400mm prime vs 70-200mm with 2x teleconverter?

5 years 8 months ago #598545 by Village Clown
For get about the f/stop for now.  If you had 2 exact cameras, one with a 400mm on it, and the other with a 70-200mm with a 2x teleconverter focused out to 200mm.  Would you see a difference in the camera or in post?


Photo Comments
,
5 years 8 months ago #598558 by garyrhook
Yes, at least for Nikon. The TCs affect image quality. I won't even discuss IQ from the zoom vs. the prime, because that really goes without saying.

That said, the 1.4 Nikon TC isn't too bad, the 1.7 has a terrible reputation, and the 2.0 is considered not too bad.

You give up something when you use a TC.


Photo Comments
,
5 years 8 months ago #598561 by Nikon Shooter
You'd be better off using a D800E, D810 or D850 as their higher
pixel counts are not loosing you lens quality as TC's do.

Light is free… capturing it is not!
Photo Comments
,
5 years 8 months ago #598580 by Village Clown

garyrhook wrote: Yes, at least for Nikon. The TCs affect image quality. I won't even discuss IQ from the zoom vs. the prime, because that really goes without saying.

That said, the 1.4 Nikon TC isn't too bad, the 1.7 has a terrible reputation, and the 2.0 is considered not too bad.

You give up something when you use a TC.


Really?  Good thing I posted this.  I thought the 1.7x would be a better pick compared to the 2x, that will take a full 2 stops.  Why is that? 


Photo Comments
,
5 years 8 months ago #598584 by fmw
I agree with Nikon Shooter.  Normally you can get a better image by cropping an image from the bare lens than you would by using a 2X converter.  I used to use TC's in emergency situations in the film era but I no longer need one nor own one.  Obviously the prime lens is the better option but the zoom without the converter would be the second best option.


Photo Comments
,
5 years 8 months ago - 5 years 8 months ago #598588 by Troponin
I believe that some 70-200 f2.8 x2 can do well against a 400mm prime when stopped down to about f8. But consider the cost of that set up. You have to really want the 200mm. Lenses of equal quality/build will generally perform relative to each other at their native focal lengths. 


Photo Comments
,
5 years 8 months ago - 5 years 8 months ago #598592 by effron

garyrhook wrote: That said, the 1.4 Nikon TC isn't too bad, the 1.7 has a terrible reputation, and the 2.0 is considered not too bad.


I'd like to see your source. The 2.0 is so so on a quality PRIME lens, the 1.7 a little better, and 1.4 better yet. On zooms ALL teleconverters usually suck, and in some cases you can't even use a Nikon TC on a Nikon Zoom, or af is compromised....
cdn-5.nikon-cdn.com/Assets/Common-Assets...y/EN_Comp_chart.html

Why so serious?
Photo Comments
The following user(s) said Thank You: Troponin
,
5 years 8 months ago #598636 by garyrhook

Village Clown wrote: I thought the 1.7x would be a better pick compared to the 2x, that will take a full 2 stops.  Why is that? 


Optics quality in the TC, as far as I know. Everything I've read has put the 1.7 behind the other two when it comes to resultant IQ.

That said: google it yourself. Do the research. Draw your own conclusions. Don't just ask here.


Photo Comments
,
5 years 8 months ago - 5 years 8 months ago #598643 by Troponin
Ok, so I now have my x2 teleconverter in my hands and took some test shots tonight. 

Don’t do it. Not one of the 50 shots I took tonight were even acceptable. It’s going back or I am selling it. Waste of money if you want anything remotely sharp. Decent if you’re just taking shots of the kids at soccer and don’t care about how sharp them are, but terrible for pretty much anything else. THe image quality is just too degraded, even on the best glass. 


Photo Comments
,
5 years 8 months ago #598655 by Carry
I remember when I got started, I have a tough time understanding why you lost light performance with teleconverters.  


Photo Comments
,
5 years 8 months ago #598692 by fmw
The f number is a relationship between aperture size and the focal length of the lens.  If you make a lens longer it needs more aperture to produce the same exposure.  TC's, like extension tubes make the lens longer.


Photo Comments
The following user(s) said Thank You: Troponin
,
5 years 8 months ago #598727 by garyrhook
+1.

Compare any two f/2.8 lenses. Accounting for telephoto components, the longer ones are bigger around, everything else being held constant. If you want to maintain the same amount of light coming in and reaching the sensor, the lens has to get wider at the front end.


Photo Comments
The following user(s) said Thank You: Troponin
,
5 years 8 months ago #598776 by James F
I'll take that 400mm!  Who wants to gift this to me?  


Photo Comments
,
5 years 8 months ago #598813 by Ian Stone
:agree:  well said Gary


Photo Comments
,

817.3K

241K

  • Facebook

    817,251 / Likes

  • Twitter

    241,000 / Followers

  • Google+

    1,620,816 / Followers

Latest Reviews

The Canon EOS R100 is an entry-level mirrorless camera introduced in 2023. But just because it’s an entry-level camera doesn’t mean it’s a bare-bones camera. Find out why in this review!

Apr 22, 2024

Nikon’s retro-looking Nikon Zfc is anything but retro. Under its classic body is a host of features and amenities that make it a worthwhile compact mirrorless camera for 2024.

Apr 15, 2024

The Canon EOS R50 is one of the newest R-system cameras from Canon. Is it worth your money? Find out all the details you need to know in this comprehensive review.

Apr 10, 2024

The Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II is Sony’s flagship mirrorless zoom lens. As such, it’s loaded with features and has a top-shelf build quality that makes it a top pick!

Mar 27, 2024

Forum Top Posters

Latest Articles

The Insta360 has one of the best lineups of action cams and 360-degree cameras. With these Insta360 accessories, you can elevate your photography and videography game!

Apr 24, 2024

Creating impactful photos of landscapes depends on many factors, not the least of which is your talent behind the lens. This guide explores other elements required for the best product.

Apr 23, 2024

The Canon EOS R100 is an entry-level mirrorless camera introduced in 2023. But just because it’s an entry-level camera doesn’t mean it’s a bare-bones camera. Find out why in this review!

Apr 22, 2024

Are you ready to upgrade your camera? Before buying new, you might consider the value of purchasing used gear to save money.

Apr 18, 2024

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is a micro four thirds camera released in 2020. It’s an entry-level system along with the OM-D E-M5 Mark III. Use this guide to determine which one is best for you!

Apr 17, 2024

Blue hour photography might not be as well known as golden hour photography, but it is every bit as good a time to create epic images of landscapes. Learn how in this quick tutorial!

Apr 17, 2024

Nikon’s retro-looking Nikon Zfc is anything but retro. Under its classic body is a host of features and amenities that make it a worthwhile compact mirrorless camera for 2024.

Apr 15, 2024

Moving from taking snapshots of your dog to creating beautiful images doesn’t have to be that difficult! Use the tips outlined in this dog photography guide, and you’ll get better results in no time.

Apr 15, 2024