Too much background blur in portraits?

4 years 2 months ago #674697 by Tim Chiang
I found a good blog post about a week ago on another site that focused (no pun intended) around the topic of going overboard with blurred backgrounds in portraits.  They had referenced a poorly executed video from Tony Northrup where he used a Canon 50mm f1.2 lens in his video and the point of focus was just his nose and eyes, leaving the background distractingly blurred.

I didn't comment then, but more I think about this, isn't that the artistic side of photography?  The purpose behind such lenses?  I don't care for that Northrup guy, so not intentionally going on his side, but seem to be thinking as creators, we create based on the vision we have.   As I see it, as long as the bulk of your face is in focus, game on right? 

Where do you stand on this topic?  


Photo Comments
,
4 years 2 months ago #674698 by Brachenland
There's a difference between background blur and background bokeh. I'd prefer the back ground bokeh. But more are saying bokeh is overrated.


Photo Comments
,
4 years 2 months ago #674699 by Tim Chiang

BrokenCanon wrote: There's a difference between background blur and background bokeh. I'd prefer the back ground bokeh. But more are saying bokeh is overrated.


Interesting, never considered that. I always categorized them as the same.  


Photo Comments
,
4 years 2 months ago #674701 by Nikon Shooter

Tim Chiang wrote: Where do you stand on this topic?  


Separation between subject and BG is most pleasing. I
don't buy into extreme anything and making a trend of
it… like if they had no other ways to explore their talents.

Light is free… capturing it is not!
Photo Comments
,
4 years 2 months ago #674723 by Piechura
I think the issue with the video you talk about is that it was a video rather than a photo, so the subject is constantly moving and the camera is constantly having to adjust the autofocus. That's distracting. But in a photo, this isn't necessarily the case.

In a studio situation where you have full control over the background and lighting, you might shoot at a higher f-stop to get sharper results, but outside the ability to make the background completely melt away can be handy when you're in front of something that isn't particularly attractive.


,
4 years 2 months ago #674749 by icepics
I think the difference between blur and bokeh is the quality of the out of focus areas; a lower quality lens may have a choppy look to a blurred background at large apertures, so it would not be considered good quality bokeh.

It's not artistic just to blur a background. It may be effective depending on the scene/subject but that alone doesn't make something artistic.

Just blurring the background does not eliminate problem objects or areas. If there's a bright red car or sign back there, it will still be noticeable, just more as a red blob, but it's still there. To eliminate objects or part of a scene that are unappealing visually, or have nothing to do with the photo, it's necessary to move yourself and/or the subject, change the vantage point, to get a different background.

Sharon
Photo Comments
,
4 years 2 months ago #674755 by Brachenland
Some great answers here, but wanted to follow up with one more observation. It's not just the blur of bokeh, but the lens used to create this effect. Some lenses are more desirable with the bokeh than others. While other lenses tend to blur/distort the back ground. So I guess your question would depend on how much research you've done on a particular lens when wanting to use it for these effects. Also, one other thing, all devices have processors and these processors work at different speed very similar to your computer's processor speed. So if the processor is slow, the blur or the amount of image processing at a slower rate, the back ground and even foreground is going to have some distortion which could be viewed as blur instead of bokeh. Add this with an inferior lens, the image quality will suffer.


Photo Comments
,
4 years 2 months ago #674763 by Tim Chiang

BrokenCanon wrote: Some great answers here, but wanted to follow up with one more observation. It's not just the blur of bokeh, but the lens used to create this effect. Some lenses are more desirable with the bokeh than others. While other lenses tend to blur/distort the back ground. So I guess your question would depend on how much research you've done on a particular lens when wanting to use it for these effects. Also, one other thing, all devices have processors and these processors work at different speed very similar to your computer's processor speed. So if the processor is slow, the blur or the amount of image processing at a slower rate, the back ground and even foreground is going to have some distortion which could be viewed as blur instead of bokeh. Add this with an inferior lens, the image quality will suffer.



True, generally the higher priced lenses will have more aperture blades giving smoother bokeh.  


Photo Comments
,

817.3K

241K

  • Facebook

    817,251 / Likes

  • Twitter

    241,000 / Followers

  • Google+

    1,620,816 / Followers

Latest Reviews

The Canon EOS R100 is an entry-level mirrorless camera introduced in 2023. But just because it’s an entry-level camera doesn’t mean it’s a bare-bones camera. Find out why in this review!

Apr 22, 2024

Nikon’s retro-looking Nikon Zfc is anything but retro. Under its classic body is a host of features and amenities that make it a worthwhile compact mirrorless camera for 2024.

Apr 15, 2024

The Canon EOS R50 is one of the newest R-system cameras from Canon. Is it worth your money? Find out all the details you need to know in this comprehensive review.

Apr 10, 2024

The Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II is Sony’s flagship mirrorless zoom lens. As such, it’s loaded with features and has a top-shelf build quality that makes it a top pick!

Mar 27, 2024

Forum Top Posters

Latest Articles

The Insta360 has one of the best lineups of action cams and 360-degree cameras. With these Insta360 accessories, you can elevate your photography and videography game!

Apr 24, 2024

Creating impactful photos of landscapes depends on many factors, not the least of which is your talent behind the lens. This guide explores other elements required for the best product.

Apr 23, 2024

The Canon EOS R100 is an entry-level mirrorless camera introduced in 2023. But just because it’s an entry-level camera doesn’t mean it’s a bare-bones camera. Find out why in this review!

Apr 22, 2024

Are you ready to upgrade your camera? Before buying new, you might consider the value of purchasing used gear to save money.

Apr 18, 2024

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is a micro four thirds camera released in 2020. It’s an entry-level system along with the OM-D E-M5 Mark III. Use this guide to determine which one is best for you!

Apr 17, 2024

Blue hour photography might not be as well known as golden hour photography, but it is every bit as good a time to create epic images of landscapes. Learn how in this quick tutorial!

Apr 17, 2024

Nikon’s retro-looking Nikon Zfc is anything but retro. Under its classic body is a host of features and amenities that make it a worthwhile compact mirrorless camera for 2024.

Apr 15, 2024

Moving from taking snapshots of your dog to creating beautiful images doesn’t have to be that difficult! Use the tips outlined in this dog photography guide, and you’ll get better results in no time.

Apr 15, 2024