Manual mode vs aperture priority.

9 years 10 months ago #382345 by Scotty
To avoid derailing the other thread, i made this thread for everybody to discuss the benefits and have a healthy discussion.

When the last candle has been blown out
and the last glass of champagne has been drunk
All that you are left with are the memories and the images-David Cooke.

Photo Comments
,
The topic has been locked.
9 years 10 months ago #382348 by EOS_Fan
I started out shooting manual all the time and now just use Aperture priority about 85% of the time.  Personally I like this mode the best.  


Photo Comments
,
The topic has been locked.
9 years 10 months ago #382359 by KCook
Oh goody a fresh start (I think?) :toocrazy:

Deal is:  PAS modes (with or without EC) react to changes in the scene.  Manual makes it super easy to ignore those changes.  So . . . which I use depends on whether I want changes in the scene to influence the exposure.  In the majority of cases I do want this auto reaction to the scene, so I don't bother with Manual mode much.  But I am not married forever to any one mode.

Kelly Cook

Canon 50D, Olympus PL2
kellycook.zenfolio.com/

,
The topic has been locked.
9 years 10 months ago #382393 by garyrhook

Scotty wrote: ...and have a healthy discussion.


I think that horse left the dock.


Photo Comments
,
The topic has been locked.
9 years 10 months ago #382421 by Joves

garyrhook wrote:

Scotty wrote: ...and have a healthy discussion.


I think that horse left the dock.

:rofl: :agree:
Well even though I posted in the other thread. I will preface this post with if you feel any of the Auto Modes work for you then use them, and good for you.     
AS for me, and the response to that I was not giving a technical reason for using it, that is false. My technical reason was that Nikons at least I tend to find that they Over Expose in P,S, and A Modes. So for me I will never use them, and have not for a few years. Just stating that you can compensate that with the EC function is just another unnecessary step to me. How that can be considered better is beyond me, well as far as my shooting style goes. I can adjust my shutter speed, and aperture with the flick of a finger, and thumb at the same time to get what I want, and not have to go to a function button to reset if the lighting changes. In MM I just change either bot, or one setting with the wheels near the focus, and shutter release. Also all of you Modes as said are indeed decided by the meter, which I find over exposes most of the time, so your modes will over expose, or not expose correctly. This is why they left manual in.
And before I hear I do not know how to use EC then, or those Modes correctly. I do know how to use them, but do not care for them. Also I know what every function of my Picture Controls do as well, but am not arrogant enough to think that I can shoot solely in Jpeg. The first thing I have done with my cameras when I bought them was comparative shooting playing with the settings, and exposures. On the subject I think MM is far superior to Aperture Priority, or the other Modes. As far as having to watch, or forgetting to look at my meter when I am shooting, I do not even have to think about it, because it is second nature for me to see the settings.
So as I said if the Modes float your boat good for you, but don't try to make me sound like a luddite for thinking they are junk to me. Lets keep this civil.


,
The topic has been locked.
9 years 10 months ago #382426 by garyrhook

Joves wrote: I will preface this post with if you feel any of the Auto Modes work for you then use them, and good for you.     
AS for me, and the response to that I was not giving a technical reason for using it, that is false.


I agree: if it works for you, that's fine.

There were a lot of false statements made in that thread. It's important to know when to fold 'em.

I shoot Nikon because it makes sense to me; I don't care for Canons. I shoot MM because it makes sense to me, and if thorough control isn't a technical reason, I don't know what is.


Photo Comments
,
The topic has been locked.
9 years 10 months ago #382461 by Scotty

garyrhook wrote:

Joves wrote: I will preface this post with if you feel any of the Auto Modes work for you then use them, and good for you.     
AS for me, and the response to that I was not giving a technical reason for using it, that is false.


I agree: if it works for you, that's fine.

There were a lot of false statements made in that thread. It's important to know when to fold 'em.

I shoot Nikon because it makes sense to me; I don't care for Canons. I shoot MM because it makes sense to me, and if thorough control isn't a technical reason, I don't know what is.


Results are what matter. :cheers:

When the last candle has been blown out
and the last glass of champagne has been drunk
All that you are left with are the memories and the images-David Cooke.

Photo Comments
,
The topic has been locked.
9 years 10 months ago #382464 by Joe Vertz
Each have a purpose in my book.  I use aperture priority for nearly all my work, but for still shots like landscapes and macro, there is no substitute for manual mode.


Photo Comments
,
The topic has been locked.
9 years 10 months ago #382473 by Scotty

Joves wrote:

garyrhook wrote:

Scotty wrote: ...and have a healthy discussion.


I think that horse left the dock.

:rofl: :agree:
Well even though I posted in the other thread. I will preface this post with if you feel any of the Auto Modes work for you then use them, and good for you.     
AS for me, and the response to that I was not giving a technical reason for using it, that is false. My technical reason was that Nikons at least I tend to find that they Over Expose in P,S, and A Modes. So for me I will never use them, and have not for a few years. Just stating that you can compensate that with the EC function is just another unnecessary step to me. How that can be considered better is beyond me, well as far as my shooting style goes. I can adjust my shutter speed, and aperture with the flick of a finger, and thumb at the same time to get what I want, and not have to go to a function button to reset if the lighting changes. In MM I just change either bot, or one setting with the wheels near the focus, and shutter release. Also all of you Modes as said are indeed decided by the meter, which I find over exposes most of the time, so your modes will over expose, or not expose correctly. This is why they left manual in.
And before I hear I do not know how to use EC then, or those Modes correctly. I do know how to use them, but do not care for them. Also I know what every function of my Picture Controls do as well, but am not arrogant enough to think that I can shoot solely in Jpeg. The first thing I have done with my cameras when I bought them was comparative shooting playing with the settings, and exposures. On the subject I think MM is far superior to Aperture Priority, or the other Modes. As far as having to watch, or forgetting to look at my meter when I am shooting, I do not even have to think about it, because it is second nature for me to see the settings.
So as I said if the Modes float your boat good for you, but don't try to make me sound like a luddite for thinking they are junk to me. Lets keep this civil.


Manual mode and aperture priority with the same settings, the needle in the middle will expose the exact same.

When the last candle has been blown out
and the last glass of champagne has been drunk
All that you are left with are the memories and the images-David Cooke.

Photo Comments
,
The topic has been locked.
9 years 10 months ago #382475 by Stealthy Ninja

Joves wrote:  My technical reason was that Nikons at least I tend to find that they Over Expose in P,S, and A Modes. .


The obvious solution is obvious. :kmonst:
,
The topic has been locked.
9 years 10 months ago #382566 by Stealthy Ninja

Scotty wrote:

Joves wrote:

garyrhook wrote:

Scotty wrote: ...and have a healthy discussion.


I think that horse left the dock.

:rofl: :agree:
Well even though I posted in the other thread. I will preface this post with if you feel any of the Auto Modes work for you then use them, and good for you.     
AS for me, and the response to that I was not giving a technical reason for using it, that is false. My technical reason was that Nikons at least I tend to find that they Over Expose in P,S, and A Modes. So for me I will never use them, and have not for a few years. Just stating that you can compensate that with the EC function is just another unnecessary step to me. How that can be considered better is beyond me, well as far as my shooting style goes. I can adjust my shutter speed, and aperture with the flick of a finger, and thumb at the same time to get what I want, and not have to go to a function button to reset if the lighting changes. In MM I just change either bot, or one setting with the wheels near the focus, and shutter release. Also all of you Modes as said are indeed decided by the meter, which I find over exposes most of the time, so your modes will over expose, or not expose correctly. This is why they left manual in.
And before I hear I do not know how to use EC then, or those Modes correctly. I do know how to use them, but do not care for them. Also I know what every function of my Picture Controls do as well, but am not arrogant enough to think that I can shoot solely in Jpeg. The first thing I have done with my cameras when I bought them was comparative shooting playing with the settings, and exposures. On the subject I think MM is far superior to Aperture Priority, or the other Modes. As far as having to watch, or forgetting to look at my meter when I am shooting, I do not even have to think about it, because it is second nature for me to see the settings.
So as I said if the Modes float your boat good for you, but don't try to make me sound like a luddite for thinking they are junk to me. Lets keep this civil.


Manual mode and aperture priority with the same settings, the needle in the middle will expose the exact same.


This is true. If AP by some chance gives you the exact same settings as M, then it will be exactly the same... The point is, will AP give you the correct settings or will something in the scene confuse it?

As I said in the old thread (or something similar at least):
If your using EC, why not just go all the way and get full control with MM?

EC can change when light changes, therefore your settings get messed up (say you know that faces in the audience need X settings, then some strong back light comes behind them, maybe from the stage, using EC would make your setting way too dark for your subject (stupid camera).

EC might work for one shot, but don't expect it to be constant. If you want to have your settings to be constant, then manual is the only way to go.

Not saying auto modes and EC can't work, but they don't know light so well. Also, I only use the meter as a rough guide. I adjust according to my eyes, not what the dumb camera thinks is right.
,
The topic has been locked.
9 years 10 months ago #382572 by butterflygirl921
I personally only shoot manual.  I like to have control over all the settings.  


,
The topic has been locked.
9 years 10 months ago #382607 by Scotty

Stealthy Ninja wrote:

Scotty wrote:

Joves wrote:

garyrhook wrote:

Scotty wrote: ...and have a healthy discussion.


I think that horse left the dock.

:rofl: :agree:
Well even though I posted in the other thread. I will preface this post with if you feel any of the Auto Modes work for you then use them, and good for you.     
AS for me, and the response to that I was not giving a technical reason for using it, that is false. My technical reason was that Nikons at least I tend to find that they Over Expose in P,S, and A Modes. So for me I will never use them, and have not for a few years. Just stating that you can compensate that with the EC function is just another unnecessary step to me. How that can be considered better is beyond me, well as far as my shooting style goes. I can adjust my shutter speed, and aperture with the flick of a finger, and thumb at the same time to get what I want, and not have to go to a function button to reset if the lighting changes. In MM I just change either bot, or one setting with the wheels near the focus, and shutter release. Also all of you Modes as said are indeed decided by the meter, which I find over exposes most of the time, so your modes will over expose, or not expose correctly. This is why they left manual in.
And before I hear I do not know how to use EC then, or those Modes correctly. I do know how to use them, but do not care for them. Also I know what every function of my Picture Controls do as well, but am not arrogant enough to think that I can shoot solely in Jpeg. The first thing I have done with my cameras when I bought them was comparative shooting playing with the settings, and exposures. On the subject I think MM is far superior to Aperture Priority, or the other Modes. As far as having to watch, or forgetting to look at my meter when I am shooting, I do not even have to think about it, because it is second nature for me to see the settings.
So as I said if the Modes float your boat good for you, but don't try to make me sound like a luddite for thinking they are junk to me. Lets keep this civil.


Manual mode and aperture priority with the same settings, the needle in the middle will expose the exact same.


This is true. If AP by some chance gives you the exact same settings as M, then it will be exactly the same... The point is, will AP give you the correct settings or will something in the scene confuse it?

As I said in the old thread (or something similar at least):
If your using EC, why not just go all the way and get full control with MM?

EC can change when light changes, therefore your settings get messed up (say you know that faces in the audience need X settings, then some strong back light comes behind them, maybe from the stage, using EC would make your setting way too dark for your subject (stupid camera).

EC might work for one shot, but don't expect it to be constant. If you want to have your settings to be constant, then manual is the only way to go.

Not saying auto modes and EC can't work, but they don't know light so well. Also, I only use the meter as a rough guide. I adjust according to my eyes, not what the dumb camera thinks is right.


It's the same metering. If the scene messes up the meter in AP, it'll do the same in manual. That's why I depend on histogram and I don't think you'll disagree with me there.

When the last candle has been blown out
and the last glass of champagne has been drunk
All that you are left with are the memories and the images-David Cooke.

Photo Comments
,
The topic has been locked.
9 years 10 months ago #382608 by Hassner
My lighting situations change too quickly for me to not to shoot MM.
I will forget to change my over/under settings.
I do not look at my shots after every frame taken, so I might end up with flops.
Today I had to snap a lot of interiors. (Snap = point and shoot.)
Pointing the camera towards windows will underexpose the interior with 1-2 stops.
So MM makes sense to me.
Our topics differ. Whatever works for the individual.


This person is a posting maniac and deserves a #1 badge!Top Poster
No one kicks up there feet next to the water cooler better than this person.  Top poster - LoungeLounge Guru
Photo Comments
,
The topic has been locked.
9 years 10 months ago #382715 by Joves

Scotty wrote:

Stealthy Ninja wrote: Manual mode and aperture priority with the same settings, the needle in the middle will expose the exact same.


This is true. If AP by some chance gives you the exact same settings as M, then it will be exactly the same... The point is, will AP give you the correct settings or will something in the scene confuse it?

As I said in the old thread (or something similar at least):
If your using EC, why not just go all the way and get full control with MM?

EC can change when light changes, therefore your settings get messed up (say you know that faces in the audience need X settings, then some strong back light comes behind them, maybe from the stage, using EC would make your setting way too dark for your subject (stupid camera).

EC might work for one shot, but don't expect it to be constant. If you want to have your settings to be constant, then manual is the only way to go.

Not saying auto modes and EC can't work, but they don't know light so well. Also, I only use the meter as a rough guide. I adjust according to my eyes, not what the dumb camera thinks is right.


It's the same metering. If the scene messes up the meter in AP, it'll do the same in manual. That's why I depend on histogram and I don't think you'll disagree with me there.[/quote]

Why Yes Adrian you are correct. If you keep the metering centered then they will be the same settings. But since I know my D300 will blow highlights with the suggested exposure value, it is never centered. And the amount of under exposure I put in is determined by what light I am working with. Something that is more of a PITA in Aperture Mode to work out.

I do not even use my histogram, never have. Once I learn how a camera exposes there is no need for it. The one thing I love about digitals is that they are consistent, as where in the film days every film had its own little way of being different. That is why there is no love lost with film being gone.


,
The topic has been locked.

817.3K

241K

  • Facebook

    817,251 / Likes

  • Twitter

    241,000 / Followers

  • Google+

    1,620,816 / Followers

Latest Reviews

The Canon EOS R100 is an entry-level mirrorless camera introduced in 2023. But just because it’s an entry-level camera doesn’t mean it’s a bare-bones camera. Find out why in this review!

Apr 22, 2024

Nikon’s retro-looking Nikon Zfc is anything but retro. Under its classic body is a host of features and amenities that make it a worthwhile compact mirrorless camera for 2024.

Apr 15, 2024

The Canon EOS R50 is one of the newest R-system cameras from Canon. Is it worth your money? Find out all the details you need to know in this comprehensive review.

Apr 10, 2024

The Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II is Sony’s flagship mirrorless zoom lens. As such, it’s loaded with features and has a top-shelf build quality that makes it a top pick!

Mar 27, 2024

Forum Top Posters

Latest Articles

Using leading lines in photography helps improve the composition by drawing viewers in and leading their eye from the foreground to the background. Explore some fine examples of this in this guide!

Apr 24, 2024

The Insta360 has one of the best lineups of action cams and 360-degree cameras. With these Insta360 accessories, you can elevate your photography and videography game!

Apr 24, 2024

Creating impactful photos of landscapes depends on many factors, not the least of which is your talent behind the lens. This guide explores other elements required for the best product.

Apr 23, 2024

The Canon EOS R100 is an entry-level mirrorless camera introduced in 2023. But just because it’s an entry-level camera doesn’t mean it’s a bare-bones camera. Find out why in this review!

Apr 22, 2024

Are you ready to upgrade your camera? Before buying new, you might consider the value of purchasing used gear to save money.

Apr 18, 2024

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is a micro four thirds camera released in 2020. It’s an entry-level system along with the OM-D E-M5 Mark III. Use this guide to determine which one is best for you!

Apr 17, 2024

Blue hour photography might not be as well known as golden hour photography, but it is every bit as good a time to create epic images of landscapes. Learn how in this quick tutorial!

Apr 17, 2024

Nikon’s retro-looking Nikon Zfc is anything but retro. Under its classic body is a host of features and amenities that make it a worthwhile compact mirrorless camera for 2024.

Apr 15, 2024