Why are there not more f/1.8 lenses from Nikon, Canon and Sony?

10 months 3 weeks ago #655457 by garyrhook

D Hornick wrote:

garyrhook wrote:

D Hornick wrote:

J Photo Man wrote: Dude that would be a crazy heavy lens and expensive.  I don't think the market would support such a lens, not at least from a volume standpoint.  



Understatement!  After I posted yesterday I was thinking about the weight, it would be nuts.  


Right. Because no one mentioned weight earlier in this thread. Or cost.


Hey why so rude?  I didn't say or suggest I was the first to bring this up.  I was just saying that I had thought about this.  It's a forum, I'm just adding to the discussion based on what was on my mind.  


1) If I misunderstood that your comment was intended as a confirmation, my apologies. That's not the way I read it, and I clearly could have considered other interpretations. I shall endeavor to do so in the future.

2) A not insignificant number of people think it's okay to ready the OP, ignore everything else that has happened on a thread, and post a comment. That's akin to walking into the middle of a conversation and trying to add to it when one does not really know what is going on. I, and I think most people would, find that problematic: "I can't be bothered to find out what's been said, but here's my opinion."

In light of (1), above, I made an assumption, but I see now I also made a mistake.


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
10 months 3 weeks ago #655464 by D Hornick
Well thank you.  I appreciate you taking the time and responding with what you did. 


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
10 months 2 weeks ago #655801 by Piechura
The OP hasn't been back since asking the question to clarify, but a bit of research suggests that the Sigma lenses they are referring to are lenses designed for APS-C cameras. In that case, I think it is an interesting question as to why the camera manufacturers haven't produced anything faster than an f2.8 for those systems.

Sigma do an 18-35mm f1.8 (27-52.5mm full frame equivalent) for $640 and a 50-100mm f1.8 (80-160mm ff equivalent) for $1100. One thing to mention here is that they are both shorter zoom ranges than your traditional focal lengths, presumably to keep the cost and weight down to sensible levels.

Both Nikon and Canon do a 17-55mm f2.8 and Sony do a 16-50 f2.8, which obviously have more zoom range than the Sigma, but are not as fast. But for APS-C cameras, they are all quite limited in terms of the number of constant aperture zoom lenses they offer. This may be a reflection of the budget of people who typically buy APS-C cameras. Or they might want customers to basically outgrow their cameras and migrate to full frame systems. It's telling that Sigma are also the only manufacturer to make f1.4 prime lenses specifically for these APS-C systems too.


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
10 months 2 weeks ago #655855 by Farestad
It would be entertaining however I don't think I would use such wide aperture enough to justify the crazy price you know they would charge for it.  

EF 50mm f/1.4
EF 35mm f/1.4L USM
EF 100mm f/2
EF 70-200mm f/4
EF 18-55mm
EF 85mm f/1.8 USM

Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,
10 months 2 weeks ago #655949 by Carry
Is Sigma using as many elements to make these 1.8 lenses?  How are they able to pull this off without their lenses costing a trillion dollars?


Photo Comments

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

,

802.3K

205K

1.62M

  • Facebook

    802,251 / Likes

  • Twitter

    205,000 / Followers

  • Google+

    1,620,816 / Followers

Latest Reviews

In this Nikon D500 vs Nikon D7500 matchup, we explore the features and specs, pros and cons, and prices of these older, but highly capable DSLRs.

Jun 22, 2020

Check out this Sony a7R IV review to learn all about this incredible camera's specs, features, image quality, price, and more.

Jun 15, 2020

The Panasonic Lumix S1 might be a few years old, but its features and specs (and its used price today) make it worth a long, hard look.

Jun 08, 2020

In this Olympus OM-D E-M1 II review, learn about the camera's specs and features, pros and cons, price, and much more.

Jun 02, 2020
Get 600+ Pro photo lessons for $1

Forum Top Posters

Latest Articles

The best camera bags of 2020 include big backpacks, small sling bags, and many variations in between. Which of these top camera bags is for you? Find out!

Jul 09, 2020

If you're looking for unique canvas prints, look no further than metallic canvas! These prints are beautiful, iridescent, and have superior, eye-catching color.

Jul 09, 2020

Canon unveiled the Canon EOS R5 and EOS R6 this morning. Both cameras look to be game-changers for Canon, and both will ship soon!

Jul 09, 2020

Is there really a reason to have a filter kit for landscape photography these days? Lightroom is all-powerful, right? Wrong...there are lots of reasons to have lens filters.

Jul 08, 2020

The H&Y RevoRing is a revolutionary new variable step ring that will save you money, time, and space in your camera bag!

Jul 08, 2020

The wedding album is an important vessel for the photographs you take. With these tips for creating a wedding album, make something that will impress your clients and give them long-lasting memories.

Jul 07, 2020

The Nikon Z7 is one of Nikon's most popular cameras. Because of its popularity, there are many accessories available as well. Here's our list of some of the best ones.

Jul 06, 2020

In the Canon EOS 80d vs Canon EOS 90D debate, you might think that the 90D is a hands-down winner since it's newer. But that might not be the case.

Jul 06, 2020