Re-edited.

11 years 7 months ago #256839 by John Landolfi
Scotty and Arkangel caught some sloppy work, so I reedited. Comments/suggestions always welcome!




Photo Comments
Attachments:
,
11 years 7 months ago #256956 by KCook
I would give it more contrast. :huh:

Canon 50D, Olympus PL2
kellycook.zenfolio.com/

,
11 years 7 months ago - 11 years 7 months ago #256969 by Stealthy Ninja
Pretty underexposed mate:




Personally I'd bump up the flower slightly and keep the background a little darker, but not that much. I'd also darken some of the shadowy areas on the petals.

Like this:



Then I'd mess with curves a little to boost contrast...


Attachments:
,
11 years 7 months ago #256976 by Rob pix4u2
Nice macro shot John

Remember to engage brain before putting mouth in gear
Rob Huelsman Sr.
My Facebook www.facebook.com/ImaginACTIONPhotography

,
11 years 6 months ago #257032 by John Landolfi

Stealthy Ninja wrote: Pretty underexposed mate:




Personally I'd bump up the flower slightly and keep the background a little darker, but not that much. I'd also darken some of the shadowy areas on the petals.

Like this:



Then I'd mess with curves a little to boost contrast...



Thanks for comments/advice, Adrian. I understand your point. But the flower you end up has little to do with the flower I shot. I tried to render the image in the light available on the spot, and recreate the scene. Your picture is a technically better flower, with a more balanced histogram- just not the flower I was trying to capture. Perhaps that's not a good approach, but it is what I am trying to learn to do. Thanks again, and I always welcome your thoughts. :thx2: :cheers:


Photo Comments
,
11 years 6 months ago #257033 by John Landolfi
Thanks Rob! :cheers:


Photo Comments
,
11 years 6 months ago #257037 by John Landolfi

KCook wrote: I would give it more contrast. :huh:


Thanks again, Kelly. Please, take a look at my answer to Adrian. I would appreciate your thoughts on what I describe as my aim in such shots. :cheers:


Photo Comments
,
11 years 6 months ago #257056 by Stealthy Ninja

John Landolfi wrote:

Stealthy Ninja wrote: Pretty underexposed mate:




Personally I'd bump up the flower slightly and keep the background a little darker, but not that much. I'd also darken some of the shadowy areas on the petals.

Like this:



Then I'd mess with curves a little to boost contrast...



Thanks for comments/advice, Adrian. I understand your point. But the flower you end up has little to do with the flower I shot. I tried to render the image in the light available on the spot, and recreate the scene. Your picture is a technically better flower, with a more balanced histogram- just not the flower I was trying to capture. Perhaps that's not a good approach, but it is what I am trying to learn to do. Thanks again, and I always welcome your thoughts. :thx2: :cheers:


So it was really dark?
,
11 years 6 months ago #257066 by John Landolfi

Stealthy Ninja wrote:

John Landolfi wrote:

Stealthy Ninja wrote: Pretty underexposed mate:




Personally I'd bump up the flower slightly and keep the background a little darker, but not that much. I'd also darken some of the shadowy areas on the petals.

Like this:



Then I'd mess with curves a little to boost contrast...



Thanks for comments/advice, Adrian. I understand your point. But the flower you end up has little to do with the flower I shot. I tried to render the image in the light available on the spot, and recreate the scene. Your picture is a technically better flower, with a more balanced histogram- just not the flower I was trying to capture. Perhaps that's not a good approach, but it is what I am trying to learn to do. Thanks again, and I always welcome your thoughts. :thx2: :cheers:


So it was really dark?


Shot on October 5, near Seattle, WA, around 6:30pm @ f/5.6, 1/80, ISO 1250. I wanted to capture the tactile impression that just looking at the flower brought out, with the low light saturating the color. I keep trying...


Photo Comments
,
11 years 6 months ago #257068 by Stealthy Ninja

John Landolfi wrote:

Stealthy Ninja wrote:

John Landolfi wrote:

Stealthy Ninja wrote: Pretty underexposed mate:




Personally I'd bump up the flower slightly and keep the background a little darker, but not that much. I'd also darken some of the shadowy areas on the petals.

Like this:



Then I'd mess with curves a little to boost contrast...



Thanks for comments/advice, Adrian. I understand your point. But the flower you end up has little to do with the flower I shot. I tried to render the image in the light available on the spot, and recreate the scene. Your picture is a technically better flower, with a more balanced histogram- just not the flower I was trying to capture. Perhaps that's not a good approach, but it is what I am trying to learn to do. Thanks again, and I always welcome your thoughts. :thx2: :cheers:


So it was really dark?


Shot on October 5, near Seattle, WA, around 6:30pm @ f/5.6, 1/80, ISO 1250. I wanted to capture the tactile impression that just looking at the flower brought out, with the low light saturating the color. I keep trying...


I see.
,
11 years 6 months ago #257103 by KCook

John Landolfi wrote:

KCook wrote: I would give it more contrast. :huh:


Thanks again, Kelly. Please, take a look at my answer to Adrian. I would appreciate your thoughts on what I describe as my aim in such shots. :cheers:

I do understand that you intended the shot to be low key. I would still like (some) more contrast, just not to such a degree than SN used!

Kelly

Canon 50D, Olympus PL2
kellycook.zenfolio.com/

,
11 years 6 months ago #257113 by John Landolfi

KCook wrote:

John Landolfi wrote:

KCook wrote: I would give it more contrast. :huh:


Thanks again, Kelly. Please, take a look at my answer to Adrian. I would appreciate your thoughts on what I describe as my aim in such shots. :cheers:

I do understand that you intended the shot to be low key. I would still like (some) more contrast, just not to such a degree than SN used!

Kelly


I'll try it. Thanks! :cheers:


Photo Comments
,
11 years 6 months ago #257272 by bhowdy
Very nice John ... I did not see the original, but I like this

Bob Howdeshell

"If I could tell the story in words, I wouldn't need to lug around a camera" ~ Lewis Hine

,
11 years 6 months ago #257281 by John Landolfi
Thanks, Bob! No change in the flower itself, just cleanign up some careless brush work on a layer mask... :cheers:


Photo Comments
,

817.3K

241K

  • Facebook

    817,251 / Likes

  • Twitter

    241,000 / Followers

  • Google+

    1,620,816 / Followers

Latest Reviews

The Olympus Pen E-P7 is an affordable micro four thirds mirrorless camera with 4K video capabilities, a 20.3MP sensor, and 121 focus points, making it a solid entry-level camera for beginners.

May 13, 2024

The Panasonic G9 II is a 25.2-megapixel micro four thirds camera with numerous features that make it punch out of its weight class, like 779 AF points, 5.8K video, and weather sealing.

May 10, 2024

The Fujifilm XT5 is a 40MP mirrorless camera capable of 6.2K video at 30p. With those specs, it’s an ideal choice for photographers needing a camera to pull double duty for imaging and video.

Apr 25, 2024

The Canon EOS R100 is an entry-level mirrorless camera introduced in 2023. But just because it’s an entry-level camera doesn’t mean it’s a bare-bones camera. Find out why in this review!

Apr 22, 2024
Get 600+ Pro photo lessons for $1

Forum Top Posters

Latest Articles

Upgrade your kit in 2024 with the best intermediate camera on the market! The question is, what camera fits the bill? We’ve got three top options for you to choose from in this buyer’s guide.

May 15, 2024

The best photography jobs right now are a mix of tried-and-true gigs like wedding photography and new jobs highlighting AI’s capabilities, travel, and videography.

May 15, 2024

The Olympus Pen E-P7 is an affordable micro four thirds mirrorless camera with 4K video capabilities, a 20.3MP sensor, and 121 focus points, making it a solid entry-level camera for beginners.

May 13, 2024

Starting a photography business is one thing; sustaining your business over a long period of time is another. Use the tips in this professional photography guide to build something with longevity!

May 13, 2024

The Panasonic G9 II is a 25.2-megapixel micro four thirds camera with numerous features that make it punch out of its weight class, like 779 AF points, 5.8K video, and weather sealing.

May 10, 2024

Cinematic photography is an interesting genre that combines photographic and videographic skills along with effective storytelling techniques. The result? Highly impactful images!

May 09, 2024

Newborn photography requires skill, the right gear, and a lot of patience. This beginner’s guide discusses critical topics that will help you be more prepared for before, during, and after the shoot.

May 08, 2024

To fill the frame means to expand the footprint of the subject in your shot. Get in close, zoom in, crop the image, or use other techniques to bring the subject to the forefront.

May 06, 2024