Top Class International Firework Display

11 years 7 months ago #252461 by nedward50
:(
Unfortunately I'm not a top class international photographer.

These were "salvaged" from a poor shoot. Managed to blow highlights big time and missed the most impressive sparks waiting for timer and long exposures.

Doh! Feel free to kick em to death. Any advice,critique welcomed.

regards
Ned www.visitblackpool.com/events/blackpool-...championships-p45090



Attachments:
,
11 years 7 months ago #252470 by effron
Those are great! and I don't think the English are quirky...except Benny Hill...... :P

Why so serious?
Photo Comments
,
11 years 7 months ago #252473 by nedward50
Thanks Ernesto and Benny Hill was one of my favourite slap stickers, a national treasure really, clever humour.
Regards
Ned
,
11 years 7 months ago #252487 by Rob pix4u2
beautiful shots Ned- I love fireworks and city skylines together

Remember to engage brain before putting mouth in gear
Rob Huelsman Sr.
My Facebook www.facebook.com/ImaginACTIONPhotography

,
11 years 7 months ago #252502 by KCook
Erm, when I look closely at the beach part, these appear to be separate left and right photos, butt spliced up against each other?

cross eyed :blink:

Canon 50D, Olympus PL2
kellycook.zenfolio.com/

,
11 years 7 months ago #252510 by nedward50
:unsure:
Easily and well spotted that man.

The original compositions were worse than my editing lol. We didn't know where the fireworks would be, just the general direction.

We viewed from central pier towards the north pier. The sparks went off at the end of the pier and didn't balance with the tower from our viewpoint. Hemmed in and on a busy pier its difficult to relocate. We will next time.

So I hamfistedly compressed the length of the pier.

Here's one that hasn't been stitched.

Attachments:
,
11 years 7 months ago #252520 by sree2472
the photos look good and if you are to be believed then the editing is great

former senior writer cum features editor for Diamond World - a trading magazine for the gem and jewellery industry
,
11 years 7 months ago - 11 years 7 months ago #252543 by nedward50
:)
sree2472 thank you for taking time to view and comment.

Kelly has a very sensitive eye and keen love of photography. Many experienced people who deal with images would not be fooled either. If you increase the brightness of any image to extreme it will reveal all sorts of things but especially on this type of "dark" shot if any cut and pasting has gone on.

So far the shots I've submitted have been clumsy manipulations in as much as they don't stand up to scrutiny. Stock sites employ their own image analysts who check for quality before they accept. One of the first things they do is brighten the image. Don"t be fooled by some of the jaw dropping firework shots you see they have been chopped and changed. Not all there are some excellent real images out there.

It all goes to show that preparation is important, so instead of trying to get away with composite images, we should get as much right in camera and on site as we can. The shots i have posted are my first attempt at a large firework display of this sort. Any manipulations are part of my form of learning and practice. I don't recommend it for anyone else. Try and get a one off good shot. If not then try again.

Here's another firework shot, can you tell if this image is a composite or not? also there is a pre firework shot to illustrate the site. We didn't know where the fireworks would be. In previous years they have used the sand mid frame and sometimes the pier. I think on my next visit I'll try off the beach, provided the tides out.

I was using a Sigma 18-50mm lens which is a good range for landscaping but it was at its longest for the fireworks.

Cheers
Ned





Attachments:
,
11 years 7 months ago #252558 by KCook
Man, the gloom of night sure fools us on distance. In the original shots it looked to me like the fireworks were a great distance away (almost to the horizon). But in your nice sunset shot that pier is clearly a lot closer than that. So I'm left confused about whether the fireworks were over the pier, or much more distant? In any case, the illumination for that tower is really nice.

blinky

Canon 50D, Olympus PL2
kellycook.zenfolio.com/

,
11 years 7 months ago #252984 by nedward50
Sorry for the late reply. Blinky

Yep the distance can be misleading during dark. The fireworks were actually on the pier. I tried a few shots without the tower but the compositions were bland. So i needed a better view point and closer methinks so i would have the option of just close up fireworks or include the tower but better balanced against the action.

I got some better sunset shots earlier but learnt a bit about firework shooting and had a good time. Some of the advice i got about 30 second exposures wide open seem to be misleading, I know each shoot differs and you have to assess as is but some internet advice was f5 for 30 seconds or even bulb!

I won't give up till i can get some good shots without pi**ing about in PS. I just need more displays than most folks to practice against!!!

Cheers
Ned
,
11 years 7 months ago #253002 by KCook
It's been many years since I shot any fireworks, but 30 seconds does sound way too long. One of the fun things about fireworks is that they are bright enough for shooting with a telephoto lens, if you can find the right vantage point of course. Some very creative things have been done by moving the lens zoom or focus during a fireworks exposure. Enjoy!

Kelly

Canon 50D, Olympus PL2
kellycook.zenfolio.com/

,

Latest Landscape Photography Tips

817.3K

241K

  • Facebook

    817,251 / Likes

  • Twitter

    241,000 / Followers

  • Google+

    1,620,816 / Followers

Latest Reviews

The Fujifilm XT5 is a 40MP mirrorless camera capable of 6.2K video at 30p. With those specs, it’s an ideal choice for photographers needing a camera to pull double duty for imaging and video.

Apr 25, 2024

The Canon EOS R100 is an entry-level mirrorless camera introduced in 2023. But just because it’s an entry-level camera doesn’t mean it’s a bare-bones camera. Find out why in this review!

Apr 22, 2024

Nikon’s retro-looking Nikon Zfc is anything but retro. Under its classic body is a host of features and amenities that make it a worthwhile compact mirrorless camera for 2024.

Apr 15, 2024

The Canon EOS R50 is one of the newest R-system cameras from Canon. Is it worth your money? Find out all the details you need to know in this comprehensive review.

Apr 10, 2024

Forum Top Posters

Latest Articles

Newborn photography requires skill, the right gear, and a lot of patience. This beginner’s guide discusses critical topics that will help you be more prepared for before, during, and after the shoot.

May 08, 2024

To fill the frame means to expand the footprint of the subject in your shot. Get in close, zoom in, crop the image, or use other techniques to bring the subject to the forefront.

May 06, 2024

With these simple yet effective beginner photography tips, you can avoid some of the common mistakes beginners make and get improved results with your images.

May 06, 2024

Urban photography is a genre showcasing features in urban settings. You can photograph people, architecture, mass transit, and many other subjects. Learn how to do so in this guide!

Apr 30, 2024

The Nikon D850 might be an older DSLR, but it was ahead of its time when it debuted in 2017. That means it still has plenty of firepower to compete with today’s powerful mirrorless cameras.

Apr 30, 2024

The best beginner camera isn’t the same for everyone. That means having choice is of the utmost importance. In this guide, explore five excellent beginner camera options for 2024 and beyond.

Apr 25, 2024

Child portrait photography is a unique undertaking requiring special skills and talents to get the best results. Start mastering this photography niche with these essential tips!

Apr 25, 2024

The Fujifilm XT5 is a 40MP mirrorless camera capable of 6.2K video at 30p. With those specs, it’s an ideal choice for photographers needing a camera to pull double duty for imaging and video.

Apr 25, 2024