Dumbell Nebula with a 70-200mm and a 2x teleconverter?

4 years 3 months ago #489789 by Stanly
And I'll be shooting with an D80, so I have the 1.5x crop going on.  Can you get any detail from shooting any Nebula's?  

Nikon Z6 | Nikon FM10 | Nikon D80 | Nikon 50mm f/1.8D | Nikon 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 AF-S VR | 35-105mm f/3.5 Macro | 80-200mm f/4.5 | SB600 | Pocket Wizard II
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
4 years 3 months ago #489831 by effron
Not without a telescope and equatorial mount or the like....

Why so serious?
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
4 years 3 months ago #489878 by KCook

effron wrote: Not without a telescope and equatorial mount or the like....

Plus a very dark sky!

Kelly

Canon 50D, Olympus PL2
kellycook.zenfolio.com/

The following user(s) said Thank You: effron

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
4 years 3 months ago #489888 by Jackson Rieger
:agree:  This nebula is something like 1,350 light years away from Earth.  You'll need a good telescope to see that.  


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
4 years 3 months ago #490113 by Garbo
Wouldn't that be great if that was the case.  As mentioned, you'll need I'm guess around a 80 to 100mm refractor telescope to see something like this. 

Nikon D300: 24-70 2.8 | 70-200 2.8 VR |Sigma 150 2.8 | 50 1.4 | SB-800
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
4 years 3 months ago #490137 by Zach Mosher
I have a question, how do you attach a camera to a telescope.  When a camera is attached to the telescope, is the eye piece removed?


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
4 years 3 months ago #490148 by KCook

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
4 years 3 months ago #490192 by Street Shark
Kcook, are you into astrophotography too?


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
4 years 3 months ago #490214 by KCook

Street Shark wrote: Kcook, are you into astrophotography too?

Back at the dawn of time, yes.  Then it was my job for several years.  Then I moved on to other forms of madness such as landscape photography.

rambler

Canon 50D, Olympus PL2
kellycook.zenfolio.com/

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
4 years 3 months ago #490215 by astrodave
OK here's a couple things on the topic. You can shoot the dumbbell (M27) but you will have to track the shot. With a 200mm and a 2x you are going to be shooting at f4+ depending on which lens you have. This is not a one shot object. You will need a couple hours of exposure as a minimum at f5ish. Take 1-3 minute individual shots and combine them with a stacking program.

One way to get way more luminance data to combine with the shot is a Hydrogen Alpha filter (probably about 12nm would be perfect) that you can stick in the camera. This would be huge for excellent detail but it will need a couple hours of exposure to. 

I'll stick up some of my astro shots and if you have questions just let me know.






Photo Comments
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
4 years 3 months ago #490222 by astrodave

Stanly wrote: And I'll be shooting with an D80, so I have the 1.5x crop going on.  Can you get any detail from shooting any Nebula's?  


I'd recommend NGC 7000 North America Nebula and it would include the nearby Pelican Nebula. They are both bright enough that a 3 minute individual shot would be very pretty. I'd also skip the 2x as with a crop sensor you are almost at 300mm which is not bad. Also much more forgiving of poor tracking / bad polar alignment than 600mm would be.

The link shows what the area looks like (not my photo) 

www.petergarbett.com/DeepSky/22c2ac50.jpg


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
4 years 3 months ago #490229 by I shoot RAW

astrodave wrote: OK here's a couple things on the topic. You can shoot the dumbbell (M27) but you will have to track the shot. With a 200mm and a 2x you are going to be shooting at f4+ depending on which lens you have. This is not a one shot object. You will need a couple hours of exposure as a minimum at f5ish. Take 1-3 minute individual shots and combine them with a stacking program.

One way to get way more luminance data to combine with the shot is a Hydrogen Alpha filter (probably about 12nm would be perfect) that you can stick in the camera. This would be huge for excellent detail but it will need a couple hours of exposure to. 

I'll stick up some of my astro shots and if you have questions just let me know.






I'm so motived.  Now I thought the hydro alpha filter was for shooting into the sun?

Wasn't me :)
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
4 years 3 months ago #490274 by Tim Dordeck
You get used to shooting beautiful things close to earth that you forget there  is so much incredible beauty in the sky


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
4 years 3 months ago - 4 years 3 months ago #490373 by astrodave
No HA filters give you a look at Hydrogen Alpha emissions and really really nice B&W images.

In astrophotography (deep space) we use these as a Luminance layer to add detail.

The attachment is HA of the Rosette Nebula




Photo Comments
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
4 years 3 months ago #490376 by Conner
Hey Dave, how did you learn astrophotography? 


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,

802.3K

205K

  • Facebook

    802,251 / Likes

  • Twitter

    205,000 / Followers

  • Google+

    1,620,816 / Followers

Latest Reviews

The Nikon D7100 is a mid-range enthusiast camera that's seven years old. But in this Nikon D7100 review, you'll learn why it's still a good option for many photographers in 2020.

Oct 28, 2020

The Canon EOS 70D is a mid-range camera that's showing its age, but it's still got specs and features that make it a solid budget-friendly choice in 2020.

Oct 22, 2020

The Olympus OM-D E-M5 III is a small and feature-rich mirrorless camera. Now that it's about a year old, is it still worth the price? Find out in this review!

Oct 20, 2020

In the Canon EOS RP vs Canon EOS R debate, the EOS R is clearly a better-equipped camera. But that doesn't mean you should buy it over the EOS RP.

Oct 14, 2020
Get 600+ Pro photo lessons for $1

Forum Top Posters

Latest Articles

If you have a family portrait session coming up, use this family portrait advice to help your clients prepare for their photo shoot.

Oct 30, 2020

What lens filter features should you prioritize? In this guide, learn all about lens filters, types of lens filters, lens filter construction, and other features you should consider.

Oct 28, 2020

The Nikon D7100 is a mid-range enthusiast camera that's seven years old. But in this Nikon D7100 review, you'll learn why it's still a good option for many photographers in 2020.

Oct 28, 2020

In this videography tutorial, learn four essential tips that will help you make more professional-looking videos.

Oct 28, 2020

What video light features should you look for? With these video lighting tips, get the inside scoop on how to shop for videography gear.

Oct 27, 2020

There are many metal print benefits that make them a great choice for any type of image. In this buyer's guide, learn just a few primary benefits of metal prints.

Oct 27, 2020

Prepare your photography business for the slow season now by using this photography business advice to streamline your business and make plans to generate extra income.

Oct 26, 2020

A filter kit is a significant investment. However, there are also many pros of filter kits that make them a smart choice, even for beginner photographers.

Oct 26, 2020