Sad day for me

7 years 3 months ago #385790 by Rudy Sosa

Tom-Lutz wrote: call me "OLD SCHOOL" then. To me its just wrong. Too many times I've seen pics look more like an OIL PAINTING than a real true to life photo.



Not trying to stir the pot of emotions here, but isn't photography about individualism and what you the photographer/artist want to create?  Boy think of where art would be if all the painters just followed the same path?  Art would be mundane and lifeless, certainly artist like Pablo Picasso is a good example of someone who experimented, who wasn't afraid of going against the grain.  I think freedom and experimenting with your photograph is very important, otherwise you limit and cap your creative expression.  There, that's my 2 cents! 


Photo Comments
,
The topic has been locked.
7 years 3 months ago #385797 by photobod
Tom, it is a sad day for you as you have a closed mind, progress in life comes from people with open minds, I am old school, I  started my photography life with an old Zorki 4K rangefinder, had my films developed by my local chemist and was never really delighted with what they produced, mainly because everything was averaged out based on the good old grey scale, I set up a darkroom so I could develop my own and found that I could make choices, was that cheating ??? I think not, after years of happy print film along came digital, I resisted the change for a long time, nothing could better film processed by my good self !!!!, surely digital was inferior, but I opened my mind and dived in, I found that instead of being in a smelly chemical darkroom, I was in a nice dry daylight room but doing the self same adjustments, as with film I could adjust or not adjust, the choice was/ is mine.
all I am saying is, if you feel your own work is good enough to stand on its own, then stick with that, believe in yourself, but don't accuse others who happily adjust in photoshop of cheating, in all walks of life we have toolboxes it's up to each and everyone of us wether we use those tools or not, choices are what make life exciting, it's how we develop (scuse the pun), if you choose to ignore such a huge rich resource tool such as photoshop then that's your choice, but please don't try to diminish its pleasures for those that do choose to use it.
all the best to you Tom in your photoshop free world.

www.dcimages.org.uk
"A good photograph is one that communicate a fact, touches the heart, leaves the viewer a changed person for having seen it. It is, in a word, effective." - Irving Penn

,
The topic has been locked.
7 years 3 months ago #385816 by Tom-Lutz
if you like taking short cuts to making oil paintings fine, but don't tell me that's the best way to do something now.I did just fine before PS and now this comes along and I'm right back where I started trying to paint oil painting which I could never do. AND FURTHER MORE DON'T TELL ME WHAT TO DO. 


,
The topic has been locked.
7 years 3 months ago #385819 by KCook

Tom-Lutz wrote: . . . Too many times I've seen pics look more like an OIL PAINTING than a real true to life photo.


Perfectly true.  PS can be abused.  And some shooters make a habit of abusing it.  Kind of like cosmetic makeup for a lady.  But ... that does not mean everybody has to abuse it.  Done right - the PS result is almost always better than a straight out of the camera JPG shot.  Learning PS skills can be a steep curve.  I first tried PS years ago, thought it was not worth the effort (at that time), now I use Lightroom for everything.  Unfortunately the skills needed for editing are very different from those needed for taking a nice photo in the first place.  Many of us are better at one than the other.  That's just life.

Kelly

Canon 50D, Olympus PL2
kellycook.zenfolio.com/

,
The topic has been locked.
7 years 3 months ago #385821 by Tom-Lutz
the problem is with this oil painting look, it wins those contests too many times. IF that's what the judges are looking for then they're just as much part of the problem.


,
The topic has been locked.
7 years 3 months ago #385823 by KCook
Why I never bother with contests. :sick:

Seriously, I just shoot for myself.  Or "the boss" when I have one.  I don't "get" the appeal of contests.

Maybe find a different contest with a different jury?

Kelly

Canon 50D, Olympus PL2
kellycook.zenfolio.com/

,
The topic has been locked.
7 years 3 months ago #385832 by Ian Stone

Rudy Sosa wrote:

Tom-Lutz wrote: call me "OLD SCHOOL" then. To me its just wrong. Too many times I've seen pics look more like an OIL PAINTING than a real true to life photo.



Not trying to stir the pot of emotions here, but isn't photography about individualism and what you the photographer/artist want to create?  Boy think of where art would be if all the painters just followed the same path?  Art would be mundane and lifeless, certainly artist like Pablo Picasso is a good example of someone who experimented, who wasn't afraid of going against the grain.  I think freedom and experimenting with your photograph is very important, otherwise you limit and cap your creative expression.  There, that's my 2 cents! 



Isn't that the truth, during that time when Picasso lived, wasn't his art shunned?  


Photo Comments
,
The topic has been locked.
7 years 3 months ago - 7 years 3 months ago #385851 by Scotty

Tom-Lutz wrote: if you like taking short cuts to making oil paintings fine, but don't tell me that's the best way to do something now.I did just fine before PS and now this comes along and I'm right back where I started trying to paint oil painting which I could never do. AND FURTHER MORE DON'T TELL ME WHAT TO DO. 


Nobody is telling you what to do.  You put your opinion on a forum, expect discussion.

Can you link me to the "oil painting" shots you're talking about? I'm curious. 

If it's the HDR fad I am in the same boat as you!

When the last candle has been blown out
and the last glass of champagne has been drunk
All that you are left with are the memories and the images-David Cooke.

Photo Comments
,
The topic has been locked.
7 years 3 months ago #385901 by John Landolfi

Ian Stone wrote:

Rudy Sosa wrote:

Tom-Lutz wrote: call me "OLD SCHOOL" then. To me its just wrong. Too many times I've seen pics look more like an OIL PAINTING than a real true to life photo.



Not trying to stir the pot of emotions here, but isn't photography about individualism and what you the photographer/artist want to create?  Boy think of where art would be if all the painters just followed the same path?  Art would be mundane and lifeless, certainly artist like Pablo Picasso is a good example of someone who experimented, who wasn't afraid of going against the grain.  I think freedom and experimenting with your photograph is very important, otherwise you limit and cap your creative expression.  There, that's my 2 cents! 



Isn't that the truth, during that time when Picasso lived, wasn't his art shunned?  


Far from it! In a relatively short time, he became famous and sought after, and especially after WWI, he sold anything he made (painted, sculpted, pottery...)So much so, that he c ould simply sign his name to a piece of paper, and give it to a friend asking for a loan. Although what this has to do with the present topic is far from clear...


Photo Comments
,
The topic has been locked.
7 years 3 months ago #385936 by icepics
I would agree this has somewhat veered off course... and didn't he cut his own ear over a woman or something? Picasso, not the OP.

I also agree on finding other/better contests, I don't get all the convoluted voting, the pictures seem all over the place as far as skill level, and the Viewbug terms are not anything I'd agree to anyway. Although you need to read Terms & Conditions on any contest site because there seem to be some that are just a photo grab - some sites apparently want photos to sell as stock or whatever and probably figure people aren't going to even look at the terms to know what they're getting into when they enter a contest or use a site.

I'm a longtime film photographer, and when I shoot digitally I do little if any post processing. There's a process of course to get photos into a viewable format (other than the back of a digital camera) but I often open in PS to view and organize and print directly what came off the media card without any further post processing. Sometimes I adjust contrast or brightness especially for printing.

With color film it's a matter of sending it out for development as not too many people ever had color developing at home, and the machines and the lab technicians adjust as needed (but if you got a crappy picture there's only so much they can do). Doing B&W darkroom work I found it depends - often if I shot a roll at the same time in the same lighting once I determined an initial exposure time I'd be able to crank out prints from that roll pretty efficiently with little or no other adjustment - it's a matter of having gotten a proper exposure and framed and composed photos the way I wanted. I might do some dodging to bring out some detail or burning in light corners, it just depends on the original image and how much I'm enlarging it, etc. but I might not have to do any.

The thing is, if you don't get good photos in camera you'd probably never get much done in a traditional wet darkroom, there are only so many hours in the day. Seems similar with digital images, if you get good pictures in camera you wouldn't need to edit much. It's possible to edit a photo creatively but with a lot of what's out there I find I often notice the processing more than the photo.

Sharon
Photo Comments
,
The topic has been locked.
7 years 3 months ago #385937 by garyrhook

John Landolfi wrote:

Ian Stone wrote: during that time when Picasso lived, wasn't his art shunned?  


Far from it! In a relatively short time, he became famous and sought after, and especially after WWI, he sold anything he made (painted, sculpted, pottery...)So much so, that he c ould simply sign his name to a piece of paper, and give it to a friend asking for a loan. Although what this has to do with the present topic is far from clear...


Rudy was trying to make a point about personal perspective in expression (and how that's a good thing).

I'm still stuck on "oil painting". I use PS for every image, but they don't look like oil paintings. I'm thinking HDR as well?


Photo Comments
,
The topic has been locked.
7 years 3 months ago #385944 by Tom-Lutz
 Then yoiu need to go over to VB and enter some of the contests. THAT'S when you'll see it for yourself. Last Christmas was one of the worst I'd seen in a winner. It was a PS of a santa Clause convention and all the people dressed up looked like paintings. NOT even close to real.


,
The topic has been locked.
7 years 3 months ago #385945 by Tom-Lutz
 I wish ?I could ut I've never learned to do that. It amazes me that there people in this forum that aren't at VB. How did they find this forum i!!?? What else is it linked to ??


,
The topic has been locked.
7 years 3 months ago #385947 by Tom-Lutz
 I did it simply because some of the prizes are appealing,but I can see its just no longer worth it. I'll enter the contests just for the exposure to my best work.


,
The topic has been locked.
7 years 3 months ago #385971 by Scotty

Tom-Lutz wrote:  Then yoiu need to go over to VB and enter some of the contests. THAT'S when you'll see it for yourself. Last Christmas was one of the worst I'd seen in a winner. It was a PS of a santa Clause convention and all the people dressed up looked like paintings. NOT even close to real.


Can you link us to what you're talking about? 

When the last candle has been blown out
and the last glass of champagne has been drunk
All that you are left with are the memories and the images-David Cooke.

Photo Comments
,
The topic has been locked.

817.3K

241K

  • Facebook

    817,251 / Likes

  • Twitter

    241,000 / Followers

  • Google+

    1,620,816 / Followers

Latest Reviews

The sony a7s might be seven years old, but the camera's specs, features, design, and price make it a worthy option for shooting photos (and video!) in 2021.

Oct 22, 2021

The Canon EOS 7D is well over a decade old, but if you're a beginner photographer looking for a first camera or even an enthusiast that needs a second body, the 7D might be a good fit.

Oct 19, 2021

The FujiFilm X-E4 is a newer camera, having been released earlier this year. But it's also an affordable camera - particularly if you buy it used.

Oct 05, 2021

Are used cameras worth it? Though there are some risks, there are many more benefits of buying used cameras. Learn why you should shop used in this guide!

Sep 20, 2021
Get 600+ Pro photo lessons for $1

Forum Top Posters

Latest Articles

Blue hour vs golden hour - which is better for landscapes? It's not so much a case of which is better, but how to use their unique features to create a beautiful shot.

Oct 25, 2021

The sony a7s might be seven years old, but the camera's specs, features, design, and price make it a worthy option for shooting photos (and video!) in 2021.

Oct 22, 2021

Not only is this camera harness able to carry multiple cameras, but it's also a cotton camera strap that's hugely comfortable to wear.

Oct 22, 2021

Not sure how to use a light meter? With this guide, you'll learn all about different kinds of light meters and how to use them to create improved images.

Oct 21, 2021

By using the real estate photography technologies outlined in this article, you'll have the firepower you need to create beautiful images and videos of properties.

Oct 20, 2021

Displaying your photos in physical form is a great way to get potential clients interested in your work. Learn how to create a gallery display of your images in this quick guide.

Oct 20, 2021

The Canon EOS 7D is well over a decade old, but if you're a beginner photographer looking for a first camera or even an enthusiast that needs a second body, the 7D might be a good fit.

Oct 19, 2021

Use these simple product photography tips to improve the quality of your photos and create images that make customers want to buy the product.

Oct 19, 2021