Focal length needed to photograph Saturn rings?

2 years 4 months ago #517837 by Fishtaco
Hey guys.  What size telescope would be needed to photograph the rings of Saturn?


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

2 years 4 months ago #517859 by KCook
Depends :dry:

I can see the rings with my little 60mm refractor.  Thus, in theory, also photograph them.  But the quality of the image would hardly be worth the effort!!!

Search for amateur photos of Saturns rings.  Some of those should yield the telescope used.

Kelly Cook

Canon 50D, Olympus PL2
kellycook.zenfolio.com/

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

2 years 3 months ago #523384 by Luca
You can see it with 300mm lens with crop sensor camera.  


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

2 years 3 months ago #523453 by effron

Luca wrote: You can see it with 300mm lens with crop sensor camera.  


Misnomer...the sensor size has nothing to do with magnification, that's the lens' job.  Using a 300mm lens and all else being the same, Saturn will be the exact same size on a full frame or "crop" sensor. The edges of the latter are merely "cropped", giving one the illusion of being closer....

Why so serious?
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

2 years 3 months ago #523674 by Stic
While this is 'sorta' true, it 'sorta' isn't as well...

With my 7DII, 100-400 +2x converter, I can get more pixels on the moon than I could with 5DIII, 100-400 and 2x converter...

It fills more of the image (and, as the full image has approximately the same number of pixels in it), it effectively gets me closer...


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

2 years 3 months ago #523796 by effron

Why so serious?
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

2 years 2 months ago #524481 by Stic
I'm sorry but, my crop just gets me closer!

I know this upsets the die hard photographic nerds, but, unfortunately, it IS TRUE.

When I take a photo on my 7D2, the resulting image at any given size, shows the 'subject' larger (read closer) than it would be in an image from a full frame camera at the same size...

I couldn't give a monkey's whether this is the 'crop' camera magnifying the subject,  a result of the smaller sensor cropping the image, voodoo or satan playing with reality, THE END RESULT IS THE SAME!

Crop's get you closer (in the resulting image); who CARES how this actually happens!


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

2 years 2 months ago #524500 by effron
Its great if you believe your "crop" gets you closer. Have fun!

Why so serious?
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

2 years 2 months ago - 2 years 2 months ago #524557 by Stic
Ok, 'closer' is the wrong word...

Enlarges the subject in my image...

...how's that?

However, this IS the SAME result as if I was using a FF and closer...


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

2 years 1 month ago #530250 by garyrhook
Well, you're correct that "closer" is the wrong word.

The rendered image on the sensor is the same size, period, based on focal length. The difference is that the captured area is larger on a full frame. By definition the same size object would occupy more space on a crop frame because the captured area is smaller. It's just geometry.

If I capture an image of the moon my full frame in FX mode, and then again in DX mode, it will turn out that the dimensions of the moon will be identical in both, measured in pixels. A crop sensor buys you nothing. Fortunately, math doesn't lie.

What should matter is pixel density. More pixels in a smaller space is likely to result in finer detail.


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

2 years 1 month ago #530632 by Stic

garyrhook wrote:

What should matter is pixel density. More pixels in a smaller space is likely to result in finer detail.


I think I mentioned that earlier...


Photo Comments
The following user(s) said Thank You: garyrhook

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

802.3K

205K

1.62M

  • Facebook

    802,251 / Likes

  • Twitter

    205,000 / Followers

  • Google+

    1,620,816 / Followers

Latest Reviews

The Sony CyberShot DSC RX1R II offers a full frame imaging sensor in a tiny body, but is all the resolution of its sensor worth the terrible battery life?

Jul 12, 2019

In our Canon PowerShot G1 X III review, we examine this powerful little camera's specifications, including its build, ergonomics, and video capabilities.

Jul 08, 2019

In our Canon EOS-1D X Mark II review, learn why this camera is such a good choice for enthusiast and professional photographers looking for still photography and video capabilities.

Jul 05, 2019

I've been testing the Zeiss 85mm f/1.8 Batis for a few days now, and to say that I'm impressed thus far is the understatement of the year.

Jul 02, 2019

Latest Articles

You can call Brendan Barry obsessed with photography. He is world-renowned for creating cameras out of the craziest objects. His projects mix photography...

Jul 19, 2019

Looking for a camera monitor to assist you with your photography and videography work? Look no further than this list of ten of the best DSLR monitors you can get in 2019.

Jul 18, 2019

Whether it's warm light, cool light, warm white light, cool white light, or something in between, the color temperature of light can have a huge impact on how your images look.

Jul 17, 2019

Screenshot from YouTube video Paradise, California was wrecked by one of the largest wildfires in recent history, and with it, people's lives went up in...

Jul 17, 2019

The Sony a7R IV was just announced to much fanfare, and initial impressions are that this thing is a beast. Check out the Sony a7R IV specs, price, and more.

Jul 16, 2019

Not sure how to keep track of your gear and get it all organized? Give these tips for protecting photography gear a try!

Jul 16, 2019

Though framed prints have their advantages, for my money, canvas prints are a much better buy. Find out why in this canvas vs framed prints match-up.

Jul 16, 2019

I was skeptical about the Nikon 14--30mm f/4 S due to its f/4 aperture. But after a weekend with this lens in Death Valley, I think it's a serious lens for landscapes.

Jul 16, 2019