Faces Are Not Required

4 years 10 months ago #613133 by garyrhook
Got this in an email today:

www.ai-ap.com/publications/article/24072...et-the-winner-z.html

The winning photo shows someone repairing a fishing net, and the face isn't visible.

Huh.

I bring this up because NewavaMike posted an image of a neighbor gardening, and there were comments that a face was required.

I'm here to state unequivocally that that is not true. Clearly it's
possible to win an international photo competition with an image that
contains people and no faces.

What I am not saying is that other elements of an image aren't important. Quite the contrary. But to
focus on a single thing is, I believe, somewhat problematic. Especially
when it's pretty easy to refute said claim.  Like here.

In any event, the winning images are beautiful, and I thought worth sharing.


Photo Comments
,
4 years 10 months ago #613136 by Nikon Shooter

garyrhook wrote: I bring this up because NewavaMike posted an image of a neighbor gardening, and there were comments that a face was required.


In the case of my comment, it was applying to Mike's picture only at
that moment, on that photo.

Mike's picture has none (yet) of the many visual pleasures your posted
linked picture has to offer. So many that the scene does not document
but expresses, inspires, reveal. A face is not required because the viewer
is overwhelmed by textures, shades, tonalities etc that are so rich and
convincing that the documentation of the person is surely not required.

Light is free… capturing it is not!
Photo Comments
,
4 years 10 months ago #613146 by garyrhook

Nikon Shooter wrote:

garyrhook wrote: I bring this up because NewavaMike posted an image of a neighbor gardening, and there were comments that a face was required.


In the case of my comment, it was applying to Mike's picture only at
that moment, on that photo.

Mike's picture has none (yet) of the many visual pleasures your posted
linked picture has to offer. So many that the scene does not document
but expresses, inspires, reveal. A face is not required because the viewer
is overwhelmed by textures, shades, tonalities etc that are so rich and
convincing that the documentation of the person is surely not required.


I'm going to disagree with that assertion.

I think that the referenced (winning) image was more successful at telling its story. I believe that effective commentary is goes deep in evaluating effectiveness.

The problem is that what were offered as (ostensibly) critiques (of Mike's image) came across as nothing of the sort ("nothing special"?). I found them unhelpful, unencouraging, and lacking in scope in either a micro, macro, or meta perspective.

And frankly, that really bothers me. Quite a bit. Not that anyone cares.

My experience (limited though it may be) is that this community (photography, not just PT) encourages (for the most part) better. And when I see an epic failure (such as how I think this instance came across) I'm going to express my opinion about it.

So: in my opinion some of the posted critiques of Mike's image could have been handled with far more grace and helpfulness. Instead of emphasis on a single aspect that was, in my opinion, relatively minor. In my opinion the sandwich approach is always a good idea, if only to force a commentor to think about what they're trying to say.  Or to keep quiet.

Def: "commentor": one who comments. Apparently it's not really a word.


Photo Comments
,
4 years 10 months ago - 4 years 10 months ago #613147 by Nikon Shooter

garyrhook wrote: So: in my opinion some of the posted critiques of Mike's image could have been handled with far more grace…

I surely have none of your skills in your language. :(
I had some PMs with Mike and the contact was easy and pleasant. I felt
like he understood what I meant even with my language difficulties.

garyrhook wrote: Def: "commentor": one who comments. Apparently it's not really a word.

Commentator maybe?

Light is free… capturing it is not!
Photo Comments
,
4 years 9 months ago #617622 by garyrhook

Nikon Shooter wrote:

garyrhook wrote: Def: "commentor": one who comments. Apparently it's not really a word.

Commentator maybe?


Works for me.

Apologies for being a grammar cop. Or perhaps "flic de la grammaire" according to babelfish.


Photo Comments
,
4 years 9 months ago #621634 by NewavaMike
I appreciate both of your inputs (and everyone else's too) about my "gardener" shot.  
It hardly compares to the winner of that contest, but I understand your point and appreciate  you sharing the link with my shot in mind Gary.  As limited as my experience in photography is, I find that critique, especially by photographers whom I respect, like NS and yourself...... (and a great number of others around here: ( I really am a small fish)  is wonderful !  It means someone actually looked at my picture and had a thought about it.  That's pretty cool.  NS didn't like that the neighbors face did not show.  To me, that only meant that he would have liked to see her face in the image.  It would have made a better connection with him as an outsider to the scene.  

Yourself and others liked it just as it was. 

Conclusion:  Keep taking pictures !!  :) 


Photo Comments
,

817.3K

241K

  • Facebook

    817,251 / Likes

  • Twitter

    241,000 / Followers

  • Google+

    1,620,816 / Followers

Latest Reviews

After starting the EOS R lineup of mirrorless cameras, Canon has expanded its offerings into APS-C territory. Which Canon APS-C camera is for you? Let’s find out!

Aug 22, 2023

In the Sony a7R V vs a7 IV, there is no doubt that both cameras are well equipped and provide excellent performance. But which is best for imaging? For video? Find out here!

Aug 21, 2023

In this FujiFilm X-T5 review, you’ll learn the ins and outs of this high-quality APS-C, including its basic specs and features, as well as a few lenses that work well with it!

Aug 08, 2023

The Panasonic GX8 is a micro four thirds interchangeable lens camera that came out in 2015. Is it still worth it in 2023? Get all the details in this comprehensive review!

Aug 07, 2023
Get 600+ Pro photo lessons for $1

Forum Top Posters

Latest Articles

With this list of gifts for photographers under $500, you'll find all sorts of awesome ideas to get for your loved ones (or yourself) this holiday season.

Sep 20, 2023

Lifestyle newborn photography typically involves the baby and its parents in settings that highlight the baby’s first forays into the world. Use these tips to get started in this kind of photography!

Sep 20, 2023

Starting a photography business is one thing. Building a successful photography business that performs well over time is another. Get some tips on starting your business here!

Sep 20, 2023

Printing photos online makes getting high-quality prints so much easier. However, you need to partner with the right company to get the best results. Use this guide to learn what to look for!

Sep 18, 2023

Not every photography or videography situation warrants a tripod. In some cases, a camera monopod will do the trick. Use this guide to learn what to look for when shopping for monopods.

Sep 18, 2023

Searching for the best cheap full frame camera is pretty easy these days, as you can find high-quality used examples on platforms like MPB, which has an extensive inventory.

Sep 18, 2023

A photo print doesn’t have to be on paper. Instead, you can choose many other substrates like acrylic, canvas, or metal. The question is, which one is best for your images?

Sep 12, 2023

Part of running a successful business is building relationships with photography clients who keep coming back over and over for your services. Use this guide to learn how to do that!

Sep 12, 2023