body design. For example, while Sony likes to tout that this body is weather-resistant, other manufacturers have consistently produced better camera bodies for inclement weather.
I wouldn’t take this out during a rainstorm.
It also has very limited touchscreen controls. While this doesn’t bother many photographers, it’s worth noting.
The Nikon D500’s build is much sturdier and more intuitive. Its weather-resistance is more serious, and the layout of the screens are more helpful to your everyday street photographer since you have one tilting screen and one screen on the top of the body.
Additionally, the Nikon D500 is more ergonomic due to the traditional Nikon shape. The Sony may be too small and compact for larger hands.
Sony a7 III vs Nikon D500 Video Performance
The Sony A7 III, as shown by Kinotika, shoots enticing, colorful video in 4K. It shoots in 24p and 30p with no field of view crop.
The traditional autofocus system works consistently in 4K mode on the Sony A7 III, but the tap to track autofocus needs some improvement.
As The Daniel Lifepoints out, the Nikon D500 was one of Nikon’s first cameras to roll out 4K video capabilities. It can do so in both 24p and 30p at a 144Mbps bitrate.
Unfortunately, unlike the Sony, this Nikon uses a large crop in order to shoot in 4K. This crop factor is essentially 2.25x, which is worse than a Micro Four Thirds and can turn a videographer off from this camera body.
Sony A7 III vs. Nikon D500 Price
Camera Gear sums the Sony A7 III vs. Nikon D500 argument up quite nicely: they’re both superb cameras and I’d like to own both.
But, since this is real life and both of these cameras are worth thousands of dollars, I can’t.
The Sony A7 III costs $2,000 new, and for those of you who have followed PhotographyTalk consistently, you know I always try and recommend used cameras whenever possible. Unfortunately, my favorite used camera site, MPB, doesn’t have any Sony A7 IIIs up right now.
But, while MPB currently doesn’t have any Sony A7 IIIs for sale, they do have a variety of Nikon D500s starting at just under $1,000 (which is a steal considering they still go for $1,500 new).
And, since MPB is a resale website, they rotate through hundreds of used cameras each day. So it’s totally possible that they will have a few Sony A7 IIIs up by the time you’re reading this.
We Recommend
Sony a7R III vs Nikon D850: Which is Best?
Talk about a battle for the ages...
It was just a few weeks ago that Nikon released the incredible D850.
That rig has already garnered a reputation as being one of Nikon's best cameras of all time. Check out Nikon D850 review by PhotographyTalk.com.
Yet here we are a few weeks later, and Sony is trying to steal a bit of the Nikon D850's thunder with the release of the Sony a7R III.
Let's see how these two incredible cameras matchup.
Essential Specifications - Nikon D850
- 45.7-megapixel BSI CMOS FX sensor
- Expeed 5 image processor
- 153-point autofocus system
- ISO range 64-25,600 (expandable to 102,400)
- 7fps burst shooting speed (9fps with optional battery grip)
- 4K video at 30fps and 1080p video at 120fps
At quick glance, you can see just how powerful the D850 really is.
Though the 45.7-megapixel sensor doesn't have the resolution of the likes of the Canon 5DS, it still manages to produce the best image quality around, at least according to DxOMark, which gave the D850 a 100/100 score for its sensor.
The fact that the sensor is back-illuminated helps, but there's much more to the D850 than its amazing image quality.
The Expeed 5 image processor is lightning fast, making quick work of tasks.
The improved autofocus system not only has more AF points, but it also has a much-improved detection range as well. Combined with a faster continuous shooting rate of 7fps (9fps with an optional battery grip), you have camera primed and ready for action photography.
This camera also has seen improvements in the viewfinder, which is larger, the processor, which is faster, and the battery, which has improved life.
There's even a silent shutter, support for XQD and UHS-II SD cards, a tilting touchscreen LCD, and 4K video.
It's got some even fancier features, too...
That includes in-camera RAW processing, built-in focus stacking, and built-in focus peaking as well. Speaking of RAW, this camera can handle up to 170 RAW files in its buffer.
Add in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, built-in timelapse video shooting, and illuminated buttons, and you have the makings of one hell of a camera.
See these features and more in the video above by PhotoRec TV.
Learn More:
Essential Specifications - Sony a7R III
- 42.4-megapixel BSI CMOS full frame sensor
- BIONZ X image processor
- 399-point autofocus system
- ISO range 50-32,000 (expandable to 102,400)
- 10fps burst shooting speed
- 4K video at 24fps or 30fps and 1080p at 120fps
Based on the specs outline above, it's plain to see that Sony came to play with the big boys.
Though DxOMark hasn't tested the a7R III as of this writing, my guess is that it's going to garner among the highest scores ever recorded.
I base that assumption on the fact that its predecessor, the a7R II, used to hold the title for the best sensor - that is, until the Nikon D850 came along.
The a7R III and the D850 are comparable in many other ways as well.
Both have 4K video, excellent ISO ranges that are expandable to 102,400, and cutting-edge processors that make quick work of tasks.
But there's a couple of ways that the a7R III might have a leg up on the D850...
The first is the burst shooting speed, which sits at an astonishing 10fps. There is simply no beating this thing when it comes to speed.
The other area where the Sony a7R III shines is its autofocus system, which is equipped with a ridiculous 399 phase-detect autofocus points and 425 contrast autofocus points.
According to Sony, that makes the a7R II two times as fast as the a7R II when shooting in dim lighting.
What all that means is that you can shoot 10 frames per second in RAW or in JPEG while having the luxury of autofocus tracking at the same time.
The kicker is that the camera does all that with zero shutter blackout.
You can see these and other features in the hands-on review of the a7R III in the video above by Kai W.
Learn More:
Comparing the Nikon D850 and the Sony a7R III
Clearly, these cameras both offer tons of features for photographers. The question is, which one will reign supreme?
That's a tough question to answer, even if we break these cameras down by their primary features.
The Nikon D850 is the winner in the sensor department. With a perfect score from DxOMark, Sony can't outdo that performance. It also offers a much wider selection of lenses and feels better in your hand.
On the other hand, the Sony a7R III takes the cake in the continuous shooting speed. And with a more robust autofocus system that has more AF points, eye detection capabilities, and face detection capabilities, the Sony wins in AF performance as well.
Both cameras offer 4K video, fast processing speeds, and excellent viewfinders. They're both weather-sealed and both have tilting touchscreen LCDs. Battery life is comparable as well, which is actually a big win for Sony, which offered abysmal battery performance in the a7R II.
Both cameras also offer a similar price tag, coming in at around $3,200 for the body.
Ultimately, these cameras are so powerful and so versatile, that you'd be hard-pressed to find something that gives you better performance.
That means that if you're a Nikon shooter, the Sony likely won't convince you to jump ship. The same goes for Sony shooters switching to Nikon. It just isn't likely to happen.
So, if you're wondering which of these cameras is the cream of the crop, the answer is both.
If you've already invested into Nikon, stick with it and upgrade to the D850. If you're in the Sony space, upgrade to an a7R III. Either way, you'll be pleased with the camera you get.
For a more in-depth comparison of the Nikon D850 and the Sony a7R III, check out the video above by Tony and Chelsea Northrup.
We Recommend
Sony a7R III vs Panasonic GH5 Comparison
In this review, we will compare two mirrorless cameras – the Sony a7RIII and Panasonic Lumix DC GH5.
From the outset, it’s worth mentioning the Sony and the Panasonic are both good cameras with lots of nice features that will allow you to make stunning images and videos. However, each camera has its own advantages and disadvantages as well.
Whether you are deciding which camera to buy or you are only curious about specs and features of these two models, you’ve come to the right place!
Sony a7R III Release Date
The Sony a7R III was announced in October 2017 and was released the following month.
Panasonic GH5 Release Date
The Panasonic GH5 was announced in January 2017 and released two months later in March
Sony a7R III vs Panasonic GH5 Sensor and ISO Performance
At first glance, the Sony a7R III seems to be a much more powerful camera than the Panasonic GH5. The reason for this is that the Sony features a 42.2MP full frame sensor while there is “just” a 20.2MP micro four-thirds sensor in Panasonic’s camera.
As I’m sure you know, the art of photography is all about playing with light and large sensors make this task much easier. Cameras with full-frame sensors usually have better low-light sensitivity, greater dynamic range, and richer color-depth than those with a micro four-thirds sensor.
Additionally, the more robust resolution in the Sony a7R III offers enhanced image quality and a possibility to crop images to smaller dimensions while still preserving all the important details.
Having said that, the GH5’s sensor is no slouch.
The combination of the Live MOS sensor and the Venus Engine Image Processor results in superb image quality for a micro four-thirds sensor. In fact, DxOMark notes that the GH5 “delivers scores that are among the best-in-class for this size sensor.”
In fact, in my testing thus far, I’ve noticed excellent per-pixel sharpness (no doubt thanks to the omission of a low-pass filter), top-notch dynamic range, and beautiful details. This has been somewhat surprising, given the reputation of micro four-thirds sensors having lesser image quality than APS-C and full frame cameras.
On the ISO front, the a7R III has a much bigger ISO range. While the Panasonic GH5 offers a native sensitivity range from ISO 200 to 25600 (extendable to ISO 100-25600), the a7R III offers a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to 32000 (extendable to ISO 50-102400).
In testing, the a7R III does, in fact, outperform the Panasonic. DxOMark notes that the Sony has one of the best low-light ISO scores it’s ever seen, and that the images produced on an a7R III have less noise than even the Nikon D850.
Again, the GH5 holds its own here. You get excellent dynamic range at base SEO, and even when I’ve pushed the ISO upward, there has been a more than acceptable level of noise.
Sony a7R III vs Panasonic GH5 – Video features
Sony a7R III
Although the Sony a7R III has the sensor to provide better image quality than the Panasonic GH5, things are different when it comes to video capabilities.
It is not because Sony’s video features are bad, either. On the contrary, the a7R III allows you to record 4K videos and someone would say you can’t get better than this. However, its frame rate is a bit lower (30p) than on the GH5 (60p). Also, the a7R III has an annoying 30 minute limit on videos.
The Panasonic GH5 records 4K video at 60p/50p.
The Panasonic GH5 is, on the other hand, perfectly designed for videographers. The camera has the capability to record Cinema 4K (4096 x 2160) 8-bit videos without crop and without a recording limit.
The GH5 also has 4K and 6K photo modes that will allow you to extract 8MP photos from 4K videos and 18MB photos from video footage. This is a very useful feature, and it is one more reason why the Panasonic has a clear advantage in video capabilities over Sony’s camera.
Finally, in addition to 4K/60p capabilities, the Panasonic GH5 also allows you to record 1080p footage at up to 240 frames per second. In comparison, the a7R III also has a possibility to record Full HD videos, but only at up to 120 frames per second.
For me, this is where the biggest difference is between these two cameras.
I’ve used Sony Alpha cameras for video work since the a6000 came out in 2014. Each subsequent Sony camera I’ve tested - including the a7R III - has been solidly built, had tons of excellent features for video, and produced great results.
However, none of my Sony cameras can hold a candle to the GH5. This thing is absolutely incredible when it comes to video, particularly for a camera that’s two years old and priced so well. I’d go so far as to say that dollar for dollar, the Panasonic GH5 is the best camera for video on the market right now.
Get a detailed look at the Sony a7R III vs Panasonic GH5 video capabilities in the video above by Brady Bigalke.
Sony a7R III vs Panasonic GH5 Autofocus and Continuous Shooting Speed
Panasonic GH5
Both of these cameras incorporate very good autofocus systems. However, the Sony a7 III features 693 phase-detection AF points and 425 densely positioned contrast-detection AF points in comparison to 225 focus points in the Panasonic GH5.
Don’t get me wrong - the autofocus system in the GH5 is fine, but it definitely has room for improvement when compared to the Sony. Overall, the autofocus system in Sony’s camera is one of the best you can find. Whether you are shooting stills or recording videos, you won’t have any issues with the camera getting the focus just right.
When it comes to burst shooting, the GH5 has a slight advantage. The camera offers continuous shooting at up to 12 fps, while the Sony a7R III allows only 10 fps.
Additionally, the GH5 also has an advantage over Sony's camera since it has less shutter lag, and bigger JPEG and RAW buffer. Both cameras support silent shooting, which is a convenient feature for photographing events or wildlife without being a distraction.
In the video above by The Everyday Dad, you can watch hands-on comparison of these two cameras.
Sony a7R III vs Panasonic GH5 Design and Connectivity
Sony a7R III
Now, let’s compare the physical characteristics of these two cameras.
First of all, both cameras are weather-sealed and designed to work without issue even in harsh weather conditions such as in freezing or extremely hot temperatures. Both models also fit into a group of lightweight and compact cameras that are ideal for travel or street photography. The Sony a7R III is a bit smaller (by about 10%) and lighter (1.6 lb. vs 1.45 lb.) than the Panasonic GH5.
However, take into consideration that you will need to add a lens on each camera. Since Sony’s camera has a much larger sensor, it might also require bigger (and heavier) lenses. Because of this, the size and weight of these cameras should not play a big role in your decision which one to buy.
Panasonic GH5
Although the Sony a7R III has a slightly higher viewfinder resolution (3686k vs 3680k dots), the Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5 has larger LCD screen (3.2" vs 3") and better LCD resolution (1.620K vs 1.440K). Finally, the LCD display in the Panasonic’s camera is selfie-friendly, while it is not the case with the Sony a7R III.
The articulated LCD display is particularly important for vloggers, because they usually want to see themselves while they are preparing videos. Although it is possible to overcome the lack of this feature via remote shooting or HDMI, an articulating screen is always appreciated by videographers.
Sony a7R III
Regarding connectivity, both cameras provide headphone and microphone jacks, an external flash shoe, HDMI out, built-in Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth. The only difference in connectivity is that Panasonic's camera lacks an NFC connection.
The common strength of both models is the possibility of using two card slots. The only difference is that the GH5 supports UHS-II cards on both slots while the a7R III allows you to use one slot for UHS-II and another slot for UHS-I.
The Sony a7 III battery life is longer, and you can expect to make around 650 shots or 100 minutes of video before your battery runs out. However, you shouldn’t expect to make more than 450 shots or 55 minutes of video with Panasonic’s camera, though the Panasonic GH5 battery life estimate is on the low side, at least based on my testing thus far.
Sony a7R III vs Panasonic GH5 Image Stabilization
The Sony a7R III has a five-axis in-body image stabilization system that offers excellent performance at varying focal lengths.
I’m a landscape photographer, so I typically use wide-angle lenses, and the a7R III has consistently given me 2-3 stops of advantage when shooting with a wide-angle. On the other end of the spectrum, you can expect 4-5 stops when shooting telephoto.
Panasonic GH5
Since the GH5 has a smaller sensor, there’s much more room for its image stabilization system to work. And work it does.
The GH5’s hybrid image stabilization system isn’t just class-leading. This sucker is world class.
Since it’s sensor-based, you can use any lens with this camera and reap the benefits of image stabilization. Whether you’re shooting stills (which I’ve done handheld down to 1/10 seconds) or video, there is no better image stabilization on the market right now, especially at this price point.
Sony a7R III vs Panasonic GH5 Price
At the moment, you can buy a new Sony a7R III (body only) for $2,798.00. If you buy used, you can save several hundred dollars as used models start at around $2,450.00.
The price of the Panasonic GH5 is much lower - you can buy a new camera (body only) for $1,497.99. Again, you can expect to save several hundred dollars if you buy used - pre-owned GH5’s can be found for about $1,250.00 and up.
If you're not sure where to buy used camera gear, read my MPB review to learn why MPB is one of the best used camera stores you can find.
As a long-time Sony owner, I can tell you that I really, really like the a7R III. It’s a fantastic, highly capable camera.
Having said that, the GH5 would be my choice between these two. I’m getting more and more into video, and the GH5 is hands-down the better camera for video. Combined with the absolutely stellar image stabilization and the much lower price, I think the GH5 is simply impossible to beat!
We Recommend
Sony a7R V vs Sony a1
Sony debuted the first-ever full-frame mirrorless camera (the Sony a7) in 2013, and they have been pumping out incredible new models ever since. Two of their most advanced cameras yet are the Sony a7R V and the Sony a1, and if you are looking for more information on their similarities and differences, you’re in the right place!
In this Sony camera comparison guide, first, we’ll share basic overviews of the cameras. Then, we’ll examine their photo and video capabilities and recommend our favorite Sony FE lenses. Additionally, thanks to innovative online platforms like MPB, buying a used mirrorless camera has never been cheaper and easier than it is today.
Who is MPB? They are a trustworthy and reliable online platform selling pre-owned photography and videography gear at unbeatable prices. Better yet, all of their cameras and lenses are methodically hand-inspected by expert product specialists with years of experience and backed by six-month warranties, allowing you to make your purchases confidently and worry-free.
We are huge fans of MPB because, over the years, we’ve saved thousands of dollars buying, selling, and trading in photography equipment using their one-of-a-kind online platform. If you want to upgrade your camera kit and save money, too, visit their website today. That said, it’s time to find out which of these amazing Sony cameras is right for you!
Check out the video above by Park Cameras to learn more about the Sony a1 vs Sony a7R V and to see example photos and videos shot with them.
Table of Contents
- Sony a7R V vs Sony a1: Overview
- Sony a7R V vs Sony a1: Imaging Performance
- Sony a7R V vs Sony a1: Video Performance
- Recommended Sony Lenses
- Final Thoughts on the Sony a7R V vs Sony a1
Sony a7R V vs Sony a1: Overview
Sony a7R V
The Sony Alpha a7R V came out in 2022, replacing the a7R IV as the company's premiere high-resolution camera. With a 61.2-megapixel Exmor R BSI CMOS image sensor, it’s the highest-resolution mirrorless camera currently available. Moreover, it boasts an updated Bionz XR image processor that is 8x more powerful than its predecessor.
On the other hand, the flagship Sony a1 launched in 2021. It features a 50.5-megapixel Exmor RS BSI sensor and the older Bionz XR image processor. At the time of its release, its photo and video package was far and away the best on the market, but the a7R V comes close (or even surpasses it!) in some areas.
Sony a1
Design-wise, the two cameras are nearly identical, with the only noticeable difference being the placement of a couple of buttons. Both feature a slew of customization options, weather-sealed bodies, sensor covers, and breathable bodies that prevent the camera from overheating. Also, their 530-shot battery life and 500,000-frame shutter life are the same.
Now, here’s a head-to-head look at the key features and specs of the Sony a7R V vs a1 to see how they stack up:
Sony a7R V vs Sony a1: Imaging Performance
Sony a7R V
For still photography, the Sony a7R V has the upper hand in terms of resolution, autofocus (AF), and pixel shift multi-shooting. While both cameras have excellent resolution, the higher pixel count of the a7R V is noticeable when enlarging images for print. For landscape and cityscape photographers, the 241MP (199MP in the a1) multi-shot mode boosts the resolution even more.
The a7R V may have fewer AF points, but its overall AF system is one step ahead because of its new AI algorithm. It adds deep machine-learning technology that improves subject recognition and tracking, making it easier to capture sharp, in-focus images of moving subjects.
Sony a1
Alternatively, the Sony a1 has faster burst shooting and a superior electronic viewfinder (EVF). The a1 can capture stills at 30 frames per second (fps) with its electronic shutter and 10 fps with the mechanical shutter. The a7R V tops out at 10 fps with the electronic and mechanical shutter.
The EVFs of both cameras have 9.44M dots and 0.90x magnification, but the 240 fps refresh rate of the a1’s is double that of the a7R V (120 fps). These two speed-related specs make the a1 a great camera for photographing fast-moving subjects.
Which is the best camera for photos? Overall, the Sony Alpha a7R V. However, thanks to its speed, the Sony a1 is best for action and sports photography.
Learn More:
Sony a7R V vs Sony a1: Video Performance
Sony a7R V
The Sony a7R V and Sony a1 are, without a doubt, two of the best mirrorless cameras for video on the planet. For starters, both have industry-leading 8K video capabilities, advanced codecs, and slow-motion video, making them ideal for everyone from professional videographers and filmmakers to YouTubers and vloggers.
Where the a1 separates itself, though, is when looking at the frame rates. The a1 boasts 8K/60p, 4K/120p, and 1080p/240p Full HD video. In contrast, the a7R V has 8K/30p, 4K/60p, and 1080p/120p Full HD video. While those numbers are still impressive, professionals will be able to notice the difference.
Sony a1
The one area where the a7R V beats the a1 is its best-in-class in-body image stabilization (IBIS). The IBIS of the a7R V adds up to 8 stops of exposure, whereas the IBIS of the a1 adds 5.5 additional stops.
The better stabilization enhances the a7R V’s low-light performance and reduces camera shake when recording handheld video. This makes it an ideal choice for run-and-gun shooters like documentary filmmakers.
Which is the best camera for video? It’s extremely close, but we give a slight edge to the Sony a1.
Recommended Sony Lenses
Sony a7R V with 24-70mm lens
Here’s a quick list of some of the best Sony Full Frame lenses for photo and video to pair with the Sony a7R V and a1.
- Sony FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM II
- Sony FE 400mm f/2.8 GM OSS
- Sony FE 50mm f/1.2 GM
- Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II
- Sony FE 12-24mm f/2.8 GM
Final Thoughts on the Sony a7R V vs Sony a1
Sony a7R V video camera setup
Regardless of which of these high-end cameras you choose, you will get a hybrid digital camera capable of capturing spectacular photos and videos. With that in mind, we recommend going with the Sony a7R V if you mostly shoot photos and the Sony a1 if you mostly record videos. Furthermore, due to the $2000 price difference, the a7R V is better for people on a budget.
After reading our Sony a7R V vs Sony a1 camera review, we hope you are one step closer to choosing your next camera. However, if you are still undecided, check out the list below of other professional mirrorless cameras on sale now at MPB:
Disclaimer: Our articles might have affiliate links and the occasional sponsored content, but don't sweat it – if you buy something, we get a little kickback at no extra cost to you, and we only hype products we truly believe in!
Learn More:
- Canon R3 vs Nikon Z9
- 4 Reasons Why the Panasonic Lumix GH6 is One of the Best Hybrid Cameras on the Market
We Recommend
Sony A7Riii vs Nikon D850 Epic Shootout
Two of the very best cameras on the market right now are the Sony A7R III and the Nikon D850.
Of course, the question is, which one of these camera beasts is the best? So here is Nikon D850 vs Sony A7RIII Epic Shootout by PhotographyTalk.com.
In the video above, Michael the Maven tackles this question.
The great thing about Michael's review of these cameras is that he is in no way sponsored by either company.
That means you get a real-world, real-life view of these cameras without worrying about the opinions offered being skewed because of money.
Have a look at what Michael has to say, and for a few details on the specifications of these amazing cameras, check the article below.
Editor's Tip: Sell your old lenses and use the money to buy an upgraded camera. Start selling your old gear now.
Key Specs: Sony A7R III
- 42.4-megapixel BSI CMOS full frame sensor
- BIONZ X image processor
- 399-point autofocus system
- ISO range 50-32,000 (expandable to 102,400)
- 10fps burst shooting speed
- 4K video at 24fps or 30fps and 1080p at 120fps
Clearly, the Sony A7R III is a beast.
This camera was meant to take on Canon and Nikon in the high-end camera market, and as Michael demonstrates in his video, Sony succeeded in more ways than one.
Best Feature: The autofocus system. It is unparalleled in its number of AF points and its performance.
Key Specs: Nikon D850
- 45.7-megapixel BSI CMOS FX sensor
- Expeed 5 image processor
- 153-point autofocus system
- ISO range 64-25,600 (expandable to 102,400)
- 7fps burst shooting speed (9fps with optional battery grip)
- 4K video at 30fps and 1080p video at 120fps
The Nikon D850 is loaded with features, as you can see above.
Not only is this one of the best cameras that Nikon has ever made, it's also one of the best cameras ever made by anyone.
But don't take my word for it. See what Michael has to say about the D850 in the video above!
Best Feature: The sensor. DxOMark gave it a perfect score - the first sensor to garner a 100 out of 100.
We Recommend
Sony Mirrorless Camera Comparison: Which is Best for 2023?
Photo by seb_ra via iStock
Sony was the first company to invest heavily in mirrorless technology around 2010, and that bet has paid off big time. Today, they are the king of mirrorless cameras, and their lineup of mirrorless cameras is stronger than ever. However, with so many sensational mirrorless cameras on sale, deciding which one to buy has never been harder.
That’s why we built this Sony mirrorless camera comparison guide! In it, we share four of the best Sony mirrorless cameras available today, break down their strengths & weaknesses, and tell you who will benefit most from shooting with each one.
One amazing resource with loads of used Sony E mirrorless cameras and used Sony FE mirrorless cameras in stock and a place I keep going back to buy and sell photo and video gear is MPB. They are a trustworthy and reliable online platform that sells used photo and video kit at unbeatable prices.
Moreover, all of their cameras and lenses are carefully hand-inspected by knowledgeable product specialists and many are backed by warranties, allowing you to make your purchases confidently and worry-free. Another phenomenal feature of MPB is its online marketplace, where you can trade in and sell your old gear to help offset the cost of new-to-you photo and video equipment.
Now, let’s dive in and explore which Sony camera is best for you based on your budget and experience!
Table of Contents
- Sony Mirrorless Camera Comparison: Sony Alpha a6000
- Sony Mirrorless Camera Comparison: Sony Alpha a6600
- Sony Mirrorless Camera Comparison: Sony Alpha a7S III
- Sony Mirrorless Camera Comparison: Sony Alpha 1
- Final Thoughts on This Sony Mirrorless Camera Comparison
Sony Mirrorless Camera Comparison: Sony Alpha a6000
First up, we have the award-winning Sony Alpha a6000. It is the longest-running and most-sold mirrorless camera of all time. Making its debut way back in 2014, this powerful little camera is on the older side, but it still holds up well today. And the fact that you can get your hands on one for under $400 makes it an absolute steal! It’s ideal for beginners and people on a tight budget.
Outside of its low price, this Sony camera has a ton going for it. The 24.3-megapixel image sensor produces high-quality images, and the responsive autofocus makes capturing in-focus images a piece of cake. On top of that, its ultra-portable, lightweight design makes it a great everyday camera, and it can even fit in your pocket!
The one downside of this camera is its lack of 4K video capabilities. With that said, the quality of its 1080p Full HD footage is superb.
Here’s an in-depth look at the key features and specs of this Sony mirrorless camera:
- Camera Type: Mirrorless
- Sensor: 24.3MP APS-C CMOS sensor
- ISO: 100 - 25,600 (expandable to 100 - 51,200)
- Lens Mount: Sony E Mount
- Speed: 11.0 fps
- Autofocus: 179 phase-detection points
- Video: 1080p/60p
- Size/Weight: 120 x 67 x 45 mm / 344 grams
- Battery Life: 360 shots
- Stabilization: No
- Touchscreen: No
Check out the video above by MPB to learn more about the Sony Alpha a6000.
Sony Mirrorless Camera Comparison: Sony Alpha a6600
Another outstanding Sony E mirrorless camera is the Sony Alpha a6600. It’s a souped-up model of the a6000 mentioned above and an ideal camera for intermediate digital content creators looking to take the next step in their photography/videography careers. The average price for a used camera in excellent condition is around $1250.
Two of the signature features of this Sony mirrorless camera are its lightning-fast autofocus and the in-body image stabilization technology. The AF is impressive and the new and improved subject tracking (along with its 11.0 frames per second continuous shooting) makes it a good option for sports, action, and wildlife photography. The stabilization boosts the camera's low-light performance and eliminates camera shake when shooting handheld.
Speaking of video, the a6600 boasts 4K video capabilities, and the microphone and headphone ports allow you to better monitor audio levels when recording. My biggest complaint with this camera is the large crop factor applied to 4K/30p footage.
Here’s an in-depth look at the key features and specs of this Sony mirrorless camera:
- Camera Type: Mirrorless
- Sensor: 24.2MP APS-C CMOS sensor
- ISO: 100 - 32,000 (expandable to 100 - 102,400)
- Lens Mount: Sony E Mount
- Speed: 11.0 fps
- Autofocus: 425 phase-detection points
- Video: 4K/30p & 1080p/100p
- Size/Weight: 120 x 67 x 69 mm / 503 grams
- Battery Life: 810 shots
- Stabilization: Yes
- Touchscreen: Yes
Learn More:
Sony Mirrorless Camera Comparison: Sony Alpha A7S III
For filmmakers and videographers, the best Sony camera in 2023 is the Sony Alpha a7S III. It was released in 2020 and is specifically designed to work in low-light situations and shoot video. A 12.1-megapixel Full-Frame sensor and a sophisticated Bionz XR image processing engine are at its core.
The pair work together to deliver stunning results and make it one of the fastest mirrorless cameras on the market. Moreover, they allow the camera to film 4K/60p video for up to an hour without overheating. You can also record 4K slow-motion footage directly in-camera by switching the frame rate to 120p.
A few more killer features of this camera are the fully-articulated screen, 5-axis in-body image stabilization, and dual memory card slots. The biggest downfall of the a7S III is that its 12MP still images have a lower resolution than most new cameras. The going rate for a used a7S III is a little under $3000.
Here’s an in-depth look at the key features and specs of this Sony mirrorless camera:
- Camera Type: Mirrorless
- Sensor: 12.1MP Full-Frame CMOS sensor
- ISO: 80 - 102,400 (expandable to 40 - 409,600)
- Lens Mount: Sony E Mount
- Speed: 10.0 fps
- Autofocus: 759 phase-detection points
- Video: 4K/120p & 1080p/120p
- Size/Weight: 129 x 97 x 81 mm / 699 grams
- Battery Life: 600 shots
- Stabilization: Yes
- Touchscreen: Yes
Still not sure if the a7S III is right for you? The video above by MPB will help!
Sony Mirrorless Camera Comparison: Sony Alpha 1
Last but not least, we have the flagship Sony Alpha 1. It hit stores in 2021 and is arguably the finest mirrorless camera ever made. It is built for professionals, and its performance is off the charts for both videos and still shooting alike. To call one of these your own, you will have to cough up roughly $5000.
Without a doubt, the headlining feature of the Sony a1 is its 8K video capabilities. It’s one of only a handful of cameras worldwide that records 8K footage, most of which are high-end cinema cameras. Also, the video autofocus is in a league of its own and is the best we have ever seen from a mirrorless camera.
More drool-worthy features of this camera include huge 50.1-megapixel still photos, a maximum frame rate of 30 fps, a high-resolution electronic viewfinder, and tons of customizable buttons/dials. If you can afford it, I promise you won’t be disappointed with the results!
Here’s an in-depth look at the key features and specs of this Sony mirrorless camera:
- Camera Type: Mirrorless
- Sensor: 50.1MP Full-Frame CMOS sensor
- ISO: 100 - 32,000 (expandable to 50 - 102,400)
- Lens Mount: Sony E Mount
- Speed: 30.0 fps
- Autofocus: 759 phase-detection points
- Video: 8K/30p, 4K/120p, & 1080p/120p
- Size/Weight: 129 x 97 x 81 mm / 737 grams
- Battery Life: 530 shots
- Stabilization: Yes
- Touchscreen: Yes
Final Thoughts on This Sony Mirrorless Camera Comparison
Photo by seb_ra via iStock
I hope you have enjoyed this Sony mirrorless camera comparison and that it has helped you in your search for a new camera. If you aren’t sold on any of the cameras above, here are a few more fantastic Sony cameras to consider that are currently in stock at MPB!
- The best Sony mirrorless camera for YouTube & Vlogging: Sony ZV-E10
- The best Sony mirrorless camera for adventure photography: Sony Alpha a6400
- The best Sony mirrorless camera for travel: Sony Alpha a7C
- The best Sony mirrorless camera for landscape photography: Sony Alpha a7R IV
- The best Sony mirrorless camera for sports and wildlife photography: Sony Alpha a9 II
Learn More:
We Recommend
The Nikon D850 vs the (Rumored) Canon 5D Mark V
Unless you've been living under a rock recently, you no doubt know that Nikon recently unveiled their D850 DSLR camera.
It's a fantastic camera, to say the least, and has already established itself as one of the best cameras Nikon has on the market today.
In fact, it's one of the best cameras that they've ever produced.
That this camera is so good certainly has the likes of Canon concerned.
So, they'll really need to bring it when they unveil the EOS 5D Mark V.
Now, the Mark V isn't out yet, nor is there an official release date. But the rumors are running hot, so I thought it would be fun to compare what we know about the Nikon D850 with what people expect from the Canon 5D Mark V.
Table of Contents:
- Essential Features: Nikon D850
- Essential Features: Canon 5D Mark V
- Nikon D850 vs Canon 5D Mark V Head to Head
Essential Features: Nikon D850
Key Specs:
- 45.7-megapixel BSI CMOS FX sensor
- Expeed 5 image processor
- 153-point autofocus system
- ISO range 64-25,600 (expandable to 102,400)
- 7fps burst shooting speed (9fps with optional battery grip)
- 4K video at 30fps and 1080p video at 120fps
There's a lot to love about the key specifications listed above.
But paramount among them is the Nikon D850's incredible sensor.
Not only did Nikon step it up with more megapixels than on the D810, but it also added a back-illuminated sensor, a first for Nikon.
To say that those were good ideas is an understatement...
In fact, DxOMark gave the D850's sensor a perfect 100/100 score - a first.
That makes this sensor better than the acclaimed Sony a7R II (98/100) and the Nikon D810 (97/100).
DxOMark went so far in their review to say that the D850's sensor "breaks new ground for image quality." That's not a bad endorsement!
Editor's Tip: Since the D850's sensor produces images of unparalleled quality, you want to pair it with a top-quality lens. The Nikon AF-S 35mm f/1.4G certainly fits the bill, with a wide, fixed f/1.4 aperture, upgraded optics, and lightweight construction that will make it the top choice of your collection of lenses. With versatility that allows it to be used for landscapes, portraiture, and everything in between, it's one of Nikon's best lenses to go with one of it's best cameras. You can learn more about the Nikon AF-S 35mm f/1.4G by visiting MPB.
The D850 delivers in other areas as well.
Its sensor produces beautiful colors, excellent dynamic range, and offers ISO performance that's virtually unmatched.
That makes it an ideal camera for photographers of all trades, from studio portrait photographers to sports photographers to nature and wildlife photographers.
Another area where the D850 shines is in its autofocus system.
Powered by a Multi-Cam 20K sensor, its autofocus system sports 153 AF points, 99 of which are cross-type.
All those cross-type sensors means that the D850 excels in situations in which you're photographing a moving subject.
It can shoot at 7fps (9fps with a battery grip), so it's a beast when it comes to rapid-firing your shots.
Editor's Tip: If it's a high-performance lens you're after for action photography, look no further than the Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Lens. Its large f/2.8 maximum aperture enables shooting even in low-light situations. Its superior optics are perfect for the Nikon D850's sensor, resulting in images that have impeccable quality. The ultra-sonic motor and vibration compensation features mean it's not just fast, but quiet and stable as well. Get the specs and pricing on this and other Nikon-fit lenses.
This rig has a slew of other incredible features that simply make it easier to use - and more fun to use as well.
That includes dual card slots - one for UHS-II SD cards and another for XQD cards.
It can shoot 4K video at 24, 25, or 30fps, too.
Its LCD is bigger, more resolute, and can tilt. It's also touch-enabled and even offers touch AF in live view. See that and other awesome features on the D850 in the video above by Kai W.
Throw built-in focus stacking, RAW processing, focus peaking, and a buffer that can handle 170 RAW files, and you have the makings for one heck of a camera.
Oh, it's got illuminated buttons, too!
The question is, can Canon come up with something to compete with all that?
Essential Features: Canon 5D Mark V
Key Specs (Rumored):
- 50-megapixel BSI CMOS sensor
- DIGIC 8 image processor
- 150-point autofocus system
- ISO range 50-32,000 (expandable to 102,400)
- 10fps burst shooting speed
- 4K video
Granted, there's nothing concrete as of this writing about the Mark V's specifications.
But in looking at the 5D Mark IV's spec sheet, we can surmise a few things.
First, the 5D Mark V will have 4K video capabilities without a doubt. That's where digital cameras are headed, and if Canon wants to keep up with Nikon and Sony, 4K video is a must.
Another virtual guarantee is that the Mark V will have at least 7fps shooting, if not much more, possibly in the 10fps range.
Since the Mark IV is equipped with the DIGIC 6+ processor and newer Canon models have the DIGIC 7, it's also reasonable to assume that the Mark V will have the 7+ or perhaps even an all-new DIGIC 8 processing engine.
Editor's Tip: If you're a Canon shooter looking for an excellent all-around lens, consider the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 L II USM. As an L-series lens, it has upgraded optics and sturdier construction. The large f/2.8 aperture allows tons of light into the lens, making it a great choice for low-light shooting. And with a focal range of 28-70mm, it's an incredibly versatile lens that can be used for all manner of photography pursuits. You can even find this lens at discounted prices. Check inventory of pre-owned models here.
Beyond that, things get a little murky.
Some rumors point to an all-new carbon fiber body that will be lighter and more durable while retaining a similar form factor to the Mark IV.
It's also expected that Canon will update its LCD offering, to something in the range of a 3.2-inch articulating touchscreen not unlike the one found on the Nikon D850.
I think it's also safe to say that the Mark V will exceed the 50-megapixel mark, given that the 5DS and 5DS R have already done that.
That will be an interesting addition to the 5D Mark V, placing it above the Nikon D850 in terms of megapixels.
Also of interest is the potential for the camera to feature in-camera image stabilization, which would be nice for all those non-IS lenses you might have.
Editor's Tip: If you need an image stabilized lens, you can trade in your old one and put the money you get from that towards a new-to-you used lens. The Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM is a great telephoto lens for sports and wildlife photographers that want a lens that's stabilized, has a large aperture, and offers a wide zoom range. You can check out the prices on pre-owned 70-200mm f/2.8 lenses as well as other Canon lenses by visiting MPB.
There aren't many other rumors yet about the Canon 5D Mark V, but the hot stove is sure to heat up the older that the Mark IV gets - and the more accolades that the Nikon D850 gets as well.
The 5D Mark IV is barely more than a year old, and considering that it debuted more than four years after the 5D Mark III, Canon fans may have a long wait in store for the 5D Mark V to arrive.
In the meantime, perhaps the best way to judge what the 5D Mark V might have in store for us is to examine more closely what the 5D Mark IV offers.
You can get a quick look at some of the top specs of the Mark IV in the video above by MPB.
Nikon D850 vs Canon 5D Mark V Head to Head
I know it's just speculation, but it's still fun to see how these two cameras *might* stack up once the 5D Mark V is released.
As you can see, if Canon puts out anything near to what's being rumored, it looks like these cameras will go toe-to-toe.
As previous versions of these cameras - the D810 and the 5D Mark III, for example - have shown, Nikon and Canon will surely continue to battle it out for supremacy in the high-end DSLR market.
But instead of supremacy, it seems to me that we're seeing them far more even-keeled and putting out cameras that are much more alike than they are different.
I suppose only time will tell if the D850 and Mark V are as closely aligned as I think they'll be!
We Recommend
The Ultimate Full Frame Showdown: Nikon D810 vs Canon 5D Mark IV vs Sony A7R II
Not everyone is looking for a high-end, fully-featured full frame camera.
But for those of you that want the best full frame on the market today, I'm guessing that your short list likely includes the Nikon D810, the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV, and the Sony A7R II.
The trouble, of course, is that each of these cameras is excellent in their own right with features that will make any photographer drool.
That makes the decision between the three a little more difficult.
To help you in your quest for a new full frame camera, we've put together this side-by-side comparison. In it, you'll find a number of performance factors, from sensor size to image quality to dynamic range, all with each camera's capabilities there in black and white.
Without further ado, let's get to it!
Table of Contents:
- General Specifications: Nikon D810
- General Specifications: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
- General Specifications: Sony Alpha A7R II
- Side-By-Side Comparisons: Image Quality
- Side-By-Side Comparisons: Autofocus
- Side-By-Side Comparisons: Dynamic Range
- Side-By-Side Comparisons: Low-Light Shooting
- The Final Verdict
General Specifications
To begin, let's outline some of the general specifications of each camera. Having a quick look at what these cameras have to offer is helpful as we break down their performance later on.
NIKON D810
- Megapixels: 36.2
- Sensor Size: Full Frame
- Video Quality: 1080p at 60fps
- Shutter Speed Range: 30 sec-1/8000th sec
- ISO: 64-12800
- Burst Speed: 5fps
- Autofocus Points: 51
- DxO Mark Test Score: 97
- Price: $2,796.95 (new), $2,045 (used)
CANON EOS 5D MARK IV
- Megapixels: 30
- Sensor Size: Full Frame
- Video Quality: 4K
- Shutter Speed Range: 30 sec-1/8000th sec
- ISO: 64-102400
- Burst Speed: 7fps
- Autofocus Points: 61 (dual pixel)
- DxO Mark Test Score: 91
- Price: $3,499.00 (new), $3,149 (used)
Sony Alpha A7R II
- Megapixels: 42.2
- Sensor Size: Full Frame
- Video Quality: 4K at 30fps
- Shutter Speed Range: 30 sec-1/8000th sec
- ISO: 50-102500
- Burst Speed: 5fps
- Autofocus Points: 399
- DxO Mark Test Score: 98
- Price: $3,075.97 (new), $2,299 (used)
Side-By-Side Comparisons
Now that we have a better understanding of the essential features of these cameras, it's time to take a look at their performance on a number of key measures in a side-by-side-by-side real-world test.
To undertake this test, Jay P. Morgan of The Slanted Lens, along with Kenneth Merrill, took to the streets to put these Nikon, Canon, and Sony cameras through the paces.
Using tripod-mounted cameras with native lenses and the exact same camera settings for each test, Jay P. and Kenneth were able to get excellent head-to-head results on which we can compare these cameras. Check out their full real-world test in the video above. Their findings are summarized below.
Image Quality
Shooting at f/2.8, 1/125th seconds, and ISO 100, the Nikon, Canon, and Sony cameras were tasked with taking a portrait of a model under blue skies. Because of the blue-toned lighting, each camera's white balance was set to 6000K.
Despite using the same camera settings, there was surprising variability in the image quality produced by these three cameras.
On the low end, the Canon had visible stepping and pixelation when its images were viewed at 1000% zoom. Of course, some pixelation is expected when zoomed in so far, but the Nikon and Sony images still had noticeable better quality at the same level of zoom.
In fact, there is really no comparison here - the 5D Mark IV lagged far behind the D810 and the A7R II, both of which produced clean, sharp images even when viewed at 1000% zoom. And even between the Nikon and the Sony, there were still noticeable differences in the color rendition and contrast, with the Nikon producing the best results of the bunch.
The Winner: Nikon D810
Autofocus
For the autofocus test, each camera was again mounted to a tripod.
The focus was pulled to a close distance of 1.5 feet, and then a shot was taken of the model who was positioned further away, forcing each camera to reacquire focus for each of a series of five shots. This process was repeated again, but this time with the focus far away that had to be reacquired on a model that was positioned closer.
This test revealed that the Canon was a bit sluggish to reacquire focus, but it was still able to do so with extremely consistent results from one shot to the next.
The much bigger issue was with the Sony, however.
Because the A7R II's sensor controls autofocus, you can't simply pull the lens out of focus by turning its focus ring. Instead, you have to navigate a maze of menus to try to work around this issue because the camera simply does not want to be out of focus. Because of this, the Sony wasn't able to complete this part of the test.
That leaves the D810, which produced sharp, clear, and accurate results with each frame. This was especially true when the focus was at a greater distance and then pulled to a close subject, though the Nikon did completely miss the focus on one out of the five shots.
In fact, when comparing the Canon and Nikon results for this measure, it's almost startling how much better the D810 did than the 5D Mark IV - and that's saying something given that the Canon's results weren't bad at all.
The Winner: Nikon D810 (still subject autofocus)
Now, there's a different story when these cameras track a moving subject with their autofocus systems.
The Canon and Nikon cameras did a respectable job of tracking the portrait subject as she moved ever closer to the camera. The results were consistent and clear with each frame.
However, with its 399 autofocus points with face detection, which during testing was found to be not just a great feature, but an excellent feature, the Sony really outperformed
Face detection gives you the ability to change the composition of the shot as the subject is moving, but the Sony will maintain focus on the subject's face seamlessly. That means you can frame the subject on the left side of the shot, then in the middle, then on the right, and back again, all without the camera ever losing focus.
In this battle of maintaining focus on a moving subject, each camera did quite well. That said, it's tough to beat the next-level capabilities of the A7R II.
The Winner: Sony A7R II (moving subject autofocus)
Dynamic Range
To test out these rigs for dynamic range, a model was placed in direct sunlight with shadows and a white wall occupying territory in the background, such that there was a very wide dynamic range in the shot.
The results reveal that the Canon did a great job handling this wide dynamic range, with an image that has a lot of detail, great contrast, and no blown out highlights or lost shadows.
The Nikon, on the other hand, produced an image that was much more contrasty, with the model's face very bright and the white wall in the background very nearly lost.
As for the Sony, the image had excellent open shadows and great detail in the highlights. And when compared to the test shots from the Canon and Nikon, it's evident that the Sony has the best dynamic range of the bunch by probably one-half to two-thirds of a stop.
The Winner: Sony A7R II
Low-Light Shooting
Taking the test indoors allowed for a head-to-head matchup of these three cameras in terms of low-light shooting performance.
Shooting at f/1.8 with the white balance set to 4400K, what was discovered is that the Canon, Nikon, and Sony all performed very well through ISO 1600 and even to ISO 3200.
But, once the ISO was pushed beyond that, there became clear differences between the three.
The first to show degraded image quality was the Canon. However, though it showed more noise sooner, the noise it created was at least visually pleasing - its images had a distinct film look to them.
The Sony started to show unappealing noise at around ISO 3200, which the testers described as "blocky" in the midtones and highlights - so not the nice, small, grain-like noise of the Canon.
However, the Sony maintained a clean appearance in the area of the model's face clear through to ISO 6400, outperforming the Canon and Nikon in that regard. But, once the ISO reached 25600, the Sony image had clear banding across the model's face, which is something the Canon and Nikon avoided.
The Nikon showed much more contrast in the shot than did the Canon (or the Sony, for that matter), but produced less desirable noise once the ISO was pushed beyond 3200 than was found on either the Canon or the Sony.
The Winner: It's a draw. While the Canon had the nicest looking noise, the Sony had the best performance at ISO 3200 and ISO 6400. The Nikon, in turn, had images with the best contrast through the range up to about ISO 6400.
The Final Verdict
When it comes down to it, each of these cameras would be a great choice for professional and enthusiast photographers.
However, based purely on the measures of image quality, autofocus performance, dynamic range, and low-light shooting, the Nikon D810 and the Sony A7R II outperformed the Canon 5D Mark IV.
That being said, the differences were, by and large, fairly minimal, and for everyday shooting, aren't going to make a huge impact on what you can and cannot do with the camera.
Likely what the decision between these three very fine cameras will come down to is what ecosystem you're already shooting in and the price. Meaning, if you're a Canon shooter and you've invested in a range of Canon lenses, going with the 5D Mark IV probably makes more sense. Likewise, if you're invested as a Nikon or Sony shooter, sticking with your current manufacturer will be easier on your budget.
Whatever your choice, the Canon 5D Mark IV, the Nikon D810, and the Sony A7R II are solid, all-around choices.
We Recommend
These Cameras Are Great Bargains for 2021
Photo by ???? ??? on Unsplash
If one word sums up 2021, it would have to be “bargain.” I’m definitely not making the same amount of money as I did last year, and chances are, you probably aren’t either.
Wherever possible, I’m always looking for a bargain. If that means searching, “cameras on sale,” at least once a day then so be it.
But, bargains are few and far between when it comes to bargain cameras. Photography equipment is, generally, very expensive. Or, conversely, you may end up getting ripped off when trying to purchase cheap cameras.
If you find yourself looking for a camera this year, then don’t get ripped off. This list includes a range of bargain cameras at different price points, but we made sure that each one of the cameras on this list are good cameras for 2021, i.e., they’re going to have all of the specs you’ll need this year.
Nikon D3500
The Nikon D3500 dropped in September of 2018 as a replacement for the Nikon D3400. Fans of this line weren’t entirely thrilled by the Nikon D3500 because Nikon didn’t update as many specs as some people expected them to. But, I think Nikon did a great job of updating the important specs while still keeping the camera at a good price point for amateur photographers.
For those unfamiliar with this line, the Nikon D3500 is an entry-level DSLR with an incredibly impressive battery life. But, videographers beware: it doesn’t feature 4K video.
Specs/Features
The Nikon D3500 is one of my favorite bargain cameras because its specs are solid across the board. For starters, it comes with a 24MP sensor and can shoot 11fps in burst mode.
But, it’s also light at just under 1 lb, and as I mentioned before, it has a tremendous battery life of 1,550 shots. With this type of a battery, you can go multiple days without needing to recharge, which is super beneficial for travel photographers.
Other Nikon D3500 specs include:
- 24MP sensor
- Full HD video capabilities
- 3.0” LCD with 921k-dots
- Built-in Bluetooth
- EXPEED 4 processor
- 1,550-shot battery life
- 14.6 oz
Pros/Cons
I’m going to get the biggest con of this camera out of the way. It doesn’t shoot 4K video. While an entry level camera at this price point shouldn’t be expected to shoot 4K, the lack of 4K in 2021 may still be a little off putting for people who have been in the industry for even a short while.
This camera also doesn’t have a tilting LCD or touchscreen, which is frustrating for street shooters.
But, I’d argue the pros of this camera far outweigh the cons. The biggest pro is the price, which I talk about more below. This camera features great image quality for the price. It also features a great ISO performance and is comfortable to hold.
I love bargain cameras that come with a wide variety of lenses, and this one does. The lens that comes packaged with the body, the 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G is itself a great starter lens. It lessens vibrations via its vibration reduction feature.
But, this camera is compatible with dozens of lenses. I write more extensively about your lens options for the Nikon D3500 in the full review I did of this camera a few months ago. You can read that here.
Price
While the Nikon D3500 originally cost $500, you can now find a used one (body only) on MPB for $300.
Sony a7 II
The Sony a7 II is definitely a step up as compared to the Nikon D3500. The Sony a7 II isn’t an entry-level camera, like the Nikon D3500, and it also isn’t a DSLR. It’s a full-frame mirrorless.
Specs/Features
The Sony a7 II is best known for its image stabilization, which is incredibly good considering the camera came out over five years ago. But, it also features an impressive ISO range.
Other Sony a7 II specs include:
- 24MP full frame sensor
- 5-axis sensor-based image stabilization
- 117-point AF system
- 3” tilting LCD with 1.23m-dots
- Full HD video capabilities
- Built-in Wi-Fi
- 5fps burst mode
- ISO range of 100-25,600
Pros/Cons
Again, since the Sony a7 II dropped so long ago, it doesn’t feature 4K video. Videographers looking for bargain cameras will need to read on.
The 5fps burst mode also seems wildly outdated.
But, for anyone looking to transition from a DSLR to a mirrorless, I highly recommend this camera. For starters, it feels much more like a DSLR than a mirrorless thanks to its chunky body. It also shoots great in low light scenarios.
Price
When the Sony a7 II first dropped, it cost nearly $1,500. Thankfully, the price has gone down over the years and you can now find a used Sony a7 II starting at $740 (body only).
Learn More:
Canon EOS RP
Next up on our bargain cameras list is the Canon EOS RP, which is a relatively new mirrorless camera that just so happens to be one of the most inexpensive cameras of its type to ever be released.
Specs/Features
The Canon EOS RP comes with a 26MP sensor, a native ISO range of 100-40,000, and, wait for it, 4K video!
That’s right, it’s the first camera on our bargain cameras list to feature it. It can shoot 4K video at up to 24fps.
Other Canon EOS RP specs include:
- 26MP sensor
- DIGIC 8 processor
- 3” vari-angle touchscreen with 1.04m-dots
- 5fps burst mode
- 4K video
- Built-in Wi-Fi
- Built-in Bluetooth
- 250-shot battery life
Pros/Cons
One major con of this camera is its battery life, which definitely means you will be requiring an extra battery, which means a higher startup cost and a heavier bag.
Its 4K video can be considered a pro or a con, depending upon how you look at it. While it’s a huge pro that it features 4K video, it also requires a crop in order to do so.
Price
You may be wondering why the Canon EOS RP is on this list since it is a bargain cameras list, but I found a Canon EOS RP in like new condition on MPB for just $930 (body only). If you compare this to its original $1,300 price tag, you’re saving nearly $400 and receiving the exact same quality of camera.
Panasonic G9
The Panasonic G9 will make it onto every bargain cameras list I ever create because I love it. It’s a mirrorless Micro Four Thirds camera that is phenomenal for still photographers, although I wouldn’t recommend it for its video capabilities.
Specs/Features
The Panasonic G9 features a 20MP Micro Four Thirds sensor, however it can create 80.6MP images by combining up to eight different shots for one incredibly detailed final product.
Its ISO is noble at 100-25,600, but is nothing compared to how great its 5-axis dual image stabilizer is.
Other Panasonic G9 specs include:
- 20MP Micro Four Thirds sensor
- 3” fully articulating screen with 1.04m-dots
- 5-axis image stabilization
- ISO of 100-25,600
- 60fps burst mode
- 1.45 lbs
Pros/Cons
The entirety of the Panasonic G9 spec sheet is a huge pro for me. It’s viewfinder works excellently, it shoots just about the highest image quality possible, and it is one of many great bargain cameras.
Unfortunately, it is a little large for a mirrorless, which some people don’t like. But, overall I can’t find much wrong with this camera.
Price
The Panasonic G9 is another camera that is typically priced at well over $1,000. Its list price is actually $1,500, but MPB has multiple bargain cameras. You can find the Panasonic G9 there for as low as $960 (body only) in excellent condition.
Learn More:
We Recommend
Top Compact Cameras for 2019
photo bypiola666 via iStock
While I don’t always use compact cameras, they have a way of coming in handy in the oddest ways.
I love my compact cameras for travel, especially, but also for quick product shoots. Plus, when I’m itching to get some new gear, I can buy a new point-and-shoot without breaking the bank.
Now that 2019 is coming to a close, I figured I should do a listicle on the top compact cameras of the year.
Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II
The Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II is one of the best compact cameras of 2019 because it is a point-and-shoot that comes with a 1-inch sensor, so it’s compact but powerful.
I’m also a huge fan of the antique feel of the Canon PowerShot. Plus, the Canon PowerShot is exactly what photographers talk about when they talk about fully-featured compact cameras.
Canon PowerShot specs:
- 20MP sensor
- ISO range of 125-12800
- 3” LCD screen
- 1.04M dot screen
- .45 lbs
- 3.86 x 2.28 x 1.22”
Canon PowerShot Pros:
- Compact (obviously)
- Easy to use, even for beginners
- Minimalist design everyone loves
- Touchscreen LCD
Canon PowerShot Cons:
- No 4K capabilities
- Limited zoom range
You can buy a Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II on Amazon for $400. While MPB doesn’t currently have any used Canon PowerShots in stock, the great thing about MPB is that they rotate products so frequently, they may have gotten some since the writing of this article.
Plus, even if they haven’t, you definitely want to check MPB out for their other cheap compact cameras.
Fujifilm XF10
This Fujifilm tops many “best point-and-shoot cameras” lists because it features a crazy resolute sensor for a camera of its size at 24MP.
It’s also one of the most travel-friendly Fujifilms.
But, the best feature of this camera is the fact that it features multiple Film Simulation modes, which beginner and enthusiast photographers alike love.
Fujifilm XF10 specs:
- 24.2MP APS-C CMOS sensor
- 3” 1040K dot LCD touchscreen
- 18.5mm f/2.8 fixed lens
- 9.88 oz
- Bluetooth connectivity
Fujifilm XF10 Pros:
- Touchscreen LCD
- Wi-Fi connectivity
- Gorgeously colored photos
- Incredible battery life
- Fixed lens
Fujifilm XF10 Cons:
- Slow AF system
- Fixed lens
I put “fixed lens” on both the pro and con columns because it really just depends upon what you’re looking for in a compact camera.
You can purchase the Fujifilm XF10 for $500 on Amazon.
You can also head over to MPB and search through their used Fujifilm XF10 selection to save up to $150.
Learn More:
Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VI
The Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VI is the most expensive compact camera on our list. But, it’s because this Sony is one of the top point-and-shoot cameras of the decade.
It features a 3” tilting screen with 1,228K dots, a 24fps burst mode, and 4K video capabilities.
This camera isn’t for beginners, though.
Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VI specs:
- 201.MP 1-inch sensor
- 3” tilting touchscreen
- Electronic viewfinder with a 2.36 million dot resolution
- 24fps burst mode
- 4K video capabilities
- 10.6 oz
- 310-shot battery life
- 315-point AF system
Sony Cyber-shot Pros:
- 4K video capabilities
- 3” tilting touchscreen
- 24-200mm zoom lens
Sony Cyber-shot Cons:
- More expensive than other top compact cameras
- Advanced controls make it a niche camera for more experienced photographers
You can buy the Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VI for $1,000 new, or search for a used one starting at $725 on MPB.
Learn More:
We Recommend
Top Mirrorless Cameras for 2021
1
Photo by ISO Republic on Unsplash
2021 is the year of the mirrorless. While DSLRs aren’t completely useless (yet), I definitely think the future of photography lies in mirrorless cameras.
If you’re looking for the top mirrorless cameras of 2021, look no further.
This list features all of the best selling mirrorless cameras on Amazon, which means it features a crazy wide array of different mirrorless cameras.
Editor’s note: If you want to upgrade your kit with a mirrorless camera but don’t want to pay new prices, check out the “Buy Used” links throughout this article. These links take you to MPB, one of the largest used gear sites in the world. I’ve bought, sold, and traded-in gear on MPB many times and have had an excellent experience from start to finish every time!
Panasonic Lumix G7
First up is the Panasonic Lumix G7. The Lumix G7 is the number one best mirrorless 2021 (according to Amazon sales, anyway). It is a mid-range mirrorless with the price of a best mirrorless camera for beginners.
The Lumix G7 features a 350-shot battery life, 4K video capabilities, and a fully-articulated touchscreen. With all of these modern features, you won’t need to upgrade for a good number of years.
Panasonic Lumix G7 Specs:
- 16MP sensor
- 4K video capabilities
- 3” fully-articulating touchscreen
- 2.36m-dot viewfinder equivalent
- 7fps burst mode
- .9 lbs
The Panasonic Lumix G7 is really only missing some qualities you would want if you’re going to be shooting in inclimate weather. For instance, it isn’t weather-sealed and there is no in-camera image stabilization.
Canon EOS M50
My favorite qualities about the Canon EOS M50 is that it’s comfortable to hold all day, it shoots 4K video and, for the price, it takes excellent photos.
However, it doesn’t feature a wide ISO range for shooting in poor lighting conditions. You’ll also definitely want to buy an extra battery for this camera while you’re looking through the top mirrorless cameras of 2021, since it will die on you if you’ve got a long day of shooting planned.
Canon EOS M50 Specs:
- 24.1MP sensor
- ISO range of 100-25,600
- 10fps burst mode
- 3” vari-angle touchscreen
- 4K video capabilities
- Built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth
- 0.39-inch OLED electronic viewfinder
Sony Alpha a6100
The Sony Alpha a6100 has long been a popular camera for those transitioning to a mirrorless. In fact, I would rate it as the best mirrorless camera for beginners because of how simple it is to use.
It’s no surprise, then, that it made Amazon’s top mirrorless cameras of 2021 list.
The Sony Alpha a6100 is known for its incredible autofocus system, given its price. It also shoots 4K video and features good low light performance and a selfie screen.
Other sony Alpha a6100 Specs:
- 24.2MP sensor
- 425 AF points
- ISO range of 100-32,000
- 4K video capabilities
- 3” tilting touchscreen
- 11 fps burst mode
- Built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth
- 1 lb
Sony Alpha a6000
I’m sort of shocked that the Sony Alpha a6000 made the top mirrorless cameras of 2021 list, if only because it came out 6 years ago in 2014. However, it clearly has remained a cult classic.
The Sony Alpha a6100, discussed above, actually served to replace the Sony Alpha a6000, although clearly this hasn’t worked out to Sony’s advantage because people still adore the original.
The Sony Alpha a6000 remains one of the best selling mirrorless cameras because, as Jason Morris points out above, it’s really popular amongst vloggers.
Sony Alpha a6000 Specs:
- 24.3MP sensor
- 179-point AF system
- 3” tilting LCD screen
- 11fps burst mode
- Full HD video capabilities
- Built-in Wi-Fi
- Built-in flash
Editor’s Tip: Join MPB for its #AskMPBAnything content series if you have any questions about photography or videography gear. The MPB will answer as many questions as they can! The goal is to provide photographers and videographers with as many answers as possible while we’re all stuck at home. Follow MPB on Youtube, Facebook, and Twitter to participate!
Sony Alpha a6400
The Sony Alpha a6400 is one of the top mirrorless cameras of 2021 (alongside all of the other Sony Alphas) because it is the perfect mirrorless camera for content creators. Its 4K video is incredible and it comes with a selfie-screen for vloggers.
Again, the AF system on this camera is good (although a bit more complex than the other Alphas).
Sony Alpha a6400 Specs:
- 24.2MP sensor
- 3” tilt-angle touchscreen
- 11fps burst mode
- 4K video capabilities
- 425-point AF system
- Built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth
- 360-shot battery life
Learn More:
Sony a5100
The Sony a5100 is one of the smallest top mirrorless cameras of 2021. It’s also one of the best selling mirrorless cameras because it’s relatively cheap.
The Sony a5100 is good for anyone who is looking for a small mirrorless camera they can carry with them, and features a good dynamic range and a better autofocus system. I don’t know if you’re catching on yet, but Sony is pretty good at creating mirrorless cameras with autofocus systems that can handle pretty much anything.
Sony a5100 Specs:
- 24MP sensor
- 3” tilting selfie screen
- ISO range of 100-25,600
- 6fps burst mode
- Full HD video
- Built-in Wi-Fi
- 400-shot battery life
Sony a7 III
The Sony a7 III is basically a hodgepodge of traits from Sony’s best cameras, like the Alpha A9 and A7R III. It’s got a 693-point AF system and uncropped 4K video capabilities.
But, unlike some of the other top mirrorless cameras of 2021, the Sony a7 III feels durable. Of course, you’re going to pay for that durability so this is not the best mirrorless camera for beginners.
Sony a7 III Specs:
- 24MP sensor
- 3” tilt-angle touchscreen
- 693-point AF system
- 10fps burst mode
- 4K video capabilities
- Built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth
- 710-shot battery life
Sony Alpha a6600
The Sony Alpha line basically dominates this “top mirrorless cameras of 2021” list and for good reason. The Sony Alpha a6600 came out in 2019 and offers new features like image stabilization and a weather-resistant build.
But, it still features the same features everyone loved about the line, like 4K video, a tilting touchscreen and an intense battery life of 810 shots.
Sony Alpha a6600 Specs:
- 24.4MP sensor
- 4K video capabilities
- 3” tilting touchscreen
- 11fps burst mode
- ISO range of 100-32,000
- Weather-resistant
- 5-axis image stabilization
Panasonic Lumix G85
The Panasonic Lumix G85 is a great choice for a mid-range mirrorless because it features some high-tech capabilities, like in-body image stabilization while still being relatively inexpensive.
The Panasonic Lumix G85MK comes in at number nine on the “top mirrorless cameras of 2021” list because, while it is an improvement from the Panasonic G7, it’s also a bit more expensive.
For a thorough comparison of the two cameras, check out this video by Justin Reves.
Panasonic Lumix G85MK Specs:
- 16MP sensor
- 5-axis image stabilization
- 3” articulating touchscreen
- 4K video capabilities
- Splash and dust proof
- 6fps burst mode
- 320-shot battery life
Fujifilm X-T30
The Fujifilm X-T30 is also one of the better built top mirrorless cameras of 2021. It’s sturdy and I love shooting with it for this reason.
It’s AF system compares with Sony’s Alpha line and it shoots lovely film. It isn’t as comfortable when working with larger glass, which is my one serious concern.
Fujifilm X-T30 Specs:
- 26MP sensor
- 4K video capabilities
- 8fps burst mode
- 3” vari-angle touchscreen
- Built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth
- 380-shot battery life
Learn More:
We Recommend
What is the Best Used 4K Camera?
photo byContentWorks via iStock
4K cameras, the newest trend in the camera industry, have never been more in demand. And with all the top camera makers pumping out new 4K cameras every year, deciding which one to buy has never been more challenging.
Lucky for you, we’ve put together this list of the best used 4K cameras on the planet! First, we highlight our favorite 4K camera from the three most popular camera brands, Fujifilm, Sony, and Canon. Later, at the end of the article, there’s a list of tons more powerful 4K cameras.
One resource with loads of 4K cameras in stock is MPB. They’re a trustworthy and reliable online platform that sells used photo and video kit at unbeatable prices.
Furthermore, all of their cameras are carefully hand-inspected by experienced product specialists and backed by warranties, allowing you to make your purchases confidently and worry-free. If you like, you can trade-in your camera gear and put its value towards purchasing new-to-you gear from MPB. Of course, you can buy used gear without selling or trading anything in as well!
Without further ado, let’s jump into the meat of the article and discover which best used 4K camera is ideal for you!
Table of Contents
- The Best Fujifilm Used 4K Camera
- The Best Sony Used 4K Camera
- The Best Canon Used 4K Camera
- More of the Best Used 4K Cameras
The Best Fujifilm Used 4K Camera
The Fujifilm X-T4 is a high-end mirrorless camera that hit shelves in April 2020 and replaced the Fujifilm X-T3 as their flagship crop sensor camera. At its heart, it boasts the combination of a 26.1 megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor and a fast X-Processor 4 image processing engine.
When taking photos, it consistently delivers high-quality images with bold and beautiful colors (especially when shooting JPEGS). Moreover, it has a ridiculous maximum continuous shooting speed of 20 frames per second and a deep buffer. These make it a phenomenal choice for sports, action, and wildlife photography.
However, its video capabilities are, without a doubt, what makes this one of the best used 4K cameras. The Fujifilm X-T4 captures both UHD and DCI 4K footage at 24, 30, or 60p frame rates. On top of that, it can record silky smooth 1080p Full HD slow-motion clips at speeds of up to 240 fps.
More killer video features of this Fujifilm camera include a fully-articulating rear touchscreen LCD, dual UHS-II SD card slots, in-body image stabilization that adds 6.5 additional stops of exposure, and a battery life of 500 shots. For videographers who want a more compact crop sensor camera, this is my top recommended used 4K camera.
Here’s an in-depth look at the key features and specs of this best used 4K camera:
- Camera Type: Mirrorless
- Sensor: 26.1MP APS-C CMOS sensor
- ISO: 160 - 12,800 (expandable to 80 - 51,200)
- Lens Mount: Fujifilm X Mount
- Speed: 20.0 fps
- Autofocus: 425 phase-detection points
- Video: 4K/60p & 1080p/240p
- Size/Weight: 135 x 93 x 84 mm / 607 grams
- Battery Life: 500 shots
- Stabilization: Yes
- Touchscreen: Yes
The Best Sony Used 4K Camera
The Sony Alpha a7 III is a professional Sony mirrorless camera featuring a 24.2 megapixel full-frame CMOS sensor and an updated Bionz X image processing engine. It was released in April 2018 and is the predecessor of the Sony Alpha a7 IV.
The pair help generate stunningly sharp photos and videos alike while also making it one of the most responsive cameras on the market. Additionally, thanks to its wide dynamic range and excellent high ISO results, it’s one of the best used 4K cameras for shooting in low light.
As a video camera, it shoots uncropped 4K videos at 24 or 30 fps. During 4K/24p recording, it oversamples the footage from 6K, while at 4K/30p, it oversamples it from 5K. Both look spectacular, with the frame rate of 30p proving a natural look and 24p giving off a more cinematic feel.
A few other noteworthy features of the Sony a7 III are its best-in-class autofocus system, superb 5-Axis in-body image stabilization, and advanced audio controls. If you are looking for a hybrid mirrorless camera, it’s unquestionably, one of the best used 4K cameras available. With that said, stills-oriented photographers should also consider the Sony Alpha a7R IV, while video content creators should take a look at the Sony Alpha a7S III.
Here’s an in-depth look at the key features and specs of this best used 4K camera:
- Camera Type: Mirrorless
- Sensor: 24.2MP full-frame CMOS sensor
- ISO: 100 - 51,200 (expandable to 50 - 51,200)
- Lens Mount: Sony E Mount
- Speed: 10.0 fps
- Autofocus: 693 phase-detection & 425 contrast-detection points
- Video: 4K/30p & 1080p/120p
- Size/Weight: 127 x 96 x 74 mm / 650 grams
- Battery Life: 710 shots
- Stabilization: Yes
- Touchscreen: Yes
Learn More:
The Best Canon Used 4K Camera
The Canon EOS R5 is an advanced Canon mirrorless camera with a high-resolution 45 megapixel full-frame CMOS sensor and an updated Digic X image processing engine. It debuted in July 2020 and immediately supplanted the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV DSLR camera as Canon’s signature model.
Still images have an enormous max resolution of 8192 x 5464 pixels, making it an excellent option for professional photographers who frequently need to enlarge their photos for posters, billboards, etc. Furthermore, it boasts Canon’s classic color algorithm, leading to bright and bold colors straight out of the camera.
As great as it is for photography, its video features are what place this Canon camera into a league of its own. It is one of only a handful of mirrorless cameras with 8K video capabilities. The amount of detail retained in the 8K footage is mind-blowing, and it also records 4K movies at up to 120 fps.
More video features worth mentioning include its industry-leading in-camera stabilization that adds eight stops of exposure, lightning-fast Dual Pixel II AF that covers 100% of the image sensor, two memory card slots (one UHS-II SD & one CFexpress Type B), and a vast array of picture profile modes.
Here’s an in-depth look at the key features and specs of this best used 4K camera:
- Camera Type: Mirrorless
- Sensor: 24.2MP full-frame CMOS sensor
- ISO: 100 - 51,200 (expandable to 100 - 102,400)
- Lens Mount: Canon RF Mount
- Speed: 20.0 fps
- Autofocus: 1053 AF areas
- Video: 8K/30p & 4K/120p
- Size/Weight: 138 x 98 x 88 mm / 738 grams
- Battery Life: 320 shots
- Stabilization: Yes
- Touchscreen: Yes
More of the Best Used 4K Cameras
While those are some of the best used 4K cameras on sale now, they are far from the only ones out there! If you want to keep browsing, check out the list below of more fantastic used 4K cameras currently in stock at MPB:
- Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH5S
- Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
- Sony Alpha a9
- Canon EOS M50
- Nikon Z7
- Fujifilm X-S10
- GoPro Hero 8 Black
Learn More:
We Recommend
What is the Best Used DSLR?
Photo by MarioGuti via iStock
Anyone searching the internet for advice about choosing the best used DSLR camera, with best emphasized, probably isn’t a first-time user of digital cameras and likely wouldn’t be interested in entry-level photography gear.
Since you found Photography Talk, I’m assuming you’re an avid photographer, perhaps even a professional or involved as a side hustle, and that you’re looking for ideas and advice on how to maximize your spending power to get the camera you really want and need. Used cameras represent one of the most cost-effective methods for upgrading your photography gear, whether pre-owned cameras or used lenses.
The place I go first when thinking about new-to-me equipment is theonline platform MPB. Not only does MPB have an amazing selection ofused DSLR cameras and other gear, but they also warranty almost everything they sell. Plus, MPB lists each camera with an accurate description of the condition since they thoroughly inspect every item they offer for sale. What’s not to like?!
Table of Contents:
- Desired Features of Best Used DSLR Cameras
- Best Used DSLR - Good: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
- Best Used DSLR - Better: Sony Alpha SLT-A99 II
- Best Used DSLR - Best: Nikon D5 (XQD)
- Final Thoughts
Desired Features of Best Used DSLR Cameras
Photo by Jerry Ballard via iStock
What type of features might we be looking for when contemplating the best used DSLR cameras? As an advanced rather than beginner-level photographer, you have no doubt noticed the limitations of entry-level gear. It’s never about lens or sensor quality, since those are outstanding in virtually all modern cameras.
What more advanced photographers like yourself probably want are features and durability. The durability and ruggedness of cameras designated as prosumer or full-fledged professional are on a higher order than the cameras meant for casual use or for an entry-level price point. Added protection such as weather and dust sealing, more metal construction, and stronger motors and gears make these levels of cameras more capable as extended use tools.
Added features can make a huge difference when comparing the best used DSLR cameras. Things like the following can help ease your workflow and make certain techniques possible:
- larger image buffer
- using dual cards for memory
- exposure bracketing
- advanced flash controls
- faster shutter speeds
- rapid sequencing
- more AF points
- better white balance and color management
- easy-to-access manual settings
To keep this list of best used DSLR cameras short, I’m taking the approach of Good, Better, and Best. I’m also listing only Full Frame format DSLRs, though there are also excellent APS-C cameras we could use these ideas presented to compare models. If you want to change formats or adopt mirrorless technology, please look over our many articles discussing those topics.
Learn More:
Best Used DSLR - Good: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
TheCanon EOS 5D Mark IV is a fully professional-level camera that takes the Good slot in our best used DSLR cameras list. The Full Frame sensor is 30.4MP and has an extended ISO range of 50 - 102,400. There are heavier duty and higher pixel count cameras in Canon’s DSLR lineup, but this is a fantastic camera for use either as a primary camera or second body to one of those higher-cost DSLRs.
Some of the advanced features are the 61 AF points, continuous servo AF in Live mode for AF during video, and 7fps still image sequencing. This camera also has Wi-Fi and NFC connectivity (eases tethering workflow), an interval timer for the shutter, and two card slots (CF and SD). Add seven frame bracketing and a weather-sealed magnesium alloy body to the mix as well.
A couple of other fantastic features that make this an easy addition to the best used DSLR list are 4K video and Dual Pixel Raw.
The 4K video is in a cropped mode, so you’ll need to keep that in mind when planning videography. Dual Pixel Raw utilizes Canon’s own post-processing software for image microadjustment, bokeh shift, and ghosting reduction.
Canon EF lenses from the mid-1980s up to current will fit and function well on this camera, meaning it will fit nicely into your existing Canon EOS system. Lenses designed for APS-C DSLRs also work, putting the camera into a cropped format recording mode.
Best Used DSLR - Better: Sony Alpha SLT-A99 II
Sony DSLR users may feel a bit left out because of all of the attention given to Sony’s amazing series of Full Frame mirrorless cameras. Photographers with an investment in DSLR lenses can either use them on mirrorless cameras with an adapter or find one of Sony’s best used DSLRs, the Sony Alpha SLT-A99 II.
Sony Alpha SLT-A99 II is an interesting type of DSLR in that the mirror doesn’t actually move. It is a special translucent construction that passes through some light to the sensor and reflects some to the internal sensors. This involves a ½ f-stop reduction in effective lens speed, so that needs to be considered.
A translucent, non-moving mirror allows for some rapid sequencing and also takes advantage of the imaging sensor for advanced AF accuracy and speed. It uses a 42.4MP sensor with ISO range of 50 - 102,400. Though it has a mirror, it is a hybrid camera design. There is no prism, it uses an electronic eye-level viewfinder, and it has an articulated rear view screen.
A-mount lenses, going all the way back to Minolta Maxxum lenses from the 1980s, can mount and work on this camera, making it a great choice as the next DSLR camera for Sony Full Frame DSLR users. The large MP count Full Frame sensor captures huge RAW still files and also allows for 4K video with no crop or as an oversampled (5K down to 4K) Super 35 format.
Best Used DSLR - Best: Nikon D5 (XQD)
I actually had to do a virtual coin flip to decide what camera would go into the Best slot in this best used DSLR cameras list. In other words, there are a lot of cameras available that could be your personal best used DSLR choice.
The Nikon D5 is an amazingly tough and fully capable professional imaging device for pros and advanced enthusiasts using Nikon F-mount lenses. Almost any lens you can find that is F-mount will fit and function as they should on this camera, even many of the lenses made in 1959 for the original Nikon F pro series 35mm film camera if updated to the 1977 standard AI controls.
Inside is a 20.8MP Full Frame sensor with an ISO range of 100 - 102,400 that can be expanded all the way up to 3,276,800 with the Hi+5 setting. It can cycle at 12 fps or 14 fps with the mirror up for super-rapid image capture sequencing. It also records 4K video with no cropping.
Most of the Nikon D5 cameras use the XQD card system though some were made with CF cards. Either way, you get two card slots. The XQD cameras can also accept CFE cards. The XQD and CFE cards add to the overall professional status of this camera since these cards are virtually indestructible, within reason, of course.
This is a full-fledged professional system camera, able to withstand hard use and with virtually every feature you could think of that a working pro might need or desire. It was supplanted by the Nikon D6 and the mirrorless Nikon Z9, but is a camera that will probably last until you simply don't want it anymore.
Final Thoughts
Photo by Antonio_Diaz via iStock
What camera brand you already have will be a huge influence on what camera you see as the best used DSLR for your needs, but this small list gives you an idea of the range of fine used cameras out there.
Whatever you decide,MPB likely has it as pre-owned stock. Give their site a look and shop with confidence of getting the best used DSLR to use for your fine imaging. This includes many other DSLRs you might deem as being a better fit for your needs.
Of course, MPB also has a large selection of pre-owned lenses for each of the camera systems featured in this article. And since MPB prices their gear so well, there’s a good chance you can get the camera you want plus a lens or two without breaking the bank!
Learn More:
- 4 Reasons Why You Need a Flash Gun
- Nikon D6 Review
We Recommend
Which Olympus Camera System is Right for You?
When choosing a camera system, plenty of options are available on the market, each with its unique features and benefits. That said, Olympus is one of the premiere camera makers on the planet. And if you are considering investing in an Olympus camera system, you’ve come to the right place!
In this Olympus camera guide, we break down three of the hottest-selling Olympus cameras currently on the market. With options for beginners, pros, and everyone in between, we promise there’s a camera for you here. Furthermore, thanks to innovative online platforms like MPB, buying a used Olympus digital camera has never been cheaper and easier than it is today.
MPB is a trustworthy and reliable online platform selling used photo and video equipment at unbeatable prices. All their mirrorless cameras are rigorously hand-inspected by knowledgeable product specialists and backed by six-month warranties, allowing you to make your purchases confidently and worry-free.
We have bought, sold, and traded in loads of camera gear using MPB’s online platform and have always been thrilled with the results. That’s why we proudly want to recommend them to you here today. Now, without further ado, it’s time to dive in and discover which of these amazing Olympus cameras is best for you and your needs!
Table of Contents
- The Best Beginner Olympus Camera
- The Best Mid-Range Olympus Camera
- The Best Professional Olympus Camera
- Final Thoughts on Olympus Cameras
The Best Beginner Olympus Camera
The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is an entry-level mirrorless camera that debuted in 2020. It features a 20.3-megapixel sensor and an advanced TruePic VIII image processing engine. The sensor and processor combine to help make the E-M10 IV one of the fastest beginner-friendly cameras ever.
Two areas where its speed really stands out are autofocus (AF) and burst shooting. The AF has solid continuous tracking and a face/eye detection mode. And with a max continuous shooting speed of 15 frames per second (fps), it can easily capture fast-moving subjects.
Additionally, the Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV has 4K video capabilities, 5-axis in-body image stabilization, and an ultra-portable body. Its compact and lightweight size make it a great choice for travel and children.
Here’s an in-depth look at the key features and specs of this Olympus camera:
- Camera Type: Mirrorless
- Sensor: 20.3MP Four Thirds CMOS Sensor
- ISO: 200 - 25,600 (expandable to 100 - 25,600)
- Lens Mount: Micro Four Thirds
- Speed: 15.0 fps
- Autofocus: 121 focus points
- Video: 4K/30p & 1080p/60p
- Size/Weight: 122 x 84 x 49 mm / 383 grams
- Battery Life: 360 shots
- Stabilization: Yes
- Touchscreen: Yes
Check out the video above by Red35 to learn more about the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV and why it’s one of the best budget mirrorless cameras on sale today.
The Best Mid-Range Olympus Camera
For hybrid shooters with a bit more experience, the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III is a fantastic mirrorless camera. It was released in 2019 and replaced the Mark II as the company’s go-to camera for enthusiasts, YouTubers, and vloggers.
Photo features include a high-resolution 20.4-megapixel sensor, 30 fps continuous shooting, and a 50MP high-res mode. The sensor delivers JPEG and RAW files with excellent image quality and sharpness. The 30 fps shooting blows similarly priced cameras like the Sony Alpha a6100 out of the water. And the high-res photo mode is great for landscape photography.
Video content creators and influences love the camera’s 4K video quality, IBIS, slow-motion video, and fully-articulated rear display. Both DCI and UHD 4K resolutions are present on the Olympus OM-D E-M5 III. The IBIS reduces camera shake and improves the quality of handheld video. And the rear display makes it easy to frame images when shooting selfie footage.
Here’s an in-depth look at the key features and specs of this Olympus camera:
- Camera Type: Mirrorless
- Sensor: 20.4MP Four Thirds CMOS Sensor
- ISO: 200 - 25,600 (expandable to 64 - 25,600)
- Lens Mount: Micro Four Thirds
- Speed: 30.0 fps
- Autofocus: 121 focus points
- Video: 4K/30p & 1080p/120p
- Size/Weight: 125 x 85 x 50 mm / 414 grams
- Battery Life: 310 shots
- Stabilization: Yes
- Touchscreen: Yes
Check out the video above by Peter Forsgård to learn more about the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III and why it’s still worth buying today.
Learn More:
The Best Professional Olympus Camera
Lastly, the best camera for professional photographers is the Olympus OM-D E-M1X. It came out in 2019 and is Olympus’s flagship camera for sports, action, and wildlife photographers. Its signature spec is its out-of-this-world continuous shooting speeds, which top out at a ridiculous 60 fps.
On top of that, it boasts lightning-fast autofocus, processing, and readout speeds. But where does all that speed come from? Well, that would be the dual TruePic VIII image processors. The Olympus OM-D E-M1X is the only Olympus mirrorless camera to utilize two all-new processors, and the results are amazing.
Other notable features include its best-in-class IBIS, built-in ND filters, and two battery slots. The stabilization adds up to 7.5 stops of exposure. The ND filters improve image quality and give you more control when shooting outdoors. And the dual batteries provide the camera with a battery life rated at 870 shots.
Here’s an in-depth look at the key features and specs of this Olympus camera:
- Camera Type: Mirrorless
- Sensor: 20.4MP Four Thirds CMOS Sensor
- ISO: 200 - 25,600 (expandable to 64 - 25,600)
- Lens Mount: Micro Four Thirds
- Speed: 60.0 fps
- Autofocus: 121 focus points
- Video: 4K/30p & 1080p/60p
- Size/Weight: 144 x 147 x 75 mm / 997 grams
- Battery Life: 870 shots
- Stabilization: Yes
- Touchscreen: Yes
Check out the video above by Qippy’s Channel to learn more about the Olympus OM-D E-M1X and why it still provides tons of value in 2023.
Final Thoughts on Olympus Cameras
Photo by AlenaPaulus via iStock
As you can see, there are some spectacular Olympus camera systems out there. Their current camera lineup stacks up against all the major brands and is full of everything from budget-friendly point-and-shoot cameras to high-powered mirrorless cameras.
Thanks for stopping by, and we hope this Olympus camera review has helped you decide which Olympus camera system is right for you. Before you go, check out the list of our favorite Micro Four Thirds lenses for photo and video to use with Olympus cameras. All of them are in stock and available now only at MPB!
- Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II
- Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 45mm f/1.2 PRO
- Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm f/2.8 PRO
- Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100mm f/4 IS PRO
- Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm f/4 IS PRO
Learn More:
- Which Used Olympus Camera Lenses Should You Buy?
- 4 Things to Look for When Buying a Used Camera Lens
We Recommend
Which Used Sony Mirrorless Camera is Right for You?
photo bywelcomeinside via iStock
If you are on the hunt for a Sony mirrorless camera but have no idea where to start looking, you came to the right place! With so many fantastic options in their camera lineup, how on earth are you supposed to find the best one for you? That’s where we come in!
In this article, we break down, in detail, three of the most popular Sony mirrorless cameras available today. Furthermore, with options for every budget and skill level, the ideal camera for you is sure to be below!
One place with tons of used Sony cameras in stock is MPB. They’re a trustworthy and reliable online platform that sells used photo and video kit at unbeatable prices.
Furthermore, all of their cameras are carefully hand-inspected by experienced product specialists and backed by warranties, allowing you to make your purchases confidently and worry-free.
Let’s dive in and discover which used Sony mirrorless camera is perfect for you!
Table of Contents
- A Good Used Sony Mirrorless Camera
- A Better Used Sony Mirrorless Camera
- The Best Used Sony Mirrorless Camera
- Final Thoughts on Used Sony Mirrorless Cameras
A Good Used Sony Mirrorless Camera
The Sony Alpha a6000 is an entry-level Sony mirrorless camera boasting a 24.3-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor and a Bionz X image processing engine. While it was first released in April 2014, it’s an oldie but a goodie that remains an excellent choice for beginners and children. It’s the most sold mirrorless camera of all time and a testament to how great it is that Sony still sells it all these years later.
The first thing that stands out about the Sony a6000 is just how shockingly compact and light it is. Measuring 120 x 67 x 45 mm and weighing only 344 grams, this used Sony mirrorless camera is one of the most portable mirrorless cameras on the planet. When paired with the Sony 16-50mm f/3.5 -5.6 OSS kit lens, it can even fit in your pocket!
Image quality is superb, and it shoots both RAW and JPEG images. One common complaint about Sony mirrorless cameras, in general, is that the colors tend to look flat. However, an easy solution is to shoot JPEGs with the “vivid” color profile turned on. This makes colors pop straight out of the camera and eliminates the need to edit your photos.
More awesome features of the Sony a6000 include 1080p Full HD video, a fast and responsive autofocus system, 11 frames per second burst shooting, and built-in wifi to transfer images to your mobile phone quickly. All in all, if you are on a budget, this is the used Sony mirrorless camera for you!
Here’s an in-depth look at the key features and specs of this used Sony mirrorless camera:
- Camera Type: Mirrorless
- Sensor: 24.3MP APS-C CMOS sensor
- ISO: 100 - 25,600 (expandable to 100 - 51,200)
- Lens Mount: Sony E Mount
- Speed: 11.0 fps
- Autofocus: 179 phase-detection & 25 contrast-detection points
- Video: 1080p/60p & 1080p/24p
- Size/Weight: 120 x 67 x 45 mm / 344 grams
- Battery Life: 360 shots
- Stabilization: No
- Touchscreen: No
A Better Used Sony Mirrorless Camera
The Sony Alpha a7 III is a high-end hybrid mirrorless camera that first hit the shelves in April 2018. The Sony Alpha a7 IV has since replaced it, but it is still a powerful camera in its own right. Furthermore, its price has plummeted since the release of the newer model, making it an attractive option for everyone from beginners to professionals.
At its core, the Sony a7 III has a 24.2-megapixel full-frame CMOS sensor and an updated Bionz X image processing engine. The two work together seamlessly to make the camera incredibly fast and deliver stunning photos and videos.
One of its most impressive features is the industry-leading autofocus. It utilizes a hybrid AF system with 693 phase-detection points and 425 contrast-detection points, covering 93% of the sensor. Autofocus points are selected either using the touchscreen LCD or the joystick on the back of the camera. Moreover, it has face/eye-detection AF that does an excellent job locating and tracking subjects during both photo and video recording.
Speaking of video, the Sony a7 III is a powerful video camera. It shoots beautiful uncropped, oversampled 4K movies at 24 or 30 fps. Also, it can record slow-motion clips directly in the camera in 1080p/120p Full HD. Finally, the in-body image stabilization adds up to five stops of exposure and significantly reduces camera shake during handheld shooting.
Here’s an in-depth look at the key features and specs of this used Sony mirrorless camera:
- Camera Type: Mirrorless
- Sensor: 24.2MP full-frame CMOS sensor
- ISO: 100 - 51,200 (expandable to 50 - 51,200)
- Lens Mount: Sony E Mount
- Speed: 10.0 fps
- Autofocus: 693 phase-detection & 425 contrast-detection points
- Video: 4K/30p & 1080p/120p
- Size/Weight: 127 x 96 x 74 mm / 650 grams
- Battery Life: 710 shots
- Stabilization: Yes
- Touchscreen: Yes
Learn More:
The Best Used Sony Mirrorless Camera
Last but not least, we have the Sony Alpha a7R IV. It’s a professional mirrorless camera that came out in September 2019 and is the successor of the Sony Alpha a7R III. Courtesy of its high-resolution 61.2-megapixel full-frame CMOS sensor and Bionz X image processing engine, it delivers mind-blowing still images.
The R stands for “resolution,” and it is an unmatched option for landscape photographers and photographers who blow up their images to large sizes (posters, billboards, etc.). Additionally, its wide ISO range produces excellent results when shooting in low-light conditions like during sunrise and sunset.
Adventure, sports, and wildlife photographers will also be thrilled by its maximum continuous shooting speed of 10 fps and the wide buffer. However, keep in mind that autofocus accuracy does suffer slightly during burst shooting.
Other noteworthy features of the Sony a7R IV are its fully weather-sealed body, 4K video capabilities, lighting-fast autofocus, and strong battery life. Even though it offers 4K video recording, I recommend going with the Sony Alpha a7S III instead if you are a serious videographer or filmmaker.
Here’s an in-depth look at the key features and specs of this used Sony mirrorless camera:
- Camera Type: Mirrorless
- Sensor: 61.2MP APS-C CMOS sensor
- ISO: 100 - 32,000 (expandable to 50 - 102,800)
- Lens Mount: Sony E Mount
- Speed: 10.0 fps
- Autofocus: 567 phase-detection points and 425 contrast-detection points
- Video: 4K/30p & 1080p/120p
- Size/Weight: 129 x 96 x 78 mm / 665 grams
- Battery Life: 670 shots
- Stabilization: Yes
- Touchscreen: Yes
Final Thoughts on Used Sony Mirrorless Cameras
photo byNicoElNino via iStock
While those are three of the best used Sony mirrorless cameras on the market, they are just the tip of the iceberg! For more options, check out the list below of more amazing used Sony cameras currently in stock at MPB: