Would Colorado massacre change your opinion of seeing Batman?

11 years 9 months ago #241907 by ShadowWalker
I was planning on seeing that movie tomorrow night, honestly I'm thinking I'll wait a few weeks before seeing this now.

What a shame that some idiot does this, the families affected and now going to see a movie won't ever be the same. That line has been crossed. :(


Photo Comments
,
The topic has been locked.
11 years 9 months ago #241915 by Stanly
This isn't a move that I would see in the theater to begin with, I wouldn't be surprise that this event changes how people attend movies. Just like 9/11 and how security measures were heightened, I wouldn't be surprised if metal detectors start popping up in theaters soon.

Nikon Z6 | Nikon FM10 | Nikon D80 | Nikon 50mm f/1.8D | Nikon 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 AF-S VR | 35-105mm f/3.5 Macro | 80-200mm f/4.5 | SB600 | Pocket Wizard II
Photo Comments
,
The topic has been locked.
11 years 9 months ago #241916 by ShadowWalker
Exactly!


Photo Comments
,
The topic has been locked.
11 years 9 months ago #241926 by John37
I'm thinking they will no longer allow costumes in the movie theaters. I will certainly not view the movies the same any longer. I'm pretty level headed... but this one has me thinking strange. As for Batman, I'm a fan of the ones from Batman Begins, and on. But I wouldn't see them in the theater. DVD is where it's at for me now. It's much cheaper in the long run.

"The most endangered species? The honest man!"
,
The topic has been locked.
11 years 9 months ago #241937 by geoffellis
Quite frankly youre a naive idiot if you let this affect your opinion of theatres or movies... or any other building. its an isolated incident ffs.

Do you second guess walking into a skyscraper? schools? bars? restaurants? hotels? getting on a bus? a train? airplane? or any other dozens of places where people have been mass murdered... yet aside from airplanes, and *some* bars and schools... there are no real security precautions.

Youre gonna die. You can die walking down the street hit by a car, drive by shooting. You can die in your sleep from a freak aneurysm or stroke.You could have cancer or aids right now. Youre a fool you are actually concerned about seeing a movie due to the notion that *someone* might shoot it up.

But really. You could go to a bowling alley, and some nutjob is just as likely to walk into that and start shooting. You arent safe from nutjobs. You can accept that and move on. Or you can turn your country into a police state with armed people doing pat downs and metal detectors prior to entry to any building.

This event is definitely a "tragedy" but this kind of talk is just stupid.
,
The topic has been locked.
11 years 9 months ago - 11 years 9 months ago #241952 by McBeth Photography
I agree with some of what you said Geoff, but naive idiots? Nah, don't think so. It seems that most times that there is a shooting tragedy, the unfortunate effect is copycat crimes from other nutjobs. Perhaps the media should report every single shooter that gets his/her plans foiled by wisdom and experience of dedicated police around the country, maybe the perception wouldn't be "isolated incidents".

Not that we should live in fear, not at all. It just affirms my personal position to defend our right to bear arms, because we'll never get the guns away from the "nutjobs". Why should we be expected to defend ourselves with swiss army knives when something like this does happen, "randomly"?

Tragedy it is ... but learn from it, we must.

People are scared Geoff, not stupid.

It is what it is.
,
The topic has been locked.
11 years 9 months ago #241956 by The Gardener

McBeth Photography wrote: I agree with some of what you said Geoff, but naive idiots? Nah, don't think so. It seems that most times that there is a shooting tragedy, the unfortunate effect is copycat crimes from other nutjobs. Perhaps the media should report every single shooter that gets his/her plans foiled by wisdom and experience of dedicated police around the country, maybe the perception wouldn't be "isolated incidents".

Not that we should live in fear, not at all. It just affirms my personal position to defend our right to bear arms, because we'll never get the guns away from the "nutjobs". Why should we be expected to defend ourselves with swiss army knives when something like this does happen, "randomly"?

Tragedy it is ... but learn from it, we must.

People are scared Geoff, not stupid.


:agree: exactly.... have a little respect for others


Photo Comments
,
The topic has been locked.
11 years 9 months ago #241965 by geoffellis
okay. lets look at it this way. a new movie like that is going to be out in most theatres. Ive seen a few numbers but moderately id say there were at least 4000+ movie theatres in the US. lets say they dont all show new releases. 3000 perhaps do? those that do probably have 1 or 2 screens with 3-4 showings daily. but lets say they only have 1 screen and 2 showings per day. Thats 6000 potential screenings per day. Thats 42000 per week. and i feel thats a fairly low estimate. Now you can consider that a theatre has between 50-300 seats on average. Since not all theatres are gigantic, but most would use their largest screen for a blockbuster like batman... so ill estimate even just 100 seats per screening filled. Thats 600,000 attendees per day, and again, likely a low number. (imo)

So you have a minimum 0.00016% chance of being a potential target on any given day. (1 in 6000)
You have a minimum of 0.00002% chance of being a potential target on any given day (12 in 600000)

But that doesnt even take into consideration that people dont shoot up movie theatres of every day. Thus that is only your minimum chances of being involved if it does happen. the actually chances of you being in a movie theatre shooting are exponentially smaller based on the chance that you go on that day, at that time, at that screening, for that movie simply because it does not happen regularly.

1 in 4-5 deaths in America is caused by Heart Disease every year. Thats 20-25%. but an infinitesimally small chance of getting shot in a movie theatre scares you? thats naive idiocy if ive ever heard it.

addendum: i said 3000 theatres, but i found after i read this that it opened in 3700 theatres opening day, and increased to 4400 in the US. So at the very least those estimates were low. dont feel like rewriting the above though... but im sure the point was made.
,
The topic has been locked.
11 years 9 months ago #241968 by Dori
Now that you have crunched the numbers, what does that prove? Nothing, statistics are just that. People will still feel as they do.

Don't pi$$ me off, I am running out of room to store the bodies...

Resident Texasotan...

,
The topic has been locked.
11 years 9 months ago #241970 by effron
I'm going this afternoon to see the movie. However, thanks to Geoff, I'm probably NOT going bowling this week.....:angry:

Why so serious?
Photo Comments
,
The topic has been locked.
11 years 9 months ago #241973 by Pettigrew

The Gardener wrote:

McBeth Photography wrote: I agree with some of what you said Geoff, but naive idiots? Nah, don't think so. It seems that most times that there is a shooting tragedy, the unfortunate effect is copycat crimes from other nutjobs. Perhaps the media should report every single shooter that gets his/her plans foiled by wisdom and experience of dedicated police around the country, maybe the perception wouldn't be "isolated incidents".

Not that we should live in fear, not at all. It just affirms my personal position to defend our right to bear arms, because we'll never get the guns away from the "nutjobs". Why should we be expected to defend ourselves with swiss army knives when something like this does happen, "randomly"?

Tragedy it is ... but learn from it, we must.

People are scared Geoff, not stupid.


:agree: exactly.... have a little respect for others


+2 That was rude geoffellis, why don't you find ways of making a point with out coming across offensive. If you fear heart disease you stay away from certain foods, if you fear flying you find other means of getting somewhere, if you fear evil leprechaun's, then you stay home St. Patties day. The point is, people have the right to freedom which does include opinions. What right does it give you to call people idiots for exercising this God given right?

Canon EOS 7D SLR | XT W/18-55 Kit Lens | Canon 50mm 1.8 | Tamron 17-50mm 2.8 | Canon 28-105mm | Canon 75-300mm | Canon 100mm 2.8 Macro | Canon 100-400
Photo Comments
,
The topic has been locked.
11 years 9 months ago #241974 by geoffellis

Dori wrote: Now that you have crunched the numbers, what does that prove? Nothing, statistics are just that. People will still feel as they do.

It proves that there is no rationality in that type of thinking/feeling. I might very well be the odd one out... but one isolated incident isnt about to change the way i feel about movie theatres. even it does happen again... a copy cat or whatever... the chances that you would be directly involved is still extremely! tiny.

there are much bigger, and direct threats to your health and safety than the occasional mass murdering gun men.

effron wrote: I'm going this afternoon to see the movie. However, thanks to Geoff, I'm probably NOT going bowling this week.....:angry:

LOL :evil:
,
The topic has been locked.
11 years 9 months ago #241980 by Joves
Well first off I do not go to theaters at all because they are over priced, and it seems that common courtesy at them is nonexistent. But if I planned on going I still would. First I do not allow some random event to intrude into how I live my life, this falls under the heading the s@#t happens. While yes it is terrible that it happened, it is nothing major in the great scheme of things. Second I have a CCW and do not do business with places that restrict my carrying of my sidearm. I have carried a firearm for over 30 years and luckily never had to use it on a human. This is a case of I would rather have one and not need it, rather than not having it and needing it. I believe that had there been somebody there that knew how to use their weapon correctly that the shooter would not have gone as far. But this is only mere conjecture, I know had I been there it would have been weapon drawn, aimed, and fired.


The following user(s) said Thank You: geoffellis
,
The topic has been locked.
11 years 9 months ago #241983 by Stealthy Ninja
Nope. I totally want to see it!!!
,
The topic has been locked.
11 years 9 months ago #241984 by Pettigrew

Joves wrote: Well first off I do not go to theaters at all because they are over priced, and it seems that common courtesy at them is nonexistent. But if I planned on going I still would. First I do not allow some random event to intrude into how I live my life, this falls under the heading the s@#t happens. While yes it is terrible that it happened, it is nothing major in the great scheme of things. Second I have a CCW and do not do business with places that restrict my carrying of my sidearm. I have carried a firearm for over 30 years and luckily never had to use it on a human. This is a case of I would rather have one and not need it, rather than not having it and needing it. I believe that had there been somebody there that knew how to use their weapon correctly that the shooter would not have gone as far. But this is only mere conjecture, I know had I been there it would have been weapon drawn, aimed, and fired.


:agree: I agree with you. Personally my leisure time won't be spent any differently either. I just have a tough time with rude people as my above statement illustrates. Regarding a fire arm, I would have done the same, however I believe from the police reports this guy was heavily protected with armor that would have made it a very tough shot for anyone, considering your in a dark room, with a bright screen in front of you, flashes coming from the gun in semi auto mode, with a target who is dressed in black and protected with bullet proof armor. I'm not to shabby with weapons, but I'll admit this would be a tough shot.

Canon EOS 7D SLR | XT W/18-55 Kit Lens | Canon 50mm 1.8 | Tamron 17-50mm 2.8 | Canon 28-105mm | Canon 75-300mm | Canon 100mm 2.8 Macro | Canon 100-400
Photo Comments
,
The topic has been locked.

817.3K

241K

  • Facebook

    817,251 / Likes

  • Twitter

    241,000 / Followers

  • Google+

    1,620,816 / Followers

Latest Reviews

The Fujifilm XT5 is a 40MP mirrorless camera capable of 6.2K video at 30p. With those specs, it’s an ideal choice for photographers needing a camera to pull double duty for imaging and video.

Apr 25, 2024

The Canon EOS R100 is an entry-level mirrorless camera introduced in 2023. But just because it’s an entry-level camera doesn’t mean it’s a bare-bones camera. Find out why in this review!

Apr 22, 2024

Nikon’s retro-looking Nikon Zfc is anything but retro. Under its classic body is a host of features and amenities that make it a worthwhile compact mirrorless camera for 2024.

Apr 15, 2024

The Canon EOS R50 is one of the newest R-system cameras from Canon. Is it worth your money? Find out all the details you need to know in this comprehensive review.

Apr 10, 2024

Latest Articles

Newborn photography requires skill, the right gear, and a lot of patience. This beginner’s guide discusses critical topics that will help you be more prepared for before, during, and after the shoot.

May 08, 2024

To fill the frame means to expand the footprint of the subject in your shot. Get in close, zoom in, crop the image, or use other techniques to bring the subject to the forefront.

May 06, 2024

With these simple yet effective beginner photography tips, you can avoid some of the common mistakes beginners make and get improved results with your images.

May 06, 2024

Urban photography is a genre showcasing features in urban settings. You can photograph people, architecture, mass transit, and many other subjects. Learn how to do so in this guide!

Apr 30, 2024

The Nikon D850 might be an older DSLR, but it was ahead of its time when it debuted in 2017. That means it still has plenty of firepower to compete with today’s powerful mirrorless cameras.

Apr 30, 2024

The best beginner camera isn’t the same for everyone. That means having choice is of the utmost importance. In this guide, explore five excellent beginner camera options for 2024 and beyond.

Apr 25, 2024

Child portrait photography is a unique undertaking requiring special skills and talents to get the best results. Start mastering this photography niche with these essential tips!

Apr 25, 2024

The Fujifilm XT5 is a 40MP mirrorless camera capable of 6.2K video at 30p. With those specs, it’s an ideal choice for photographers needing a camera to pull double duty for imaging and video.

Apr 25, 2024