Dumbell Nebula with a 70-200mm and a 2x teleconverter?

3 years 8 months ago #489789 by Stanly
And I'll be shooting with an D80, so I have the 1.5x crop going on.  Can you get any detail from shooting any Nebula's?  

Nikon Z6 | Nikon FM10 | Nikon D80 | Nikon 50mm f/1.8D | Nikon 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 AF-S VR | 35-105mm f/3.5 Macro | 80-200mm f/4.5 | SB600 | Pocket Wizard II
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
3 years 8 months ago #489831 by effron
Not without a telescope and equatorial mount or the like....

Why so serious?
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
3 years 8 months ago #489878 by KCook

effron wrote: Not without a telescope and equatorial mount or the like....

Plus a very dark sky!

Kelly

Canon 50D, Olympus PL2
kellycook.zenfolio.com/

The following user(s) said Thank You: effron

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
3 years 8 months ago #489888 by Jackson Rieger
:agree:  This nebula is something like 1,350 light years away from Earth.  You'll need a good telescope to see that.  


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
3 years 8 months ago #490113 by Garbo
Wouldn't that be great if that was the case.  As mentioned, you'll need I'm guess around a 80 to 100mm refractor telescope to see something like this. 

Nikon D300: 24-70 2.8 | 70-200 2.8 VR |Sigma 150 2.8 | 50 1.4 | SB-800
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
3 years 8 months ago #490137 by Zach Mosher
I have a question, how do you attach a camera to a telescope.  When a camera is attached to the telescope, is the eye piece removed?


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
3 years 8 months ago #490148 by KCook

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
3 years 8 months ago #490192 by Street Shark
Kcook, are you into astrophotography too?


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
3 years 8 months ago #490214 by KCook

Street Shark wrote: Kcook, are you into astrophotography too?

Back at the dawn of time, yes.  Then it was my job for several years.  Then I moved on to other forms of madness such as landscape photography.

rambler

Canon 50D, Olympus PL2
kellycook.zenfolio.com/

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
3 years 8 months ago #490215 by astrodave
OK here's a couple things on the topic. You can shoot the dumbbell (M27) but you will have to track the shot. With a 200mm and a 2x you are going to be shooting at f4+ depending on which lens you have. This is not a one shot object. You will need a couple hours of exposure as a minimum at f5ish. Take 1-3 minute individual shots and combine them with a stacking program.

One way to get way more luminance data to combine with the shot is a Hydrogen Alpha filter (probably about 12nm would be perfect) that you can stick in the camera. This would be huge for excellent detail but it will need a couple hours of exposure to. 

I'll stick up some of my astro shots and if you have questions just let me know.






Photo Comments
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
3 years 8 months ago #490222 by astrodave

Stanly wrote: And I'll be shooting with an D80, so I have the 1.5x crop going on.  Can you get any detail from shooting any Nebula's?  


I'd recommend NGC 7000 North America Nebula and it would include the nearby Pelican Nebula. They are both bright enough that a 3 minute individual shot would be very pretty. I'd also skip the 2x as with a crop sensor you are almost at 300mm which is not bad. Also much more forgiving of poor tracking / bad polar alignment than 600mm would be.

The link shows what the area looks like (not my photo) 

www.petergarbett.com/DeepSky/22c2ac50.jpg


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
3 years 8 months ago #490229 by I shoot RAW

astrodave wrote: OK here's a couple things on the topic. You can shoot the dumbbell (M27) but you will have to track the shot. With a 200mm and a 2x you are going to be shooting at f4+ depending on which lens you have. This is not a one shot object. You will need a couple hours of exposure as a minimum at f5ish. Take 1-3 minute individual shots and combine them with a stacking program.

One way to get way more luminance data to combine with the shot is a Hydrogen Alpha filter (probably about 12nm would be perfect) that you can stick in the camera. This would be huge for excellent detail but it will need a couple hours of exposure to. 

I'll stick up some of my astro shots and if you have questions just let me know.






I'm so motived.  Now I thought the hydro alpha filter was for shooting into the sun?

Wasn't me :)
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
3 years 8 months ago #490274 by Tim Dordeck
You get used to shooting beautiful things close to earth that you forget there  is so much incredible beauty in the sky


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
3 years 8 months ago - 3 years 8 months ago #490373 by astrodave
No HA filters give you a look at Hydrogen Alpha emissions and really really nice B&W images.

In astrophotography (deep space) we use these as a Luminance layer to add detail.

The attachment is HA of the Rosette Nebula




Photo Comments
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
3 years 8 months ago #490376 by Conner
Hey Dave, how did you learn astrophotography? 


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,

802.3K

205K

1.62M

  • Facebook

    802,251 / Likes

  • Twitter

    205,000 / Followers

  • Google+

    1,620,816 / Followers

Latest Reviews

The Sony a7S II might be almost five years old, but as you'll see in this Sony a7S II review, it still packs a mighty punch with a small price tag.

Mar 23, 2020

In this Nikon D780 review, learn about the D780's features, specs, video capabilities, and more. Also learn how to score a discounted price on a D780 and how you can extend your gear budget!

Mar 13, 2020

In the Sony a6000 vs Sony a6100 battle, which one comes out on top? One offers a lower price tag while the other has more updated features. Find out which camera is best for you in this buyer's guide.

Mar 13, 2020

The Canon EOS RP is an entry-level camera that has some excellent features. In this Canon EOS RP review, learn all about its pros, cons, features, price, and more!

Mar 03, 2020

Latest Articles

Shutterfly is a household name for photographic prints. In this Shutterfly metal print review, find out if this popular Shutterfly product is a must or if you should skip it.

Apr 06, 2020

The mirrorless vs. DSLR debate has raged for years. So which one is best for 2020? Find out in this camera gear comparison guide.

Apr 06, 2020

To create a vlog people want to watch, you need the right vlogging accessories. But you don't have to spend a fortune on accessories for vlogging...get some budget-friendly recommendations!

Apr 06, 2020

Mpix is a popular online printer. But the question is, are Mpix products like their metal prints worth the price? Find out in this Mpix metal print review!

Apr 03, 2020

Learning how to photograph your newborn might be easier than you think. With these newborn photography tips for parents, you'll be in position to take much-improved photos of your bundle of joy.

Apr 03, 2020

This best cameras for beginners 2020 list includes the best DSLRs for beginners and the best mirrorless cameras for beginners at affordable prices.

Apr 02, 2020

real estate photography business, improve your real estate photography business, tips for improving your real estate photography business, real estate photography business tips

Apr 01, 2020

Learning how to become a professional photographer might not be as hard as you think. With these tips on becoming a freelance photographer, you'll be able to get the process started more quickly.

Apr 01, 2020