Faces Are Not Required

4 years 4 months ago #613133 by garyrhook
Got this in an email today:

www.ai-ap.com/publications/article/24072...et-the-winner-z.html

The winning photo shows someone repairing a fishing net, and the face isn't visible.

Huh.

I bring this up because NewavaMike posted an image of a neighbor gardening, and there were comments that a face was required.

I'm here to state unequivocally that that is not true. Clearly it's
possible to win an international photo competition with an image that
contains people and no faces.

What I am not saying is that other elements of an image aren't important. Quite the contrary. But to
focus on a single thing is, I believe, somewhat problematic. Especially
when it's pretty easy to refute said claim.  Like here.

In any event, the winning images are beautiful, and I thought worth sharing.


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
4 years 4 months ago #613136 by Nikon Shooter

garyrhook wrote: I bring this up because NewavaMike posted an image of a neighbor gardening, and there were comments that a face was required.


In the case of my comment, it was applying to Mike's picture only at
that moment, on that photo.

Mike's picture has none (yet) of the many visual pleasures your posted
linked picture has to offer. So many that the scene does not document
but expresses, inspires, reveal. A face is not required because the viewer
is overwhelmed by textures, shades, tonalities etc that are so rich and
convincing that the documentation of the person is surely not required.

Light is free… capturing it is not!
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
4 years 4 months ago #613146 by garyrhook

Nikon Shooter wrote:

garyrhook wrote: I bring this up because NewavaMike posted an image of a neighbor gardening, and there were comments that a face was required.


In the case of my comment, it was applying to Mike's picture only at
that moment, on that photo.

Mike's picture has none (yet) of the many visual pleasures your posted
linked picture has to offer. So many that the scene does not document
but expresses, inspires, reveal. A face is not required because the viewer
is overwhelmed by textures, shades, tonalities etc that are so rich and
convincing that the documentation of the person is surely not required.


I'm going to disagree with that assertion.

I think that the referenced (winning) image was more successful at telling its story. I believe that effective commentary is goes deep in evaluating effectiveness.

The problem is that what were offered as (ostensibly) critiques (of Mike's image) came across as nothing of the sort ("nothing special"?). I found them unhelpful, unencouraging, and lacking in scope in either a micro, macro, or meta perspective.

And frankly, that really bothers me. Quite a bit. Not that anyone cares.

My experience (limited though it may be) is that this community (photography, not just PT) encourages (for the most part) better. And when I see an epic failure (such as how I think this instance came across) I'm going to express my opinion about it.

So: in my opinion some of the posted critiques of Mike's image could have been handled with far more grace and helpfulness. Instead of emphasis on a single aspect that was, in my opinion, relatively minor. In my opinion the sandwich approach is always a good idea, if only to force a commentor to think about what they're trying to say.  Or to keep quiet.

Def: "commentor": one who comments. Apparently it's not really a word.


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
4 years 4 months ago - 4 years 4 months ago #613147 by Nikon Shooter

garyrhook wrote: So: in my opinion some of the posted critiques of Mike's image could have been handled with far more grace…

I surely have none of your skills in your language. :(
I had some PMs with Mike and the contact was easy and pleasant. I felt
like he understood what I meant even with my language difficulties.

garyrhook wrote: Def: "commentor": one who comments. Apparently it's not really a word.

Commentator maybe?

Light is free… capturing it is not!
Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
4 years 3 months ago #617622 by garyrhook

Nikon Shooter wrote:

garyrhook wrote: Def: "commentor": one who comments. Apparently it's not really a word.

Commentator maybe?


Works for me.

Apologies for being a grammar cop. Or perhaps "flic de la grammaire" according to babelfish.


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
4 years 3 months ago #621634 by NewavaMike
I appreciate both of your inputs (and everyone else's too) about my "gardener" shot.  
It hardly compares to the winner of that contest, but I understand your point and appreciate  you sharing the link with my shot in mind Gary.  As limited as my experience in photography is, I find that critique, especially by photographers whom I respect, like NS and yourself...... (and a great number of others around here: ( I really am a small fish)  is wonderful !  It means someone actually looked at my picture and had a thought about it.  That's pretty cool.  NS didn't like that the neighbors face did not show.  To me, that only meant that he would have liked to see her face in the image.  It would have made a better connection with him as an outsider to the scene.  

Yourself and others liked it just as it was. 

Conclusion:  Keep taking pictures !!  :) 


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,

817.3K

241K

  • Facebook

    817,251 / Likes

  • Twitter

    241,000 / Followers

  • Google+

    1,620,816 / Followers

Latest Reviews

In this Panasonic GH6 review, you’ll learn about the essential specs and features that make it a high-quality option for photo and video work, including superb image quality and a great price!

Feb 28, 2023

The Canon Rebel T5i is a budget-friendly entry-level DSLR. And while it’s a few years old, it still has excellent capabilities, especially for entry-level and enthusiast photographers.

Jan 30, 2023

The Panasonic Lumix GH5 might be nearly six years old, but when it arrived in 2017, it had incredible features, particularly for video. Do those features still hold up? Let’s find out!

Dec 28, 2022

If you’re in the market for a rangefinder camera, there is no better choice than Leica. The Leica M11 is just one model worth considering for your photographic needs.

Dec 08, 2022
Get 600+ Pro photo lessons for $1

Forum Top Posters

Latest Articles

In this Lumaprints canvas print review, I'll unbox and inspect the canvas and give you a blow-by-blow of its qualities and features so you'll know exactly what to expect when you order a canvas from this company.

Mar 21, 2023

Nikon Z9 specs like built-in image stabilization, a sensor shield, and a 45.7-megapixel sensor make it a prime option for professional photographers.

Mar 16, 2023

The FujiFilm X-H2S is a feature-rich, power-packed camera. But is it the right camera for your needs? Find out in this guide that explores five must-know features of the X-H2S!

Mar 15, 2023

Photography inspiration can be found anywhere - your backyard, online, on your phone, and on your travels. It’s just a matter of knowing where to look and what to look for to be inspired!

Mar 15, 2023

There’s a lot of competition for the best camera for landscape and wildlife photography. The question is, which camera beats out the competition for the top spot? Find out here!

Mar 15, 2023

Understanding how to decorate your walls can be daunting because there are so many choices. Get some great wall photography ideas in this guide to help you!

Mar 14, 2023

It’s that time of the year when high school and college students anticipate graduation. You can get ready for the big day by checking out these excellent graduation photo ideas!

Mar 13, 2023

In this Canon EOS R3 review, learn all about this high-powered camera and its imaging capabilities, video features, specifications, compatible lenses, and much, much more!

Mar 13, 2023