Canon 70-200mm 2.8 non IS or Canon 70-200mm 2.8 IS ??

12 years 11 months ago #86753 by DavidandJess
Ok I have been struggling with this for a while. I have the non IS Canon 70-200mm 2.8 lens and have been thinking about upgrading to the IS. Is it really worth the extra $600??

Is there really a difference in the image quality between the two?


,
12 years 11 months ago #86805 by MLKstudios
I have the Nikon (VR) version and can easily handhold 1/10 zoomed in all the way. But, any type of image stabilization can only stop lens shake, not motion in the subject. For sports, 1/10th of second is going to give you a blurry subject.

So, it depends what your subject is, if it will be worth the extra $600 or not.

HTH,

Matthew

Matthew L Kees
MLK Studios Photography School
www.MLKstudios.com
[email protected]
"Every artist, was once an amateur"

,
12 years 11 months ago #87081 by bhowdy
It really depends on what you like to photograph in my humble opinion. Personally it was worth the extra money for me.

Bob Howdeshell

"If I could tell the story in words, I wouldn't need to lug around a camera" ~ Lewis Hine

,
12 years 10 months ago #96251 by dilbarmano
Hi

Yeah i too suggest the same... I own 70-200mm F2.8L IS II USM and the IS is worth.. but i am just an amatuer and not into serious photography.. My hands are not sturdy so i need IS and i went for it... But in your case , it depends on what kind of sports photography you are actually covering...

Cheers
Mano

Cheers
Mano

,
12 years 10 months ago #100467 by nicoledallal
I have this IS lens, it is positively sweet, however one thing to remember is it is FREAKIN HEAVY! I find that if I'm not using a tripod I wont use it, it's just a lot to carry. If ypu're strong and have the stamina, you can't beat the image quality.
Nicole

nicole =^..^=
,
12 years 10 months ago #110278 by jmk-nbsc
It's true that the IS lens is heavy, but if you are going to use a tripod all or much of the time, then you are really negating the need for the IS to a large degree.

If that's the case, then you can save some weight & money!

jim
jmk-nbsc


Photo Comments
The following user(s) said Thank You: ScottyQ
,
12 years 9 months ago #123701 by Stealthy Ninja
I use to own the Canon 70-200 2.8L IS II.

It's an amazingly sharp lens (prime levels of sharpness) and the IS is very effective.

Now I own the Nikon 70-200 2.8 VR II, it's just as good as the Canon version.

So yeh, it's worth it IMHO.
,
12 years 8 months ago - 12 years 8 months ago #134845 by ScottyQ
I'm in the same dilema!
Do I go IS or save the dollars.

Of the many reviews I've read about both lenses, the first version is an awesome lens and has faithfully served many photogs for many years.

If i'm following / panning a subject like a bird or a racecar, does the IS play a large roll in stabilisation.
If mounted to a tripod ( like my 500kg Manfrotto :pinch: ) I guess the IS wouldn't be working overtime.

I can't see myself using this lens all day as a walkabout, I am strong, but a bit of a princess having to lug something that heavy around for hours on end.

If the pricing was a bit closed (either way) I'd probably go the IS II in a heartbeat!

what are your thoughts?


,
12 years 8 months ago #134854 by Stealthy Ninja

ScottyQ wrote: I'm in the same dilema!
Do I go IS or save the dollars.

Of the many reviews I've read about both lenses, the first version is an awesome lens and has faithfully served many photogs for many years.

If i'm following / panning a subject like a bird or a racecar, does the IS play a large roll in stabilisation.
If mounted to a tripod ( like my 500kg Manfrotto :pinch: ) I guess the IS wouldn't be working overtime.

I can't see myself using this lens all day as a walkabout, I am strong, but a bit of a princess having to lug something that heavy around for hours on end.

If the pricing was a bit closed (either way) I'd probably go the IS II in a heartbeat!

what are your thoughts?


To me IS is a minor factor. The Canon 70-200 2.8L IS II is an amazingly SHARP lens. That's what makes it worth it over the 2.8.

It's was SHARPER than my 200 2.8L prime lens I had at the same time. Seriously that's amazingly sharp. It's like the Canon 70-200 f/4L IS, but it's sharp all the way down to 2.8 (which the f/4 obviously can't do).

The IS is very effective, I remember I got a sharp shot at 200mm with the shutter speed being 1/8... 1/8 for goodness sake!

All of the above applies to the Nikon 70-200 2.8 VR II as well. :)
The following user(s) said Thank You: ScottyQ
,
12 years 8 months ago #134888 by ScottyQ
Thankyou for your input Adrian. Did you have it set to 1/8 or was it a OMG moment...lol

Now I've had another thought , do I really need 2.8 when f/4L will probably do the job just fine! I know the advantages of 2.8 but?

I'm thinking I might 'rent-a-lens' for the few models I have in mind, that'll give me time to play around, feel the weight, see how many times I may be at risk of being mugged! :duel:


,

817.3K

241K

  • Facebook

    817,251 / Likes

  • Twitter

    241,000 / Followers

  • Google+

    1,620,816 / Followers

Latest Reviews

The Olympus Pen E-P7 is an affordable micro four thirds mirrorless camera with 4K video capabilities, a 20.3MP sensor, and 121 focus points, making it a solid entry-level camera for beginners.

May 13, 2024

The Panasonic G9 II is a 25.2-megapixel micro four thirds camera with numerous features that make it punch out of its weight class, like 779 AF points, 5.8K video, and weather sealing.

May 10, 2024

The Fujifilm XT5 is a 40MP mirrorless camera capable of 6.2K video at 30p. With those specs, it’s an ideal choice for photographers needing a camera to pull double duty for imaging and video.

Apr 25, 2024

The Canon EOS R100 is an entry-level mirrorless camera introduced in 2023. But just because it’s an entry-level camera doesn’t mean it’s a bare-bones camera. Find out why in this review!

Apr 22, 2024
Get 600+ Pro photo lessons for $1

Latest Articles

The Olympus Pen E-P7 is an affordable micro four thirds mirrorless camera with 4K video capabilities, a 20.3MP sensor, and 121 focus points, making it a solid entry-level camera for beginners.

May 13, 2024

Starting a photography business is one thing; sustaining your business over a long period of time is another. Use the tips in this professional photography guide to build something with longevity!

May 13, 2024

The Panasonic G9 II is a 25.2-megapixel micro four thirds camera with numerous features that make it punch out of its weight class, like 779 AF points, 5.8K video, and weather sealing.

May 10, 2024

Cinematic photography is an interesting genre that combines photographic and videographic skills along with effective storytelling techniques. The result? Highly impactful images!

May 09, 2024

Newborn photography requires skill, the right gear, and a lot of patience. This beginner’s guide discusses critical topics that will help you be more prepared for before, during, and after the shoot.

May 08, 2024

To fill the frame means to expand the footprint of the subject in your shot. Get in close, zoom in, crop the image, or use other techniques to bring the subject to the forefront.

May 06, 2024

With these simple yet effective beginner photography tips, you can avoid some of the common mistakes beginners make and get improved results with your images.

May 06, 2024

Urban photography is a genre showcasing features in urban settings. You can photograph people, architecture, mass transit, and many other subjects. Learn how to do so in this guide!

Apr 30, 2024