Should beginner photographers buy pro level lenses?

1 month 3 weeks ago #649384 by Liem Stailey
I'm referring to those that know they will be in photography for the long haul.  Does it make sense to not buy pro level lenses?  After all you buy lesser priced lenses, which is great because you save money.  However in the long game, you will likely want to upgrade, then you have to buy new glass, pricier lenses and home you can sell your old.  

Well this is what I was just told last night by another photographer I ran into shooting some night stuff.  So is there logic in what I was told?  Basically should we be budgeting to just buy pro level gear? 


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 month 3 weeks ago #649385 by Nikon Shooter
Ultimately, lenses are capturing the images and they are,
compared to bodies, somewhat less prone to age, become
obsolete. In 1988, I bought the F4 and the 600 mm ƒ4. The
body — still working perfectly — has long been retired but
the lens continues its career on my D850.

Lens are really a long term investment.

Light is free… capturing it is not!
This person is a posting maniac and deserves a #1 badge!Top Poster

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 month 3 weeks ago #649438 by Liem Stailey
600mm?  Well that's a $5000 lens isn't it?  :)

yeah I would keep that one too.  But referring too 24-70mm, 70-200mm, lenses like those.  Does it make sense to buy the best of the best now to prevent having to sell others to get the better lenses?  


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 month 3 weeks ago #649440 by Nikon Shooter
I told about the 600 as an extreme example of an investment
that was not undone. The same applies to all lenses because
one will lose money every time anything is undone.

Light is free… capturing it is not!
This person is a posting maniac and deserves a #1 badge!Top Poster

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 month 3 weeks ago #649450 by Troponin
I started with an a6000 so that I could get the Sony 90mm macro lens when I started. I thought it was well worth it. It's still my favorite lens! 


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 month 3 weeks ago #649451 by garyrhook

Liem Stailey wrote: yeah I would keep that one too.  But referring too 24-70mm, 70-200mm, lenses like those.  Does it make sense to buy the best of the best now to prevent having to sell others to get the better lenses?  


There are no cheap versions of those lenses, only older editions and/or used. Even third party products can be spendy.

So, from a meta perspective (and repeating what you've already stated above):

What makes sense is to start off with one good lens and work with it. Decide if you want to pursue photography to the point of heavy investment. And while you're doing that, learn that the best camera is the one you have with you.

Once you've arrived at the decision that you're there to stay, and you know that it takes certain gear to meet your needs, then invest in it, yes. But do you need the Nikon 70-200 f/2.8E over the VRII? Probably not, and the latter can be had used for half the $ of the former. Each lens will require a separate decision.

IMNSHO, of course. I could be wrong.


Photo Comments
The following user(s) said Thank You: KCook

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 month 3 weeks ago #649461 by Ozzie_Traveller
G'day Liem

There is an age-old saying used across many areas of life ... "buy the best that you can afford" ~ and cameras & lenses [or fishing rods or golf clubs or whatever] are no exception

I personally would NOT recommend that a novice or a "keen newbie" go out and buy a pro-level camera or pro-level lens etc.

Ideas change, brands change as you discover more things about your new hobby and different features become more or less important. So to start off paying heaps of $$ for stuff that might easily end up gathering dust within a year or two, is IMO quite silly

Phil from the great land Downunder
www.flickr.com/photos/ozzie_traveller/sets/


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 month 3 weeks ago #649496 by Artview
I still use my entry level DSLR with a standard lens. I'd say it's counter productive to buy expensive gear as a newbie. The reason is that you learn how to use the equipment, find the right settings, lights, composition etc. when you have cheaper equipment. You can still take great photos with you smartphone. I still use my three year old phone and sometimes takes better photos with it than my DSLR's.


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 month 4 days ago #652048 by Jared-Weaver
I was taught lenses before bodies for the following reason: 

A pro line lens will generally not hold your camera back. Putting a mediocre lens on a pro body however just makes no sense because the bigger sensor will accentuate the shortcomings of the lens. Using a pro lens on even a beginner line body will give you the clearest, sharpest images provided that you focus and expose correctly. 


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

1 month 2 days ago #652222 by Johan Alonso

Troponin wrote: I started with an a6000 so that I could get the Sony 90mm macro lens when I started. I thought it was well worth it. It's still my favorite lens! 


What camera are you using now?


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

802.3K

205K

1.62M

  • Facebook

    802,251 / Likes

  • Twitter

    205,000 / Followers

  • Google+

    1,620,816 / Followers

Latest Reviews

In this Fujifilm X100F review, learn about its essential features and specs, its pros and cons, and where you can pick one up for a great price.

Aug 16, 2019

The Nikon D500 might be several years old, but it's still a highly capable camera. In this Nikon D500 review, learn why it's still a good investment in 2019.

Aug 16, 2019

In this Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 S review, learn about its specs, features, build quality, handling, price, and more.

Aug 13, 2019

The Fujifilm X-T2 might be three years old, but it's still a highly capable camera with specs and features that will suit just about any photographer in 2019.

Aug 12, 2019
Get 600+ Pro photo lessons for $1

Forum Top Posters

Latest Articles

With a big budget, there's no end to what you can give your favorite photographer this holiday season. See what some of the best gifts for photographers under $2,500 are in 2019!

Aug 20, 2019

Photography clients can be hard to find and even harder to keep, but with these photography business tips, you'll learn how to retain clients for the long-term.

Aug 20, 2019

Though being a new photographer means you probably have a ton of questions, there are some beginner photography questions that professionals are tired of hearing.

Aug 19, 2019

Using a vintage lens with a modern camera is a fun exercise, and can teach you a lot. But before you buy a vintage lens, be sure you know what you're getting yourself into...

Aug 19, 2019

Photo by Jakob Owens on Unsplash Joshua Rosenthal makes a living from taking pictures of strangers in public, legally. Under...

Aug 18, 2019

By Teichnor Bros., Boston - eBayfrontback, Public Domain "It wasn't the first time he utilized a couple of bottles of scotch to get into an area that...

Aug 18, 2019

Photo by Jesse Mills on Unsplash It is easy for us to forget that 9/11 is still claiming lives almost 2 decades later. It is...

Aug 17, 2019

In this Fujifilm X100F review, learn about its essential features and specs, its pros and cons, and where you can pick one up for a great price.

Aug 16, 2019