Photo sharpness

11 months 1 week ago #698361 by meganhaderphotography
I'm on my 2nd Nikon camera that has 24 megapixels and I shoot RAW so I can do more editing. I've got a weird question though.  I was going through some older photos trying to find different entries for some contests and I kept coming across photos that at full size, 4,000 by 6,000 pixels approximately, are not tack sharp, bordering on blurry with some.  However, at half the size or even a little smaller, they look nice and sharp.  When aiming for taking sharp photos, should I worry if they aren't tack sharp at the full size of 24 megapixels? And are professional photographers able to get their photos tack sharp at the full megapixel size? The reason I ask this is whenever you watch a pros videos on YouTube their photos always look perfect but they don't show you them at their full megapixel size so it's hard to know if they were perfect to begin with or if they became perfect after editing. Thanks for the advice!


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
11 months 1 week ago - 11 months 1 week ago #698364 by Nikon Shooter
This shot, taken this week when I was just having a break at the marsh,
was capture with a D850 + 600 mm ƒ4 combo. The resolution is 8256
x 5504 px. It is the full RAW with Auto WB and just the DRL (Dynamic
Range Levels = black and white points settings) applied.

***The two red oval are confirming that it is always the same file and
at what enlargement it is viewed.

Before crop, viewed to fit the working window of the app on my screen.



Once cropped to my intent and fit to the app's screen yields this:



Seen at 100% : 300 ppi



Seen at 200% : 150 ppi



Seen at 300%



Seen at 400% : 75 ppi. This is +/- the resolution of billboards meant to
be seen yards and yards away… ultimately, that's really what counts.


Light is free… capturing it is not!
This person is a posting maniac and deserves a #1 badge!Top Poster
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
11 months 1 week ago - 11 months 1 week ago #698374 by Piechura
Yeah, I usually find that if you've done everything right, they should be sharp fully zoomed in. There might be all sorts of reasons why not though. Slow shutter speed, unsteady hands, not using the lens' sharpest aperture (or focal length for a zoom). One time I took a picture of a building I photographed a few times before and noticed that it wasn't sharp fully zoomed in, and realised I was shooting at f22, which apparently reduces sharpness (which is presumably why landscape photographers stack their focus at something like f8 rather than going for a really narrow aperture).


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
11 months 1 week ago #698376 by Nikon Shooter

Piechura wrote: y… which apparently reduces sharpness…


Correct.

ƒ 22 will increase the DoF but the critical sharpness
will be loss through diffraction.

Light is free… capturing it is not!
This person is a posting maniac and deserves a #1 badge!Top Poster
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
11 months 1 week ago - 11 months 1 week ago #698384 by Ozzie_Traveller
G'day NS

A most impressive series of enlargements  :thumbsup:

Phil from the great land Downunder
www.flickr.com/photos/ozzie_traveller/sets/


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
11 months 1 week ago #698393 by db3348
Wow NS,  amazing images .


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
11 months 1 week ago #698402 by Nikon Shooter
Greetings down under and thank you gentlemen! :P

Light is free… capturing it is not!
This person is a posting maniac and deserves a #1 badge!Top Poster
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
11 months 1 week ago #698448 by Nikon Shooter

meganhaderphotography wrote: When aiming for taking sharp photos, should I worry if they aren't tack sharp at the full size of 24 megapixels?


Tack sharp is possible — whatever the resolution — and
should be reached.

Light is free… capturing it is not!
This person is a posting maniac and deserves a #1 badge!Top Poster
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
10 months 2 weeks ago #700688 by Esseff

Nikon Shooter wrote: This shot, taken this week when I was just having a break at the marsh,
was capture with a D850 + 600 mm ƒ4 combo. The resolution is 8256
x 5504 px. It is the full RAW with Auto WB and just the DRL (Dynamic
Range Levels = black and white points settings) applied.

***The two red oval are confirming that it is always the same file and
at what enlargement it is viewed.


Nikon Shooter, was this shot using a tripod? Maybe a silly question but I'm basically still a beginner so... curious.


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
10 months 2 weeks ago #700702 by Nikon Shooter

Esseff wrote: Nikon Shooter, was this shot using a tripod? Maybe a silly question but I'm basically still a beginner so... curious.


Ooooh yes!
A 4section CF series 5 with gimbal on levelling plate,
the darn thing is too heavy to hand shoot with it.

A student took this during a mentoring session…


Light is free… capturing it is not!
This person is a posting maniac and deserves a #1 badge!Top Poster
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
10 months 2 weeks ago #700712 by Khelm
the lens is holding the camera?  How does this not cause any issues?  The camera and battery pack aren't exactly light.  I've only used primes so I have never even thought about it/researched this before


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
10 months 2 weeks ago #700715 by Nikon Shooter
This lens IS a prime!

The pro body of magnesium alloy is well capable of supporting
its own weight but wouldn't dare suspend that lens to it.

Light is free… capturing it is not!
This person is a posting maniac and deserves a #1 badge!Top Poster
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
10 months 2 weeks ago #700730 by Khelm

Nikon Shooter wrote: This lens IS a prime!.


:blink: :blink: :blink:  Oh!  


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
10 months 2 weeks ago #700739 by Nikon Shooter
Yes, it is. The definition of a prime lens is having a fixed
focal length vs zoom lens.

Light is free… capturing it is not!
This person is a posting maniac and deserves a #1 badge!Top Poster
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
10 months 2 weeks ago #700764 by Esseff

Nikon Shooter wrote:

Esseff wrote: Nikon Shooter, was this shot using a tripod? Maybe a silly question but I'm basically still a beginner so... curious.


Ooooh yes!
A 4section CF series 5 with gimbal on levelling plate,
the darn thing is too heavy to hand shoot with it.

A student took this during a mentoring session…


Very nice. I never used a tripod before and only bought my first one about three months ago. I thought I'd buy a cheapie off ebay just to see how useful it is. And yes it is useful, although my one has plastic mounting brackets to hold the camera, so not very stable. Kinda regret not spending more on a better quality one.

Also, I like how your tripod can float on water. So light. Must be a dream for hikes.  ;)


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,

817.3K

241K

  • Facebook

    817,251 / Likes

  • Twitter

    241,000 / Followers

  • Google+

    1,620,816 / Followers

Latest Reviews

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 II is now six years old, but despite that, it still has many capabilities and features that make it a good option for today's beginner and enthusiast photographers.

Sep 17, 2021

The Nikon Z50 is a high-quality and affordable camera. Learn about the Nikon Z50 pros, cons, specs, and pricing in this quick guide.

Sep 16, 2021

The Canon PowerShot G5 X II isn't a professional camera by any means, but if you're looking for a small, capable, compact camera, this might be the one for you.

Sep 02, 2021

If you think a nearly decade-old camera can't still hack it, you're wrong. Though it isn't perfect, the Fujifilm X-E2 is still a solid camera.

Sep 02, 2021
Get 600+ Pro photo lessons for $1

Latest Articles

In the latest installment of our holiday gift guides, we present some great gifts for photographers that are all priced at $25 or less.

Sep 22, 2021

If you aren't sure what the difference between photo restoration and photo retouching is, check out this quick explainer guideline.

Sep 20, 2021

With these accessories for micro four-thirds cameras, you'll be able to improve your workflow and expand the functionality of your camera.

Sep 17, 2021

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 II is now six years old, but despite that, it still has many capabilities and features that make it a good option for today's beginner and enthusiast photographers.

Sep 17, 2021

One of the most common ways of upselling clients is to offer prints. But how to get your clients to buy more prints can be a mystery. Here's how.

Sep 16, 2021

The Nikon Z50 is a high-quality and affordable camera. Learn about the Nikon Z50 pros, cons, specs, and pricing in this quick guide.

Sep 16, 2021

With these wedding photography accessories, you'll not only look good, but you'll also have gear that helps improve your workflow.

Sep 16, 2021

There are many benefits of buying used lenses, not the least of which is that you can save some money. Check out this guide for even more reasons to buy used.

Sep 15, 2021